<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitt Romney: $885 A Vote</title>
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 01:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PD100</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64165</link>
		<dc:creator>PD100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 05:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64165</guid>
		<description>I Fart Huckabee(s)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Fart Huckabee(s)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Gaines</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64164</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Gaines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 01:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64164</guid>
		<description>I hope Ron Paul vies for the Libertarian nomination after he loses so he can pull a Nader.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Ron Paul vies for the Libertarian nomination after he loses so he can pull a Nader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertarian</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64163</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64163</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The big winner in this is Huckabee. I'm sure I've posted this before -- watch out for him. He's a no-name, but he's a very smart campaigner.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Sounds like quite a combination - "Howdy Doody" Romney and "Huckleberry" Huckabee.  What a pair of losers!
This election is the democrat's to lose.  But don't put it past them, not after 2004!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The big winner in this is Huckabee. I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve posted this before &#8212; watch out for him. He&#8217;s a no-name, but he&#8217;s a very smart campaigner.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sounds like quite a combination - &#8220;Howdy Doody&#8221; Romney and &#8220;Huckleberry&#8221; Huckabee.  What a pair of losers!<br />
This election is the democrat&#8217;s to lose.  But don&#8217;t put it past them, not after 2004!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdhatter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64162</link>
		<dc:creator>mdhatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 22:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64162</guid>
		<description>I read that the Huckabee campaign spent around 150K.

Can anyone source that?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that the Huckabee campaign spent around 150K.</p>
<p>Can anyone source that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64161</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64161</guid>
		<description>"The big winner in this is Huckabee. I'm sure I've posted this before -- watch out for him. He's a no-name, but he's a very smart campaigner."

Could he be the V.P.?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The big winner in this is Huckabee. I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve posted this before &#8212; watch out for him. He&#8217;s a no-name, but he&#8217;s a very smart campaigner.&#8221;</p>
<p>Could he be the V.P.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWH</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64160</link>
		<dc:creator>JWH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 17:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64160</guid>
		<description>Nevermind the 5 boys… Has ANYONE in the Romney family EVER served in the United States Military?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevermind the 5 boys… Has ANYONE in the Romney family EVER served in the United States Military?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diamond LeGrande</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64159</link>
		<dc:creator>Diamond LeGrande</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64159</guid>
		<description>The big winner in this is Huckabee. I'm sure I've posted this before -- watch out for him. He's a no-name, but he's a very smart campaigner.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big winner in this is Huckabee. I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve posted this before &#8212; watch out for him. He&#8217;s a no-name, but he&#8217;s a very smart campaigner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gun Toting Liberal™</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64167</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gun Toting Liberal™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 06:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64167</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Potential Serial Killer Wins Ames Straw Poll For Republican Oval Office Hopefuls&lt;/strong&gt;

Obviously, studies have proven (other sources HERE) that folks like Mitt Romney who abuse animals and show blatant disregard for their lives (another horrific example HERE) are more likely to become serial killers and axe murderers than those of us who...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Potential Serial Killer Wins Ames Straw Poll For Republican Oval Office Hopefuls</strong></p>
<p>Obviously, studies have proven (other sources HERE) that folks like Mitt Romney who abuse animals and show blatant disregard for their lives (another horrific example HERE) are more likely to become serial killers and axe murderers than those of us who&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breaking News USA</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64166</link>
		<dc:creator>Breaking News USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 06:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64166</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Romney A Joke After Paying Too Much For Straw Poll "Win"&lt;/strong&gt;

Romney A Joke After Paying Too Much For Straw Poll "Win" Mitt Romney spent something like $4 million dollars in order to buy the Iowa straw poll, and what he has to show for it is 4,516 votes and 31%....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Romney A Joke After Paying Too Much For Straw Poll &#8220;Win&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Romney A Joke After Paying Too Much For Straw Poll &#8220;Win&#8221; Mitt Romney spent something like $4 million dollars in order to buy the Iowa straw poll, and what he has to show for it is 4,516 votes and 31%&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64158</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 06:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2007/08/12/mitt-romney-885-a-vote/#comment-64158</guid>
		<description>This vote sucked. Not only did Romney not win by a big enough margin to boost his national poll numbers, (at least that's my analysis of the situation), Ron Paul got enough to give his delusional supporters a boost. 9.1% is better than he's done in any national poll, after all.

The only good news is Fred Thompson beat Giuliani, which should boost his campaign if / when he finally officially announces.

Okay, there's a second piece of good news, there were less than half as many voters as they were expecting. But even this could be explained by the absence of the top three polling Republicans and not a general sense of dissatisfaction in the choices.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This vote sucked. Not only did Romney not win by a big enough margin to boost his national poll numbers, (at least that&#8217;s my analysis of the situation), Ron Paul got enough to give his delusional supporters a boost. 9.1% is better than he&#8217;s done in any national poll, after all.</p>
<p>The only good news is Fred Thompson beat Giuliani, which should boost his campaign if / when he finally officially announces.</p>
<p>Okay, there&#8217;s a second piece of good news, there were less than half as many voters as they were expecting. But even this could be explained by the absence of the top three polling Republicans and not a general sense of dissatisfaction in the choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
