Like Kryptonite To Stupid
» Breaking News
Lindsay Lohan, Samantha Ronson Fight At Dubai Hotel
Russian Billionaire Sergei Rodionov Publishes Book Of Nudes… Of His Wife Olga
Alexis Tyler: Breaking Beauty
Kristin Chenoweth @ Four Christmases Premiere
Obama Has Plan For 2.5 Million Jobs
Tancredo is so aftaid of Hispanics he wants to put American soil on the other side of his wall. Idiot.
Republican Tom Tancredo supports the border wall. The U.S. representative attended the hearing in Brownsville yesterday.
During the hearing, he told the Brownsville landowners, “I suggest that you build this fence around the northern part of your city…” implying that all of Brownsville should be on the Mexican side of the wall.
Oliver Willis
owillis@gmail.com
AIM: oliverwill
OW @ MySpace
OW @ Facebook
OW @ Flickr
OW @ XBox Live
OW @ Twitter
Right now NEWSCHANNEL 5 is working to get clarification from Congressman Tancredo.
How about, oh, I dunno, getting clarification before running the story? Or blogging about it?
If you don’t want the MSM making a manufactured distraction out of a poorly phrased “bitter” comment you really shouldn’t be jumping on things like this.
When Tom is ready to put all of Texas on the other side of his fence, I’ll listen.
See, it’s all part of Mexico’s plan to get Texas back.
“When Tom is ready to put all of Texas on the other side of his fence, I’ll listen.”
Hey now, Hoss!
As Kinky Friedman says, the only thing a 10′ high fence will do is sell 11′ high ladders.
Tom is a double-agent in the service of teh Reconquista? ¢Dios mio!
Crap. That was supposed to be:
¡Dios mio!
“As Kinky Friedman says, the only thing a 10′ high fence will do is sell 11′ high ladders.”
Haw! Friedman never disappoints!
He said that in the context of those to whom he was speaking illustrating divided loyalties. Of course, what matters context, right? No one comes here expecting much thought from ODub.
Well, it is “Brownsville.” Maybe he thought it belonged on the Mexican side because of that.
Tom Tancredo needs to cut this foolishness out. He’s the type of legislator that will go down in history the same way Senator McCarthy did: An obsessed, overzealous persecutor of innocent people, all to make a name for himself while conveniently championing a so-called “cause.”
This whole “secure our borders” crap has given bigots everywhere an excuse to voice a bunch of ignorant, racist rhetoric that basically amounts to a nation of jackasses living in fear that Hispanics might one day pose a threat to America’s white-dominated poser structure.
A message to all the Minutemen and proponents of the manure Tom Tancredo is shoving down your respective throats: WHITE PEOPLE OWN AND/OR RUN PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING OF MAJOR SIGNIFICANCE IN AMERICA. Your spot is safe, regardless of who you let in the country…So stop being fanatics for 30 seconds…think about that reality…calm your angry @sses down…Then go find something better to do with your time.
“Context” as in, if you object to the border fence you’re not real ‘Muricans? Because, in context, that is what he is implying. Just build the fence north of Brownsville, and fence out all of those pesky unAmericans especially the brown ones) who don’t agree with you.
Either that or he doesn’t know his geography from his ass.
Or both.
Or he misspoke.
As someone who once drove west for a couple hours because I just didn’t process that the occasional highway marker didn’t say “east”, I find it quite possible it could be just a north/south mixup.
I’m not a fan of Tancredo by any means, but I find it interesting how everyone here is jumping on this, for which even the news which reported it was “working to get clarification from Congressman Tancredo”. And how many of you objected to the over-analysis of “bitter” small town Pennsylvanians?
“He said that in the context of those to whom he was speaking illustrating divided loyalties.”
Fuck that. He was pissed off that people think his fence idea is stupid. It’s as simple as that. People booed his fence, so he figured they weren’t ‘true Americans.’
Southern Quaker: “‘Context’ as in, if you object to the border fence you’re not real ‘Muricans? Because, in context, that is what he is implying.”
Exactly.
Well, in that context, yeah. He’s a moran.
“He said that in the context of those to whom he was speaking illustrating divided loyalties”. Of course, what matters context, right?
Even in that context, it’s still a pretty inflammatory thing to say, especially when those words are coming from an elected official.