The Definite Article

Sen. Obama, from an interview with CNBC’s Maria Bartiromo.

Well, look, there’s no doubt that anything I do is going to be premised on what the economic situation is when I take office. I’m going to be sworn in in January, we don’t know what the economy’s going to look like at that point.

Digg This!

20 Responses to “The Definite Article”


  1. Gravatar Icon 1 Wellstone

    Hubris.

  2. Gravatar Icon 2 Oliver Willis

    Hypocrite.

    HRC

    And, when I am President, I will work to reverse the damage of the eight years of George Bush and I will restore the pride and progress in America that should be our birthright. That is who America is. We want to be proud again. We want to be progressive again and we will, when I am president.

  3. Gravatar Icon 3 SpiderJ

    I saw that exchange happening before I even clicked on the comments.

    Nice bait, Oliver. I didn’t think Wellstone would go for it.

  4. Gravatar Icon 4 Sean D. Martin

    So how long before someone attacks Obama for not sticking with the economic plan he has now?

    I mean, look at the flack he took for wanting to adjust any military plan once he sees what the situation is after he takes office.

  5. Gravatar Icon 5 Duros62

    Hubris? You say that like it’s a bad thing.

  6. Gravatar Icon 6 SpiderJ

    Well…Sean…yes it is. “Hubris,” you may recall, is what led to Rummy’s idealized vision of a cheap war and occupation.

  7. Gravatar Icon 7 Sean D. Martin

    Oh, god. I’m Duros now.

    LOL

  8. Gravatar Icon 8 Duros62

    Oh, god. I’m Duros now.

    You say that like it’s a bad thing. :-)
    “Hubris,” you may recall, is what led to Rummy’s idealized vision of a cheap war and occupation.

    Well, sure, that’s what happens when you give hubris to the mentally challenged. It’s just like any other tool; you gotta read the fucking manual.

  9. Gravatar Icon 9 ed

    And contrast that with what the dumbass currently in the White House said in 2000:
    “Tax Cuts good…because we have such a large surplus”
    then
    “Tax Cuts good…because the surplus is shrinking”
    then
    “Tax Cuts good…because we’re head for troubling economic times, and we need the stimulus.”

    No matter what, Tax Cuts good. Obama sounds more like an adult.

  10. Gravatar Icon 10 durablend

    Man my head feels like it’s going to explode after reading all the dead enders who posted comments over there. How anyone can still thing GWB is the greatest man to walk the earth I’ll never understand.

  11. Gravatar Icon 11 duros62

    He has said, and he told me today, that he won’t go above 28 percent. So we are talking about the possibility of a doubling in the capital gains tax. He was averaging at about 25 percent.”

    Wha? How does going from 15% to 25% equal double?

  12. Gravatar Icon 12 SaveFarris

    How anyone can still thing GWB is the greatest man to walk the earth I’ll never understand.

    Uh… because they don’t? Believe it or not, there actually *IS* a middle ground between Jesus and Hitler.

  13. Gravatar Icon 13 SpiderJ

    durablend is being hyperbolic. But many of GWB’s 28-percenters do at least consider him the Bestest American President Evar (and of those who are still on the fence, he stands only below Ronald Reagan).

    Which is crap.

  14. Gravatar Icon 14 Wellstone

    Hubris: Definition

    From Greek tragedy, that quality of prideful arrogance, of challenging the Gods, that leads to a protagonist’s downfall.

    I have no idea what fevered cult trance Ollie’s in, his “hypocrite” post makes no sense whatsoever.

    HRC: WHEN I AM ELECTED PRESIDENT

    OBAMA: I’M GOING TO BE SWORN IN IN JANUARY.

    I think those two ways of making that statement are very different, don’t you?

  15. Gravatar Icon 15 Sean D. Martin

    No. Not really at all.

  16. Gravatar Icon 16 Sean D. Martin

    Seriously, Wellstone. When Oliver makes a posting noting Obama’s saying “when I take office” and you reply only with “Hubris”, I think it fair to assume you mean he’s showing prideful arrogance in assuming he will be president. And if he’s showing arrogance with his assumption he will be president, then so is she (”when I am president”, not “if”). A minor difference in phrasing doesn’t make any difference in teh assumption being made.

    If he’s showing arrogance and hubris, and deserves to be criticized for it, then so is she.

    If you meant something different, you’ll have to provide more than a one word comment.

  17. Gravatar Icon 17 Duros62

    Yeah, no, I don’t see the qualitative difference of those two statements.

  18. Gravatar Icon 18 Oliver Willis

    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

  19. Gravatar Icon 19 mambochicken23

    Mmm… delicious pretzel logic. Drool…

    And no, there’s no difference between those statements… nor do I think that either of them should be criticized for those sorts of statements. Presidential candidates have spoken this way forever, this is nothing new.

    ‘Course, that acknowledgment brings into question the point of OW posting on it in the first place, but that’s a whole ‘nuther point.

  20. Gravatar Icon 20 fafaroo

    Never again should a presidential candidate be introduced to a crowd as “the next president of the united states” lest they be accused of hubris. Sheesh. Nitpick much, Wellstone?

Leave a Reply




Recent Comments

  • SpiderJ: Between today and yesterday’s unequivocal announcement that it would be wrongheaded for Clinton...
  • Porlock Junior: Beautiful stuff. Doesn’t it feel good to stop being pissed off at her and cheer a real...
  • Duros62: And continues. According to an article in the May 5 issue of New Yorker magazine, several bin Laden family...
  • Oliver Willis: I MUST FIND A WOMAN TO MARRY ASAP BEFORE TEH GAY.
  • Duros62: Gah! Wedding band on finger…melting! Love and devotion to wife…fading! Must…think…heterosexual...

Disclaimer

The views on this site are mine and mine alone, they do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

Privacy Policy