Oliver Willis

6 Responses to ““Precious Bodily Fluids””

1. 1 Organic George
   Apr 30th, 2007 at 7:35 pm

   Off Topic, but let’s see if protesting works

   Parking space, not politics, is what usually gets my thoroughly decent, middle-class Istanbul neighborhood in a twist. But Sunday morning, the Burberry set — trendy teenagers in Ray-ban Aviators, pensioners in sun hats, young professionals and entire families — turned revolutionary. Waving red and white Turkish flags and chanting “Turkey will not become Iran,” they streamed up the road by the hundreds to join the city’s biggest secularist rally in recent memory. Fed up with the politics of Turkey’s Islamic-rooted government, the so-called White Turks have finally taken to the streets. “Count us!” they chorused, nearly 1 million of them, the silent middle class on a very noisy day out. Many were novice demonstrators. “This is the first time I’ve ever been to a rally,” said Mine Okcuoglu, a 29-year-old banker, attending with her mom. “I felt that I had to do something because the government is taking Turkey in a direction I strongly object to.”
   The breaking point has come over Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s insistence on nominating his number two, Abdullah Gul, as Turkey’s next President. The presidency is a largely symbolic role, but he wields important veto power. With Gul as President, and the Justice and Development Party (AKP) a comfortable majority in parliament, secular Turks fear “it would be the beginning of the end for Turkey as we know it,” says commentator Metin Munir. Their concern is that the AKP harbors a secret Islamist agenda, and that without the appropriate checks on their power, they will seek to adopt Sharia-based laws.
   Since taking power in 2002, the AKP has tried to distance itself from some of the Islamist rhetoric of its precursor party, and in government, it has done more for Turkey’s European Union membership bid than any party before it. But its record is patchy. It also tried to pass a law that would criminalize adultery, and to appoint an Islamic banker as head of the central bank. Every day the papers carry a report of an AKP official in some town doing something outlandish — men and women being segregated at a municipal event, a swimming pool banning women from entering with their young sons (because they are male), bars being closed down to discourage alcohol consumption.
   “We are afraid,” says Aygul, a teacher. “Today’s rally is not political, its psychological. We don’t want to become another Iran.” AKP politics strike a nerve with women in particular, and at least half of Sunday’s crowd was female. “This government would like women to wear headscarves and sit at home,” says Canan Melis Konca, a 20-year-old university student. “I’m a practicing Moslem, but I can choose whether or not to cover my hair. I’m here to support that choice.”
   The presidency is the apex of Turkey’s secular state system, and draws its symbolic strength from the country’s founding President, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, who inscribed a pro-Western orientation into the political DNA of the state he built on the ruins of the Ottoman Empire. Secularism — the strict division between religion and public life — is a lasting Ataturk legacy, as is a ban on wearing headscarves in public buildings.
   All bets are off as to what happens next. The powerful generals have come out against Gul’s candidacy and the opposition party is seeking court action against Gul based on a constitutional technicality. The resulting uncertainty may prompt the AKP to take the country to early elections as a referendum on its choices. But for Turkey’s middle class, at least on Sunday, there was elation. “We have shown the government that we matter.” says Isilsu Cinar, a student, in between rounds of dancing. “And we are stronger than they think.”

2. 2 Organic George
   Apr 30th, 2007 at 7:39 pm

   The entire attachment did not copy this article is from Pelin Turgu of Time

3. 3 Anonymous
   Apr 30th, 2007 at 9:09 pm

   oliver, I thought you didn’t like Dr. Strangelove?

4. 4 Rheinhard
   Apr 30th, 2007 at 10:33 pm

   I am so ashamed that my alma mater (PENN) allowed these two hypocritical fucknozzles, Lieberman and Boehner, to present themselves as the arbiters of civility and decency in the public discourse. So Boner, were you “disagreeing without being disagreeable” when you said Democrats are rooting for the terrorists? So, LIEberman, were you eschewing vituperative toxicity when you lied to the entire media claiming Lamont had hacked your cheap-ass website, and when you said that rape victims denied treatment by one hospital should suck it up and find another?

   I would desperately have loved to be in the Q&A after this (if they had one) and asked these chuzzlewits to define the semantic difference between the statements “Our politics is too uncivil” and “Those annoying MoveOn.org people should shut the hell up.” (I have yet to ever hear any of these ass-clowns highlight the violent, eliminationist rhetoric common on rightie blogs)

   I am amazed that the self-appointed guardians of our political sphere continually fail to understand that freedom BEGINS with the ability of the plebs to tell their leaders to fuck off, not ends with it!

5. 5 Oliver Willis
   Apr 30th, 2007 at 11:57 pm

   I didn’t like Strangelove that much, but that doesn’t say some of the scenes didn’t resonate.

6. 6 Duros62
   May 1st, 2007 at 11:56 am

   Chuzzlewits. =D I like that.

Leave a Reply