Comments on: Wasting Our Tax Dollars Looking At Porn

By: buma

buma — Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:13:30 +0000

That retired guy should set up a decent porn link site while he’s at work, to make it easier for the rest of us volunteers who are constantly online on our watchful quest to save humanity from obscenity.

By: midderpidge

midderpidge — Sat, 11 Aug 2007 05:45:15 +0000

You need to up that waste number Farris.

67,000 case referrals. That has got to waste someone’s time at the DOJ. Even if all they do is hit the delete button or throw the files in the trash.

By: Jkid

Jkid — Sat, 11 Aug 2007 02:43:03 +0000

Here’s a better idea, repeal obscenity and indecency laws. Make the justice department deal with worst problems.

By: Ted

Ted — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:16:49 +0000

“The number of prosecutions resulting from those referrals is zero. ”

In other words, each time a case is submitted the US Attorney says, “Nope, that’s protected. Nope, protected.”

The whole thing’s just for show for the looneys

By: Duros62

Duros62 — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:14:32 +0000

No, I got it. It looks like you are saying Phht, what’s the big deal?
While it looks like a waste of money, because you dirty hippie liberals are opposed to it, I’ll just say its mountains and molehills.

It would be okay for you to agree with us once in a while, you know. We won’t tell anyone.

By: IanY77

IanY77 — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:11:45 +0000

And all this time I’ve been doing it for free?! Jesus, where the hell is the want ad for that job listed? Even Craigslist might find that a little too skanky.

By: SaveFarris

SaveFarris — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:58:40 +0000

Duros, I mean this in the nicest way possible: are you literate? I’m having a hard time coming up with a rationale as to how you missed the beginning of my post.

By: Enlightened Liberal

Enlightened Liberal — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:46:02 +0000

$150k to download dirty pictures of womyn having teh sex, nothing for operations to catch Osama bin Laden. Telling.

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:41:47 +0000

$150K to download naughty pictures at work?

I’m underpaid.

By: Duros62

Duros62 — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:30:39 +0000

So, basically, Farris, you’re okay with the government paying people to look at porn? It’s a waste, but it isn’t that much money? Remember, your tax dollars. Or, as per dugger, your sweat equity at work.

Like I said, cut me off a slice.

By: SaveFarris

SaveFarris — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:25:07 +0000

The money and manpower would be much better spent on other projects. No Doubt. HOWEVER, this is only $150K we’re talking about. On a 0 to 10 scale of Government Waste, this rates about .6. If we get rid of this program, we’ll be able to afford that new gym in 53 years!

By: OxyCon

OxyCon — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:19:37 +0000

Here’s a hot tip for the Justice Department:

http://www.page3.com/gallery3/

That would be Rupert Murdoch’s pornagraphy you are looking at. Another “family values” hypocrite.

By: Duros62

Duros62 — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:57:52 +0000

Dude, how do I get slice of that?