<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Well, Damn</title>
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24684</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24684</guid>
		<description>Quaker,

For some, those words echo some profound toughts and perspectives.  For others, nuttin.  I'm not at all ashamed to admit I'm one of the former.

Dugger, Different strokes
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker,</p>
<p>For some, those words echo some profound toughts and perspectives.  For others, nuttin.  I&#8217;m not at all ashamed to admit I&#8217;m one of the former.</p>
<p>Dugger, Different strokes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24683</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24683</guid>
		<description>"The civil liberties the ACLU so courageously defends are not the foundation-stones of any existing Marxist society."

Dugger --

Please kindly pass this Dugger-endorsed bit of wisdom on to rest of your conservative brethren: &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/lzkqb" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/lzkqb" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/lzkqb&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The civil liberties the ACLU so courageously defends are not the foundation-stones of any existing Marxist society.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dugger &#8211;</p>
<p>Please kindly pass this Dugger-endorsed bit of wisdom on to rest of your conservative brethren: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/lzkqb" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/lzkqb" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/lzkqb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24682</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24682</guid>
		<description>Oh, and Don Knotts rocks. RIP.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and Don Knotts rocks. RIP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semanticleo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24681</link>
		<dc:creator>Semanticleo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24681</guid>
		<description>Ann Althouse comes out o her self absorbed and supercilious lair to discuss
Don Knotts as a phenomenon of sexual identity.(i.e. Men are bad)

&lt;a href="http://althouse.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://althouse.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://althouse.blogspot.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann Althouse comes out o her self absorbed and supercilious lair to discuss<br />
Don Knotts as a phenomenon of sexual identity.(i.e. Men are bad)</p>
<p><a href="http://althouse.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://althouse.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://althouse.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24680</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24680</guid>
		<description>Well, you lost me.

I don't see what's supposed to be illuminative of "how illiberal today's liberals are."

Suppose Allen were to say the same thing today. How would that be significant (other than as proof of life after death)?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you lost me.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see what&#8217;s supposed to be illuminative of &#8220;how illiberal today&#8217;s liberals are.&#8221;</p>
<p>Suppose Allen were to say the same thing today. How would that be significant (other than as proof of life after death)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24679</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24679</guid>
		<description>maybe here

&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1573920908/102-8826931-4044169?v=glance&#038;n=283155" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1573920908/102-8826931-4044169?v=glance&#038;n=283155" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1573920908/102-8826931-4044169?v=glance&#038;n=283155&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe here</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1573920908/102-8826931-4044169?v=glance&#038;n=283155" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1573920908/102-8826931-4044169?v=glance&#038;n=283155" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1573920908/102-8826931-4044169?v=glance&#038;n=283155</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24678</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24678</guid>
		<description>Quaker,

I don't expect you to accept my interpretation with eyes wide open.  But, I can't find the whole exchange.  Some commie sites reference only Dalton Trumbo's side of the debate (which ultimately had to to do with a meeting re Tom Bradley's run for LA mayor - you could Google 'Steve Allen trumbo esquire' and see what I mean) .  Here's an excerpt from the only Steve Allen quote I could find:

It would be to a degree irrelevant and presumptuous here to review the political history of the first half-century but I cannot conceive how any true Liberal, being familiar with that history could be anything but anti-Communist. As a Liberal, I am in favor of freedom of the press, freedom of speech, and of freedom of assemblage. But I know of no Communist society in which such freedoms exist. I am also opposed to the death penalty, as are most Liberals, but it is clear that Communist societies cannot function without the threat, and frequently the reality, of state murder. As a Liberal I am suspicious of official censorship, but I observe that it is harshly dominant in all Communist cultures. As a Liberal I do not think a college student should automatically be considered a crim­inal if a marijuana cigarette is found in his possession, but we know of the utter ruthlessness with which Communist societies stamp out such instances of bourgeois decadence. The civil liberties the ACLU so courageously defends are not the foundation-stones of any existing Marxist society. The litany of specifics need not be continued; certainly the point is clear enough... I have frequently been a stern critic of American society and expect to function as such in the future, [ed.: note the admonition he finds necessary] but for years I have con­sistently maintained the position that it does not profit the non-Communist political Left to be formally allied with those who will endorse a Liberal cause only when to do so coincides with the pur­poses of Moscow or Peking in Vietnam, for example, what I hope for is peace; therefore I cannot cooperate with those who are moti­vated primarily by hopes of victory for Ho Chi Minh.

Dugger
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t expect you to accept my interpretation with eyes wide open.  But, I can&#8217;t find the whole exchange.  Some commie sites reference only Dalton Trumbo&#8217;s side of the debate (which ultimately had to to do with a meeting re Tom Bradley&#8217;s run for LA mayor - you could Google &#8216;Steve Allen trumbo esquire&#8217; and see what I mean) .  Here&#8217;s an excerpt from the only Steve Allen quote I could find:</p>
<p>It would be to a degree irrelevant and presumptuous here to review the political history of the first half-century but I cannot conceive how any true Liberal, being familiar with that history could be anything but anti-Communist. As a Liberal, I am in favor of freedom of the press, freedom of speech, and of freedom of assemblage. But I know of no Communist society in which such freedoms exist. I am also opposed to the death penalty, as are most Liberals, but it is clear that Communist societies cannot function without the threat, and frequently the reality, of state murder. As a Liberal I am suspicious of official censorship, but I observe that it is harshly dominant in all Communist cultures. As a Liberal I do not think a college student should automatically be considered a crim­inal if a marijuana cigarette is found in his possession, but we know of the utter ruthlessness with which Communist societies stamp out such instances of bourgeois decadence. The civil liberties the ACLU so courageously defends are not the foundation-stones of any existing Marxist society. The litany of specifics need not be continued; certainly the point is clear enough&#8230; I have frequently been a stern critic of American society and expect to function as such in the future, [ed.: note the admonition he finds necessary] but for years I have con­sistently maintained the position that it does not profit the non-Communist political Left to be formally allied with those who will endorse a Liberal cause only when to do so coincides with the pur­poses of Moscow or Peking in Vietnam, for example, what I hope for is peace; therefore I cannot cooperate with those who are moti­vated primarily by hopes of victory for Ho Chi Minh.</p>
<p>Dugger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24677</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24677</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Some absolutely great reading is an interchange between Steve Allen, a great old style liberal and one of the old supposedly  heroic  Communist Hollywood writers/producers. Lets you understand how illiberal today s liberals are.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Any possibility you'll let us know where we can find this "great reading"? Or do you ask us to accept your interpretation blindly?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Some absolutely great reading is an interchange between Steve Allen, a great old style liberal and one of the old supposedly  heroic  Communist Hollywood writers/producers. Lets you understand how illiberal today s liberals are.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Any possibility you&#8217;ll let us know where we can find this &#8220;great reading&#8221;? Or do you ask us to accept your interpretation blindly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24676</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24676</guid>
		<description>"impossibly nervous / jittery  man in the street  being interviewed on Steve Allen s (original) Tonight Show*"

Frank showing his age.

Remember the other man in the street interviewees: Louis Nye, Tom Poston.

Remember Steve Allen's "musical questions": The answer would be: "by running them over with tractors." He would then play the musical question: "how ya gonna keep 'em down on the farm."

Some absolutely great reading is an interchange between Steve Allen, a great old style liberal and one of the old supposedly "heroic' Communist Hollywood writers/producers. Lets you understand how illiberal today's liberals are.

Dugger (I do run on)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;impossibly nervous / jittery  man in the street  being interviewed on Steve Allen s (original) Tonight Show*&#8221;</p>
<p>Frank showing his age.</p>
<p>Remember the other man in the street interviewees: Louis Nye, Tom Poston.</p>
<p>Remember Steve Allen&#8217;s &#8220;musical questions&#8221;: The answer would be: &#8220;by running them over with tractors.&#8221; He would then play the musical question: &#8220;how ya gonna keep &#8216;em down on the farm.&#8221;</p>
<p>Some absolutely great reading is an interchange between Steve Allen, a great old style liberal and one of the old supposedly &#8220;heroic&#8217; Communist Hollywood writers/producers. Lets you understand how illiberal today&#8217;s liberals are.</p>
<p>Dugger (I do run on)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: washtub</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24675</link>
		<dc:creator>washtub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24675</guid>
		<description>He portrayed the good hearted NAIVE soul in a way eyeryone could relate too

mark the passing of the common knowledge of humanity  that gave him the platform to relate to us in a human way ,... please....a hero of humanity,in his own individual way....

he had grace  and kindness ...i lament his passing ,having come up ,when he was a guest of considerable stature in our living room

as phony as the concept of the whole maybeery thing was ...the honesty of his portrayal of his character...was part of the 'reality 'of that show ...

rock on Barney! I see you1 hangin' with Maynard!

so long pal
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He portrayed the good hearted NAIVE soul in a way eyeryone could relate too</p>
<p>mark the passing of the common knowledge of humanity  that gave him the platform to relate to us in a human way ,&#8230; please&#8230;.a hero of humanity,in his own individual way&#8230;.</p>
<p>he had grace  and kindness &#8230;i lament his passing ,having come up ,when he was a guest of considerable stature in our living room</p>
<p>as phony as the concept of the whole maybeery thing was &#8230;the honesty of his portrayal of his character&#8230;was part of the &#8216;reality &#8216;of that show &#8230;</p>
<p>rock on Barney! I see you1 hangin&#8217; with Maynard!</p>
<p>so long pal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hattie</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24674</link>
		<dc:creator>Hattie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 06:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24674</guid>
		<description>Are you nervous? Nope! I can still hear that little yelp.
He seemed like a really sweet guy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you nervous? Nope! I can still hear that little yelp.<br />
He seemed like a really sweet guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24673</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 03:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24673</guid>
		<description>I remember Don Knotts as the impossibly nervous / jittery "man in the street" being interviewed on Steve Allen's (original) Tonight Show*. Usually, he wouldn't answer any questions, he would shake, and clear his throat, until Steve would ask, You seem to be nervous -- is anything wrong?" Don would bug out his eyes and say the line that would be repeated in school yards, and at water coolers and at dinner tables for years: "Nope!"

* a role that laid the foundation for the future Barney Fife.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember Don Knotts as the impossibly nervous / jittery &#8220;man in the street&#8221; being interviewed on Steve Allen&#8217;s (original) Tonight Show*. Usually, he wouldn&#8217;t answer any questions, he would shake, and clear his throat, until Steve would ask, You seem to be nervous &#8212; is anything wrong?&#8221; Don would bug out his eyes and say the line that would be repeated in school yards, and at water coolers and at dinner tables for years: &#8220;Nope!&#8221;</p>
<p>* a role that laid the foundation for the future Barney Fife.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cypher</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24672</link>
		<dc:creator>cypher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2006/02/25/well-damn/#comment-24672</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.darrenmcgavin.net/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Kolchak too.&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.darrenmcgavin.net/" rel="nofollow">Kolchak too.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
