Lindsey Graham: It’s Hard Out Here For A Southern White Guy

4:15 pm EST October 6th, 2011 | News | 27 Comments

Who will stand up for the southern white man? WHO???

No Related Post

« RIP Steve Jobs
Hey, Occupy Wall Street, I Was Wrong »

27 Responses to “Lindsey Graham: It’s Hard Out Here For A Southern White Guy”

Marco21 says:

October 6, 2011 at 4:56 pm

Aw, poor sad little closet case.
Repack Rider says:

October 6, 2011 at 5:59 pm

Sarah Palin, when she is sworn in as…

Wait.

Remember when we feared her? Good times.

Now back to the original question, the Tea Party stands up for those fine gentlemen. Until the check bounces.
merl says:

October 6, 2011 at 7:46 pm

I’ve always wondered how he ever got elected in the first place. Don’t cons hate gay people?
moonbat monitor says:

October 6, 2011 at 7:52 pm

Who will stand up for the Southern white man?

Certainly not the Democratic party. Which is why they, and frankly, a lot of white men in all geographical areas aren’t going to be voting Democrat in ’12 either.

Look at the polls. There aren’t enough Mexicans for you to buy off with the promise of legalizing their illegal relatives to balance that out.
Marco21 says:

October 6, 2011 at 8:53 pm

Why do I think every time GG mentions Mexicans, they’re wearing sombreros and picking oranges?

Just a hunch.
Frank DiSalle says:

October 6, 2011 at 10:00 pm

Civil War ends – 146 years ago
Civil Rights Act – 47 years ago
Voting Rights Act – 46 years ago

Southerners getting ridiculed and getting their balls busted – Yesterday
Zython says:

October 6, 2011 at 10:01 pm

Certainly not the Democratic party. Which is why they, and frankly, a lot of white men in all geographical areas aren’t going to be voting Democrat in ’12 either.

How DARE Democrats not pretend that white people are the only people that matter!

Maybe if you guys actually gave a shit about other people, you could win elections without having to disenfranchise voters. Just a thought.
Zython says:

October 6, 2011 at 10:03 pm

I think Frank posts just to hear himself talk.
Marco21 says:

October 6, 2011 at 10:26 pm

Civil War ends – 146 years ago
Civil Rights Act – 47 years ago
Voting Rights Act – 46 years ago

Tea Baggers’ racist signs – priceless.
Jaim says:

October 7, 2011 at 12:42 am

Sometimes I wish their terrorist attempt at secession had worked out for them. My country would probably be better off today.
moonbat monitor says:

October 7, 2011 at 8:32 am

Zython.

Perhaps if liberals acted as if they DID matter, even a tiny bit, instead of ridiculing them, you might actually win a state in the south on a regular basis.

They don’t ask people to ‘give them stuff’ at the expense of society, like your sorry ass constituents do. They want to largely just be left alone, and yes, southern white men, and conservatives in general need politicians that will stand up for us against the freeloading hoards of liberal constituents.

The only unifying principle the left has is ‘free stuff at the expense of others.’ Aside from that, you have a bunch of bought off factions that wouldn’t otherwise speak to on another. Now that the money is not there to continue handing out like feed to livestock, your side has become increasingly desperate, and even more delusional. Seriously…you could tax every millionaire at a 95% rate and it still wouldn’t cover the massive debt/deficit we’ve racked up.

Big spending politics are dying. Here, and in Europe.

Deal with it.
Zython says:

October 7, 2011 at 10:06 am

Oh, MM, you and your drugs.

Perhaps if liberals acted as if they DID matter, even a tiny bit, instead of ridiculing them, you might actually win a state in the south on a regular basis.

Yeah, when you can point to a major Democratic politician holding a rally with hate groups to talk about how much you suck based on who you are, then you might have a point.

They want to largely just be left alone

What’s the government stopping them from doing, pray tell?

and yes, southern white men, and conservatives in general need politicians that will stand up for us against the freeloading hoards of liberal constituents.

Again, just because you say something doesn’t make it true.

Big spending politics are dying. Here, and in Europe.*

*Offer does not apply to giving CEOs free money.

As the old saying goes: The next conservative to be right about something will be the first.
Rheinhard says:

October 7, 2011 at 10:26 am

They want to largely just be left alone

*

* – where “left alone” is understood to carry the unstated postscript, “in a society designed to give them every possible advantage from birth over every other ethnicity, religion, and economic class”
jrfunkenstein says:

October 7, 2011 at 11:35 am

‘Southerners getting ridiculed and getting their balls busted – Yesterday’

Just out of purely venomous reasons huh Frank? Wouldn’t have ANYTHING to do with Grahams’ wholly ludicrous statement that White Southern men are the true victims of racial intolerance, now would it?
jrfunkenstein says:

October 7, 2011 at 11:36 am

‘Which is why they, and frankly, a lot of white men in all geographical areas aren’t going to be voting Democrat in ’12 either.’

And your evidence of that is what, exactly?
fafaroo says:

October 7, 2011 at 2:38 pm

Now that the money is not there to continue handing out like feed to livestock, your side has become increasingly desperate, and even more delusional.

It always leads to good things when racist fucks start referring to human beings as “livestock.”
merl says:

October 7, 2011 at 6:20 pm

His evidence is something he pulled out of his ass, like everything else. I’m white and I’m voting Democrat.
Repack Rider says:

October 7, 2011 at 8:00 pm

a lot of white men in all geographical areas aren’t going to be voting Democrat in ’12 either.

Your statement contradicts my own experience. All the white guys I know vote Democratic. All the Black ones too.

Who am I gonna believe, a blog post or my own eyes?
Frank DiSalle says:

October 9, 2011 at 4:24 pm

Just out of purely venomous reasons huh Frank?
Of course not, J R … Every time somebody makes fun of, or mocks a redneck, there is always a perfectly good reason.
After all, we all know no one on the left is prejudiced **cough** **Catholics**, or biased **cough** **southerners** against anyone, ever.
The left is never wrong, or even flawed, because the left cares…
The Dark Avenger says:

October 9, 2011 at 5:08 pm

Every time somebody makes fun of, or mocks a Republican redneck, there is always a perfectly good reason.

Fixed that for you, Frank.

After all, we all know no one on the left is prejudiced **cough** **Catholics**,

No, just against the Catholics in the RCC hierarchy who covered up and protected child molesters, despite your plea that there may have been “theological reasons” for doing so.

The left is never wrong, or even flawed, because the left cares…

Ollie admitted to a mistake in his latest post, but of course that didn’t register on your anti-left radar.

Thanks for proving J. S. Mill correct yet again, Frank.
Frank DiSalle says:

October 10, 2011 at 9:33 pm

D A ::
fix·a·tion
(fĭk-sā’shən) pronunciation
n. Psychology. A strong attachment to a person or thing … manifested in immature or neurotic behavior that persists throughout life.

Yes, J.S. Mill was correct about the conservatives of his day, who more closely resemble the liberals of this day, than they do resemble modern conservatives.

And I don’t believe Oliver admitted to being in error; he merely changed his mind. Of course, he also admitted that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” and he had no trouble suggesting that that was correct.

The only time a liberal comes close to admitting an error, is when they meant to have been even further to the left.
Zython says:

October 11, 2011 at 6:31 am

Frank, when was the last time you, or any conservative for that matter, ever admitted to being wrong about anything? Your arrogance really knows no bounds, does it?
The Dark Avenger says:

October 11, 2011 at 7:51 am

And I don’t believe Oliver admitted to being in error; he merely changed his mind.

I was wrong about Occupy Wall Street.

wrong
[rawng, rong] Show IPA
adjective
1.
not in accordance with what is morally right or good: a wrong deed.
2.
deviating from truth or fact; erroneous: a wrong answer.
3.
not correct in action, judgment, opinion, method, etc., as a person; in error: You are wrong to blame him.
4.
not proper or usual; not in accordance with requirements or recommended practice: the wrong way to hold a golf club.
5.
out of order; awry; amiss: Something is wrong with the machine.

Yes, J.S. Mill was correct about the conservatives of his day, who more closely resemble the liberals of this day, than they do resemble modern conservatives.

If by that, you mean that the conservatives of more than a century ago weren’t religious obsessed nuts who wanted to put a stop to progress, I’ll have to agree with you:

It is not that, of course; if NATIONAL REVIEW is superfluous, it is so for very different reasons: It stands athwart history, yelling Stop, at a time when no one is inclined to do so, or to have much patience with those who so urge it.

Mill believed in the following, which are hardly conservative values, then and now:

Human rights and slavery

In 1850, Mill sent an anonymous letter (which came to be known under the title “The Negro Question”), in rebuttal to Thomas Carlyle’s anonymous letter to Fraser’s Magazine for Town and Country. Carlyle had defended slavery on grounds of genetic inferiority and claimed that the West Indies development was due to British ingenuity alone and dismissed any notion that there was a debtedness to imported slaves for building the economy there. Mill’s rebuttal and references to the ongoing debate in the US at the time regarding slavery were emphatic and eloquent. The full text, as well as a link to the Carlyle letter that prompted it, is available online.[19]

Connection to feminism

Mill saw women’s issues as important and began to write in favour of greater rights for women. With this, Mill can be considered among the earliest feminists. In his article, “The Subjection of Women” (1861, published 1869), Mill attempts to prove that the legal subjugation of women is wrong and that it should give way to perfect equality.[20] He talks about the role of women in marriage and how he felt it needed to be changed. There, Mill comments on three major facets of women’s lives that he felt are hindering them: society and gender construction, education, and marriage. Mill is also famous for being one of the earliest and strongest supporters of ever greater rights for women. His book The Subjection of Women is one of the earliest written on this subject by a male author. He felt that the oppression of women was one of the few remaining relics from ancient times, a set of prejudices that severely impeded the progress of humanity.[21]

Mill’s ideas were opposed by Ernest Belfort Bax in his treatise, ‘The Legal Subjugation of Men’.

Of course, as a loyal Catholic, you don’t believe women have the right to control their own bodies, do you?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Stuart_Mill

hanks for demonstrating again why you’re a dummy, Frank.

Any questions?
The Dark Avenger says:

October 11, 2011 at 7:53 am

Thanks
Marco21 says:

October 13, 2011 at 1:18 pm

Maybe Hank Williams Jr. will write a song for poor Lindsay.
jrfunkenstein says:

October 18, 2011 at 4:40 pm

Let me guess D.A.; ‘Momma’s don’t let your babies grow up to be Dumb asses?
jrfunkenstein says:

October 18, 2011 at 4:46 pm

Right again Frank; the real discrimination has clearly been against the poor, disadvantaged White Southern male who has managed to survive the endless onslaughts of verbal and physical abuse based on nothing more substantial than a visceral reaction to the kind of deeply intelligent musings and opinions of one Shelton Williams, the no talent loser who pretends to be named Hank Williams Jr.

Oh the humanity.