<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 52-42</title>
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89454</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89454</guid>
		<description>Huh. Would ya look at &lt;a href="http://www.pollster.com/08-US-Dem-Pres-Primary.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;that?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh. Would ya look at <a href="http://www.pollster.com/08-US-Dem-Pres-Primary.php" rel="nofollow">that?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89453</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89453</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It will be the SD’s subjective call as to who will go forward as the best Candidate.&lt;/i&gt;

May be, but that's not what you said. 
Even if they did a revote in FLA and MI, she wouldn't get closer.

You throw a hell of a lot of projection around here, man. Where did the Obama campaign lobby "vigorously" to shut down a MI re-do?

&lt;i&gt;Obama has had to go public saying he thinks Hillary “has a right to run”. Like it was his to give.&lt;/i&gt;

Wow. Someone asks for a comment and you see it as a decree or something.

I support Obama for President. Failing that, I support the Democratic nominee for President. Can you say the same thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It will be the SD’s subjective call as to who will go forward as the best Candidate.</i></p>
<p>May be, but that&#8217;s not what you said.<br />
Even if they did a revote in FLA and MI, she wouldn&#8217;t get closer.</p>
<p>You throw a hell of a lot of projection around here, man. Where did the Obama campaign lobby &#8220;vigorously&#8221; to shut down a MI re-do?</p>
<p><i>Obama has had to go public saying he thinks Hillary “has a right to run”. Like it was his to give.</i></p>
<p>Wow. Someone asks for a comment and you see it as a decree or something.</p>
<p>I support Obama for President. Failing that, I support the Democratic nominee for President. Can you say the same thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wellstone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89406</link>
		<dc:creator>Wellstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89406</guid>
		<description>SUBJECTIVE = SUPERDELEGATE

It will be the SD's subjective call as to who will go forward as the best Candidate.

All the other "simple mathematics" is Nomination Masturbation. (tm) Wellstone ;-)

Once again, NEITHER candidate can get to 2025 WITHOUT the SD's, and once again, the SD's are purposely free and clear to select who gets their vote.

That is why the Obama campaign lobbied vigorously to shut down any hope of a re-do in Michigan, that is why Obama supporters keep bleating about "the rules" when they said FLorida could not and should not find a way to revote, that is why one Obama surrogate after another has gone national in concern-trolling Hillary and telling her to lie down "for the good of the Party".

It has come back to bite them, and Obama has had to go public saying he thinks Hillary "has a right to run".  Like it was his to give.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SUBJECTIVE = SUPERDELEGATE</p>
<p>It will be the SD&#8217;s subjective call as to who will go forward as the best Candidate.</p>
<p>All the other &#8220;simple mathematics&#8221; is Nomination Masturbation. &#8482; Wellstone <img src='http://www.oliverwillis.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Once again, NEITHER candidate can get to 2025 WITHOUT the SD&#8217;s, and once again, the SD&#8217;s are purposely free and clear to select who gets their vote.</p>
<p>That is why the Obama campaign lobbied vigorously to shut down any hope of a re-do in Michigan, that is why Obama supporters keep bleating about &#8220;the rules&#8221; when they said FLorida could not and should not find a way to revote, that is why one Obama surrogate after another has gone national in concern-trolling Hillary and telling her to lie down &#8220;for the good of the Party&#8221;.</p>
<p>It has come back to bite them, and Obama has had to go public saying he thinks Hillary &#8220;has a right to run&#8221;.  Like it was his to give.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mambochicken23</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89332</link>
		<dc:creator>mambochicken23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89332</guid>
		<description>Wellstone, what the hell?  It's going to be a subjective decision on who is the closest to 2025 delegates?  Really?  How is it subjective?  Seems to me that Obama is ahead, is closer to 2025, and that he will STILL be after the rest of these primaries take place.  No one, NO ONE, believes that Clinton can eliminate the gap between them with the remaining primaries.  Absolutely no one with a brain and a penchant for simple mathematics, that is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wellstone, what the hell?  It&#8217;s going to be a subjective decision on who is the closest to 2025 delegates?  Really?  How is it subjective?  Seems to me that Obama is ahead, is closer to 2025, and that he will STILL be after the rest of these primaries take place.  No one, NO ONE, believes that Clinton can eliminate the gap between them with the remaining primaries.  Absolutely no one with a brain and a penchant for simple mathematics, that is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89297</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89297</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The only question will be who got the closest, and that is going to be a subjective decision&lt;/i&gt;

Would you care to elaborate on this? 'Cuz there's been an awful lot of creative mathematics going on lately.
Obama already is closest, and it doesn't seem that is going to change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The only question will be who got the closest, and that is going to be a subjective decision</i></p>
<p>Would you care to elaborate on this? &#8216;Cuz there&#8217;s been an awful lot of creative mathematics going on lately.<br />
Obama already is closest, and it doesn&#8217;t seem that is going to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wellstone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89289</link>
		<dc:creator>Wellstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89289</guid>
		<description>Amazing how the polling is related to news cycles, ain't it?  THe Media build up, the Media tear down.

The Gallup, Zogby, all these polls ARE irrelevant right now.  They only show the extent to which the MSM is capable of influencing the people's vote.


And Pennsylvania is still 3 weeks away.  Whatever will these idiots talk about now?

The big picture hasn't changed:  3100 delegates to date, and there's only a 100-150 delegate difference.

Obama will not get to 2025 by June 10, and neither will Clinton.  The only question will be who got the closest, and that is going to be a subjective decision

But the MSM needs to sell papers, needs to sell ads, needs to get viewers.  So we have to live thru this unending barrage of slimy, foetid news cycles where only the worst in each candidate guarantees coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing how the polling is related to news cycles, ain&#8217;t it?  THe Media build up, the Media tear down.</p>
<p>The Gallup, Zogby, all these polls ARE irrelevant right now.  They only show the extent to which the MSM is capable of influencing the people&#8217;s vote.</p>
<p>And Pennsylvania is still 3 weeks away.  Whatever will these idiots talk about now?</p>
<p>The big picture hasn&#8217;t changed:  3100 delegates to date, and there&#8217;s only a 100-150 delegate difference.</p>
<p>Obama will not get to 2025 by June 10, and neither will Clinton.  The only question will be who got the closest, and that is going to be a subjective decision</p>
<p>But the MSM needs to sell papers, needs to sell ads, needs to get viewers.  So we have to live thru this unending barrage of slimy, foetid news cycles where only the worst in each candidate guarantees coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: durablend</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89275</link>
		<dc:creator>durablend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89275</guid>
		<description>Or Gallup according to the annointed queen.

"Oh, he's only leading in places that are irrelevant.  Anyone with half a brain knows he's unelectable!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or Gallup according to the annointed queen.</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, he&#8217;s only leading in places that are irrelevant.  Anyone with half a brain knows he&#8217;s unelectable!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89271</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89271</guid>
		<description>My heart will sing when they start coming out in droves for Senator Obama and finally put this Clinton death march to rest!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My heart will sing when they start coming out in droves for Senator Obama and finally put this Clinton death march to rest!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89249</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 05:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/30/52-42/#comment-89249</guid>
		<description>"and clearly nobody should pay any attention to Zogby polls,"

Or ARG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;and clearly nobody should pay any attention to Zogby polls,&#8221;</p>
<p>Or ARG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.335 seconds -->
