Archive for the 'Abortion' Category

Apparently I’m Not A Progressive

At Shakesville, writing about Obama and abortion Kate Harding writes this intriguing bit

Progressives? Do not respect the anti-choice position.

Really? This is the road we’re going to go down now? I think being pro-choice is a necessity for a Democratic candidate. It’s a showstoper for me, and I couldn’t support a presidential candidate who wasn’t pro choice. I personally believe that a woman’s got a right to choose her own health care.

But I do respect the anti-choice position. I understand that if someone believes that a fetus is a human why they might feel so strongly about abortion. I don’t agree with them in the least and think their opinion is dumb, but I respect it.

Of course, at the same time, I respect those who are more pro-choice than I am. I happen to support parental notification for minors, but understand the reasoning of those who oppose it. I don’t agree with them, but I respect it too.

The conservative movement shows us what its like when idealogical movements abandon all pragmatism and consent to thought-based purges. As does the Democratic party of the ’70s and ’80s.

But then, I guess I’m not a progressive.

Digg This!

How Conservatives Lie: Mike Gallagher Edition

gallagherCon radio host Mike Gallagher, adding to the collective race-based attack coming on the right vs. Sen. Obama makes this convenient deception:

When even the Washington Post publishes an article entitled, “Obama’s Abortion Extremism”, you know that something astonishing is going on here.

Wow! The Washington Post published that in an article? Golly, that’s a mighty loaded description for a straight news article, especially in one of the country’s leading newspapers. I wonder…

Oh, yes, here it is in the Post: “Obama’s Abortion Extremism”.

What’s that you say?

What kind of article is it? Let’s see. Hmm. It’s in the “Columns” section of the paper, and it’s header says “op-ed columnist”. So, that’s an opinion piece and not a straight article as Gallagher made it seem. That’s awful deceptive.

And what’s that?

Who wrote it? Well, it says here that the author is a Michael Gerson. I wonder what sort of political connections he might have, surely he’s an independent thinker, a maverick like John McCain?

He served as President George W. Bush’s chief speechwriter from 2001 until June 2006, and as a senior policy advisor from 2000 through June 2006.

Oh, well eff that.

So Mike Gallagher pretends as if a straight news article said something, when in fact the article was written by a conservative hack former member of the Bush administration. Even worse, the Gerson op-ed itself contains falsehoods about Sen. Obama.

Washington Post columnist Michael Gerson suggested that Sen. Barack Obama should “come out strongly for policies that would reduce the number of abortions — support for pregnant women, abstinence education, the responsible promotion of birth control.” In fact, Obama has advocated the policies Gerson mentioned: “education” that “include[s] abstinence” and “information about contraception.”

This has been another edition of “How Conservatives Lie”. I will never run out of material for this.

Digg This!

Department Of Bad Ideas

A comic strip. About abortion. Starring a fetus.

Digg This!

"Peaceful" Pro-Lifers?

Not so fast, fake “Christian” soldiers.

Digg This!

Theocons Divided

The religious far right just want abortion banned. But many in the conservative movement know that Americans while they favor restrictions and oversight, also see abortion as a viable medical procedure so they try to chip away at it bit by bit. The theocons are tired of waiting.

The Republicans had the White House, Congress and the Supreme Court and it bears mentioning they made little to to no progress on the religious right’s drive to ban abortion. Because the Republicans know that to do that would be to deprive themselves of their most effective get-out-the-vote tool.

Digg This!

Abortion Doesn’t Cause Breast Cancer

Science strikes again.

The new study, appearing in Monday’s Archives of Internal Medicine, looked at data from 105,716 women participating in the Nurses’ Health Study, which was established in 1976 to study a wide range of health issues affecting women.

The women, ages 29 to 46 at the start of the study, were followed for 10 years. Every two years, they were asked about abortions, miscarriages and new breast cancer diagnoses. The researchers looked at medical records to confirm the diagnoses.

The researchers found no greater rate of breast cancer among the women who reported having abortions, compared to the other women. They saw no greater risk associated with multiple abortions and no greater risk linked with miscarriages.

Damn you, factual scientific information!

Digg This!

The Left Needs To Wise Up On The Supreme Court

It can’t get any clearer: “The re-election of George W. Bush in 2004 begat the nomination to the United States Supreme Court of Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. and Justice Alito’s ascenion to the High Court last year begat today a landmark abortion ruling that anti-abortion advocates have pushed to get for years.”

A vote for Republicans is a vote against women’s health.

Digg This!

Judges Matter

As Senator Obama points out, the supreme court’s decision against allowing “partial birth” abortion, even when the woman’s health is in the balance, shows once again how crooked the courts have become after the Republicans have packed them with conservative ideologues. Democrats too often cede the issue of judges to the right, and only discuss them when the abortion issue comes up, but this is an ongoing assault on the American way of life and we need common sense judges to stop the perversion of democracy.

PREVIOUSLY: Running On Judges
ALSO: One Woman’s Late Term Abortion Story

Digg This!

He Did It Again

Even at a lowly 28%, George Bush does not want to associate himself with the wackjobs in the anti-choice movement. Once again, Bush takes the coward’s way out and phones in to the “March for Life”. Democrats, for all their faults, never shy away from clearly stating that they support a woman’s right to choose. They’re not ashamed, because it’s a mainstream position especially among America’s women. But Bush doesn’t have the balls.

UPDATE: Kevin Drum noticed this act of cowardice too.

MORE: Sam Brownback and Duncan Hunter had the guts to face the crowd in person. They both vowed to end Roe vs. Wade, so that means there’s no way they’d win a presidential election, but that was a given already.

Digg This!




Recent Comments

  • faye: Is anyone on this blog aware that when Hillary was denied her wins in Florida and Ohio, at the very beginning...
  • faye: We have RAMPANT beatings of black men by police, housing is more segregated than it was in the 1950s, job...
  • Vanessa: fracking battle star galactica, comics, obama, super models and video games… It’s unfortunate...
  • Vanessa: Yikes.
  • PD100: MORE LIKE THIS PLEASE

Disclaimer

The views on this site are mine and mine alone, they do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

Privacy Policy