<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Noise Machine, In Action</title>
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2005/09/29/the-noise-machine-in-action/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jlaw</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2005/09/29/the-noise-machine-in-action/#comment-7883</link>
		<dc:creator>jlaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 22:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2005/09/29/the-noise-machine-in-action/#comment-7883</guid>
		<description>I had to deal with Comstock in the early 90's as a lawyer representing witnesses in hearings relating to Travelgate. My clients were not Clinton folks but neutral fact witnesses with no political axe to grind -- just wanted to testify and go home. Had never heard of her before and will never forget her.  She had a blatant "let's get the Clintons" agenda and viewed any testimony that did not fit her agenda as unacceptable and likely perjurous and any witnesses providing such unhelpful testimony as co-conspirators.  I believe she and Ann Coulter were separated at birth.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to deal with Comstock in the early 90&#8217;s as a lawyer representing witnesses in hearings relating to Travelgate. My clients were not Clinton folks but neutral fact witnesses with no political axe to grind &#8212; just wanted to testify and go home. Had never heard of her before and will never forget her.  She had a blatant &#8220;let&#8217;s get the Clintons&#8221; agenda and viewed any testimony that did not fit her agenda as unacceptable and likely perjurous and any witnesses providing such unhelpful testimony as co-conspirators.  I believe she and Ann Coulter were separated at birth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2005/09/29/the-noise-machine-in-action/#comment-7882</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2005/09/29/the-noise-machine-in-action/#comment-7882</guid>
		<description>Oliver,

Still waiting for somebody to address the substance of what she wrote.  Or in your mind, is it just sufficient to point out that she is a Republican?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver,</p>
<p>Still waiting for somebody to address the substance of what she wrote.  Or in your mind, is it just sufficient to point out that she is a Republican?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuco Ramirez the Rat</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2005/09/29/the-noise-machine-in-action/#comment-7881</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuco Ramirez the Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2005/09/29/the-noise-machine-in-action/#comment-7881</guid>
		<description>hwo?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hwo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2005/09/29/the-noise-machine-in-action/#comment-7880</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2005/09/29/the-noise-machine-in-action/#comment-7880</guid>
		<description>Let us take a look at this.  In one instance, Oliver criticizes people for criticizing the messenger, so long as the messenger is saying something he agree with.  However, when it involves politics that he does not agree with, the messenger is open for criticism.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us take a look at this.  In one instance, Oliver criticizes people for criticizing the messenger, so long as the messenger is saying something he agree with.  However, when it involves politics that he does not agree with, the messenger is open for criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2005/09/29/the-noise-machine-in-action/#comment-7879</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2005/09/29/the-noise-machine-in-action/#comment-7879</guid>
		<description>So, she is a Republican.  Brilliant.  How about addressing the substance of what she wrote ?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, she is a Republican.  Brilliant.  How about addressing the substance of what she wrote ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
