Democrats Fumbling Big Time On Iraq

I 100% agree with the sentiment expressed here by my fellow Democrats. The idea that we’ve spent the last couple weeks haranguing over non-binding legislation (the congressional equivalent of a parent wagging their finger at a child) while America sinks deeper and deeper into Iraq, sacrificing the lives of soldiers over there and our security right here, is beyond ridiculous. And the senate leadership is fooling the hell out of themselves if they think they’re accomplishing a damn thing to end this war.

Having banked on the promise that Democrats would force a change of course in Iraq if they won control of Congress, some of the people who helped the Democrats get there are growing impatient.

They’re frustrated that Democrats sank so much energy into a nonbinding resolution then dropped the bipartisan plan of Sens. John Warner, R-Va., and Carl Levin, D-Mich., like a hot potato when Republican leaders who support President Bush maneuvered them into a corner.

All the finagling has gotten in the way of a formal debate or vote in the Senate on Bush’s plans for Iraq.

The House of Representatives, sensing voters’ impatience, is expected to go ahead next week with its own plan rather than follow the Senate.

“The people spoke pretty clearly in November, and nothing’s happened,” said Bill Fahrenwald, a marketer from Blue Island, Ill., a Chicago suburb. “It’s pretty discouraging.”

“They’re being overly cautious, to the point of really not accomplishing anything,” said Lisa Rone, a psychiatrist from Oak Park, Ill. “I thought the Democrats would be much more clear about that vote and be much more active.”

2 Responses to “Democrats Fumbling Big Time On Iraq”


  1. Gravatar Icon 1 Duros62

    To be fair, the number of oversight committee sessions and, not the least of which, putting Bremer and rice on the hot seat, is encouraging and more balls-y than we’ve seen in quite some time.
    Non-binding resolution? feh.
    though I agree that all this hand-wringing back and forth is not productive.
    A vote to debate whether to debate the non-binding resolution? Come on. People, get on with it already

  2. Gravatar Icon 2 tdraicer

    Anyone who thinks that a Dem Senate that depends on Lieberman for its bare majority can end this war is kidding themselves. That the war will continue until Bush leaves office was decided when Kerry lost. The Dem job is to stick the GOP with the bill, so we don’t get someone like Rudy in the White House in 2009.

Leave a Reply




Recent Comments

  • Oliver Willis: Yes, claiming that someone who has a consistent position is doing so for political gain isn’t...
  • Jay Tea: Oh, and if you’re looking for substantive discussion of real issues, just hop around the main page...
  • SaveFarris: Your browser’s search function must be on the fritz. I thought you were going to show where McCain...
  • Zython: Chuckle. And Oliver North was innocent. Fixed your typo.
  • Jay Tea: Call bullshit all you want, Quaker, that doesn’t change the fact that years before Obama spouted his...

Disclaimer

The views on this site are mine and mine alone, they do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

Privacy Policy