Comments on: Fox News Isn’t News

By: fafaroo

fafaroo — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:41:03 +0000

He’s President Thin-Skin.

You think that up yourself, Dennis?

Of course not: http://tinyurl.com/yah9mds

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:26:01 +0000

You want a comment on Fox? Stewart is spot on. Fox’s initial response was: “Well, most of our broadcast day doesn’t count because it’s all opinion, not news.”

In short, “The White House says we’re not a news channel? Well, duh!”

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:22:40 +0000

then why don’t you volunteer to be a site-monitor.

I don’t have time for it, Den. Pointing out your diversions, misdirections, and straight out “look-over-there” threadjacks gives me as much as I can handle. I don’t have time to take on larger responsibilities.

By: Ed Norton

Ed Norton — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 03:09:52 +0000

Shot in the face? So what?

F*cker deserved it. Getting in range while the Dickster was on point? That’s a No-No in my books. Why, if Dick hadn’t gone for deferment #6 back in the day, he might have snagged a Bronze Star for a caper like that.

Just goes to show. What, I have no idea.

By: Dennis

Dennis — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:36:52 +0000

No, Wuibs, you don’t understand correctly. What you’re saying is jr ws spot-on topic by making a statement about someone who appears on FOX, but my reply to him was off-topic. If you’re the expert on what’s on-topic and what’s not, then why don’t you volunteer to be a site-monitor.

Wanna go over comments on this thread alone and see which ones were on-topic?

How about we start with your seven comments. Every one of them.?

Fox, Quaker?

By: buma

buma — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:06:49 +0000

Jon Stewart nailed it, which is why dennis is in full look-over-here mode.

By: Dr. Psycho

Dr. Psycho — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:41:08 +0000

No, our previous Vice President shot someone in the face. Our current Vice President just shoots himself in the foot.

By: mambochicken23

mambochicken23 — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:26:09 +0000

“President Thin-Skin”, huh? You really have completely forgotten the years 2001-2008, haven’t you? I mean, jeebus…

By: mambochicken23

mambochicken23 — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:24:42 +0000

Oh yeah, I remember that incident. What an intellectually dishonest, miserable person.

By: Jaim

Jaim — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:13:45 +0000

Hey Dennis, if you don’t like it here so much try:

http://wordpress.com/

By: mambochicken23

mambochicken23 — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:50:18 +0000

Do I have to pull out the Harold & Kumar reference again, cockboy?

By: isms

isms — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:21:39 +0000

Here’s a good distraction for this thread –

Rush “Take that bone out of your nose and call back later.”

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:59:57 +0000

Fox?

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:59:19 +0000

Do I understand correctlly? Your own threadjacking isn’t blameworthy. Noticing your threadjacking, not so much.

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:56:37 +0000

Or as Quibs would say “Haw! That’s what I’m talking about.”

Misquoting me again, Dennis? You’re testing my charitable nature and causing me to think you’re misleading folks on purpose.

By: Dennis

Dennis — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:35:52 +0000

Maybe you could, too, Hick.

Two eight hour shifts among the two of you and let the 12 am- 8am shift continue being the Wild, Wild, West for brawls and mambochicken vulgarity and challenges to duels.

By: Dennis

Dennis — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:32:55 +0000

Edmunds didn’t lie or distort, Chicken; that’s the point. Obama’s White House took exception to some points they made and then made the Mars comment. That sounds like something exactly like you’d see on Media Matters. Exactly. That White House blog is essentially MMFA Redux.

It’s one opinion against another opinion and Obama doesn’t like any opinions that criticize him. He’s President Thin-Skin.

By: I'm a Hick

I'm a Hick — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:26:22 +0000

I want a cushy job in return.

By: Dennis

Dennis — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:23:13 +0000

Thanks, Hick, a second.

There you go, Quibbie.

By: mambochicken23

mambochicken23 — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:22:32 +0000

I don’t understand what calling me “Mambo the Chicken” is supposed to do for you, anyway. It’s stupid. You keep clowning around though!

It’s more than okay for the White House to criticize Fox News, because the network basically is the mouthpiece for the GOP, it is not “Fair and Balanced”, and it lies and distorts information in order to try and undermine Obama’s administration. They are not honest with their criticisms nor their coverage in total. Make sense, clown?

And who gives a flying fuck about whether they call out Edmunds.com? Do you lose sleep at night over this kind of thing? Damn, you’re a dope.

I have no problem whatsoever with the administration criticizing influential people and entities that distort and lie in order to attack the Democrats and Obama in particular. None. If you don’t want the Obama administration to jump on you, THEN DON’T MAKE UP BULLSHIT TO CRITICIZE THEM. Not hard to understand.