Delivering

12:21 am EST March 22nd, 2010 | History, Politics | 81 Comments


President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, and senior staff, react in the Roosevelt Room of the White House, as the House passes the health care reform bill, March 21, 2010.

I’ve often noted that the Republican party plays a cynical game with their religious right base. They tell them about what they’d do to stop gay marriage, abortion, and the like and then when Republican majorities are elected the most they do is chip at the margins of these issues because they know how far out of the mainstream those absolutist positions are.

I’ve also said that the Democrats risk ruin if they were elected into power without enacting health care reform, because the base of the party has demanded it so strongly.

Done.

Topic: ,

Related Posts

«
»

81 Responses to “Delivering”

  1. jr says:

    “Why do you dispute the wisdom of Sean Hannity?”-Doug Schoen and Pat Caddell

  2. hanuman38 says:

    Delivering? Not yet… not by a long shot. This is *not* reform. Add a public option and repeal the antitrust exemption, and it *might* kinda sorta almost be reform.

    Weak performance by a President, and a Congress, that are determined to serve their corporate masters rather than the folks who elected them.

  3. fafaroo says:

    Today millions more Americans will have access to health care.

    What a betrayal.

  4. Marco says:

    Congrats to all Americans today. The President, Speaker of the House and the Democratic House moved the country forward.

  5. mike in dc says:

    For all the talk about it falling short of “real reform”, John Dingell seemed pretty happy about the passage of the bill. Maybe he has a better “long view” perspective on this than others do?

  6. Moses2317 says:

    Thank you, President Obama, Speaker Pelosi, and the House and Senate Democratic leadership for taking an historic first step toward fixing our broken health care system. As the spouse of a young adult cancer patient, I am especially grateful that my family, and millions of other Americans, will not have to worry about being denied coverage due to a pre-existing health condition.

    And, thank you Senator Ted Kennedy for passionately fighting for health care reform over your entire career. This victory could not have been achieved without your decades of tireless advocacy.

  7. Wilbur says:

    Holy cow, I can’t believe he said that.

  8. fafaroo says:

    Wow. Wtf.

  9. Repack Rider says:

    This is good news for the McCain campaign.

  10. Wilbur says:

    All we’ve done is secure the Normandy beaches. We still have to fight the battle of the bulge and capture the Remagen bridge.

  11. Jen7 says:

    Are you sure that’s his real twitter account?? I found another one that was different, under GOPLeader.

  12. Jen7 says:

    That is not his real twitter.

  13. Wilbur says:

    Snort! I thought it was too good to be true.

  14. Todd says:

    Not that I doubt he’d say it for real but that’s not his Twitter account.

    The actual one is: http://twitter.com/Gopleader

    Still. Love that it’s passed! Hopefully it’s just the first step towards getting a single payer system like the rest of the modern world!

  15. icruise says:

    Of course it’s not his real account. Read some of the other tweets.

  16. Todd says:

    (Blah, everyone is faster at typing then me ><)

  17. Wilbur says:

    Of course his real twitter feed turns out to be worse if anything. It’s just an endless litany of ridiculous republican lies about the health care bill: “government takeover” “federal funding of abortions”, etc. I’m sure if I scroll down far enough I’d find “death panels”.

    What an enormous stinking pile of clown shit that guy is.

  18. Marco says:

    All of his bullshit and he still failed. Poor Orange Julius.

  19. mike in dc says:

    By the way, I think the new definition of “Purity Troll behavior” should be “threatening to primary Dennis Kucinich for ‘selling out’.”

  20. Parthenon says:

    Oh, I am not missing Limbaugh tomorrow.

  21. mike in dc says:

    …although “calling Bart Stupak a ‘baby-killer’” would be a good alternate definition from the other end…

  22. Sean D. Martin says:

    Not going to be able to tune in. Let us know if he says exactly when he’s going to be moving out of the country.

  23. SaveFarris says:

    TodayIn 2014, millions more Americans will have access to health care.

    /fixed

  24. bryan says:

    welcome to the 20th century, US healthcare.

  25. Phil says:

    In 5 years US Healthcare will be like late 20th Century Cuba.

    Fake numbers to the UN and your very own cockroach on the operating table.

  26. Jaim says:

    Health-care isn’t so bad in Cuba. You could have picked a much worse country for your tired, helpless rage.

    But your tears are sweet and delicious. More of them, please!

  27. durablend says:

    You bought your plane ticket out yet?

  28. PTCruiser says:

    @hanuman -

    I’m with you. This bill is far better than nothing but I’m not going to give Obama and the Democrat’s Congressional leaders a lot of points. Pleased? Yes. Grateful? Nope.

  29. Indeed says:

    I’m not missing the Daily Show! (They’d better not be on vacation. Not after the Teabagger epithets and Respected Elder Statesman and Historian Newt Gingrich claiming that passing the Civil Rights Act was a really stupid thing to do. And other stuff.)

  30. Well .. it seemed real enough. That’s some awfully good snark then. Besides, Strom does have his fans(see Trent Lott for starters).

  31. Luv says:

    Relly? You can’t believe that John Boehner is a racist?

    And here’s what’s funny: he doesn’t think anyone knows what he’s REALLY saying with that tweet.

    That’s how stupid racists are. They think if they aren’t saying “niggerspickikechinkcameljockey” that they didn’t say anything “racist”.

    What an asshole.

  32. Luv says:

    Gah! Wasn’t his real account!

  33. prodigal says:

    Whether today or in 2014, SaveFerris, it’s still millions more than would have been the case if the GOP had its way.

  34. Dr. Psycho says:

    Just what I’ve been thinking — USAn health care has finally entered the 20th Century.

    Alternatively, we finally have Third World health care, instead of the nightmare dystopian health care system we used to have.

    Maybe one day we will enter the 21st Century and/or the First World.

  35. Fred says:

    It Is GREAT news for McCain!

  36. Marco says:

    Cuba is ranked 39th by the W.H.O. Little did I know being 2 steps below us = roaches on the tables.

    What do we have? Lice? Bedbugs? Poltergeists?

  37. Leota2 says:

    Corporate masters, huh? Maybe. But that’s too easy.

    A public option–I wanted that.
    But I also live in this country where a completely effed up group of Americans think
    this president is going to eat their kids. Maybe all those Dems that voted no,
    Repubs that voted no and screwed up the works and all the high pitched whining from
    all sides got us what we got. Perfect–not even close. Comprehensive–not even close.

    But I won’t be crying now that my diabetic brother can finally get insurance.
    I guess it’s the little things . . . . .

  38. liberalrob says:

    Delivering…to the wrong address.

    Greenwald:

    But that’s exactly how he ended up negotiating this bill — using the exact secret processes that he railed against and which he swore he would banish. It was only because The Huffington Post’s Ryan Grim uncovered the secret memo-deal the White House had entered into with PhRMA — a deal they had publicly denied until then and until PhRMA demanded they publicly affirm it — did we know that the administration had agreed to oppose drug re-importation and bulk price negotiations, measures Obama (and the Democrats generally) repeatedly promised to enact. Indeed, when it came time to vote on drug re-importation, the administration concocted false “safety concerns” about re-importation in order to whip against Byron Dorgan’s re-importation amendment, rather than admit that they really opposed it because they secretly promised they would to PhRMA, which hates drug re-importation because it lowers prices. And it was only two days ago that we finally had confirmed what (at least to me) was obvious all along: namely, the White House had agreed in secret with health care industry representatives that there would be no public option in a final bill, even as the President publicly feigned support for it and pretended to be fighting for it.

    In other words, this bill was negotiated using the standard, secret, sleazy Beltway lobbyist/industry practices that candidate Obama frequently condemned and vowed to defeat. And these industries extracted such huge benefits as a result of these secret deals — a bill shaped to their liking and profit objectives — that they are essentially in favor of it.

    Emphasis mine. Congratulations, we’ve handed the health insurance industry change they can believe in. How progressive.

  39. liberalrob says:

    We haven’t even done that. If you’re looking for a WWII analogy, this is more like the Dieppe raid. Begun full of hope and promise, the “second front” opened at last…

  40. liberalrob says:

    Access != Care.

    Let’s just see what this “access” results in. The devil is in the details, as usual.

  41. Quaker in a Basement says:

    Setting aside my judgment of the bill itself, I’m hugely pleased that Mr. Obama withstood the oceans of b.s. the GOP threw his way over the course of the last year.

    Wingnut tears is so yummy!

  42. Buzz Killington says:

    Wow, just wow… those of you that didn’t immediately realize that was a fake twitter account truly believe the very worst things you throw out in comments about the “other side”. I assumed you were just doing the usual hyperbole-as-political-discussion thing.

    That’s horrifying.

  43. Quaker in a Basement says:

    What do we have? Lice? Bedbugs? Poltergeists?

    Worse. Insurance underwriters.

  44. Quaker in a Basement says:

    DEMS DON’T HAVE THE VOTES!!!

  45. anotherbozo says:

    from Wikipedia:
    “Social Security was controversial when originally proposed, with one point of opposition being that it would cause a loss of jobs. However, proponents argued that there was in fact an advantage: it would encourage older workers to retire, thereby creating opportunities for younger people to find jobs, which would lower the unemployment rate. While most economists attribute the recession of 1937 and 1938 to other causes, historian Edward Berkowitz subsequently contended that the Act was a cause of the “Roosevelt Recession.”

    Most women and minorities were excluded from the benefits of unemployment insurance and old age pensions. Employment definitions reflected typical white male categories and patterns.[11] Job categories that were not covered by the act included workers in agricultural labor, domestic service, government employees, and many teachers, nurses, hospital employees, librarians, and social workers.[12] The act also denied coverage to individuals who worked intermittently.[13] These jobs were dominated by women and minorities. For example, women made up 90% of domestic labor in 1940 and two-thirds of all employed black women were in domestic service.[14] Exclusions exempted nearly half the working population.[13] Nearly two-thirds of all African Americans in the labor force, 70 to 80% in some areas in the South, and just over half of all women employed were not covered by Social Security.[15][16] At the time, the NAACP protested the Social Security Act, describing it as “a sieve with holes just big enough for the majority of Negroes to fall through.”

    Of course you’re right, liberalrob, but on the upside, Social Security legislation was pretty awful in its first version, too, but was eventually improved. View this as a first step–we’ve taken the beach at Normandy but the rest of the war is yet to be won, as somebody (here?) said.

  46. fafaroo says:

    Oh please.

  47. Can it be too long before we have Cuba’s GDP and Britain’s medical expertise?

  48. Wilbur says:

    As I said, Buzz, the truth is even worse.

  49. I am already on Medicaid. My ex-wife, who is disabled, has been on Medicare for over 20 years.

    I have seen the future and for the previously uninsured 30 million – it sucks !

  50. mambochicken23 says:

    You fucking socialist, living off the government teat! Reprehensible!

  51. fafaroo says:

    Frank, if you hate Medicaid, why don’t you get off it and buy private insurance?

  52. durablend says:

    Exactly! Why are you leeching off my tax money?

  53. Wilbur says:

    Doctors cut off the wrong ball? Are you under the illusion that things like that never happen here?

  54. AwkwardSilence says:

    I’ll see your nut and raise you a kidney

    Also, if it wasn’t for Medicare/Medicaid, where do you think you and your wife would receive health insurance? I’m going to go out on a limb and say that private insurers aren’t exactly beating down your door to offer you affordable rates…

  55. Parthenon says:

    Let us know if he says exactly when he’s going to be moving out of the country.

    Not a word so far. Some pretty epic whining, though, and some ‘we’ll fight on in the state governments’ stuff.

  56. canadian bacon says:

    This is good news for Canadians because now Sarah Palin doesnt have to sneak into Canada when she needs healthcare!

  57. Parthenon says:

    Fantasy author George R.R. Martin (of ‘A Song of Ice and Fire’) knocked it out of the park on facebook last night.

  58. jrfunkenstein says:

    As opposed to the Republican plan which was to continue to do nothing and rake in the insurance lobbyist monies.

    So more Americans will have health care, insurance companies will be forced to abandon some nefarious practices and the bill will help to reduce the outrageous deficits run up by an 8 year exercise in needless wars and fiscal mismanagement.

    Who does this Obama guy think he is? A leader?

  59. jrfunkenstein says:

    As opposed to the Republican plan which was to continue to do nothing and rake in the insurance lobbyist monies?

    So more Americans will have health care, insurance companies will be forced to abandon some nefarious practices and the bill will help to reduce the outrageous deficits run up by an 8 year exercise in needless wars and fiscal mismanagement.

    Who does this Obama guy think he is? A leader?

  60. Duros62 says:

    TFJ, Quaker. I’m with you.

  61. Felix Helix says:

    And I’d like to say that I couldn’t believe it, either, but I’m afraid I could. And did. And posted it on Facebook. And then went and read the rest of the posts.

    I got punk’d.

  62. durablend says:

    Question for the peanut gallery….have you guys checked on grandma today? Y’know those death panels are now in full effect!

    Maybe she’s at the neighborhood FEMA camp…better look in on her.

    Just a friendly PSA :)

  63. Marco says:

    Sorry I am aborting my gay baby today on your dime.

  64. The fact that you think it’s funny speaks volumes about your attitude. You didn’t just beat “Tech’s” Debating Club; you are celebrating the birth of an expensive, cumbersome, inefficient health care system which does not bode well for the future of this nation. But your faith in the government is unlimited. You ignore the facts: The projected costs of Medicare and Medicaid when they passed have been exceeded tenfold. I’ll bet not one of you even KNOWS someone on Medicaid or Medicare, and if you do, you have no idea what they go through, or you wouldn’t be so overjoyed.

    People are already caught in bewildering paperwork errors. States are already having trouble paying for Medicaid. Do any of you have any real idea of what you are celebrating?

    A victory for Big Pharma ; a victory for big hospitals; a victory for the AMA — and , as usual, the average guy gets a Federal suppository.

  65. Parthenon says:

    Card-carrying Dickensian caricature Sean Hannity just whined that there’s money in the bill for hospitals for poor people in Tennessee. Aren’t rural Tennesseeans generally real ‘murikans?

  66. fafaroo says:

    The projected costs of Medicare and Medicaid when they passed have been exceeded tenfold.

    Frank, you just told us that you’re on Medicaid. Do you not feel any personal responsibility for this cost? Granted, your individual demands on the system are sub-sub-miniscule as a percentage of overall costs, but you’re still benefiting from a system that you’re now whining costs too much.

    If you have gripes with paperwork, I can understand that, but if you hate it so much, why aren’t you on a private insurance plan?

  67. Paul_D says:

    I’ll bet not one of you even KNOWS someone on Medicaid or Medicare, and if you do, you have no idea what they go through, or you wouldn’t be so overjoyed.

    Actually, I do. My mother had to have her entire aorta rebuilt or risk a rupture.
    Her condition had deteriorated to the point where the surgery required her entire left side opened up to the tune of 160 stiches and 8 hours of cardiac surgery. It took her over a month in the hospital to recover.

    Since my mom was retired and had no private insurance, we anticipated a bill that would likely result in a mortgage on her home that had long since been paid up.
    Then the bill came; $0.00 -paid in full through Medicare / Medicaid.
    Is there paperwork involved? You bet, and there are still out-of-pocket expenses for prescriptions but my mother is very much alive and she won’t have to mortgage her home.

    So yes, I do know someone on Medicaid / Medicare and have a very good idea what she and us went through, fuck you very much.

  68. Dave in SoCal says:

    Democrats to America: Drop Dead

    As Congress was debating, and ultimately passing, the health care reform bill, CNN was conducting a poll that has some very interesting results:

    20. As you may know, the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate are trying to pass final legislation that would make major changes in the country’s health care system. Based on what you
    have read or heard about that legislation, do you generally favor it or generally oppose it?

    Mar 19-21 2010

    Favor 39%
    Oppose 59%
    No opinion 2%

    21. (IF OPPOSE) Do you oppose that legislation because you think its approach toward health care is too liberal, or because you think it is not liberal enough?

    QUESTIONS 20 AND 21 COMBINED

    Mar 19-21 2010

    Favor (from Question 20) 39%
    Oppose, too liberal 43%
    Oppose, not liberal enough 13%
    No opinion 5%

    Enjoy the moment. In 224 days we’ll find out whether people prefer the “Party of No” or the “The Party of ObamaCare”.

  69. Burn says:

    Waaaaaaa! Waaaaaaaaaa! Oh, did you say something? All I could hear was shrieking and wailing from a bunch of babies who got their little asses kicked last night, and they haven’t stopped crying since. Do let me know when the bitter tears stop flowing, mmmkay sweetie? Do you need Auntie Sarah to tell you a wittle bedtime story to make the scawy thoughts go away, mmm?

    Until then, you can go find a nice insane wingnut blog to talk about armed insurrection, that will make baby happy, right?

  70. N. Muntz says:

    Wow, that’s horrible! The chutzpah of democratically elected representatives and a presidential administration to openly thumb their noses at focus groups and polls! It’s fucking Hitlerian, it is!

    Oh, wait,

    Based on what you have read or heard about that legislation, do you generally favor it or generally oppose it?

    Ah, “based on what your have read or heard.” So Teh American Peoples still reject Death Panels and FEMA Internment Camps and Teh Muslin Kenyan Dicktater Nobama. Well, then. And They just oppose it because it’s too dadgum liberal. Obviously. No need to get any more specific than that! That says it all! Thanks Dave in SoCal for the insights. Wow, Newt Gingrich is correct per usual. This is worse than that awful Civil Rights Bill back in Teh Sixties. Fucking hippies!

  71. fafaroo says:

    Dave, you should probably take into account that from here until November people are more likely to be “reading and hearing” about what’s actually in the bill and how it will actually effect them.

    When I picked up the LA Times this morning it had just such an article, detailing exactly how this bill will impact people at various income levels and in various insurance situations. Why they didn’t run such an article months ago, I have no idea, but they were too busy running he said/she said pieces.

    Steve Benen sums it up nicely:

    For months, the coverage of this issue was dominated by ridiculous demagoguery. It was followed by excessive scrutiny of legislative procedure, horse-trading, arm-twisting, and vote-counting. Is this the kind of coverage that’s likely to generate public support for the underlying effort? Not so much.

    But that’s changing — because it has to. Americans’ interest in self-executing rules was dubious last week, but it’s non-existent now. Reconciliation, cloture votes, motions to recommit — they all lose their salience the moment the process wraps up.

    The result is coverage like this and this, which show what health care reform will do for people, instead of how it will get passed.

    http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_03/022996.php

    Go check the links Benen highlights. He includes the LA Times piece I woke up to this morning.

    It will be a lot harder for conservatives to scream “Death panels” and “socialism” now that journalists have finally gotten around to reporting what’s actually in the bill.

    I imagine there will always be the 20 percenters who will never trust the hated MSM and insist that this bill will kill grandma but the window for further right wing bullshit slinging is rapidly closing.

    So good luck with that “Remember in November” campaign.

  72. timmy says:

    I haven’t read the bill. But I know it contains death panels, babykillers, republicankillers, socialism, reparations, government takeovers, you lies and legislation that makes Obama a legal citizen.

    I know this because I only watch America’s Most Trusted News Source – what with the communist MSM having been taken over by George Soros’ and his Saul Alinsky Mind Control Techniques.

    Satan laughing, spreads his wings. Oh lord yeah! Da da. Da Da Da, Da!

  73. Enlightened Liberal says:

    I thought Cons didn’t pay attention to polls. Apparently that changed 1/21/2009. I figure polls in 1964 were against Civil Rights Legislation also. Good thing liberals didn’t listen to those polls, huh Davey?

  74. Enlightened Liberal says:

    Not if they are poor. Poor people are NEVER real Americans, no matter how white they are.

  75. Enlightened Liberal says:

    Frank is alive because of socialized medicine. Frank, btw You’re welcome.

  76. mambochicken23 says:

    Hey Dave, what do you think the odds are of the 13% of people who think that this bill isn’t “liberal enough” are going to vote for the Republicans in November?

    By my count, 52% favor the bill or think it’s not liberal enough, and 43% oppose it and think it’s too liberal.

    Suck it.

  77. Indeed says:

    Yeah, as a relatively liberal guy why grossly dislikes the modern Republican party and their suckass policies, I sincerely hope that Republicans run on “Repeal HCR”. Go for it, dildos!