Reid goes checkmate.
“After telling a bunch of different stories about why they fired the U.S. Attorneys, the Bush administration is not entitled to the benefit of the doubt. Congress and the American people deserve a straight answer. If Karl Rove plans to tell the truth, he has nothing to fear from being under oath like any other witness.”
Amen.
Administration officials should only be forced to testify under oath when it is a matter of critical national importance, such as eight-year-old sexual harrassment suits or getting blowjobs from interns.
I agree with Wilbur.
Me, too. Good post, Wilbur.
This is definitely a matter of critical national importance.
Well, then, wouldn’t that Dusty Foggo story deserve more attention? Hookergate and all that? As I recall, that had something to do with a US Attorney at the time, one that has since been let go?
And they said there’d be pictures!
This is definitely a matter of critical national importance.
I hope you’re being sarcastic.
My comment was tongue - in - cheek.
Was that the USA who was expanding her investigation to look at Dick Cheney’s involvement, Duros?
fd10801 | Mar 21, 2007 3:26:45 PM
“I hope you’re being sarcastic. My comment was tongue - in - cheek.”
LoL!! DUH!