The Latest From The Annals Of B.S. Conservative Legal Theory

John Yoo’s memo giving the administration an escape clause for illegal acts in the war in terror has been released. If you look at it, his other work, and the interviews he has given its stunningly clear that he has no idea what the hell he’s doing (nor does Cheney’s legal guy, David Addington). It’s not that I disagree with the conservatism of it, it’s that his basic argument boils down to “if the president does it, it must be legal”. As Richard Nixon can testify, that assertion is without any grounding - legal, moral, or otherwise.

Yet, at least when the president is conservative (they would give no such latitude to Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton), the right will always err on the side of executive discretion.

Digg This!

2 Responses to “The Latest From The Annals Of B.S. Conservative Legal Theory”


  1. Gravatar Icon 1 pablo

    Reserve your front row seats early for the Yoo-Addington War Crimes Trial!

  2. Gravatar Icon 2 jr

    The unitary executive theorists monarchism fetish knows no bounds

Leave a Reply




Recent Comments

  • merl: 3 generations of treason. prescott and the nazis, bush 41 and Iran contra, chickengeorges blowing the cover of...
  • merl: I thought about grandpa bush, myself.
  • merl: he works for clown hall now? damn, that’s pathetic.
  • merl: when all the other guy can do to cover up his ignorance is yell, you’ve already won. I tell the FIL that...
  • Bruce: I just got separated and am about to be divorced. Among the factors involved were the severity of my work...

Disclaimer

The views on this site are mine and mine alone, they do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

Privacy Policy