The Washington Post writes up 735 words on Hillary Clinton’s cleavage??
Seriously.
Seriously?
The media in this country is so seriously broken, it is beyond repair.
Like Kryptonite To Stupid
The Washington Post writes up 735 words on Hillary Clinton’s cleavage??
Seriously.
Seriously?
The media in this country is so seriously broken, it is beyond repair.
Politics 2008 Election Republicans Conservatives John McCain Media Barack Obama Iraq Democrats George W. Bush Humor Hillary Clinton Links 2006 Election Uncategorized Newsweek NFL Oliver's World Race Right Wing Media Redskins Sports Maryland Terrorism Movies Religious Right Economy Mitt Romney Fox News Racism Women Liberal Media Michael Steele Liberals News Rudy Giuliani Superman Fred Thompson Black Conservatives Sarah Palin Television Comics Economics Immigration Democratic Congress John Edwards History Democratic Convention Ben Cardin Media For McCain Technology Global Warming 9/11 Crime U.S. Attorney Scandal Al Gore Al Qaeda Republican Culture Of Corruption Democratic House Dick Cheney Bill Clinton Religion Site Stuff Iran TV Fox News Channel Science Joe Lieberman Energy Democratic Senate Education Weird Stem Cell Research Useful "Liberals" Abortion The Politico Intelligent Design Supreme Court Joe Biden Foreign Policy Books Kirsten Powers Free Speech America Health Care Guns Progressives Atheism Video tba2007 Washington Post Katrina Bob Ehrlich Military World The Washington Post Virginia Jessica Alba Washington D.C. Hillary Clinton's Experience Mike Allen David Broder Business USA Stupid Things Entertainment Ron Paul Fox News Democrats 2005 Election Martin O'Malley Instapundit MSNBC Howard Dean Space Gay Marriage Alaska Snoopgate GOP Bigot Eruptions Hugh Hewitt D.C. Virginia Tech Massacre Evolution Glenn Reynolds Nancy Pelosi Blogs National Security New York Times MBAPBSAllAmericaDem Anti-Gay Jamaica CNN OW Radio CK Doctor Who Disney Chris Matthews Real Estate Republican Bigot Eruption Cindy McCain Dumb Liberals Afghanistan The Truth Advertising First Amendment Football Social Security Mark Penn New Orleans BBC Army Freema Agyeman James Carville AP Taylor Marsh Art Subprime Torture Alan Colmes Trade Wal-Mart Weblogs Zen! 209 Torchwood Tom DeLay Anti-Semitism Ted Stevens The Daily Show The War Time Magazine Ted Kennedy Olympics John McCain And Airbus John Kerry 163 Jon Stewart Karl Rove Mark Halperin Libertarians Legal Islam Iowa Hillary Hate GOP Bigot Eruption Health Homeland Security Howard Kurtz Hurricane Gustav Glenn Beck Democrat Media Research Center Brent Bozell Celebrities Regulation Bob Barr Bill Richardson Senate Sean Hannity CIA Polling Music Current Affairs Michelle Obama Conservativies Conservative Clenis Obama Haters Bill Kristol

Oliver Willis
owillis@gmail.com
AIM: oliverwill
OW @ MySpace
OW @ Facebook
OW @ Flickr
OW @ XBox Live
OW @ Twitter

Read My Endorsement
Oliver Willis is powered by WordPress 2.6 and K2
To be fair, Oliver, it is the Fashion column.
Up next, Fred Thompson’s “package!”
I could’ve gone without seeing the words “Hillary Clinton’s cleavage” for the rest of my life.
Oddly enough, I was just thinking of cleavage. Really.
I guess the WaPo was just following up on Oliver’s claim that Hillary was a “juggernaut”.
Who knew she had any.
One party runs a candidate with boobs. The other runs boobs as candidates.
could cause rips in the fabric of the universe.
Anything I can do to help gets out of this one.
As I’ve said in the past, the media will be a bigger threat to the Democrats than the Republican party.
So why is the article about her boobs? And why is a woman who writes a fashion column uncomfortable about boobs?
And do we really need a reminder on the drooling in the media over Bush’s “codpiece” during his “Mission Accomplished” debacle?
Point taken, Mouse. Let’s instead turn our attention to the frumpy pantsuits of the great fashion plate, Pickles!
Which would you rather read about this weekend: the Senatorial decolletage, or the Executive bunghole?
Myself, I THOUGHT I’d be reading that damn Potter book, but instead it looks like I’m being dragged to an art festival…
You want to see something really scary?
I do not own a television. I stopped watching cable news shortly before the invasion of Iraq.
I stopped watching television completely about 3 years ago.
So, the Washington Post prints an article about HC’s cleavage. Granted it is in the fashion section but still.
What frightens me is that I have no idea how Clinton, or the rest of the field, play on TV.
Television news has been abysmal for at least 20 years.
I watched a video clip of “The View” online once. It was either here or at Pandagon.
The clip was absurd. The talking head, allegedly on our side, was equally as idiotic as the talking head of the opposing view.
It frightens me that people who watch television are allowed to vote.
It’s that woman from 24, the one married to Blue-Rinse Dan. Apparently every episode my mother would shout at her to do the top button up.
We’ve gone from stories about Britney Spears’s cleavage to Hillary Clinton’s cleavage, from frivolous to inane. Next up — Bea Arthur’s cleavage. Please, shoot me first.
(FYI, the Google search “Hillary Clinton’s cleavage,” with the quotes, brings up only 32 hits. That’s 32 more than there need to be, but still only 32.”
Now I have the biggest and best argument AGAINST a Hillary Clinton presidency: some folks in the media will be too busy whacking off to pictures of the President instead of reporting the news. I liked the idea that they were out-of-touch, corporate sycophants much better.
On the plus side, this may well lead to a Scarlett Johansson presidency. But that Google search only brings up 62 hits … dammit, only about twice as many. Something is wrong with this world!
I am waiting with great anticipation for the stories comparing the packages of the male candidates. I am not holding my breathe for those stories though. Only women are objectified in this kind of way.
When I saw the picture, I did not think “decolletage.” I thought “this lady looks stoned.” Granted, it’s a pixellated shot for which she did not “pose.”