<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Oliver Willis &#187; Nancy Pelosi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/category/nancy-pelosi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:45:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='www.oliverwillis.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Americans Would Like Some Health Care Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/21/americans-would-like-some-health-care-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/21/americans-would-like-some-health-care-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democratic Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If only the scaredy pants Democrats in congress would let them have it.
Americans overwhelmingly support substantial changes to the health care system and are strongly behind one of the most contentious proposals Congress is considering, a government-run insurance plan to compete with private insurers, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.
The poll found [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only the scaredy pants Democrats in congress <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/21/health/policy/21poll.html">would let them have it</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Americans overwhelmingly support substantial changes to the health care system and are strongly behind one of the most contentious proposals Congress is considering, a government-run insurance plan to compete with private insurers, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.</p>
<p>The poll found that most Americans would be willing to pay higher taxes so everyone could have health insurance and that they said the government could do a better job of holding down health-care costs than the private sector.</p></blockquote>
<p>There is no impediment to health care reform other than the courage of <em>Democratic</em> members of congress. They have the votes and a President ready and waiting to sign the bill. Most importantly they have a public out there that wants this reform. The only wind in their faces is wind from insurance companies flapping around their millions of dollars in the breeze.</p>
<p>There are no reasons, no excuses for making this happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/21/americans-would-like-some-health-care-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi &amp; The CIA? Bush Was Still The Trigger Man</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/14/pelosi-the-cia-bush-was-still-the-trigger-man/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/14/pelosi-the-cia-bush-was-still-the-trigger-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My guess? Speaker Pelosi is, at best, being misleading about what the CIA did and didn&#8217;t tell her. In all likelihood? She&#8217;s probably lying. But does it really matter?
After 9/11, the Democrats not only lost their marbles the way the rest of us did at the horror, they also had their spines turn to jelly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.oliverwillis.com/img/ZZ14C7219A.jpg" width="300" height="209" alt="pelosi and bush" align="right" />My guess? Speaker Pelosi is, at best, <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2009/05/pelosi-cia-lied.html">being misleading</a> about what the CIA did and didn&#8217;t tell her. In all likelihood? She&#8217;s probably lying. But does it really matter?</p>
<p>After 9/11, the Democrats not only lost their marbles the way the rest of us did at the horror, they also had their spines turn to jelly politically. After years of polling showing conservative superiority on national security issues, Democrats did the stupid thing and caved in to the right on security issue after issue &#8211; on issues ranging from the invasion of Iraq to the use of torture and warrantless wiretapping.</p>
<p>Now, many of us out there in liberalland did &#8211; and still &#8211; knew better than those in DC on our side of the aisle. We rejected the notion that conservatives know anything about national security, let alone the idea that they are more trustworthy on the issue.</p>
<p>Oh sure, around 2005-6 the Democratic party itself started talking a better game on these issues, but that doesn&#8217;t change the fact that from 01-04 they were limp noodles. They gave the Bush administration a free pass, and went along to go along. That doesn&#8217;t absolve them of guilt. They voted for things and supported policies no member of a liberal party should have done.</p>
<p>But.</p>
<p>We only have one President. He, and he alone, made the final decision on these issues &#8211; congressional authorization or not. Congress gave him the loaded weapon, but he chose whether or not to pull the trigger. George Bush authorized the torture of people, and while the congress turned a blind eye to it and authorized it and deserves some of the blame for it, it is Bush and his henchmen who committed the act itself.</p>
<p>I feel its probably likely that Speaker Pelosi was an accessory to these acts, but George W. Bush was the trigger man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/05/14/pelosi-the-cia-bush-was-still-the-trigger-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>111</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Doesn&#8217;t Matter If Pelosi Knew</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/04/23/it-doesnt-matter-if-pelosi-knew/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/04/23/it-doesnt-matter-if-pelosi-knew/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As John notes, whether Nancy Pelosi knew or didn&#8217;t know about the Bush administration&#8217;s authorization and execution of torture doesn&#8217;t matter. Either Pelosi didn&#8217;t know or she abdicated her responsibility as a political leader and American by not speaking up and opposing it. Either way, it doesn&#8217;t matter.
What matters is that the government tortured people.
(The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As John <a href="http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=20362">notes</a>, whether Nancy Pelosi knew or <a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/04/23/1905111.aspx">didn&#8217;t know</a> about the Bush administration&#8217;s authorization and execution of torture doesn&#8217;t matter. Either Pelosi didn&#8217;t know or she abdicated her responsibility as a political leader and American by not speaking up and opposing it. Either way, it doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>What matters is that the government tortured people.</p>
<p>(The argument over whether the evidence was good or not is mostly a red herring, as well)</p>
<p>Also, Harry Reid <a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/04/23/1905071.aspx">seems to have taken a break</a> from continually getting rolled by the Senate Republicans to come out against an investigation into an activity that stained the soul of America. A lot of brilliance there, as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/04/23/it-doesnt-matter-if-pelosi-knew/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just Who Do These Rich Clinton Donors Think They Are?</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/27/just-who-do-these-rich-clinton-donors-think-they-are/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/27/just-who-do-these-rich-clinton-donors-think-they-are/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/27/just-who-do-these-rich-clinton-donors-think-they-are/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more I read about the rich donors who told Nancy Pelosi to shut up, the more angry I get. I may not agree with her on quite a few issues, but Speaker Pelosi is second in line to the Presidency, the first woman to hold her position and a figure demanding of respect &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/03/27/just-who-do-these-rich-clinton-donors-think-they-are/howell-from-gilligans-island/' rel='attachment wp-att-7289' title='Howell from Gilligan’s Island'><img src='http://www.oliverwillis.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/howells.jpg' align='right' alt='Howell from Gilligan’s Island' /></a>The more I read about <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/26/clinton_donors_warn_pelosi_on.html">the rich donors</a> who told Nancy Pelosi to shut up, the more angry I get. I may not agree with her on quite a few issues, but Speaker Pelosi is second in line to the Presidency, the first woman to hold her position and a figure demanding of respect &#8211; especially from people who are supposed to be her fellow Democrats. These guys seriously think that because they went to a fancy fundraiser or maybe played a round of golf with the ex-president that they really are better than the rest of us. They have every right to add their voice to the chorus supporting Sen. Clinton, but they have no place, no standing, no right to order the Speaker around.</p>
<p>These people are symptomatic, quite frankly, of the negative that came along with all the good President Clinton did during his tenure. The moribund liberal wing of the party, defanged after the losses of Carter, Mondale, and Dukakis, gave way to the big check writers, the elite crowd whose cash did prop up the party for the short term and helped President Clinton gain his office. But for the Democratic party and the progressive movement they have been a waste. Just look at the congressional seats lost during Clinton&#8217;s tenure, look at how unprepared the party was to field a coast-to-coast slate of candidates under Terry McAuliffe&#8217;s leadership &#8211; a party chairmanship that was all about fundraising to the exclusion of getting majorities and a president elected.</p>
<p>But the Clintons and the moneybags crowd have not learned. That&#8217;s why <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-michigan20mar20,1,2478056.story">they tried</a> to throw their money around in Michigan and re-do the primary. That&#8217;s why the Clinton campaign is now faltering at fundraising, having maxed out these whales she doesn&#8217;t have the pool of Average Joe donors (like myself) that Sen. Obama will have in the general who have not come close to the $2,300 limit. That&#8217;s why, as their anointed candidate began to fail they just cut another of their fat checks to <a href="http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/02/proclinton_527_prepares_for_oh.php">form a 527</a> committee whose work product is horrendous compared to the work of groups like MoveOn and the labor unions. Sure, wealthy donors help fund some of those efforts as well, but they are truly nothing without their regular Joe volunteers and members. And none of those groups is so in love with themselves that they believe that they can tell Speaker Pelosi what she can and cannot say.</p>
<p>We poor unwashed masses, lacking mansions and minks and chaueffers, elected Rep. Pelosi to the position of Speaker via our representatives in the House. We may not have tee times at the golf club, a yacht parked on the intra coastal, nor do we feed our pets prime rib &#8212; but we know that the Speaker is to be afforded a modicum of respect.</p>
<p>This is the stain that remains on the party even after the events of <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FCrashing-Gate-Netroots-Grassroots-People-Powered%2Fdp%2F193339241X%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1206600402%26sr%3D8-1&#038;tag=boomnation-20&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">Crashing The Gate</a></em> were documented by Markos Moulitsas and Jerome Armstrong. These are the hangers-on who look down their plastic surgery noses at Governor Dean&#8217;s 50-state strategy and his middle class demeanor even as the party begins to regain its role as a truly <i>national</i> party. These are the people who think nothing &#8211; nothing &#8211; of throwing a tantrum because us people, us regular Joes and Janes, had the gall to not vote and caucus for the candidate they bankrolled and sought to shove down our gullets the way they always do. Instead we chose to vote for a candidate whose donor base is almost 2 million strong. Just like a couple of weeks ago when they were <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/15/us/politics/15donate.html?_r=1&#038;ei=5065&#038;en=68bdcd72f717cb5f&#038;ex=1206158400&#038;partner=MYWAY&#038;pagewanted=print&#038;oref=slogin">demanding refunds</a> of their donations to the party they thought they owned they are once again trying to tell us they bought the Democratic party the same way they bought a diamond necklace at Tiffany&#8217;s for their trophy wife.</p>
<p>Not any more. The Democratic party is once again becoming little-d democratic. A party where the rich guys have a say, but so do the regular guys. Speaker Pelosi speaks for us, from Park Avenue to Georgetown to Skid Row to Baltimore to The Lower 9th Ward and beyond.</p>
<p>And you respect her, or shut up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2008/03/27/just-who-do-these-rich-clinton-donors-think-they-are/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi Talks To Petraeus</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/25/pelosi-talks-to-petraeus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/25/pelosi-talks-to-petraeus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The right claims Nancy Pelosi ignored Gen. Petraeus, but she <a href="http://www.speaker.gov/blog/?p=293">talked to him</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>General Petraeus and I had a very informative half-hour discussion yesterday, which included the assessment of the situation in Iraq that he will share with other House Members today. I appreciated his report and his responses to my questions on security and political issues in Iraq. We share a conviction that the war in Iraq will not be resolved militarily, and I look forward to future reports from him on the effects of President Bush’s escalation plan.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/25/pelosi-talks-to-petraeus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi And Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/02/pelosi-and-bush/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/02/pelosi-and-bush/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 02:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if folks have picked up on this, but the way that Speaker Pelosi has been responding to Republican attacks on her &#8211; all the way up to the president &#8211; has been great. <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/02/pelosi-shrugs-off-white-house-criticism-of-syria-trip/">She has</a> basically taken the position that these people are amazingly stupid and that they can&#8217;t understand basic statements. She&#8217;s two heartbeats away from the presidency, and she&#8217;s acting like it.</p>
<p>Kudos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/02/pelosi-and-bush/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steny Hoyer vs. John Murtha</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/14/steny-hoyer-vs-john-murtha/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/14/steny-hoyer-vs-john-murtha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democratic House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, lemme get this straight: the &#8220;battle&#8221; and &#8220;fight&#8221; and &#8220;controversy&#8221; is over which <em>DEMOCRAT</em> is going to be <em>MAJORITY</em> LEADER OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES under SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE, <em>DEMOCRAT</em> Nancy Pelosi?</p>
<p>I could not care less about who&#8217;s in the job if that&#8217;s the case. They&#8217;ve got a (D) after their name. That&#8217;s what matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/14/steny-hoyer-vs-john-murtha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
