Oliver Willis: Like Kryptonite To Stupid

Home »

Insurance Company Targeted HIV Positive Patients To Drop Their Coverage

2:43 pm EST March 17th, 2010 | News | 15 Comments

This is who Republicans and conservative Democrats are giving cover to.

Previously undisclosed records from Mitchell’s case reveal that Fortis had a company policy of targeting policyholders with HIV. A computer program and algorithm targeted every policyholder recently diagnosed with HIV for an automatic fraud investigation, as the company searched for any pretext to revoke their policy. As was the case with Mitchell, their insurance policies often were canceled on erroneous information, the flimsiest of evidence, or for no good reason at all, according to the court documents and interviews with state and federal investigators.

The revelations come at a time when President Barack Obama, in his frantic push to rescue the administration’s health care plan, has stepped up his criticism of insurers. The U.S. House of Representatives is expected to vote later this week on an overhaul of the health system, which Obama has said is essential to do away controversial and unpopular industry practices.

Insurance companies have long engaged in the practice of ‘rescission,’ whereby they investigate policyholders shortly after they’ve been diagnosed with life-threatening illnesses. But government regulators and investigators who have overseen the actions of Assurant and other health insurance companies say it is unprecedented for a company to single out people with HIV.

Topic: ,

Related Posts

«
»

 

15 Responses to “Insurance Company Targeted HIV Positive Patients To Drop Their Coverage”

  1. durablend says:

    “Bah let em go to the emergency room or get a job or something….” -cons

  2. jr says:

    “HIV patients have to die so we can have liberty”-Ron Paul

  3. El Cid says:

    Shame on the liberals for using their big government intimidation to force an innocent company to destroy all their records of denying care coverage to one of their customers.

  4. MrGreyGhost says:

    Yeah, reminds me of what those “EVIL!” Repubs and conservative Dems are doing to “poor” taxpaying citizens like Natoma Canfield….OH WAIT!

  5. SaveFarris says:

    … and got their as*es sued, costing them a $10 million verdict, innumerated trial fees, and a crippling legal precedent.

    You left off that part. Wonder why?

  6. El Cid says:

    Exactly! This chemo-queen’s story is totally bunk because various people said she may qualify for various aid programs! What a preening, leukemia-rich bitch!

  7. Jody says:

    Because it was irrelevant to the fact that THE COMPANY DENIED HEALTH CARE TO HIV POSITIVE PATIENTS, you paint drinking idiot.

  8. fafaroo says:

    This is so classic.

    Out of one side of the conservative mouth we hear: “The customer sued the company and won. The system worked but the liberals want to destroy it!”

    Out of the other side we hear: “The key to the health care crisis is limiting patient’s ability to sue their insurer and/or doctor through tort reform but the liberals won’t listen.”

    Awesome.

  9. Repack Rider says:

    Fafaroo FTW.

    Bueller?

  10. Michael Over Here says:

    What are the chances that SaveFarris doesn’t come back to this thread to respond to fafaroo’s full-of-win dissection of his argument?

  11. David says:

    They also try to drop women who they think might be trying to become pregnant. They comb their records looking for women who stop taking birth control pills.

  12. Quaker in a Basement says:

    TFJ!!

  13. Quaker in a Basement says:

    Mr. GG, did you actually read the article you linked?

    I recommend Mr. GG’s link to all. It is Ferristacular!

  14. Lonya says:

    Additionally, Fafaroo, if I read the article correctly, it appears the company made $150 million in profit (or savings) during a 5-year period. Even with a $10 million verdict they are still up $140 million and therein lies the crux of the matter.

    Some insurers, like some product manufacturers, will make this a part of their cost-benefit analysis. The conscious decision that the ocassional law suit will cost less than fixing a faulty design flaw. No difference in concept here. Engage in an unlawful policy and bank on the fact that if discovered the liability will be less than the savings. The fact that people die as a result of this is besides the point.

    BTW – rescission has its place in insurance but obviously, as practiced here, it is unlawful and violates the insurer’s good faith obligation to insure its policy holders.

  15. Duros62 says:

    Out of one side of the conservative mouth we hear:

    Um….because SHUT UP THAT’S WHY!

    /con

 

Contact
Email: owillis@gmail.com
Twitter: @owillis
Facebook
Flickr
AIM: oliverwill
Google Reader Shared Items
Huffington Post Columns
Media Matters Blog Entries

Must Reads
Why Didn’t Obama’s DOJ Go After The New Black Panther Party For Voter Intimidation?
History: Democrats & Republicans On Civil Rights & Equality

Latest Entries
Glenn Beck, 1962
Megan McCardle’s Review Of Half Of A Book Doesn’t Get It Half Right
Why Did The Bush-Era Pentagon Ignore Child Porn Purchases By Defense Dept. Employees?
PBS: God In America
NASA: Actually, Viking DID Find Organic Material On Mars
VIDEO: Epic David Vitter Prostitution Documentary Vid
Did Chris Christie Lie About What He Knew When He Attacked Obama? Sounds Like It
VIDEO: Jan Brewer’s Debate Fail
Overwhelming Majority Still Blame Bush For Economic Problems
AUDIO: Tea Party Senate Candidate Christine O’Donnell Has Epic Radio Fail

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

    Breaking News
    Timothy Wayne Hammerstone: Disney Worker Arrested For Child Porn On Xbox
    Clay Sannar: Mormon Bishop Shot & Killed
    Shooting Spree In Slovakia Capital Kills Six
    Lindsay Lohan Stopped By Cops In LA
    Yvonne Strahovski at 8th Annual BAFTA/LA TV Tea Party
    Possible E. Coli Beef Recalled From BJ’s Wholesale
    VIDEO: Britney Spears “Radiance” Commercial
    Ryan Reynolds, Bradley Cooper To Star In Action Comedy
    Rumor: Cisco Offers To Buy Skype
    Retargeting: Web Ads Stalk Users

    Coverage
    President Obama 2008 Election John McCain Humor Iraq George W. Bush Health Care Economy NFL Links Fox News Hillary Clinton Race Sarah Palin Redskins Newsweek Tea Party 2006 Election Racism Oliver's World Michael Steele Maryland History Religious Right Conservative Superman Crime Liberals Women Mitt Romney Glenn Beck Democratic Senate Immigration Liberal Media Black Conservatives Weird Twitter Rudy Giuliani Global Warming Abortion Dick Cheney Fred Thompson Foreign Policy Religion Supreme Court

    Disclaimer
    The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

    Blogroll

  • Atrios
  • Balloon Juice
  • Barack Obama
  • Blog Report
  • Bob Cesca
  • Bob Geiger
  • Breaking News USA
  • Bring It On
  • Carpetbagger Report
  • Comments From Left Field
  • Coyote Gulch
  • Crooks & Liars
  • CSM Vote Blog
  • Culturekitchen
  • Deltoid
  • Digby
  • Down With Tyranny
  • Ed Cone
  • Ezra Klein
  • First Draft
  • Frank Chow
  • George Kelly
  • Hughes For America
  • Instaputz
  • Jack & Jill Politics
  • James Wolcott
  • Jamison Foser
  • Jed Report
  • Jon Swift
  • Juan Cole
  • Liberal Oasis
  • Lincoln Nebraska Flag Football
  • Matt Osborne
  • Memeorandum
  • MyDD
  • NewsAmericaNow
  • Odd Time Signatures
  • Omaha Nebraska Flag Football
  • Orcinus
  • Pam Spaulding
  • Paulette Lowe-Willis
  • Peek @ Alternet
  • Pharyngula
  • Philip Barron
  • Political Carnival
  • Prometheus 6
  • Q and O
  • Right To Bear Arms
  • Seeing The Forest
  • Shoq Value
  • Shoq Value
  • Some Guy With A Website
  • supergee
  • Talking Points Memo
  • Tapped
  • TBogg
  • The Poor Man
  • The Ruckus
  • The World According To… Me
  • Think Progress
  • This Modern World
  • txvoodoo
  • United States Of Jamerica
  • UseMyComputer
  • Voxefx
  • Whiskey Fire
  • William K. Wolfrum
  • Zaius Nation