<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Faggot&#8221; Is New Conservative Way To Argue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: AwkwardSilence</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192348</link>
		<dc:creator>AwkwardSilence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192348</guid>
		<description>Translation: I will add a completely irrelevant tangent to my initial ridiculous comment, just so I can take a swipe at some anonymous liberal strawmen and create the illusion of equivalence with this idiot I really shouldn&#039;t be defending in the first place.  

Also, &quot;Chimpy&quot; is as bad as &quot;faggot&quot;?  &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Really&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;???

You need to recalibrate your insults.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Translation: I will add a completely irrelevant tangent to my initial ridiculous comment, just so I can take a swipe at some anonymous liberal strawmen and create the illusion of equivalence with this idiot I really shouldn&#8217;t be defending in the first place.  </p>
<p>Also, &#8220;Chimpy&#8221; is as bad as &#8220;faggot&#8221;?  <i><b>Really</b></i>???</p>
<p>You need to recalibrate your insults.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192315</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192315</guid>
		<description>No, that&#039;s not the issue, Frank.  This isn&#039;t just &quot;someone,&quot; this is the co-chair of an organization representing a very prominent and vocal political and ideological movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, that&#8217;s not the issue, Frank.  This isn&#8217;t just &#8220;someone,&#8221; this is the co-chair of an organization representing a very prominent and vocal political and ideological movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192308</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192308</guid>
		<description>I should add here that if the issue were simply that someone had said something that offended a former President, then surely crapstain, chimpy and Bushitler are as bad as &quot;faggot&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should add here that if the issue were simply that someone had said something that offended a former President, then surely crapstain, chimpy and Bushitler are as bad as &#8220;faggot&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192306</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192306</guid>
		<description>Because I didn&#039;t think of the word as being meant to offend gays; I wanted to make that distinction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because I didn&#8217;t think of the word as being meant to offend gays; I wanted to make that distinction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192296</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192296</guid>
		<description>Yes it is Mr. Rotter

If you believe that, then why did you imply that its usage by Williams against former President Carter isn&#039;t a big deal as long as the former wasn&#039;t using it against the latter as an insulting term for a gay man (Do any of you think that he was perjoratively referring to former Pres Carter as a homosexual?)? What&#039;s the point of raising this question if you agree with me that &quot;faggot&quot; is ALWAYS a crude word to use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it is Mr. Rotter</p>
<p>If you believe that, then why did you imply that its usage by Williams against former President Carter isn&#8217;t a big deal as long as the former wasn&#8217;t using it against the latter as an insulting term for a gay man (Do any of you think that he was perjoratively referring to former Pres Carter as a homosexual?)? What&#8217;s the point of raising this question if you agree with me that &#8220;faggot&#8221; is ALWAYS a crude word to use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192279</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192279</guid>
		<description>Yes it is Mr Rotter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it is Mr Rotter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192238</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192238</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a crude insult, Frank, in whatever context it&#039;s used in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a crude insult, Frank, in whatever context it&#8217;s used in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192232</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192232</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;When I was growing up , we called wimps and Mama’s boys “faggots” and we didn’t know what a homosexual was.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, ignoring Awkward&#039;s point that you obviously knew, I honestly can&#039;t say I&#039;m surprised you acted that way when you were young.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>When I was growing up , we called wimps and Mama’s boys “faggots” and we didn’t know what a homosexual was.</i></p>
<p>Well, ignoring Awkward&#8217;s point that you obviously knew, I honestly can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m surprised you acted that way when you were young.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatanteDodo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192214</link>
		<dc:creator>MatanteDodo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192214</guid>
		<description>Now now... I have a ridiculously small body, ridiculously affected by the fairly small amount of alcohol I just had, and I&#039;m admitedly not qualified to represent anyone even when sober, but I still can tell that random namecalling is just stupid. Maybe not if trolling is what you want to do, but if the best person you can find to represent you is a troll... no comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now now&#8230; I have a ridiculously small body, ridiculously affected by the fairly small amount of alcohol I just had, and I&#8217;m admitedly not qualified to represent anyone even when sober, but I still can tell that random namecalling is just stupid. Maybe not if trolling is what you want to do, but if the best person you can find to represent you is a troll&#8230; no comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AwkwardSilence</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192203</link>
		<dc:creator>AwkwardSilence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192203</guid>
		<description>Wow, that is &lt;b&gt;soooooo&lt;/b&gt; weird that you just happened to call &quot;wimps&quot; and &quot;Mama&#039;s boys&quot;- which probably means kids whose masculinity wasn&#039;t up to your impeccable standards- by a term which is, unbeknownst to you, also used to denigrate gay men.... what are the odds?  

It&#039;s like putting an infinite number of monkeys in front of an infinite number of keyboards and getting a random insult that &lt;i&gt;magically&lt;/i&gt; happens to dovetail nicely with the traits you&#039;re attempting to insult!

I would have thought that one was indefensible… heck, shows what I know.  

Also, since he also made a reference to &quot;hairy pitted female &amp; faggot alleged male biological train wrecks&quot;, I&#039;m inclined to believe that he knows what the real &quot;f&quot; word means.  

Oh, &lt;b&gt;and&lt;/b&gt; because he&#039;s a fifty something year old man with access to the internet, popular culture, and common sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that is <b>soooooo</b> weird that you just happened to call &#8220;wimps&#8221; and &#8220;Mama&#8217;s boys&#8221;- which probably means kids whose masculinity wasn&#8217;t up to your impeccable standards- by a term which is, unbeknownst to you, also used to denigrate gay men&#8230;. what are the odds?  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s like putting an infinite number of monkeys in front of an infinite number of keyboards and getting a random insult that <i>magically</i> happens to dovetail nicely with the traits you&#8217;re attempting to insult!</p>
<p>I would have thought that one was indefensible… heck, shows what I know.  </p>
<p>Also, since he also made a reference to &#8220;hairy pitted female &amp; faggot alleged male biological train wrecks&#8221;, I&#8217;m inclined to believe that he knows what the real &#8220;f&#8221; word means.  </p>
<p>Oh, <b>and</b> because he&#8217;s a fifty something year old man with access to the internet, popular culture, and common sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192199</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192199</guid>
		<description>Frank, how old is Mark Williams?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, how old is Mark Williams?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192195</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192195</guid>
		<description>Do any of you think that he was perjoratively referring to former Pres Carter as a homosexual?
When I was growing up , we called wimps and Mama&#039;s boys &quot;faggots&quot; and we didn&#039;t know what a homosexual was.

And, of course, for Oliver, &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; Republican becomes &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; Republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do any of you think that he was perjoratively referring to former Pres Carter as a homosexual?<br />
When I was growing up , we called wimps and Mama&#8217;s boys &#8220;faggots&#8221; and we didn&#8217;t know what a homosexual was.</p>
<p>And, of course, for Oliver, <i>any</i> Republican becomes <i>all</i> Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192186</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192186</guid>
		<description>If he&#039;s so against it, you know what that means. He&#039;s a cruiser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he&#8217;s so against it, you know what that means. He&#8217;s a cruiser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dotlizard</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192099</link>
		<dc:creator>dotlizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192099</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s totally been watching South Park! Or, you know, not. Maybe just a clueless douche?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s totally been watching South Park! Or, you know, not. Maybe just a clueless douche?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192092</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192092</guid>
		<description>Stay classy, Mr. Williams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stay classy, Mr. Williams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192091</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192091</guid>
		<description>Typical conservative poster at Oliverwillis:

But, but, but... that Dire Straits song..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typical conservative poster at Oliverwillis:</p>
<p>But, but, but&#8230; that Dire Straits song..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Batterycentury</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192082</link>
		<dc:creator>Batterycentury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192082</guid>
		<description>New word for argue? Seems good for himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New word for argue? Seems good for himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jr</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/11/20/faggot-is-new-conservative-way-to-argue/#comment-192080</link>
		<dc:creator>jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=17792#comment-192080</guid>
		<description>He&#039;ll probably get more CNN bookings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;ll probably get more CNN bookings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

