<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newspapers Think We Should Pay For This</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: EM</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182800</link>
		<dc:creator>EM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182800</guid>
		<description>A little weaselly of you not to name those multitudes of columns that you read yesterday by conservative authors NOT gleeful over Obama&#8217;s &#8220;failure,&#8221; Frank.
Which columns were those, exactly? You know, the ones expressing a variety of perspectives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little weaselly of you not to name those multitudes of columns that you read yesterday by conservative authors NOT gleeful over Obama&#8217;s &#8220;failure,&#8221; Frank.<br />
Which columns were those, exactly? You know, the ones expressing a variety of perspectives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182621</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182621</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t watch television, or listen to Limbaugh, Savage, or any other right - wing radio guy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t watch television, or listen to Limbaugh, Savage, or any other right &#8211; wing radio guy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182614</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182614</guid>
		<description>You showed me two, Frank, and I found one more, by Joe Scarborough on HuffPo, so I stand corrected.

I guess what I meant to say is &quot;Conservative&quot; -- a la FOX, Beck, Limbaugh, Savage, et al -- as opposed to Conservative, like WSJ, etc.

And I apologise for the &quot;weaselly&quot; remark, as in &quot;like a weasel&quot;, as opposed to &quot;weasily&quot;, whatever that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You showed me two, Frank, and I found one more, by Joe Scarborough on HuffPo, so I stand corrected.</p>
<p>I guess what I meant to say is &#8220;Conservative&#8221; &#8212; a la FOX, Beck, Limbaugh, Savage, et al &#8212; as opposed to Conservative, like WSJ, etc.</p>
<p>And I apologise for the &#8220;weaselly&#8221; remark, as in &#8220;like a weasel&#8221;, as opposed to &#8220;weasily&#8221;, whatever that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182608</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 09:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182608</guid>
		<description>a) I don&#039;t hate Pres Obama
b) You still have not provided any evidence that the anger or diapppointment with Pres Obama is motivated ny racism. You have merely found some incidents of racism, some from people who were racists before Pres Obama was even elected .
c) You are trying to make a case that no one else is arguing.
d) Whatever Pres Obama and his Congress are doing that resembles what Pres Bush and HIS Congress did, is not what has people angry.

But, rave on , if it makes you feel better. Why let a lack of evidence throw you off ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a) I don&#8217;t hate Pres Obama<br />
b) You still have not provided any evidence that the anger or diapppointment with Pres Obama is motivated ny racism. You have merely found some incidents of racism, some from people who were racists before Pres Obama was even elected .<br />
c) You are trying to make a case that no one else is arguing.<br />
d) Whatever Pres Obama and his Congress are doing that resembles what Pres Bush and HIS Congress did, is not what has people angry.</p>
<p>But, rave on , if it makes you feel better. Why let a lack of evidence throw you off ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaim</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182602</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 07:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182602</guid>
		<description>&quot;People who are disappointed with him now, and , yes, angry, are not diappointed or angry because he is black.&quot;

Please explain this &quot;who&quot; to me.  Because his national approval remains twice that of what Bush II&#039;s was, and personally I think he&#039;s doing a great job.

But as a Republican, you must have plenty of &quot;angry former Obama supporters&quot; on speed-dial, I&#039;m sure.  And I&#039;ll bet at least half of the tea-baggers actually didn&#039;t vote for McCain.  Right.  Sure, Frank.

&quot;So where did this idea occur to them that Pres Obama is not a legitimate President because he is black?&quot;

Right.  There hasn&#039;t been a single bigotted outburst or people sending pictures of the White House in front of a field of watermelons, or pictures of him with a bone in his nose circulated by GOP activists:

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/07/conservative_activist_forwards_racist_pic_showing.php?ref=fpa

Like I said, maybe you aren&#039;t a racist.  But you sure as hell are a hypocrite for hating Obama for doing exactly what Bush II did re: spending.  In fact, at least Obama&#039;s stimulus bill actually accomplished something if that liberal rag the Wall Street Journal can be believed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;People who are disappointed with him now, and , yes, angry, are not diappointed or angry because he is black.&#8221;</p>
<p>Please explain this &#8220;who&#8221; to me.  Because his national approval remains twice that of what Bush II&#8217;s was, and personally I think he&#8217;s doing a great job.</p>
<p>But as a Republican, you must have plenty of &#8220;angry former Obama supporters&#8221; on speed-dial, I&#8217;m sure.  And I&#8217;ll bet at least half of the tea-baggers actually didn&#8217;t vote for McCain.  Right.  Sure, Frank.</p>
<p>&#8220;So where did this idea occur to them that Pres Obama is not a legitimate President because he is black?&#8221;</p>
<p>Right.  There hasn&#8217;t been a single bigotted outburst or people sending pictures of the White House in front of a field of watermelons, or pictures of him with a bone in his nose circulated by GOP activists:</p>
<p><a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/07/conservative_activist_forwards_racist_pic_showing.php?ref=fpa" rel="nofollow">http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/07/conservative_activist_forwards_racist_pic_showing.php?ref=fpa</a></p>
<p>Like I said, maybe you aren&#8217;t a racist.  But you sure as hell are a hypocrite for hating Obama for doing exactly what Bush II did re: spending.  In fact, at least Obama&#8217;s stimulus bill actually accomplished something if that liberal rag the Wall Street Journal can be believed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182599</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 07:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182599</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know which GOP you are referring to, but I believe that Obama was elected by people who were willing to vote for a black candidate.

People who are disappointed with him now, and , yes, angry, are not diappointed or angry because he is black.

Think a minute -- they knew he was black on Inauguration, did they not?

So where did this idea occur to them that Pres Obama is not a legitimate President because he is black?

Because you said so, or the blog writers say so, doesn&#039;t make it so. If you could produce one piece of evidence that such a change has taken place , besides an occasional email, or derogatory picture , you might be believable.

As of now, you are simply hoping that people will believe you if you say it often enough.

The problem is , that you cannot believe that anyone doesn&#039;t like someone in whom you have invested ao much, and it threatens your self-image . That&#039;s my opinion, anyway.

And if you don&#039;t have any proof  for what you say, then I don&#039;t need any, either .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know which GOP you are referring to, but I believe that Obama was elected by people who were willing to vote for a black candidate.</p>
<p>People who are disappointed with him now, and , yes, angry, are not diappointed or angry because he is black.</p>
<p>Think a minute &#8212; they knew he was black on Inauguration, did they not?</p>
<p>So where did this idea occur to them that Pres Obama is not a legitimate President because he is black?</p>
<p>Because you said so, or the blog writers say so, doesn&#8217;t make it so. If you could produce one piece of evidence that such a change has taken place , besides an occasional email, or derogatory picture , you might be believable.</p>
<p>As of now, you are simply hoping that people will believe you if you say it often enough.</p>
<p>The problem is , that you cannot believe that anyone doesn&#8217;t like someone in whom you have invested ao much, and it threatens your self-image . That&#8217;s my opinion, anyway.</p>
<p>And if you don&#8217;t have any proof  for what you say, then I don&#8217;t need any, either .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaim</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182592</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 06:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182592</guid>
		<description>Deep in their hearts the GOP cretins don&#039;t consider Obama a legitimate POTUS because he&#039;s black.  And hence, they think it makes sense that mocking him for not getting the Olympics, something that all rational people would consider to be a good thing for the country, is what they should do.

They are incapable of understanding that things that are good for the country might, indeed, benefit Obama politically.  But they can&#039;t get over their simple bigotry.  In fact, their bigotry is apparently much stronger than their sense of patriotism.  Sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep in their hearts the GOP cretins don&#8217;t consider Obama a legitimate POTUS because he&#8217;s black.  And hence, they think it makes sense that mocking him for not getting the Olympics, something that all rational people would consider to be a good thing for the country, is what they should do.</p>
<p>They are incapable of understanding that things that are good for the country might, indeed, benefit Obama politically.  But they can&#8217;t get over their simple bigotry.  In fact, their bigotry is apparently much stronger than their sense of patriotism.  Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182576</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 02:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182576</guid>
		<description>Yeah , it was &quot;weasly&quot;, Bruce ... 
Absolutely.

Perhaps it was something else : Like throwing more gasoline on the fire, by having ten people disagree with me, while ten others told me that, actually, these people were glad that Obama failed , because I didn&#039;t read it right, and I&#039;m a right wing troll, and &quot;Why do you hate America, Frank?&quot; , and &quot;You are a bigot and a racist, because you don&#039;t love Our Dear President&quot;

No, thanks.

Yeah, it was &quot;weasly&quot; ...

Go check Pajamas Media , or Wall Street Journal&#039;s Best of the Web -- no gloating there.

If that&#039;s not enough for you , go back to &quot;weasly&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah , it was &#8220;weasly&#8221;, Bruce &#8230;<br />
Absolutely.</p>
<p>Perhaps it was something else : Like throwing more gasoline on the fire, by having ten people disagree with me, while ten others told me that, actually, these people were glad that Obama failed , because I didn&#8217;t read it right, and I&#8217;m a right wing troll, and &#8220;Why do you hate America, Frank?&#8221; , and &#8220;You are a bigot and a racist, because you don&#8217;t love Our Dear President&#8221;</p>
<p>No, thanks.</p>
<p>Yeah, it was &#8220;weasly&#8221; &#8230;</p>
<p>Go check Pajamas Media , or Wall Street Journal&#8217;s Best of the Web &#8212; no gloating there.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s not enough for you , go back to &#8220;weasly&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182543</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182543</guid>
		<description>A little weaselly of you not to name those multitudes of columns that you read yesterday by conservative authors NOT gleeful over Obama&#039;s &quot;failure,&quot; Frank.

Which columns were those, exactly? You know, the ones expressing a variety of perspectives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little weaselly of you not to name those multitudes of columns that you read yesterday by conservative authors NOT gleeful over Obama&#8217;s &#8220;failure,&#8221; Frank.</p>
<p>Which columns were those, exactly? You know, the ones expressing a variety of perspectives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182515</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 20:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182515</guid>
		<description>I was referring to the columns that I read. I don&#039;t blame those people for being glad that Obama failed, although that is not the course I would take. They have been listening to gushing and oooing and aaaaahing that has accompanied Pres Obama&#039;s every word and gesture for two and one half years. Conservative commentators are not emmisaries from Satan, but they are human.

As I said , I have my own reasons for believing that he should never have gone to the IOC, and my own reasons as to why he did so. One of the reasons he should not have gone is that, if Chicago was not chosen, he could not possibly look good for going.

I feel that he should have considered that eventuality, and not gone.

But to be happy that he failed is to be happy that the Olympics ma will not be in the United States. That is rather juvenile, and a sort of spiteful reaction.

People who continually raise the specter of racism to explain why more and more people are getting angry at Pres Obama maye be covering up their own feeling that they made a mistake believing in him -- may be -- but they are definitely minimizing his errors, while falsely smearing his detractors to justify to themselves that it is not that Pres Obama is making mistakes, it is that evil people tell lies. That is pretty much the opposite of the perspective they had towards Pres Bush, which was , &quot;Bush must be evil -- look at the people who support him&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was referring to the columns that I read. I don&#8217;t blame those people for being glad that Obama failed, although that is not the course I would take. They have been listening to gushing and oooing and aaaaahing that has accompanied Pres Obama&#8217;s every word and gesture for two and one half years. Conservative commentators are not emmisaries from Satan, but they are human.</p>
<p>As I said , I have my own reasons for believing that he should never have gone to the IOC, and my own reasons as to why he did so. One of the reasons he should not have gone is that, if Chicago was not chosen, he could not possibly look good for going.</p>
<p>I feel that he should have considered that eventuality, and not gone.</p>
<p>But to be happy that he failed is to be happy that the Olympics ma will not be in the United States. That is rather juvenile, and a sort of spiteful reaction.</p>
<p>People who continually raise the specter of racism to explain why more and more people are getting angry at Pres Obama maye be covering up their own feeling that they made a mistake believing in him &#8212; may be &#8212; but they are definitely minimizing his errors, while falsely smearing his detractors to justify to themselves that it is not that Pres Obama is making mistakes, it is that evil people tell lies. That is pretty much the opposite of the perspective they had towards Pres Bush, which was , &#8220;Bush must be evil &#8212; look at the people who support him&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaim</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182503</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 19:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182503</guid>
		<description>Meh.  Would have been nice I guess.  But it&#039;s funny to see racist wing-nuts latch on to this.

As I&#039;ve said before, if President Obama could cure cancer the KKK/GOP would bitch about curing AIDS.

They got nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh.  Would have been nice I guess.  But it&#8217;s funny to see racist wing-nuts latch on to this.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said before, if President Obama could cure cancer the KKK/GOP would bitch about curing AIDS.</p>
<p>They got nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mambochicken23</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182497</link>
		<dc:creator>mambochicken23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 17:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182497</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Um, Frank?&lt;/i&gt;

Every single one of those persons quoted in that article, happy that Chicago didn&#039;t get the Olympics, is complete and total scum.  Fuck all of them.

The conservatives are only concerned with Obama failing.  Fucking scum.  No substantive ideas, no dignity, no pride - they claim to love America, while reveling in the Presidents&#039; &quot;defeats&quot;.  Disgusting, reprehensible, vile people, the lot of them.

Fuck them all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Um, Frank?</i></p>
<p>Every single one of those persons quoted in that article, happy that Chicago didn&#8217;t get the Olympics, is complete and total scum.  Fuck all of them.</p>
<p>The conservatives are only concerned with Obama failing.  Fucking scum.  No substantive ideas, no dignity, no pride &#8211; they claim to love America, while reveling in the Presidents&#8217; &#8220;defeats&#8221;.  Disgusting, reprehensible, vile people, the lot of them.</p>
<p>Fuck them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fafaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182491</link>
		<dc:creator>fafaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 17:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182491</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The precedent had been set by Blair and Sarkozy in the competition for the 2012 games ...&lt;/i&gt;

Just FYI, the head of every other country in the running for the 2016 Olympics went to Copenhagen this year. If Obama hadn&#039;t gone, he would have been the only national leader to blow it off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The precedent had been set by Blair and Sarkozy in the competition for the 2012 games &#8230;</i></p>
<p>Just FYI, the head of every other country in the running for the 2016 Olympics went to Copenhagen this year. If Obama hadn&#8217;t gone, he would have been the only national leader to blow it off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aunt Moe</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182489</link>
		<dc:creator>Aunt Moe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182489</guid>
		<description>Oliver: It&#039;s been a few years since I&#039;ve visited your site. Used to be here all the time some years back. It&#039;s matured a lot and I&#039;m so impressed. It seems to me you were eleven years old when this all began. And I am very glad to see &quot;Like Kryptonite to Stupid&quot; still has a place of honor. 

Media failures are a pet peeve of mine. I&#039;ve decided that on top of all the other things they are - and are not - they are mostly LAZY. And those page one screenshots sum it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver: It&#8217;s been a few years since I&#8217;ve visited your site. Used to be here all the time some years back. It&#8217;s matured a lot and I&#8217;m so impressed. It seems to me you were eleven years old when this all began. And I am very glad to see &#8220;Like Kryptonite to Stupid&#8221; still has a place of honor. </p>
<p>Media failures are a pet peeve of mine. I&#8217;ve decided that on top of all the other things they are &#8211; and are not &#8211; they are mostly LAZY. And those page one screenshots sum it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182487</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182487</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;none of which included joy over the President’s failed attempt.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/weekly-standard-newsroom-erupts-into-cheers-at-news-of-olympics.php?ref=fpa&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Um, Frank?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>none of which included joy over the President’s failed attempt.</i></p>
<p><a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/weekly-standard-newsroom-erupts-into-cheers-at-news-of-olympics.php?ref=fpa" rel="nofollow">Um, Frank?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182479</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182479</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;and Obama would have been equally criticized for not going if Chicago lost. &lt;/i&gt;

Paranoia strikes deep; into your heart it will creep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>and Obama would have been equally criticized for not going if Chicago lost. </i></p>
<p>Paranoia strikes deep; into your heart it will creep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182478</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182478</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;This, in a nutshell, was the “conservative” reaction to the IOC decision.&lt;/i&gt;
I beg to differ, but there were many columns written about it, by conservatives, with all manner of perspectives, none of which included joy over the President&#039;s failed attempt.

Your fellow office worker is just one person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This, in a nutshell, was the “conservative” reaction to the IOC decision.</i><br />
I beg to differ, but there were many columns written about it, by conservatives, with all manner of perspectives, none of which included joy over the President&#8217;s failed attempt.</p>
<p>Your fellow office worker is just one person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southern Quaker</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182476</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern Quaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182476</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it was necessarily a bad decision for Obama to personally make an appeal for Chicago, since it is his hometown. The precedent had been set by Blair and Sarkozy in the competition for the 2012 games, and Obama would have been equally criticized for not going if Chicago lost.  He was damned if he did, damned if he didn&#039;t. 

The IOC absolutely made the correct decision. Rio had a very strong argument in terms of the games never before being held in a South American country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it was necessarily a bad decision for Obama to personally make an appeal for Chicago, since it is his hometown. The precedent had been set by Blair and Sarkozy in the competition for the 2012 games, and Obama would have been equally criticized for not going if Chicago lost.  He was damned if he did, damned if he didn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>The IOC absolutely made the correct decision. Rio had a very strong argument in terms of the games never before being held in a South American country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182469</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182469</guid>
		<description>It may have been a bad decision.

But yesterday, when I encountered a coworker who is a &quot;conservative&quot;, he greeted me with a pointed finger and a &quot;Yessssss! Obama failed! In your face!&quot;

This, in a nutshell, was the &quot;conservative&quot; reaction to the IOC decision. Never mind that it was a loss for a great American city, and for our country. All that matters is that Obama has &quot;failed.&quot; 

Screw them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may have been a bad decision.</p>
<p>But yesterday, when I encountered a coworker who is a &#8220;conservative&#8221;, he greeted me with a pointed finger and a &#8220;Yessssss! Obama failed! In your face!&#8221;</p>
<p>This, in a nutshell, was the &#8220;conservative&#8221; reaction to the IOC decision. Never mind that it was a loss for a great American city, and for our country. All that matters is that Obama has &#8220;failed.&#8221; </p>
<p>Screw them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-think-we-should-pay-for-this/#comment-182467</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16928#comment-182467</guid>
		<description>If it was a bad decision to make the pitch for Chicago to get the Olympics , then it was . And commentators can, and possibly should say so. I, for one, have my own opinion about it which I will keep to myself.

But if the left expected us to listen to vituperation and insults hurled at Pres Bush, they had better get used to the idea that Pres Obama is going to get criticized whenever he appears to stumble. The right is not heaping anywhere near the scorn and contempt that was heaped on Pres Bush (please don&#039;t provide me with one or two examples, unless you would like me to link you to hundreds , if not thousands , terrible things that were said about Pres Bush),but Pres Obama is beginning to exhibit feet of clay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it was a bad decision to make the pitch for Chicago to get the Olympics , then it was . And commentators can, and possibly should say so. I, for one, have my own opinion about it which I will keep to myself.</p>
<p>But if the left expected us to listen to vituperation and insults hurled at Pres Bush, they had better get used to the idea that Pres Obama is going to get criticized whenever he appears to stumble. The right is not heaping anywhere near the scorn and contempt that was heaped on Pres Bush (please don&#8217;t provide me with one or two examples, unless you would like me to link you to hundreds , if not thousands , terrible things that were said about Pres Bush),but Pres Obama is beginning to exhibit feet of clay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

