Now where have I heard that before?

I knew you couldn’t stay away from this Dennis the coward.

In what alternative is moving abroad to work and learn another language a bad thing? Only in the minds of bigots like yourself.

It kills you, I know — people much more highly educated and successful than yourself moving abroad to take opportunities to do more.

But back to the topic at hand, I’ve already admitted that unemployment is bad. But the spiral started under Bush and if McCain (god forbid) had won we’d be looking at similar numbers (lagging indicator and all that). There’s no magic bullet for fighting unemployment, but the stimulus package was a good start. As a disciple of Rush, you’re actually hoping things stay this bad since it will confirm your wing-nut biases. But again, it’s been less than a year. And IMO Obama still has a lot of hard work to do. But if you’re saying that the unemployment rate in America is never going to improve then well, you’re a bigger idiot that we all thought. Which is really an accomplishment! Congrats!

Again, Obama has had less than a year. Unemployment started to explode under Bush.

Lie. Again, Obama told us the rate wouldn’t go avove 7.8% if we passed porkulus. Now he’s just making shit up and you guys are not even bringing it about about his bullshitting you on the fictitious jobs created or saved numbers. You’re full of shit, sir.

But here’s the thing — historically it will go down, but hopefully as quickly as possible. Obama is less than a year in and the trends are looking favorable for America.

The trends are NOT looking favorable. We are bottoming in some areas; a tribute to American ingenuity and fortitude. The exact of what you displayed when you bailed on the country and thumbed your nose at it- or at least half of it. The other half you are doing absolutely nothing to help out. Narcisstic creep.

The question is, and will continue to be, does America do better under a GOP president or a Democratic one.

To put it another way, do you really think any sane American wants to go back to the Bush years?

Hell, I moved abroad to find a better job. You always try and make fun of me for this out of your ignorance and racism, but the fact is a lot of Americans would probably jump at the chance for foreign employment given the alternative of not having any job at all.

I call you out on your cutting and running when things (maybe) got a little tough for you. There’s no way that’s a better job, Jaim. Not when you could easily be making twice that salary here in America and paying taxes and contributing to make this a better country in it’s moment of weakness.

You cheer-led Bush for eight long years of blowing up the deficit, stagnant wage growth, and incredibly costly (not to mention failed) wars. No we’re supposed to take you teabaggers seriously when a stimulus bill passes that even the WSJ has admitted created jobs? And that includes long-term infrastructure improvements?

Of course the stimulus has created some jobs, mook. But at what cost for just how many? And why is Obama being deceptive about it now and why aren’t you holding him accountable to his transparency claims? The answer to that is that you’ll forever be the clueless cheerleader saying it’s all gonna be ok while you mock the other side and blame them for your sad life.

But here’s the thing — historically it will go down, but hopefully as quickly as possible. Obama is less than a year in and the trends are looking favorable for America.

The question is, and will continue to be, does America do better under a GOP president or a Democratic one.

To put it another way, do you really think any sane American wants to go back to the Bush years?

Hell, I moved abroad to find a better job. You always try and make fun of me for this out of your ignorance and racism, but the fact is a lot of Americans would probably jump at the chance for foreign employment given the alternative of not having any job at all.

You cheer-led Bush for eight long years of blowing up the deficit, stagnant wage growth, and incredibly costly (not to mention failed) wars. No we’re supposed to take you teabaggers seriously when a stimulus bill passes that even the WSJ has admitted created jobs? And that includes long-term infrastructure improvements?

Only if you’re comparing Obama to Jimmy Carter, then maybe you could say he was doing relatively well. Otherwise, like I said, you’re nothing more than a cheerleader with pom poms jumping up and down, oblivious to the real score.

Actually I mention it a lot. The stimulus bill wasn’t big enough.

And in addition to being a coward, you’re a liar. You directly linked Obama’s performance with the DOW after a few months in office. You did it gleefully and cheerfully. And now you never mention it because you are also a hypocrite.

Obama’s had less than a year to fix the Bush Recession and he’s doing relatively well.

Why don’t you step out of the shadows and reveal your ignorance some time? Be a part of society instead of a meek little gnat. I’m embarrassed for you.

And THAT’S the fucking point I alluded to earlier. You paying attention, Dennis?

Yes you did, Dennis. Yes you did.

IMO we shouldn’t judge any presidency’s economic legacy until it’s over, but I’m not the one who posted hourly market updates and linked them to Obama’s performance.

Yes you did. As far back as October.

Amongst the longest books in the world:

“Stuff Dennis Claims He Never Said (Despite Ample Evidence to the Contrary)”

Yes you did. As far back as October.

Perhaps, but it is effective and you can’t deny it. If McCain had won, well, I can’t even imagine how bad it would be if McCain had won. We’d most likely be at war in Iran and North Korea by now.

Well, you oughta know.