AP writer Douglass Daniel was enjoying the moderate Republican (and Obama Republican) response to conservatives on the Sunday talk shows.

How does Graham know the AP writer enjoyed anything? The writer never says anything of the sort in the story, and Graham links to no supporting materials. This is part of the reason people in journalism have a hard time taking MRC seriously vs Media Matters, FAIR, and others. MRC is emotion-based, all about imputing feelings and notions to reporters in order to further their mythology about liberal bias. MRC very rarely – if ever – refutes actual facts.

ALSO: Congrats to MRC on their new website. Imitation is surely the sincerest form of flattery.

The Washington Post sub-headline in print: “Not Everyone Is Celebrating Glittering Moment of Inclusiveness”

So the Post headline is discussing the fact that not everyone is wild about the drag queen, and yet the Newsbusters version is that the Post is hyping it as a positive thing. How does Newsbusters reconcile this b.s.?

The real issue here is that the people at Newsbusters (and Media Research Center, who backs them) are so insecure in their sexuality that they don’t want the newspaper reporting on an event about a drag queen. It’s not that they seriously have an issue with the paper’s reporting — they just don’t want the story reported.

You gotta figure that at Casa Bozell when they play Clue it’s always Bill Clinton with the Candlestick and never Miss Scarlet.