Baby Dictator
Tweet
In retrospect, probably not the best idea to dress up your infant as Hitler, Stalin, and Pinochet among others.
5 Responses to “Baby Dictator”
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
What Time Is Super Bowl 2012 (Super Bowl XLVI)?
Republican Senate Candidate To Run Racist Ad During Super Bowl
Latest Entries
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
C.K.: November 22, 1999 – January 7, 2012
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

Your point well taken. In a way it could be a depiction of the infantile psychological makeup that is deep with the ego self of the “evil” person/dictator in question. These people have not shall we say developed past the narcissism of an infant; a metaphor for the emotional impotent human being perhaps? The evil never evolving from outside of the self, ect., ect. ect., all that Psych 101 stuff.
That said… the Stalin baby is too funny.
I think it would be a brilliant juxtaposition of evil and innocence that challenges our preconceived notions of those abstract concepts, except for one thing.
It’s a baby. An actual human being. Who is too young to comprehend what’s being done to her, let alone consent to it.
I think the real theme of this exhibition is “How Attention-Seeking Parents Use Their Kids As Tools.”
I prefer the jihadis dressing their children up as suicide bombers. It’s much more of socio-political statement than some bourgeois house wife with a digital camera and a sewing machine looking to make a name for herself.
From The Onion, 2001: Anne Geddes Starting To Lose It
Yeah, but notice that while that Onion-article is nine years old, the baby girl is now eleven years old.