<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wicked Looking New Dark Knight Poster</title>
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/04/27/wicked-looking-new-dark-knight-poster/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/04/27/wicked-looking-new-dark-knight-poster/#comment-92608</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/04/27/wicked-looking-new-dark-knight-poster/#comment-92608</guid>
		<description>Yeah.  Keaton never looked over his shoulder because it would have sliced off his nose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah.  Keaton never looked over his shoulder because it would have sliced off his nose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/04/27/wicked-looking-new-dark-knight-poster/#comment-92600</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/04/27/wicked-looking-new-dark-knight-poster/#comment-92600</guid>
		<description>At least now he can turn his ball-like head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least now he can turn his ball-like head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/04/27/wicked-looking-new-dark-knight-poster/#comment-92586</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/04/27/wicked-looking-new-dark-knight-poster/#comment-92586</guid>
		<description>A lot of people have mentioned it and I do see it now, but the 9/11 connection isn't what I first saw.  My first impression was, they didn't have a better picture of Batman?  Can't explain exactly why, since we're looking for vauge, even subliminal, impressions here.  But I didn't think that shot makes Bats look particularly... dark?  Intimidating?  Mysterious?  Looks more like just any other guy in a rubber suit with fake muscles and a ball for a head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people have mentioned it and I do see it now, but the 9/11 connection isn&#8217;t what I first saw.  My first impression was, they didn&#8217;t have a better picture of Batman?  Can&#8217;t explain exactly why, since we&#8217;re looking for vauge, even subliminal, impressions here.  But I didn&#8217;t think that shot makes Bats look particularly&#8230; dark?  Intimidating?  Mysterious?  Looks more like just any other guy in a rubber suit with fake muscles and a ball for a head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nimrod Gently</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/04/27/wicked-looking-new-dark-knight-poster/#comment-92585</link>
		<dc:creator>Nimrod Gently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/04/27/wicked-looking-new-dark-knight-poster/#comment-92585</guid>
		<description>Holy shit yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy shit yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/04/27/wicked-looking-new-dark-knight-poster/#comment-92584</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/04/27/wicked-looking-new-dark-knight-poster/#comment-92584</guid>
		<description>First thing I thought of was 9/11. Anybody else?

As for the film, following the standard rule, the 2nd will be better than the 1st. The third one will suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First thing I thought of was 9/11. Anybody else?</p>
<p>As for the film, following the standard rule, the 2nd will be better than the 1st. The third one will suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.356 seconds -->
