Yet Again: Abstinence-Only Sex Ed Does Not Work

Proven, for the 7 millionth time.

Stoking the fire, a study published in the April edition of the Journal of Adolescent Health found that those who received comprehensive sex education were 50 percent less likely to become pregnant than those who received abstinence-only education. The study also found that those who received comprehensive sex education were 60 percent less likely to become pregnant than those who received no sex education at all.

“I do think that there’s strong evidence that comprehensive sex education is more effective at preventing teen pregnancies,” said Pamela Kohler, lead author of the study and program manager at the University of Washington’s Center for AIDS and STD. “I think we pretty much debunked the myth that comprehensive sex education causes teenagers to have sex.”

Digg This!

6 Responses to “Yet Again: Abstinence-Only Sex Ed Does Not Work”


  1. Gravatar Icon 1 Sean D. Martin

    “I do think that there’s strong evidence that comprehensive sex education is more effective at preventing teen pregnancies.
    I think we pretty much debunked the myth that comprehensive sex education causes teenagers to have sex.

    To which Dick Cheney would also reply, “So?”

    And Bush would befuddledly ask, “What’s your point?”

  2. Gravatar Icon 2 C.S.Strowbridge

    “I think we pretty much debunked the myth that comprehensive sex education causes teenagers to have sex.”

    Sex education doesn’t make teenagers want to have sex any more than math classes make teenagers want to do algebra.

  3. Gravatar Icon 3 jojo

    My sex ed classes were filled with pictures of people with all sorts of diseases. Pretty damn effective…at least until I got to college ;)

  4. Gravatar Icon 4 fafaroo

    Exactly. I remember sex ed class being as much as a turn on as drivers ed class.

  5. Gravatar Icon 5 jr

    the rapture bunnies talk about “limited government” but they legislate morality at every turn

  6. Gravatar Icon 6 Tim

    “I think we pretty much debunked the myth that comprehensive sex education causes teenagers to have sex.”

    I think this is a mildly misleading statement. You can’t measure the amount of sex teenagers are having by how many of them are getting pregnant, particularly if you know they’re using contraception. There is actually a pretty decent chance that they’re having more sex, because they know they can do it with minimal consequences. That’s really the point of sex education: to minimize the negative consequences. Kohler is focusing on the wrong issue.

    I agree with C.S. that sex ed doesn’t make students want to have sex: their own bodies do that just fine. I think telling kids not to have sex is about as effective as the telling your dog to stay off the couch: some well-behaved dogs may stay off the couch all the time, but others will do as they’re told when you’re home, but you can’t watch them all the time, and then they’ll do as they please. Sex prevention is a futile effort and a waste of money. Pregnancy and disease prevention, though, are vital concerns where abstinence education is clearly not doing the job. Morality can only be regulated to a certain extent, but what this study really shows is that public health is a lot easier to control with sound public policy.

Leave a Reply




Recent Comments

  • soullite: Yeah, and my aunt is 68, and she’s senile as can be. We’ve actually seen John McCain make the...
  • Enlightened Liberal: “As I have mentioned Big Tent is Big Hypocrite, the supposed balance to the all Obama...
  • C.S.Strowbridge: Okay people, it’s not just McCain’s age. It’s his health. The man has had three...
  • Sean D. Martin: Why is it she has not gotten the kind of reaction that Obama got with the “bitter” comments on...
  • mambochicken23: A candidate’s age is a legitimate issue because of accompanying decreases in psychological...

Disclaimer

The views on this site are mine and mine alone, they do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

Privacy Policy