I should point out that, barring me diving through tons of old threads, I have no way of knowing whether this is actually true. I remember thinking this to be true, but perhaps my perception was just off.

See: my age, Zython’s age, whether Zython at one time engaged in nym-stealing, Jaim’s decision to teach in Korea, something about Indeed being a child molester… the list goes on. None of these things have anything to do with ANYTHING, much less politics.

See, I actually think that Dennis is worse than Frank or AO, simply by virtue of the fact that he shits on every single goddamn thread. Frank and AO don’t have that kind of commitment, and occasionally poke their heads out for us to laugh at them. No, Dennis continually shits all over this blog, even to the point where most people here know a phrase that signifies his lack of on-topic, serious conversation.

“So, Dennis… Schmidt?”

It ain’t my house, so if OW wants to put up with that, that’s his call. More power to him, I suppose. He has more patience than me.

So if it was put to a vote, I would NOT vote to ban Dennis. Then again, I don’t seem to be one of his usual targets.

I don’t have a lot of patience for this kind of thing (as is obvious), but it takes a lot to make me think that he should just be barred from commenting. I think I’m at that point. He is just too tiresome, becoming an even greater pest than Frank or any other con on here. And no, Dennis, it’s not because of the self-imagined lucidity and rationality of your comments. You are an obnoxious hack.

Anyway, OW, obviously it’s your blog. I’m just a guest. But I think that Dennis is not contributing toward any kind of constructive conversation and should be eliminated.

And Sarah Palin, Dennis! Don’t forget when you called Palin a liar for her death panel crap. Remember?

I, for one, applaud your bipartisanship!

I think you actually do believe that and so does spring chicken because that’s what the lib blogs tell you is true and it fits in with your school work. You have papers on it in your backpacks.

I’ll be the first ti come to Dennis’s defense here. He’s right. They want people to die slowly and painfully so they can watch them suffer.

Well then, their behavior does not mirror their true feelings then. Because the point that Grayson was making was the complete lack of a Republican plan amounts to the plan being “Don’t get sick. If you do, die quickly.” Like I said before, crude, bold, and hyperbolic, but not fundamentally incorrect.

and your argument to the contrary shows your abject hypocrisy.

Again, you are wrong. Do you know what the word “hypocrisy” means, idiot?

because you stumble trying to deny it.

I didn’t stumble at all. Whose words are you reading?

No background in logic or the applied sciences can aid you, either, Grasshopper.

Actually, this is precisely how I avoid being an insipid piece of shit like you, Dennis. I actually work at being logical and reasonable.

Oh, I’m sorry. I didn’t realize that telling you all to fuck off was necessarily something a child would do. I didn’t know it was common parlance for children. Now, from pissed-off adults who are sick of dealing with morons, sure. Telling an absolute clown to go fuck himself is not being a crybaby in any way. A little crude, perhaps.

You’re just a child, spring chicken…He was telling you to grow up, dude.

Says the fucking idiot who tells me to make sure that my lips are well-salivated so that I can accept a scrotum into my mouth. Says the idiot who gives little snarky nicknames to everyone on this board. Says the idiot who cannot be a fucking man and own up to the fundamental nature of many of the people on his side. Says the idiot who thinks that snarky comments about someone’s age is equivalent to discrediting their points.

So says the idiot, folks.

If it is wrong for Goehmert to be aided from his party for saying what he said, the same applies to Grayson, and your argument to the contrary shows your abject hypocrisy.

Which is why it pisses you off so much, because you stumble trying to deny it. No background in logic or the applied sciences can aid you, either, Grasshopper.

You’re just a child, spring chicken.

As Barack Obama said in his inauguration speech, “the time has come to set aside childish things”.

He was telling you to grow up, dude.

Says the poster who told me that I should keep my lips well salivated so that I may comfortably accept the scrotum of another into my mouth.

It pisses you off when your hypocrisy is as plain as the nose on your face

No. What Alan Grayson said, while heated and bold and not PC, was fundamentally correct. The Republicans had (have?) no plan. Unless you want to claim that Gohmert is being fundamentally truthful and correct in his commentary, I am again not being hypocritical.

The trolling wingnuts can never just come into a thread when a Republican has said something absolutely repugnant and just say, “You know what? You’re right. What a fucking stupid and disgusting thing to say.”

When you can come into a thread not try to defend repugnant behavior, or try to deflect criticism from conservatives, or point fingers in the other direction, then maybe you can be taken seriously. But in the meantime, fuck off.

It still applies.

This is where your immaturity is on full display. It pisses you off when your hypocrisy is as plain as the nose on your face and it’s shown to you in no uncertain terms, and you have no idea as to how to counteract it or make a case for it not being an apt comparison. The only thing you’re able to do at this stage in your life with the limited wisdom you possess is lash out like an impish middle school hothead, which is what you are.

Dimwits shouldn’t try to use sarcasm, just as toddlers shouldn’t be allowed to play with sharp kitchen knives.

It always comes to “But your side does it too/is worse/waaaaaah!”

Fuck you guys.

When you can come into a thread not try to defend repugnant behavior, or try to deflect criticism from conservatives, or point fingers in the other direction, then maybe you can be taken seriously. But in the meantime, fuck off.