Is this font (Trebuchet) harder or easier to read than the one I’ve been using (Georgia)? I’m not redesigning - I promise - I’m just trying to get the site easier to skim through.
» Breaking News
Sunny Leone: Breaking Beauty
Jamie Lynn Spears Does Wal-Mart
More Pictures Of Lisa Ann As Sarah Palin Leak
Daisy De La Hoya To Star In ?Daisy Of Love? Reality Show


I think you need to put up a moderately sized post in both fonts….
Not sure it mattters. Those of us that are skimmers will be checking in via RSS anyway.
Arial, Verdana and Trebuchet — in that order — are my favorites. At least 12 point.
Arial, Verdana and Trebuchet — in that order — are my favorites. At least 12 point.
personally i like the smaller fonts better
The Trebuchet is a bit harder.
Trebuchet is my pick over Georgia.
Trebuchet, baby.
I don’t have a problem with either format.
I’m overriding you abyway, since I’m using Lucida Grande in NetNewsWire
They are all fairly easy to read.
Trebucht likely requires a few more strips of lead between lines.
Adding additional leading between lines is usually the best way to improve legibility. Type size doesn’t matter as much as leading.
Wow, type size and leading…no wonder I hate designing for the web.
it’s a little less, i think.
I use Verdana myself and like it a lot - bold, italic, and regular. I use 20 pt. in my e-mails, but I think you should probably use 14 or 16 pt. in your posts.
But, whatever, it’s the words that count, not the font.
They are about equal - if you could use slightly larger type, especially for the comments, that would be even better.
I use Firefox, so I just increase the font size to what I think is useful.
I like it the way it is. Much easier to read than it was before, so thanks for the changes.
Is this font (Trebuchet) harder or easier to read than the one I’ve been using (Georgia)?
Does this font make my blog look big?
eqsxaltmh osxdcqen vcewjt nkafs gktxqfeh wakgsjl abmits
eqsxaltmh osxdcqen vcewjt nkafs gktxqfeh wakgsjl abmits