The result of Hurricane Katrina is unlike anything America’s ever seen. We’ve seen a major American city essentially wiped out with casualties on a biblical level.
Where is our president, and where the hell has he been?
Like Kryptonite To Stupid
The result of Hurricane Katrina is unlike anything America’s ever seen. We’ve seen a major American city essentially wiped out with casualties on a biblical level.
Where is our president, and where the hell has he been?
And then there’s this: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_08/007014.php
Ole Bush is on the tube. Something needs to happen. I am absolutely disraught because my entire family lives in Slidell,Metarie, and New Orleans. I can’t contact some of my family and if evacautions aren’t stepped up people will start to get sick and die.
According to Kevin Drum (http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/) it appears that FEMA has been virtually dismantled and is to be replaced by an as yet unnamed new directorate.
“This year it was announced that FEMA is to “officially” lose the disaster preparedness function that it has had since its creation. The move is a death blow to an agency that was already on life support. In fact, FEMA employees have been directed not to become involved in disaster preparedness functions, since a new directorate (yet to be established) will have that mission.”
Isn’t that kind of like jumping out of an airplane with a sewing machine and parachute makin’ instructions?
Leadership is only the beginnings of your trouble. A quick tour of the disaster zone, once Bush gets his head out of his ass, is only the start.
I urge everyone to read about Cyclone Tracy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclone_tracy), which wiped the city of Darwin, Australia off the map in 1974. That was a city of 30000 people at the time, and it took at least five years to rebuild it, with 2/3rds of those needing to be evacuated and housed elsewhere during the rebuilding.
Now multiply that by a factor of 30. That’s what New Orleans is facing. You’ve got 1 million refugees with just the clothes on their backs to feed, clothe, and house for years, starting now. You must hold Bush to account on this, and demand real relief and not just token guestures, or you’ve got Darfur on your doorstep.
Mike, how many New Orleans refugees have you offered to put up in your spare room for the duration? (I’m in Australia, so hardly in a position to offer that right now - I wish I was).
Looking at your blog, I see that you’ve used this disaster as an opportunity to fundraise for the Church of the Nazarene. Hardly the first organisation that I would think of in a time of crisis. And you go on a rant about looters and their prospects of going to Hell for it.
The major lefty blogs (Atrios, DailyKos, etc) over the last few days have been fundraising too, with strict instructions to donate to the Red Cross, not some relatively unknown Christian sect who looks at the disaster as “This seems like a prime area for Christian ministries”. Yeah, bible-thumping the desperate will help.
Where is the Democratic party? Take a quick look at the Web sites for the DNC and RNC. Katrina relief is front-page DNC. Bush’es VJ speech is on the RNC, with a tiny Red Cross donation button in the corner.
I just completed a brief tour of many a-list blogs, from both the right and left sides of the blogosphere, and was not at all surprised with what I found. While the left blogosphere is in full hyperventillation mode about what they perceive as an absent president, or a vacationing president, the right blogosphere is all about mobilizing grassroots aid to the victims of Katrina. Bush will DO no less than Clinton would have done, without all the “I feel your pain” bullshit.
It’s time for you liberals to grow up and act like adults, or I swear to god we’re going to stop the car, and leave you on the side of the road.
Is that what you call focused leadership? Them being in tears is exactly the problem, and damning proof that they have no idea what they’re doing.
White Whale, my prayers are with you and your family.
…
Maybe we should be asking, where is the United Nations?
After all, aren’t they the moral standard-bearers for international relief efforts? Aren’t they the arbiters of “stingyness?”
New York is only a few hours away from New Orleans by jet. It’s been three days now. Where is Kofi Annan? Where are the UN food shipments? Tents? Drinking water stations?
For that matter, where is Hollywood? I haven’t heard of a single Hollywood celebrity announcing a substantial donation from movie industry elites. They could raise millions for John Kerry, but where is the cash for the poor and homeless?
And where is the local Democratic party? They can find fleets of buses to carry the poor to the voting booths on election day (and provide helpful instructions on which candidates to vote for) but where were the Democratic party buses when the poor needed them to evacuate the city?
If something is wrong in New Orleans, it goes far beyond Bush and the Republican party.
phile, those a-list left blogs have been calling for donations too. But they can walk and chew gum at the same time. Hence, the perfectly valid criticism of Bush draining National Guard resources to Iraq, cutting funding to improve levvies, and what-not. Those issues must be dealt with, to ensure that a screwup like this doesn’t happen again. The real test of Bush is whether he rises to the occasion to fix these mistakes, or just punts responsibility elsewhere.
As for Clinton, well I happen to think that a little “I feel your pain” bullshit would come in real handy right now. It’s called compassion for the less fortunate. Look it up. The Mayor of New Orleans and the Governor of Louisiana are in tears right now. Bush only cut his vacation short when he started getting bad press because of it.
Is this what you call focused leadership? Playing guitar? First goats, now guitars; President Bush has a leadership problem.
Hey Joe, here’s a sneak preview for what phile’s going to say to whatever you post: Moonbat moonbat blah michael moore fat hyperventilate Cindy Sheehan is a traitor blah blah why no, I’ve sacrificed nothing for this all important war on terror blah blah moonbat liberals suck etc….
Joseph, why don’t you tell us what Bush should have been doing. I’m all ears.
Exactly. With a little less flair, however.
That we’re even debating what the president did in a time of crisis was it enough/wasn’t it? is disgusting. If he had acted, this thread would be moot.
Thanks, TomY. You saved me having to write all that.
I just wish Bush hadn’t cut funding for New Orleans’s levies in his budgets. Is that really such a high hurdle? Oh wait, you’re just here to tell the lie that the left doesn’t fundraise for Katrina victims, and throw the word moonbat around. Go back to making excuses for the accountability president on Free Republic, why don’t you?
phile said, “Is that what you call focused leadership? Them being in tears is exactly the problem, and damning proof that they have no idea what they re doing.”
You insensitive clod.
They are in tears because their entire city has been washed away and the nearest help that could do them some good (military with helicopters and amphibious vechicles) is days away at best. Let’s see how well you would cope in a similar situation. You’d be sitting in the corner rocking back and forth mumbling to yourself in no time.
What they need *right now* is someone to go in, give them a big ole hug, and then say “right, here is how I am going to help you get through this”. When you are sinking, you need someone, anyone, to throw you a lifeline. Seeing people on the shore playing guitars and eating cake while your life is washed away is enough to make anyone cry in frustration. Anyone with a heart that is. Which you seem to be sorely lacking.
Bush’s job is to make sure federal disaster aid and relief is allocated and on-site. The elected officials in the affected states are the ones responsible to lead their constituencies through these horrible times.
Please explain to me what Bush isn’t doing that he should be doing, in order to really help the situation, and what other presidents have done in the past, during comparable events.
Looking back on the Florida hurricanes from the last few years, Jeb Bush was obviously in charge, and effectively led his state through the crises. The president’s role was minimal throughout.
I swear to allah that people like Joseph have to be some of the most patently un-serious people walking upright. Moonbats such as him apparently would prefer if our President dropped everything, starting screaming, yelling, and crying about what a horrific disaster it is, hold some press conferences on site, taking away valuable resources needed elsewhere. According to Joseph, the President is not to eat, especially cake, attend any functions, or do anything that the moonbats might not consider to be sympathetic enough. The reality is that no matter what he does, they will find a reason to criticize him.
Absolutely correct, JD. I share your righteous indignation at all this BDS-driven ankle-biting.
JD, phile, the last time I checked, I was able to walk upright AND be serious. Would I prefer if President Bush dropped everything and helped out? OF COURSE. Why did he go to Arizona and California when people were dying as he ate cake and played guitar? Why? Can you give me ONE good reason why you think he’s got his priorities in order on that one? And please, I don’t give a rat’s ass what he eats. That you think I’m referring to cake and not to what that image represents truly signifies your arrogance and ignorance. It’s not what he was doing, it’s what he WASN”T doing. He could have lead in a time of crisis from the start; instead, he went west to beat a dead horse. Plain and simple. And nothing, NOTHING, you right wingers will EVER say will change that fact. Nothing you do will erase that picture from America’s collective memory.
Both the Coast Guard and National Guard have plenty of choppers and crews working 24/7, rescuing the flooded residents of New Orleans. How many gd choppers doing rescue work are required, in order for you to be satisfied that Bush isn’t an evil chimp?
As for amphibious vehicles:
Hm, I wonder if the President has anything to do with that? It’s not like he’s the commander in chief, or anything.
Or, they would see her as human just like them, able to feel the same pain they are going through, and then pull together to work on the crisis in concert.
Kathleen Blanco seems nothing less than a quivering mass of jello.
Older posters might recall another woman Democrat governor, Ella Grasso of Connecticut, a hard-working, rumpled woman whose sterling leadership during a winter storm crisis in the 1970’s will be long remembered.
And tell me, why aren’t those residents of N.O. being told WHERE to evacuate to?
Oh, wait, that’s Bush’s responsibility!!
phile, I was responding to your nonsense that the poor in the superdome would be angry at the governor for falling into tears. I gave you an alternative way for them to look at it: “she’s going through what we are - she understands - let’s help her out”.
Bush is the leader of the country. If he doesn’t show leadership in a time of crisis, he should be replaced with someone who will.
“And tell me, why aren t those residents of N.O. being told WHERE to evacuate to?”
What is your evidence that they are not being told where? Are you monitoring every radio and TV broadcast in the area? I seriously doubt the denizens of the superdome are happily watching TV right now - no electricity.
And there is still the logistical exercise of getting so many people across miles of water. “Evacuate to So-And-So County” does no one any good if they have no way to get there.
“Oh, wait, that s Bush s responsibility!!”
Yes, organising a huge flotila of rescue craft would seem to be something that Bush can do a lot better than Blanco, don’t you think?
phile, I already answered that. Military with helicopters and amphibious vehicles. Like, yesterday. Oh, so sorry. They are currently in Iraq. Because you never know when you might need an amphibious vehicle in the middle of a desert!
What rhys said. Did Michael Moore steal your heart, phile?
So, what you’re really saying is that states don’t require strong leadership, because that’s Bush’s responsibility.
Bush’s war of choice has deprived the states hit by Katrina of 6500 National Guardsman in their time of crisis, and all you can talk about is how liberal bloggers aren’t raising enough money and how the Governor of Louisiana cried during a press conference.
Is this what passes for seriousness at littlegreenfootballs these days?
You people are too much. If I was one of those poor souls in the superdome, and saw my governor reduced to tears, at a time when I was counting on her to do her job, I would be livid. In a time of crisis, leaders do not have the luxury of buckling under the emotional stress of the moment. They’re duty, and responsibility, is to get the job done. Kathleen Blanco’s job is to coordinate the response to the crisis in her state, and Bush’s responsibility to giver her what she needs, not do her job for her. To date, she has failed miserably to do her job, and my compassion is with the people who are worse off as a result.
Bush cut funds for New Orleans’s levy reinforcement.
Bush deemphazised FEMA’s role in natural disaster relief.
Bush’s immediate reponse to the flooding of New Orleans was to read my pet goat, no wait, play guitar.
These things are not going to go away no matter how many times you call liberals unserious or moonbats, or how much you pathologically hate Hollywood or the United Nations. Bush is the most unpopular president since WWII, and sticking your head in the sand is exactly what the left wants you to do. Keep it up, and maybe we can get him down to 35% approval!
In a time of crisis, leaders do not have the luxury of buckling under the emotional stress of the moment.
You’re absolutely right. Good ole’ President Bush didn’t buckle –
He ran away!!
Once again, I ask you to illustrate how he has failed in his duy to help the people in the Katrina ravaged states. He has directed federal resources, mobilized the Nazy, and pledged to provide whatever support the respective state governments require. That’s his job during this crisis, along with the requisite visits to the affected areas - something that NEVER occurs before several days have passed. One must not forget that much security preparations must be made before the president, whether his name is Clinton or Bush, makes any public visit, anywhere.
Thanks for joining us Matty. Since you’re taking the same position as Rhys and Tony, perhaps you would like to respond to the same question I put them (for which neither have provided a response):
Please explain to me what Bush isn t doing that he should be doing, in order to really help the situation, and what other presidents have done in the past, during comparable events.
phile,
For starters, he could have cut short his vacation about 4 days ago when Katrina was a Category 5 heading straight for N.O. He could have put a lot more time and effort into coordinating an evacuation plan for the area. Knowing that over 1/4 of the Louisiana National Guard - plus much of its equipment - is over in Iraq, he could have cobbled together a more effective security and rescue force.
After the hurricane passed through, he should have headed straight to the disaster area, rolled up his sleeves, and played a leading role in the efforts to rescue the stranded and keep the survivors fed and sheltered.
Riddle me this, Joseph. How many people that have lost family members, loved ones, their homes, etc … are giving 3 freaking seconds of their thoughts to where the President is at this time?
Both the Coast Guard and National Guard have plenty of choppers and crews working 24/7, rescuing the flooded residents of New Orleans. How many gd choppers doing rescue work are required
Gotta call ‘nonsense’ on this.
Any helo can only fly about 12-16 hours/day–and that’s for a short duration of time. They require mandatory maintenance downtimes–as do the crews. And understand that a helo can’t fly 12-16 hours continuously; their fuel endurance only permits about 2-3 hours–or less depending on the mission. Additionally, it’s very likely these aircrews are only doing limited ops at night.
But let’s answer your question–in a city and surrounding area where some 100-200K might require SAR ops, coupled with medevac and transport ops–do you really believe there are enough helos?
I’ll guarantee you those aircrews don’t think so.
JD, will you let us know when President Bush starts to do the job that you layed out so well in your entry? Or why, at the very least, he only started doing it today, when people have been dying for three days?
phile : The short answer to your question is that the leftists response is essentially President Bush should have done … the opposite of whatever he did. They would not have been satisfied with anything. If he flew there, and got out and walked around, serving exactly no purpose whatsoever, they would have barked about a photo-op. If he actually does his job, mobilizes appropriate amounts of the military, and has the appropriate federal agencies do what they can, within their power, they cry because he is not giving them their “I feel your pain” moment.
Actually TomY’s response is pretty much spot on for what I expected. When asked what President Bush should have done, the response is he should NOT have done A, B, C, D, etc … which are wholely or partly unrelated to the question posed.
JD, I’m sure many of them were eagerly awaiting a massive federal response. When it didn’t come, I’m sure they were at the very least curious. Once they see where their leader was, they’ll be enraged. You’re saying, rightly, that their thoughts were elsewhere when disaster struck. Now that the storm has passed and the response has begun, that it did not begin soon enough is akin to letting the person trapped in quicksand sink a few extra feet before reaching out with the tree limb.
I’m not sure where I implied that ALL choppers were flying 24/7. It is true, however, that at any given moment, there are active search and rescue missions going on. Whether or not more choppers are needed, I can not say for sure.
Shorter JD: “It was a GOOD thing Bush defunded New Orleans’s levies in his budgets. It was GOOD that he deempasized FEMA’s natural disaster role. It was GOOD he sent all the National Guard away to Iraq to faciliate Rumsfeld’s idiotic pet theories about military reorganization.” Typical that he would ignore all those issues. All conservatives can talk about these days is the left, or their twisted vision of it. So when there’s no grieving mother to demonize, or no war hero to call a coward, they flounder like poor JD and phile here.
Riddle me this, phile. We were told that Bush was able to do anything he could do in Washington from the “Western White House” in Crawford. We were told he wasn’t on vacation, he was avoiding Washington due to repairs being made to the White House. If he WASN’T on vacation and COULD do as good a job from Crawford as from D.C., then why the hell did he leave Crawford early to go back to Washington?
More of this vacation obsession. Let’s get this straight: whatever the President has to do, he can do at the WH, from the ranch, or on AF1 - i other words: wherever he is. Enough with this vacation crap… as if he told his secretary to hold all calls for 5 weeks. Presidents don’t take vacations like you and me take vacations.
Firstly, how on earth do you know what he was doing all weekend, with respect to preparations for this hurricane? He’s not vacationing in the Big Brother house, so I’m not sure how you can account for his every waking moment. Secondly, coordinating an evacuation is the responsibility of the people hired for such matters. The President’s responsibility is to allocate federal resources, not play Macgyver.
For chrissakes, man! You f**king kill me. That doesn’t even merit a serious response.
I think he should not have cut funds for New Orleans s levy reinforcement.
I think he should not have deemphazised FEMA s role in natural disaster relief.
I think he should not have sent 6500 Gulf National guardsmen to fight his damn fool war of choice.
Now, I think he should take responsibility for these mistakes.
Oh, wait, responsibility only applies to Dan Rather. I forgot.
“That doesn t even merit a serious response.”
Translation: “You don’t even *deserve* to have me call you a moonbat.”
Serious people don’t apologize for defunding levies the day after this kind of catastrophe. Go back to Free Republic.
Spirits lifted? Try waving your arms for help when rescuers fly overhead, only to see them fly away.
Their rage is irrational, ours is fact- and reality-based.
That’s pretty funny. This coming from somebody who believes that people who were trapped in their attics because of flood waters would believe that their spirits would be lifted knowing the President took a chopper flight overhead.
The phony left wing ‘outrage’ has reared its’ ugly head again. You frigging people are more transparent than a sheet of plastic wrap.
Who is the one using profanity? And it was a Republican who said “reality-based community,” not a Democrat. If you want insufficient, try reading the two articles I linked to above, proving without a shadow of a doubt that federal funding was reduced to the areas that have failed in the wake of Katrina.
You have got to be fucking kidding me. We are fueled by rage? Who is it on here that pillories President Bush for every single thing he does, ever perceived slight? Who on here does not even have the common decency to address a sitting President in a respectful manner?
Reality-based ?! Such a beautiful little flippant phrase that is rendered comical in light of your posts. Apparently you know lots and lots about the logistics of the types of response that has been set in motion, so you could easily point out how your “massive federal response” would have been instituted. While you are at it, how about describing how the existing federal response is insufficient. Or, do you just sit back and think that people, equipment, goods, etc … just magically appear somewhere?
Please point out where I have blamed any victims. Please point out where I have attempted to create any victims.
Joseph, in regards to your photo op question, I would answer that neither of them would do one damn thing to help one single person affected by this natural disaster. Neither has any effect, except in your mind.
Is it too much for you to act like grown ups ?
Of course, that is exactly right.
When Joseph is asked about the responsibilities for the aftermath of the hurricane, apparently his list includes ; 1) President Bush, and now 2) the rescuers. Nice.
Seriously, TomY. These guys are like machines fueled by rage. Their rage is irrational, ours is fact- and reality-based. When there isn’t, as you said, a mother to demean or a veteran to deride, they fill the void not by helping the victims, but by blaming them … and creating new ones.
And thanks, phile, for taking the time to be the thread police on a progressive blog. Wow.
“since you re so adamant that Congress funding cuts are significantly responsible for the levee system s failure”
All I have ever said is that Bush has cut levy spending when clearly, the pendulum shoul’ve been swinging the opposite way. At the least, it’s something that should be investigated. But you’re the one who’s certain that the President’s off the hook for this one. But then, he’s always off the hook isn’t he? That’s his whole life in a nutshell, really.
Not to mention the fact that we’re currently engaged in a war of choice that’s deprived us of the National guard in a time when we need them home more than ever. Why did we do it that way? Because of Rumsfeld’s crackpot theories about military restructuring, and because Bush was never willing to institute a draft to demonstrate the courage of his convictions in Iraq. Because he wanted easy answers, and he’s been given them. The only surprise is that it’s taken this long for his poll numbers to collapse.
Fueled by rage? Yes, conservatives are. We see it in every post, subjects that are completely unrelated get brought in, since they’re so central to conservative narrative. 1) liberal media 2) hollywood 3) the UN/France. These are three things you will see every day on Drudge, Instapundit, Hannity, Rush, you name it. Three institutions that, really are quite small in the overall scheme of things, but which loom like Freudian nightmares in the conservative mind.
Ok, it’s time to prove whether or not you actually know what you’re talking about, are regurgitating a brand-new anti-Bush talk-point. I can say with absolute certainty that I have no idea what’s what, with respect to NO levee funding, and if more funding would have made any difference. Please enlighten me as to how the lack of funding over the last 4 years contributed to this disaster. Specifically, what contigencies were not put into place, due to lack of funding, that would have strengthened the levee system to handle the storm surge caused by a category 4 or 5 hurricane.
I don’t have said information but, since you’re so adamant that Congress’ funding cuts are significantly responsible for the levee system’s failure, I’m sure you can elaborate with some specifics.
Harsh words, “phony outrage.” Like anyone cares whether you think I am, in fact, angry at Bush defunding the levies.
JayC, by contrast, saw the devastation caused by Katrina and thought, “I think the most virtuous response to this kind of suffering is to go make excuses on a liberal blog.” Truly you are a Christian among Philistines Jay, and I am humbled simply to hear your upright, moral message.
… and what’s better, a photo op from the disaster area, or a photo op of cake eating and of guitar playing?
Wilbur,
I don’t disagree with the second part of your statement. Bush’s speech today, for example, was hollow and very much uninspiring. That doesn’t mean for a second that he is failing to perform the duties of the office of the president. There’s a difference between reasonable criticism and the typical demagoguery that’s the hallmark of many of this site’s posters.
I don’t want Bush “rolling up his sleeves” anywhere near those rescue operations. I’m sure the people in charge of those have enough incompetent loons to deal with.
What _would_ make me feel a little better about Bush was if he could show the slightest capacity for inspiring and compassionate leadership. Which in this, as in other situations, he is apparently completely incapable of doing. phile, if you look back on inspiring conservative leaders like Ronald Reagan, Barry Goldwater, Teddy Roosevelt, I’m sure even you can recognize the difference.
JD, try reading into what I write. I wasn’t blaming the rescuers, I was likening Bush’s low-level flyover to a situation where someone is aching for help only to see it get so close yet so far away. Is nuance lost completely on you?
Try this. And then this. Look, the hurricane which no one disputes or blames Bush for wasn’t a man-made disaster. It appears the resultant flood may have been.
Hey TomY, show me where I called anyone a moonbat. You’ve put that term into my mouth so often in this thread, you actually believe I said it.
Thanks for the laugh.
As I predicted, not a shred of substance on the levee funding issue. Just the same old Liberal mantra: every problem could have been avoided had we only thrown more money at it, while we could - never taking into account how said money would have been spent. Perhaps, we should refurbish the levee system with actual dollar bills.
You’re right, I’ve got my threads confused. All you guys who think that defunding the levy system and sending the national guard away were a good thing — you all look alike to me.
Should I still fuck-off? You didn’t specify.
BTW, TomY, that was a very gracious apology. In any case, I think it’s obvious to any casual observer of this thread who’s really “fuelled by rage”, right Joseph?
And where today, during the president’s speech, did he ask for a national sacrifice? All I heard him do was say that it was “hard work” to be in the oil industry. Meanwhile, we’re taking it in the shorts at the pump.
talking points has alink to red cross right at the top.
kos has an ad for the red cross on the top right.
washingtonmonthly: right at the top.
You really are a fucking idiot, phile. Did you think I wouldn’t visit those sites?
Slur? It’s exactly what I observed after visiting dozens of left and right blogs. Go have a look for yourself.
Of course. I also think you should withdraw your cowardly slur about liberals not donating as much as conservatives.
Or hollow promises and unfunded mandates. Perhaps a faith-based levee. Something along the lines of what you would have done.
From the left:
Atrios main page: one brief entry with a link to a list of places to donate.
KOS main page: nada
tpmcafe main page: nada
washingtonmonthly: i do not have access
From the right:
LGF main page: seven posts, several of which are massive clearinghouses for information on how to help
instapundit main page: tons of info on how to help
I could go on, but I’m sure it would accomplish nothing. I stand by my original statement.
Talkingpoints, washingtonmonthly, atrios, kos, tpmcafe are the ones I check regularly, and they all have them. I think you’re a liar.
After the hurricane passed through, he should have headed straight to the disaster area, rolled up his sleeves, and played a leading role in the efforts to rescue the stranded and keep the survivors fed and sheltered.
For chrissakes, man! You f**king kill me. That doesn t even merit a serious response.
Ha ha! I know phile! I myself bust a gut laughing right after I posted that comment. What the hell was I thinking??
You see, I forgot who we’re dealing with here. It’s pretty ludicrous to think President Little Boy Blueblood would do something even remotely compassionate and humane like get directly involved in an effort to save a drowning city. Why, he might get his precious little hands dirty. And he might be forced to (gasp!) rub shoulders with the commoners. After all, we all know Bush only associates with two kinds of people: the “haves” and the “have-mores.”
I would like to point out, boys and girls, that comparing how differing groups of sites are linking to donation sites is slightly less juvenile than comparing penis sizes in the locker room, and not nearly as entertaining.
Joseph, I am not concerned with who coined the term. You using it to described your way of thinking is nothing short of laughable.
Insufficient, not timely enough … maybe he should have mobilized rescue teams the day before the hurricane hit, so they could all just be standing there waiting to get annhililated in the storm. Kind of hard to respond to the wake of a natural disaster until the natural disaster has actually passed.
TomY - How much was cut from their budget? What was their budget when President Bush took office? What were their budget requests? How much would it have costed to build a levee that would withstand a Cat 4 hurricane? Cat 5? Would those absolutely or hopefully stop the water? What funding level were you crusading for prior to this disaster, or did you jump on this bandwagon after Kos told you to ?
Matty - I was going to attempt to respond to your post, but it is hard to come up with a response to a post that is so obviously devoid of reality. Suffice it to say that the job of ANY President of the United States, is NOT to do as you described. In fact, it would be incredibly stupendously irresponsible for ANY President of the United States to do so.
Phile –
Here’s the broad categories of individual, private response: For those with the time and the training, there’s direct involvement in the relief effort; for those without the time or the training, there is the cash donation to a responsible relief organization; and for those without the time, training or money (and even for those who have al three) there is prayer.
As for myself, the first place I went to donate what I could was the Red Cross. http://www.redcross.org/ When the tsunami hit (and throughout the year for certain family birthdays) I gave money to Mercy Corps. http://www.mercycorps.org/
For those of us who cannot give our time, a link to a site is all we need to do all we can. If someone has time and training to get involved but doesn’t know where to go, the Red Cross is still probably the best place to go as it is directly plugged into the major relief efforts. If a site has 100 links to choose from, most people will still only be able to donate money to one site, so pissing contests over who has the most links to the most charities on their sites is ludicrous.
I understand, however, where your frustration comes from. No doubt for those, like yourself, who supported Bush through the nation’s worst terrorist attack, through what is rapidly becoming one of its most expensive foreign wars, through record gas prices, through the gutting of funds for the nation’s infrastructure and now one of the most mismanaged disaster responses in recent memory, there is a great inner need to overcompensate for your misplaced faith. I recognize and understand the struggle that divides you. Could you really have been that wrong, that mislead? Denial is the natural first response. Give it time and slowly you will be able to accept your role in this nightmare of a presidency and come to terms with it. We will be waiting for you and we will forgive you. We are all Americans, afterall, and everyone makes mistakes. In the meantime, don’t bring your righteousness here. You and other Bush supporters have a lot to answer for in voting for this failure of a man and a leader.
TomY,
Yes, but all of those sites were late to the party.
Reason: They were focusing all of their energy into trying to come up with ways to blame Bush for what had happened. Unlike non-leftist sites, where the first instinct was to think about the actual victims, not to try and score political points doomed to reach their targets anyway.
“regurgitating a brand-new anti-Bush talk-point.”
Oh shut up phile. You’re just pissed that we got our talking points out the door before your side could come up with some cockamamie scheme to blame it all on Clinton. If it’s good enough for you, it’s good enough for us.
I’ll remind you of this in two days time when Rush, Hannity, et al are repeating the Republican talking points. Because as sure as I’m sitting here, some think tank is right now focus grouping some excuse for Bush’s incompetence that blames it on everyone but himself.
You made up the rules to this modern media game. We’re simply making you play by them.
Tuco -
That’s bullshit and you know it. This whole holier than thou discussion is stupid and childish, apparently the only response that conservatives have when faced with serious questions about Bush’s policy priorities and management skills. Would anyone like to take a stab at actually defending Bush’s funding choices in 2003 and 2004 and current leadership in this time of crisis?
This is why debating with the left is so much fun. Instead of addressing any points of substance, you guys are all about the ad hominem, laced with the occasional paranoid ranting. And, how hostile you become toward people that don’t agree with you. I wonder why you find it so difficult to just have a civilized conversation. Perhaps, this hostility is just the manifestation of your frustration at not being able to articulate a reasoned response to a question put to you.
TomY, I don’t think you know how to read.
I never mentioned this site, and the one sole link is exactly my point, which I will restate: the size of the effort to mobilize help for Katrina victims is miniscule on the left, while the effort from the right is comparitively massive.
Once again, I must question your ability to read, and understand simple concepts. Perhaps, you might explain to me how running an ad suggest that KOS and his diarists are working on drumming up aid and support for Katrina victims. Everything I have said on the matter has been related to blog posts, because that’s what counts. Not getting paid to run an ad.
Again, the one sole link is exactly my point.
More of that charming liberal charisma.
Mr Ad Hominem Pot, meet Mr Kettle.
I didn’t attack you. I attacked the you of two days hence, when you come back with some asinine right-wing talking point to blame everyone but Bush.
We answered the question. You just didn’t like the answer. If you are only looking for an answer that confirms your own viewpoint, then why bother asking the question? It is not a “debate” if you mark us down for merely disagreeing with you.
To clarify, how exactly is this a “debate” when you are one of the participants and you have also elected yourself the adjudicator of what the correct answer is? You’re not looking for a “debate”, but rather blind agreement with your viewpoint.