Glenn Beck: He Says He Honors Martin Luther King, Opposes Central Idea Behind MLK

10:35 pm EST August 29th, 2010 | Conservative | 65 Comments

To reiterate, anyone who believes this huckster is an idiot. Even worse if you travel across the country to see him handle snakes.

Topic: ,

Related Posts

«
»

65 Responses to “Glenn Beck: He Says He Honors Martin Luther King, Opposes Central Idea Behind MLK”

  1. sqeptiq says:

    Shorter Glenn Beck: MLK has his MLK, and I have mine.

  2. jr says:

    “YOU’RE JEALOUS NOBODY WATCHES MSNBC”-Matt Drudge

  3. Indeed says:

    Quick quiz. Which spiritual leader actually said the following:

    I am not a fan of social justice.

    Was it:
    a. Jesus Christ
    b. Mother Teresa
    c. Martin Luther King, Jr.
    d. Glenn Fucking Beck

  4. isms says:

    Clearly he’s a joke, why isn’t everybody laughing?

  5. Wilbur says:

    Because he’s a joke but he’s not a funny joke

  6. Dennis says:

    Bishop shot and killed at Mormon church in Visalia

    Clearly anti-Mormon hysteria aimed at Glenn Beck by the left-wing.


    In trying economic times, opportunistic political movements demonize the “other” and the result is often violence against ethnic minorities.

    Are we seriously so stupid and far gone that we’re going to recreate 1930s Germany?

  7. durablend says:

    Wow Denise…kind of early for a “look over there” isn’t it?

  8. Randy Brown says:

    Hey Denise the Dipshit, here’s an sterling example of the Mormons’ tolerance of non-Mormons.

  9. anotherbozo says:

    Just learned today that Beck’s a Mormon, which led me to his Wikipedia bio. Wow. I’m not saying you can’t overcome all that early trauma, but even as the background of a megalomaniac demagogue it’s pretty hair-raising.

  10. Dennis says:

    Downtown Randy Brown, why would you condone the killing of an innocent man such as this bishop, just because of an incident that happened back in 1857 that he had nothing to do with?

    Why do you hate the “other”?

    1930′s Germany much?

  11. Wilbur says:

    Our criticism of racism and religious bigotry in the tea party must really be getting to you, Dennis, otherwise you wouldn’t be reaching so far for your you-too-isms.

    I can almost see the shit-eating grin on your face as you type your response: “You’re not getting to me, Wilbur…” Yeah, sure we’re not.

    For the record, when the Democratic Party, Daily Kos and Media Matters sponsor a big Keith Olbermann Rally with anti-mormon rhetoric, with people carrying signs saying “A Mormon on Teevee is a Moron on Teevee”, and demanding that no Mormon churches be built within three blocks of any Ted Bundy murder site, then you can post stuff like this and not look like a complete dookey-shoot.

  12. Tyro says:

    Ah, Dennis, what a stunning “look over there” piece of crap you pulled while your hero Glenn Beck goes around spitting, once again,on a real American hero, MLK. It’s amazing, Dennis, how full of hate you are for Americans and liberals that you’re reduced to the stupidity you’re reduced to.

  13. hnice says:

    Are any of us so stupid as to believe that the Salt of the Earth is as suspicious and hostile toward Mormons as toward Muslims?

    I mean, what kind of head-in-the-sand ignoramus would even imply that?

  14. The Dark Avenger says:

    Google “The Mountain Meadows Massacre” and then tell us how wonderful the Mormons again.

  15. The Dark Avenger says:

    “the Mormons are again” for “the Mormons again”.

    Fixed.

  16. Dennis says:

    It’s amazing, Dennis, how full of hate you are for Americans and liberals that you’re reduced to the stupidity you’re reduced to.

    I don’t hate anyone, Tyro. As much as you need for that to be true in order to validate your animosity towards anyone who doesn’t espouse your liberal philosophy, or you the “others”, if you will, it simply just isn’t true.

    If you think what I wrote here as commentary to a very true story is stupid, a story far worse than what little you know about some construction equipment at the site of a future mosque being set ablaze for which you likened to 1930′s Germany, then you need to do some serious soul searching about just what it is you think should define stupidity. It can’t be that Oliver’s hysteria about equipment being set on fire by who the hell knows who is serious, and the commentary by me about left-wing hysteria about Glenn Beck and a mormon bishop being murdered is just pure stupidity. Your logic does not follow, Tyro.

  17. One says:

    Either MLK believed:

    “I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”

    Or he believed in quotas based on the color of skin; have it both ways, you cannot!

  18. Dennis says:

    and demanding that no Mormon churches be built within three blocks of any Ted Bundy murder site, then you can post stuff like this and not look like a complete dookey-shoot.

    Will I. Am, serious question.

    Do you think the comparison by Oliver to 1930′s Germany hysteria is a valid one to what’s going on today?

  19. Dennis says:

    Google “The Mountain Meadows Massacre” and then tell us how wonderful the Mormons again.

    “So….”what you are saying, DA, this your justification for what happened a century and a half ago and part of the Obama philosophy of “we will punch back twice as hard”?

    Shorter DA: “The 1859 incident must not remain unavenged!”

  20. Wilbur says:

    Sorry Den.un.is, you don’t get to ask any serious questions as long as you’re slinging dogshit like this. I’m not going to play chess with someone who’s brandishing a can of cheez whiz.

  21. The Dark Avenger says:

    I’m saying they’re a group with a clear history of violence against non-Mormons, and therefore they and their offshoots(like Ervil Baron) should be watched carefully.

  22. Dennis says:

    I’m not going to play chess with someone who’s brandishing a can of cheez whiz.

    The reference to Nazi Germany was the cheez whiz, Wilbur. And you guys ordered up the boxes of Ritz Crackers and had a nice little serious discussion about it. You wolfed down the cheez whiz like there was no tomorrow. Of course you think this is like 1930′s Germany.

  23. hnice says:

    “Of course you think this is like 1930′s Germany.”

    So does Glenn Beck, and he gets to have a big party on the lawn.

  24. The Dark Avenger says:

    Or Weimar Germany:

    Here we are now. We’ve run up a ‘bar tab’ so huge that even with a decent GDP growth rate, it would take a century to pay it off. That’s only IF we decided to do so! Glenn Beck cautions America to study the Weimar Republic and it’s history. Are we headed now for a period of chaos and our own version of an Enabling Act? Will some ‘national emergency’ be used to justify such? Did it already happen back on 9/11? Or September, 2008? Glenn Beck likes to quote Thomas Jefferson, “Question with boldness!” Perhaps Howard Beale said it best, “So if you want the truth… Go to God! Go to your gurus! Go to yourselves! Because that’s the only place you’re ever going to find any real truth.”

    History according to Glenn Beck:

    Over the past year, Beck has used images from Nazi rallies or the Soviet Union when stoking fears of creeping socialism in the United States. And he’s often placed historical figures into the far-out theories he diagrams on his chalkboard. But in Friday’s hourlong documentary, titled “The Revolutionary Holocaust: Live Free … or Die,” Beck doubled down on the use of imagery pulled from the 20th century’s totalitarian past to make a point about citizens needing to be wary of government overreach in the present.

    Beck, in teasing the documentary Thursday, claimed that “progressives” don’t want the public to know about this history and that it’s “not being taught in classrooms in America.”

    Not everyone who watched his history lesson was convinced — especially some professional historians.

    Clemson University professor Steven Marks, author of “How Russia Shaped the Modern World,” said that while Beck doesn’t explicitly tie the left-wing totalitarian regimes of the past to contemporary liberals, that’s what “he’s hinting at here.”

    “No one in their right mind is going to defend Stalin or Mao or Che Guevara,” Marks said. “The implication is that this is what’s going to happen if Democrats get their way. This is just a complete lie.”

    Alan Wolfe, director of the Boisi Center for Religion and American Life at Boston College, said that the film not only isn’t accurate, but that Beck “lives in a complete alternative universe.”

    As an example, he said, Beck mentions how the Nazis supported programs like universal health care as evidence that their ideology may have more to do with the left than the totalitarian right.

    Nazi Germany was “not evil because of their economic program,” said Wolfe, which he noted included a few programs designed to promote public health.

    “It was evil,” he said, “ because it aimed at the extermination of European Jewry.”

  25. anotherbozo says:

    Missing from the Beckathon was the song. Mutatis mutandis.

    The sun on the meadow is summery warm
    The stag in the forest runs free
    But gather together to greet the storm
    Tomorrow belongs to me

    The branch on the linden is leafy and green
    The Rhine gives its gold to the sea
    But somewhere a glory awaits unseen
    Tomorrow belongs to me

    The babe in his cradle is closing his eyes
    The blossom embraces the bee
    But soon says a whisper, arise, arise
    Tomorrow belongs to me
    Tomorrow belongs to me

    O Fatherland, Fatherland, show us the sign
    Your children have waited to see
    The morning will come
    When the world is mine
    Tomorrow belongs
    Tomorrow belongs
    Tomorrow belongs to me

  26. Indeed says:

    Not hearing a lot from wingnuts comparing Beck to social justice champion MLK–you know, the subject of this post. Maybe it “won’t show up in google.”

  27. anotherbozo, why would that crowd want to sing a show tune written by a pair of Jews?

  28. Tyro says:

    Ah, Dennis, at the end of the day, your hero Glenn beck and his parade of hatred filled animals tries to claim the mantle of MLK, but at the end of the day, they hate what he stood for. Those opposed to MLK were, like the beck fans of today, people who hated the poor and shilled for the warmongers and right wing tycoons of their day, just as you do. The republican party has become a hate group.

  29. One says:

    Doctorpsycho1960

    Aren’t most showtunes written by Jews?

    When it comes to the entertainment industry they pretty much have the market covered.

  30. Dennis says:

    So does Glenn Beck, and he gets to have a big party on the lawn.

    Gosh darn, hnice, if I didn’t know you any better, and I admit I barely know you at all, I’d almost have the impression you didn’t think Glenn Beck had that right. Or, perish the thought, that you acknowledged that he did have the right, but you opposed it.

    Nahhhh. Now way you’d be thinking THAT!

  31. hnice says:

    Sorry — are you taking issue with either of my assertions? Because they sort of undercut the idea that the left made up shouting about how the US pre WW2 germany.

  32. hnice says:

    missed an = in there. US = pre ww2 germany.

  33. inverseliberal says:

    Dark Avenger said (and Randy Brown seemed to agree)
    I’m saying they’re a group with a clear history of violence against non-Mormons, and therefore they and their offshoots(like Ervil Baron) should be watched carefully.

    Sort of like Muslims, eh boys?

  34. hnice says:

    “Sort of like Muslims, eh boys?”

    Yes, exactly — the difference is — and try and keep up — we don’t get suspicious of Mormons, but apparently *everyone* is suspicious of Muslims. So, yes. Sort of like them, as you say, but one group is the target of nationwide protests, while the other isn’t.

    Is it just me, or is that just not that hard to follow?

  35. Indeed says:

    “Oh, nobody made me the God Squad. The pope even said, this is Pope Benedict, that it is demonic not divine when theology crosses into the line of doing that which only the divine can do. He was speaking specifically about liberation theology,” – Glenn Beck, asked by Chris Wallace about his views on Obama’s religion. Keep restoring that honor.

  36. Dennis says:

    hnice, you need to reread Dark Avenger’s post. He said Mormons need to be watched carefully. This after commenting about a Mormon bishop who was just shot and killed.

    Evidently, yes, is it just you.

  37. Dennis says:

    Evidently, yes, it is just you.

  38. hnice says:

    Sorry Dennis, you’re confused: I was responding to IL.

  39. Ol'Froth says:

    Good gravy, they really don’t understand sarcasm, do they?

  40. mambochicken23 says:

    Ol’ Froth, Dennis has some sort of high-functioning autism or something, because he really does struggle with these kinds of social interactions. Sarcasm is way too complex for him to wrap his feeble little brain around.

  41. Dennis says:

    Every once in a while, the mask slips, Ol Froth. Thank God hnice has the old ‘Oh, I was just being sarcastic.’ excuse to go to the well on when it does.

  42. mambochicken23 says:

    See, Froth? And no matter how absurdly over-the-top the sarcasm actually was, or what hnice says now, or what anyone tells Dennis, he’s sticking to his guns. Same old, same old. Dennis’s perception IS reality, and ain’t nobody gonna tell him different.

    What a egocentric hack.

  43. Ol'Froth says:

    Um, yeah, but when I read the post, I clearly saw it as sarcasm, hnice didn’t have to explain that to me.

  44. anotherbozo says:

    @doctorpsycho1960: “that crowd” would be surprised to learn that Jesus was a Jew.

  45. Dennis says:

    Gawd.

    ***Warning: Too awful to read.***

    Huffington Poster Offers $100,000 for Nonexistent Glenn Beck Sex Tape

    Welcome to modern day liberalism: if you can’t beat ‘em, smear ‘em!—Noel Sheppard

    This is who they are, Noel. This is what they do.

  46. ***Warning: Too awful to read.***

    FINALLY.

  47. Dennis says:

    This is Hitler and Goebbels and Nazi-style character assassination all over again, Pollak.

    In other words, in trying economic times, opportunistic political movements demonize the “other” and the result is often character assassination against ethnic minorities.

    Tell me, August, are we seriously so stupid and far gone that we’re going to recreate 1930s Germany?

  48. Ol'Froth says:

    Again Dennis, you (and the right) clearly do not understand sarcasm. You didn’t “get” the Brietbart reference in the piece? The writer of the article you linked to didn’t get it either.

  49. Dennis says:

    Editor’s Note: This piece was published directly to the Huffington Post by its author. It didn’t meet our editorial standards and has been removed from the site.–PuffHo

    Apparently, Huffington Post didn’t get the sarcasm, either, Ol’ Froth.

  50. THOSE DAMNED EDITORS!

  51. Dennis says:

    Guster, you’re not getting my sarcasm.

  52. hnice says:

    “Thank God hnice has the old ‘Oh, I was just being sarcastic.’ excuse to go to the well on when it does.”

    What the fuck is this piece of shit talking about? I was serious the entire time. Not my fault if no one has any fucking idea what he’s talking about.

    I’m trying to make any sense of this — if it’s about the ‘party on the lawn’ comment, I was completely serious. Go google ‘Glenn Beck Weimar’ — he thinks it’s 1930s germany. And he did get to have a big party. Which of those wasn’t I clear about, and how could I possibly have been more literal? It was a statement of fact about what you can hope to achieve if you compare America in 2010 to pre-WW2 germany. If this bothers you because you think this comparison is hysterical, I mean, what can I say?

  53. Who’s Guster? Is he Polly’s boyfriend? Do they both know Ted Rall?

  54. isms says:

    Not sure MLK would cite Elizabeth Dilling as a must read.

  55. timmy says:

    Since his assassination in 1968, he has been the single most important exemplar of civil rights and of liberalism generally in recent world history. – Conservapedia

  56. Dennis says:

    Stories You Won’t Find at Media Matters…..

    Education secretary urged his employees to attend Sharpton’s rally

    President Obama’s top education official urged government employees to attend a rally that the Rev. Al Sharpton organized to counter a larger conservative event on the Mall.

    “ED staff are invited to join Secretary Arne Duncan, the Reverend Al Sharpton, and other leaders on Saturday, Aug. 28, for the ‘Reclaim the Dream’ rally and march,” began an internal e-mail sent to more than 4,000 employees of the Department of Education on Wednesday.

    Chicago-style intimidation tactics being funded by the American taxpayer.

    This is who they are.

    This is what they do.

    “Are we seriously so stupid and far gone that we’re going to recreate 1930s Germany?”

  57. Dennis, go get your own blog.

  58. SaveFarris says:

    Shorter Oliver: IOKIYAD

  59. Shorter me: This has nothing to do with what we’re talking about, Duncan didn’t do anything wrong, and Dennis needs to go get his own blog.

  60. SaveFarris says:

    Yes, had any of Bush’s cabinet secretaries told their minions to attend a political rally of any type, Oliver would declare “nothing wrong” and let it sit without commenting at all. In other news, the sky is green.

    PS: Isn’t it about time for another update on the ObamaBoom?

  61. Ol'Froth says:

    And invitation to do something is now a requirement to do so?

  62. The Dark Avenger says:

    Yah think, SF?:

    OIG and OPR found Bush DOJ officials’ reasons for firing U.S. attorneys were “an unprecedented removal of a group of high-level Department officials.” The Offices of the Inspector General (OIG) and Professional Responsibility (OPR) conducted an investigation into the Bush administration’s firing of nine U.S. Attorneys in 2006. The report by the OIG and OPR, which explored the Bush administration’s “reasons for the removals of the U.S. Attorneys and whether they were removed for partisan political purposes,” found that the firings were “an unprecedented removal of a group of high-level Department officials.” The report concluded:

    In sum, we believe that the process used to remove the nine U.S. Attorneys in 2006 was fundamentally flawed. While Presidential appointees can be removed for any reason or for no reason, as long as it is not an illegal or improper reason, Department officials publicly justified the removals as the result of an evaluation that sought to replace underperforming U.S. Attorneys. In fact, we determined that the process implemented largely by Kyle Sampson, Chief of Staff to the Attorney General, was unsystematic and arbitrary, with little oversight by the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, or any other senior Department official. In choosing which U.S. Attorneys to remove, Sampson did not adequately consult with the Department officials most knowledgeable about their performance, or even examine formal evaluations of each U.S. Attorney’s Office, despite his representations to the contrary.

    [...]

    The Department’s removal of the U.S. Attorneys and the controversy it created severely damaged the credibility of the Department and raised doubts about the integrity of Department prosecutive decisions. We believe that this investigation, and final resolution of the issues raised in this report, can help restore confidence in the Department by fully describing the serious failures in the process used to remove the U.S. Attorneys and by providing lessons for the Department in how to avoid such failures in the future.

    The report also expressed concerns that the offices “were not able to fully investigate” the “most serious allegation” that the removal of David Iglesias, the U.S. Attorney for New Mexico, occurred in order “to influence voter fraud and public corruption prosecutions” due to the unwillingness of many Bush administration officials to testify, including “Karl Rove, Harriet Miers, and William Kelley.”

    Link

    The latest evidence of this practice comes from former Surgeon General Richard H. Carmona who testified before a Congressional Committee that the Administration fiddled with public health reports because of political considerations:

    Former Surgeon General Richard H. Carmona told a Congressional committee today that top officials in the Bush administration repeatedly tried to weaken or suppress important public health reports because of political considerations.

    Dr. Carmona, who served as surgeon general from 2002 to 2006, said White House officials would not allow him to speak or issue reports about stem cells, emergency contraception, sex education, or prison, mental and global health issues because of political concerns. Top administration officials delayed for years and attempted to “water down” a landmark report on secondhand tobacco smoke, he said in sworn testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

    He was ordered to mention President Bush three times on every page of every speech he gave, Dr. Carmona said. He was asked to make speeches to support Republican political candidates and to attend political briefings, at least one of which included Karl Rove, the president’s senior political adviser, he said.

    Just because the Surgeon General is nominally a political appointment in that the post is filled by someone nominated by the President doesn’t mean that the job itself should be politicized. And to believe that reports and studies that would have an immediate impact on the health of American citizens should be held hostage to some myopic political views promoted by the White House is outrageous.

  63. timmy says:

    What happens when Obama wants to cut taxes for small businesses? That’s right, republican obstructionism – they don’t even believe in their own ideology:
    http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/47768/20100831/obama-urges-republicans-to-drop-the-blockade-on-jobs-bill.htm

    P.S. MLKs March for Jobs and Freedom demanded a minimum wage increase. Odd, the Mall looks much fuller than for Beck’s rally.

  64. Chicago-style intimidation tactics being funded by the American taxpayer.

    An e-mail saying that the education secretary is going to be somewhere, and employees are invited to attend, is “intimidation” in Chicago? Wow.

    That’s really pretty pathetically weak. Do you have an opinion on why you grab such weak stuff and try to make them out to be meaningful?