Unemployment Drops To 10%

11:00 am EST December 4th, 2009 | News | 18 Comments

Link

The U.S. unemployment rate unexpectedly fell to 10 percent in November as employers cut the smallest number of jobs since the recession began. The better-than-expected job figures are a rare note of encouraging news for the labor market.

White House: On the Employment Situation in November

Payroll employment declined 11,000 in November. This is a dramatic improvement from the decline of 597,000 in November 2008 and 741,000 in January 2009. It is by far the closest we have been to stable employment since the recession began almost two years ago. Furthermore, the employment loss in both September and October was revised down substantially, with the result that employment as of October is nearly 160,000 higher than was reported last month. As was true in October, the largest employment gains in November were in temporary help services, which is often a leading indicator of labor demand. 21,000 jobs were also added in state and local public education. Both the work week and aggregate hours increased, another early sign of labor market healing.

>> Oil back above $77 on encouraging US jobs report

Topic:

Related Posts

«
»

18 Responses to “Unemployment Drops To 10%”

  1. tim says:

    Finally, George Bush’s tax breaks are starting to turn this economy around!

  2. Joe Anonymous says:

    Funny, I was just thinking that the “stimulus” that was supposed to keep unemployment below 8% was finally doing some good.

  3. Indeed says:

    Hey, sorry the jobs report contained less unemployment than expected. I’m sure you’re taking it hard. Why don’t you knock off early, grab a pint of fudge ripple, curl up with Mr. Fuzzypants, and watch last nite’s Hannity. Again.

  4. durablend says:

    This is no doubt excellent news for John McCain!

  5. Good news for America = bad news for the right.

  6. Joe Anonymous says:

    And without the Democrats spending over $100,000 per new job that pays about a quarter of that, who the hell knows where unemployment would be? Why, it might be as bad as nine percent!

    Too bad the best of those jobs are in fictional Congressional districts…

  7. Indeed says:

    The opposite is also true. See 11, comma, 9.

  8. SaveFarris says:

    The unemployment rate also dropped because fewer people are looking for work. The size of the labor force, which includes the employed and those actively searching for jobs, fell by nearly 100,000, the third straight decline. That indicates more of the unemployed are giving up on looking for work.

    Bravo to Oliver. Not everyone would have the guts to post this obvious bit of horrendous news and try to pass it off as another “turned corner” when it comes to the economy.

  9. Chris K. says:

    Oliver WillisBravo to Oliver. Not everyone would have the guts to post this obvious bit of horrendous news and try to pass it off as another “turned corner” when it comes to the economy.

    Figuring out how to get bad news out of every story.

    Priceless.

    Some things money cannot buy. For everything else, there’s modern Republicans.

  10. Rheinhard says:

    I wonder if any of our wingnut friends are familiar with the concept of the second derivative? Or possibly, that they are but pretend not to be because it would contradict the Rush Limbaugh talking points?

  11. Chris K. says:

    I am increasingly curious as to how they will handle job growth.

  12. SaveFarris says:

    We’ll do the exact same thing we did in 1995: credit the incoming Republican Congressional Majority.

  13. william says:

    Since we are still losing jobs, where exactly do you see jobs coming from?

    Who is going to start hiring with the uncertainties of health care, cap & trade, and tax increases looming?

  14. Quaker in a Basement says:

    Shorter wingnuts: “NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!”

  15. Rheinhard says:

    Thank you, william, for demonstrating my point at the top of this thread so perfectly.

  16. Chris K. says:

    HaHaHa…

    Therein lies your denial of reality. So the incoming Congress gets to take credit for the prior Congresses work?

    And only when the economy is improving?

    Otherwise it’s Obama’s fault, right?

    Just making sure I get the shitty logic straight.

  17. timmy says:

    With McCain/Palin, unemployment would be half that, the DJIA double, bin Laden dead, and a moose head would be in every pot. I know this because Jesus has given me magical superpowers. And liberals cannot ever have these powers.

  18. Amused Observer says:

    If you are going to respond to every little blip on the economic radar screen as a significant sign of improvement or decline your neck is going to get pretty sore from the constant whiplash. Ollie is parroting the propaganda coming out of the Whitehouse. It doesn’t mean a thing one way or another, except that politicians are detached from economic reality and lie to us on an almost continuous basis but we already knew that.