Steele’s Makeover Attempt

It’s been admitted now that the Post story from this morning is Michael Steele, attempting to hide his conservative Republican credentials in order to be seen as different from his party, the Republicans.

“He realizes that he can’t win being a conservative Republican in Maryland in 2006,” said Maryland Democratic Party spokesman Arthur Harris. “He’s out of touch with the majority of Marylanders.”

In a statement, Democratic Party Chairman Terry Lierman pointed out that Steele, despite distancing himself from Bush, has held fundraisers with numerious Republican luminaries, including the President himself, Vice President Cheney, Bush adviser Karl Rove and Republican Party Chairman Ken Mehlman.

Nationally, Democrats eagerly pointed to Steele as an example of Republicans running away from Bush in the mid-term elections.

A Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee news release dubbed Steele “a premier member of Republicans Anonymous” and highlighted the fact that Steele’s campaign Web site does not mention he is a Republican.

Digg This!

5 Responses to “Steele’s Makeover Attempt”


  1. Gravatar Icon 1 simianceo

    As my Mom used to say…”Show me your friends and I can tell you who you are”.

  2. Gravatar Icon 2 Jamey

    Look at Steele’s website. Notice anything missing, like the word, “Republican”?

  3. Gravatar Icon 3 legion

    It’s hilarious. Steele is touted by the GOP for being that rarest of things, a conservative black republican. But Steele himself realizes, at least on some level, that he can’t win if people think of him as a republican. That alone speaks volumes about the modern GOP…

  4. Gravatar Icon 4 scratch

    Jamey…

    It’s standard practice, in my observation at least, for office holders and candidates to NOT mention party affiliation on their websites. Other examples are easy to find…for example the website of prominant Maryland Democrat Martin O’Malley. I’m a little surprised you didn’t turn that up in your research.

  5. Gravatar Icon 5 Crablaw

    He just screwed up his best shot at wingnut welfare.

    He may be politically stupider than Kathleen Townsend.

Leave a Reply




Recent Comments

  • daniel rotter: “…but what are Democrats interested in? Mothers Day votes…” Good grief, only...
  • Silver Owl: What did Barr wake up from a boring game checkers with Nader and Perot and decide his next activity to...
  • Quaker in a Basement: Doesn’t this mean the House GOP is breaking one of the 10 Commandments?
  • buma: Question: Why is the video ‘no longer available’ now?
  • Bill Woessner: 2. I have to admit I eyeballed the charts. But unlike you I based my assessment on current numbers. In...

Disclaimer

The views on this site are mine and mine alone, they do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

Privacy Policy