Repack never asked for credentials.

When it’s a liberal, they do.

Those are the rules.

And a complete buffoon, if the only thing you know about him is what he writes in his column. How did so much education fail to “take”?

As the Wizard of Ox pointed out to the Scarecrow, you don’t need brains if you have a diploma.

That means it similar to a tenderfoot or a nooby…

Typo. Should read “You have failed”.

I claim you are a wet behind the ears shavetail

…the hell is a “shavetail”?

You need to go a long way to “claim” victory, son.

I claim you are a wet behind the ears shavetail, who has a long way to go to argue politics with anyone .

I have books about politics in my home that are older than you, boy.

Yes , Zython, if it was our intention to get Germany to stand down from fighting, and they claimed victory, yes that would have indicated not that we lost , but that we failed to get them to make peace.

And what does “You have no failed” mean , anyway?

Today we learn that philosophy != psychology. Close, but not quite.

And who among the latter 2 has any credentials in psychology.

If Iran “claimed” victory, then Pres Obama failed , you nincompoop…

So if Germany “claimed” victory in WWII, we would’ve lost? Gotcha.

At this point, I will “claim” victory over you on this topic. You have no failed, Frank.

1) http://samvak.tripod.com/cv.html

2) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/opinions/krauthammer.htm

3) http://www.solvinglight.com/about/rbjbio.htm

No credentials, Zython, right…

If Iran “claimed” victory, then Pres Obama failed , you nincompoop…

Don’t you ever give up?

A few issues on sources. The first source is described as an “expert”. I don’t know if you know this, but EVERYONE’s an “expert”. With no listed credentials, I’d take what he says with a ton of salt. The next source is “The American Thinker”, one of their most recent articles is about decrying eating healthily. This, sadly, is one of their more sane articles, so yeah… They also link Charles Krauthammer, which I won’t even being to dissect. There’s no one with psychology credentials, no independent sources, nothing to make this article credible.

Pres Obama screwed up in Iran

The key word here is “claim”. They can claim whatever they want. Remember “This is good news for John McCain”?

What’s wrong with Pres Obama

There ya go, Skippy!

Wait, negotiating nuclear disarmament is “screwing up”? I’d hate to see your idea of “getting stuff right”.

Pres Obama will be lucky if he is not in St Elizabeth’s by 2011.

Again, what’s your reasoning for this? So far, my theory remains uncontested.

Earlier this month “Custom Times Feeds” went live via the First Look blog on NYTimes.com. It’s a free service.

Access Custom Times Feeds

From the Blog Post by Tom Jackson:

Our new custom RSS tool is intended for all Times readers — not just developers. It provides a simple way to query the Times Article Search API and a standard way to consume the results.

Frank, what you talking about? Why are you bringing up Rush Limbaugh? Who said you sat around listening to him all day? Who said he was your “conservative source” or even that he was your only one?

If I ever had to guess which one of the trolls here was a software program written by conservative hackers to mimic actual sentient thought, I’d go with you hands down.

You are so hilariously random and incoherent there can be few other possible explanations.

fafroo: same goes for you: You don’t know squat about conservatives. You think we all sit around listening to Rush Limbaugh? The last time I heard Rush Limbaugh was last year, for about 10 minutes — in a cab!.
Once you’re reading Hot Air, and Pajamas Media and Jewish World Review, and NRO , you can come back and make some good guesses at what conservatives think. Until then, keep on smoking whatever you’re smoking.

Does that mean you’ll take Palin and the points?

Did he also “look into his soul”? Just askin’.

Yes, by endorsing teabagging candidates rather than the actual Republican party candidates. Way to go, Sarah!