<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OMG Teh Diplomacy (Iran Edition)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Southern Quaker</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182799</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern Quaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182799</guid>
		<description>Frank, you do realize that the first hit on the link you provided was &quot;CAIR backs fatwah against terrorism,&quot; no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, you do realize that the first hit on the link you provided was &#8220;CAIR backs fatwah against terrorism,&#8221; no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182788</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182788</guid>
		<description>And , ever since , the CAIR has been hollering about &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/yajpfcu&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;every move the USA makes&lt;/a&gt; , as prejudiced against Muslims</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And , ever since , the CAIR has been hollering about <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yajpfcu" rel="nofollow">every move the USA makes</a> , as prejudiced against Muslims</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southern Quaker</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182782</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern Quaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182782</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I would love to have seen the kind of full page ads C A I R likes to post, posted by moderate middle easterners from all around the world , denouncing the barbarism of 9/11, and all the other explosions that killed so many other innocent civilians.&lt;/i&gt;

Gee Frank, you mean like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cair.com/Portals/0/cair_washington_post_ad1.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt; from the Washington Post, dated September 16, 2001?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I would love to have seen the kind of full page ads C A I R likes to post, posted by moderate middle easterners from all around the world , denouncing the barbarism of 9/11, and all the other explosions that killed so many other innocent civilians.</i></p>
<p>Gee Frank, you mean like <a href="http://www.cair.com/Portals/0/cair_washington_post_ad1.gif" rel="nofollow">this one</a> from the Washington Post, dated September 16, 2001?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaim</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182747</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182747</guid>
		<description>As a Baathist, Saddam went out of his way to try and show that his Sunni regime was secular as opposed to the supposedly &quot;crazy&quot; Shia over in Iran.  Indeed, this is why Reagan and Rumsfeld were in love with him and gave him tons (literally) of weapons and cash, in order to fight the fanatics in Iran.  Only later, with the start of the first Gulf War did he try and model himself as a Muslim holy leader to garner sympathy from other Muslim nations.  Hence, he had the flag of Iraq changed to hold a quotation from the Koran:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Iraq#1991.E2.80.932004

But this came after he spend decades ruthlessly stamping out those religious muslim leaders he considered to be threats to his own rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Baathist, Saddam went out of his way to try and show that his Sunni regime was secular as opposed to the supposedly &#8220;crazy&#8221; Shia over in Iran.  Indeed, this is why Reagan and Rumsfeld were in love with him and gave him tons (literally) of weapons and cash, in order to fight the fanatics in Iran.  Only later, with the start of the first Gulf War did he try and model himself as a Muslim holy leader to garner sympathy from other Muslim nations.  Hence, he had the flag of Iraq changed to hold a quotation from the Koran:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Iraq#1991.E2.80.932004" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Iraq#1991.E2.80.932004</a></p>
<p>But this came after he spend decades ruthlessly stamping out those religious muslim leaders he considered to be threats to his own rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182741</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182741</guid>
		<description>&lt;/i&gt; sorry about that .

&lt;i&gt;So can anyone explain to me how say So can anyone explain to me how say Iran v. Iraq marks Muslims as “warlike” but Germany v. France, or Germany v. Britain, or Germany v. Poland doesn’t do the same for Christians?&lt;/i&gt;

Who said that “Iran v. Iraq marks Muslims as ‘warlike’”? Not I.

“Germany v. France, or Germany v. Britain, or Germany v. Poland doesn’t do the same for Christians?” because there was zero religious component to the war.

I am not certain, but one could say that Iran v Iraq was interreligious. I doubt it, but it is not totally out of the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> sorry about that .</p>
<p><i>So can anyone explain to me how say So can anyone explain to me how say Iran v. Iraq marks Muslims as “warlike” but Germany v. France, or Germany v. Britain, or Germany v. Poland doesn’t do the same for Christians?</i></p>
<p>Who said that “Iran v. Iraq marks Muslims as ‘warlike’”? Not I.</p>
<p>“Germany v. France, or Germany v. Britain, or Germany v. Poland doesn’t do the same for Christians?” because there was zero religious component to the war.</p>
<p>I am not certain, but one could say that Iran v Iraq was interreligious. I doubt it, but it is not totally out of the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182740</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182740</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So can anyone explain to me how say So can anyone explain to me how say Iran v. Iraq marks Muslims as “warlike” but Germany v. France, or Germany v. Britain, or Germany v. Poland doesn’t do the same for Christians?

Who said that &quot;Iran v. Iraq marks Muslims as &#039;warlike&#039;&quot;? Not I.

&quot;Germany v. France, or Germany v. Britain, or Germany v. Poland doesn’t do the same for Christians?&quot; because there was zero religious component to the war.

I am not certain, but one could say that Iran v Iraq was interreligious. I doubt it, but it is not totally out of the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So can anyone explain to me how say So can anyone explain to me how say Iran v. Iraq marks Muslims as “warlike” but Germany v. France, or Germany v. Britain, or Germany v. Poland doesn’t do the same for Christians?</p>
<p>Who said that &#8220;Iran v. Iraq marks Muslims as &#8216;warlike&#8217;&#8221;? Not I.</p>
<p>&#8220;Germany v. France, or Germany v. Britain, or Germany v. Poland doesn’t do the same for Christians?&#8221; because there was zero religious component to the war.</p>
<p>I am not certain, but one could say that Iran v Iraq was interreligious. I doubt it, but it is not totally out of the question.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canadian bacon</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182721</link>
		<dc:creator>canadian bacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182721</guid>
		<description>Socrates  - &quot;Actually now that I think of it, under AO’s “crush them because of history” analogy- we really should have nuked Germany to glass following WW2 ... .&quot;

I think he would agree with what you just said.  That&#039;s the rub.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Socrates  &#8211; &#8220;Actually now that I think of it, under AO’s “crush them because of history” analogy- we really should have nuked Germany to glass following WW2 &#8230; .&#8221;</p>
<p>I think he would agree with what you just said.  That&#8217;s the rub.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182720</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182720</guid>
		<description>&lt;/i&gt;

BBCode &gt; me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBCode &gt; me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182719</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182719</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So can anyone explain to me how say Iran v. Iraq marks Muslims as “warlike” but Germany v. France, or Germany v. Britain, or Germany v. Poland doesn’t do the same for Christians?&gt;/i&gt;

Because they were white.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So can anyone explain to me how say Iran v. Iraq marks Muslims as “warlike” but Germany v. France, or Germany v. Britain, or Germany v. Poland doesn’t do the same for Christians?&gt;/i&gt;</p>
<p>Because they were white.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Socraticsilence</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182681</link>
		<dc:creator>Socraticsilence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182681</guid>
		<description>So can anyone explain to me how say Iran v. Iraq marks Muslims as &quot;warlike&quot; but Germany v. France, or Germany v. Britain, or Germany v. Poland doesn&#039;t do the same for Christians? Actually now that I think of it, under AO&#039;s &quot;crush them because of history&quot; analogy- we really should have nuked Germany to glass following WW2 think about it Germany as a nation had existed for roughly a century (depending on how one defines Germany) at that point but had been the instigator of the two most violent wars in human history as well as a participant in countless other military conflicts- why shouldn&#039;t we have crushed them rather than allowing them to survive- if anything Germany circa 1945 makes the threat of muslims downright laughable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So can anyone explain to me how say Iran v. Iraq marks Muslims as &#8220;warlike&#8221; but Germany v. France, or Germany v. Britain, or Germany v. Poland doesn&#8217;t do the same for Christians? Actually now that I think of it, under AO&#8217;s &#8220;crush them because of history&#8221; analogy- we really should have nuked Germany to glass following WW2 think about it Germany as a nation had existed for roughly a century (depending on how one defines Germany) at that point but had been the instigator of the two most violent wars in human history as well as a participant in countless other military conflicts- why shouldn&#8217;t we have crushed them rather than allowing them to survive- if anything Germany circa 1945 makes the threat of muslims downright laughable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182678</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182678</guid>
		<description>BTW, that was written off the top of my head, without resorting to WikiPedia, or any other Intertubes location.

If you ask for a link, I will fry your computer by cyberpsychokinesis 

=;-}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, that was written off the top of my head, without resorting to WikiPedia, or any other Intertubes location.</p>
<p>If you ask for a link, I will fry your computer by cyberpsychokinesis </p>
<p>=;-}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182676</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182676</guid>
		<description>To a degree, but I suspect the average middle eastern American has some qualms about taking a public stand against terrorists. Even if they fear drawing attention to themselves, they should still be able to support the simple statement that terrorists are America&#039;s enemies, not Muslims, &lt;i&gt;per se&lt;/i&gt;

I am very familiar with the Middle East, and Islam. I have a healthy respect for the people and their beliefs. I also think, however, that there is a deep resentment in the Middle East -- not so much in America, but neither is it non-existent -- for America as a representation of the West, as Britain, for example, was until World War I. Things turned for the middle east, and Arabs in particular, after World War I, with the redivision of colonies, the Balfour Declaration, and the addition of oil rights to the Middle East mix.
It was when I studied World War I and the Middle East, that it all came to me at once: Babylonia, Mesopotamia, the Eastern Roman Empire, Islam, the Crusades and the sacking of Constantinople , western Europe&#039;s colonization of the Americas, and then , damn near everything else , the Congresses of Berlin and Vienna, and finally, the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in 1914 - all leading to what Samuel Huntington has called &quot;The Clash of Civilizations&quot;, and Norman Podhoretz has called &quot;World War IV&quot;.

I would love to have seen the kind of full page ads C A I R likes to post, posted by moderate middle easterners from all around the world , denouncing the barbarism of 9/11, and all the other explosions that killed so many other innocent civilians.

I am still waiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To a degree, but I suspect the average middle eastern American has some qualms about taking a public stand against terrorists. Even if they fear drawing attention to themselves, they should still be able to support the simple statement that terrorists are America&#8217;s enemies, not Muslims, <i>per se</i></p>
<p>I am very familiar with the Middle East, and Islam. I have a healthy respect for the people and their beliefs. I also think, however, that there is a deep resentment in the Middle East &#8212; not so much in America, but neither is it non-existent &#8212; for America as a representation of the West, as Britain, for example, was until World War I. Things turned for the middle east, and Arabs in particular, after World War I, with the redivision of colonies, the Balfour Declaration, and the addition of oil rights to the Middle East mix.<br />
It was when I studied World War I and the Middle East, that it all came to me at once: Babylonia, Mesopotamia, the Eastern Roman Empire, Islam, the Crusades and the sacking of Constantinople , western Europe&#8217;s colonization of the Americas, and then , damn near everything else , the Congresses of Berlin and Vienna, and finally, the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in 1914 &#8211; all leading to what Samuel Huntington has called &#8220;The Clash of Civilizations&#8221;, and Norman Podhoretz has called &#8220;World War IV&#8221;.</p>
<p>I would love to have seen the kind of full page ads C A I R likes to post, posted by moderate middle easterners from all around the world , denouncing the barbarism of 9/11, and all the other explosions that killed so many other innocent civilians.</p>
<p>I am still waiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canadian bacon</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182653</link>
		<dc:creator>canadian bacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182653</guid>
		<description>FDS - &quot;Not bad , I could, but I won’t quibble.&quot;

But has it influenced your thinking on the mattter?  That&#039;s the real question here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FDS &#8211; &#8220;Not bad , I could, but I won’t quibble.&#8221;</p>
<p>But has it influenced your thinking on the mattter?  That&#8217;s the real question here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canadian bacon</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182652</link>
		<dc:creator>canadian bacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182652</guid>
		<description>An ancient Greek goes into a tailor shop with a couple of torn togas. The tailor says &quot;Euripides?&quot; and the guy says &quot;Yeah. Eumendides?

Hehe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An ancient Greek goes into a tailor shop with a couple of torn togas. The tailor says &#8220;Euripides?&#8221; and the guy says &#8220;Yeah. Eumendides?</p>
<p>Hehe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182647</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182647</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Again you miss the obvious between expressing a viewpoint and limiting the choices of the universe. Keep digging&lt;/em&gt;

Are you admitting those &lt;em&gt;aren&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; thoe only two possibilities, AO?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Again you miss the obvious between expressing a viewpoint and limiting the choices of the universe. Keep digging</em></p>
<p>Are you admitting those <em>aren&#8217;t</em> thoe only two possibilities, AO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182622</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182622</guid>
		<description>Not bad , I could, but I won&#039;t quibble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not bad , I could, but I won&#8217;t quibble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southern Quaker</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182612</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern Quaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182612</guid>
		<description>Dr. Yahia Abdur-Rahman, from the Islamic Shurah Council of Southern California (ISCSC), offers Supplication For The Victims   

Dr. Maher Hathout, from the the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) and The Islamic Center of Southern California (ICSC), condemns the attack and issues a statement. 

Dr. Ahmad Sakr, from the Islamic Education Center (IEC), offers his condolences to the families of the victims and condemns the attack. 

Dr. Muzammil Siddiqi, former president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), condemns the attack.

&quot;Scholars Call Attacks a Distortion of Islam,&quot; Laurie Goodstein, The News York Times, 30 September 2001

A Common Word Between Us and You, by 130 Islamic scholars

Attacks on Civilians: Forbidden by Islam, by Shaykh Yusuf Qaradawi

Ayatollah Muhammad Husain Fadlallah of Lebanon condemns Osama Bin Laden, by Ayatollah Muhammad Husain Fadlallah

Bin Laden&#039;s Violence is a Heresy Against Islam, by AbdulHakim Murad (Tim Winter)

Defending the Civilians (a fatwa against terrorism), by Shaykh Muhammad Afifi al-Akiti

Expert Says Islam Prohibits Violence Against Innocents, by Shaykh Hamza Yusuf

Grand Sheikh of al-Azhar Condemns Suicide Bombings, by Shaykh Muhammad Sayyed Tantawi

High Mufti of Russian Muslims calls for Extradition of Bin Laden, by Russian Muslim leaders</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Yahia Abdur-Rahman, from the Islamic Shurah Council of Southern California (ISCSC), offers Supplication For The Victims   </p>
<p>Dr. Maher Hathout, from the the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) and The Islamic Center of Southern California (ICSC), condemns the attack and issues a statement. </p>
<p>Dr. Ahmad Sakr, from the Islamic Education Center (IEC), offers his condolences to the families of the victims and condemns the attack. </p>
<p>Dr. Muzammil Siddiqi, former president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), condemns the attack.</p>
<p>&#8220;Scholars Call Attacks a Distortion of Islam,&#8221; Laurie Goodstein, The News York Times, 30 September 2001</p>
<p>A Common Word Between Us and You, by 130 Islamic scholars</p>
<p>Attacks on Civilians: Forbidden by Islam, by Shaykh Yusuf Qaradawi</p>
<p>Ayatollah Muhammad Husain Fadlallah of Lebanon condemns Osama Bin Laden, by Ayatollah Muhammad Husain Fadlallah</p>
<p>Bin Laden&#8217;s Violence is a Heresy Against Islam, by AbdulHakim Murad (Tim Winter)</p>
<p>Defending the Civilians (a fatwa against terrorism), by Shaykh Muhammad Afifi al-Akiti</p>
<p>Expert Says Islam Prohibits Violence Against Innocents, by Shaykh Hamza Yusuf</p>
<p>Grand Sheikh of al-Azhar Condemns Suicide Bombings, by Shaykh Muhammad Sayyed Tantawi</p>
<p>High Mufti of Russian Muslims calls for Extradition of Bin Laden, by Russian Muslim leaders</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182603</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 07:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182603</guid>
		<description>Actually, Paul D , you are incorrect. Hitler was propagndizing and trying to appeal to Christians , by saying that he was one of them. This id not mean he was , or that he was motivated by his own particular interpretation. In fact , he believed in the Thule, and a belief in the &lt;i&gt;volk&lt;/i&gt; that Germans were a part of the land in which they lived , a sort of animist ideology, not a Christian.

This is absolutely NOT the same as saying that &quot;God spoke to me, and said I could bring peace to the Middle East&quot;. In fact, nowhere does he suggest that he would convert the people of Iraq to Christianity.

You gonna to work on those rhetorical skills.



Canadian bacon: Is he related to the famous Greek tailor , Euripides Eupaiphades?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Paul D , you are incorrect. Hitler was propagndizing and trying to appeal to Christians , by saying that he was one of them. This id not mean he was , or that he was motivated by his own particular interpretation. In fact , he believed in the Thule, and a belief in the <i>volk</i> that Germans were a part of the land in which they lived , a sort of animist ideology, not a Christian.</p>
<p>This is absolutely NOT the same as saying that &#8220;God spoke to me, and said I could bring peace to the Middle East&#8221;. In fact, nowhere does he suggest that he would convert the people of Iraq to Christianity.</p>
<p>You gonna to work on those rhetorical skills.</p>
<p>Canadian bacon: Is he related to the famous Greek tailor , Euripides Eupaiphades?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canadian bacon</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182586</link>
		<dc:creator>canadian bacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 04:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182586</guid>
		<description>I think this is Obama&#039;s MO and his coolness will prevail on the diplomatic front - 

&quot;Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.&quot;

Euripides</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is Obama&#8217;s MO and his coolness will prevail on the diplomatic front &#8211; </p>
<p>&#8220;Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.&#8221;</p>
<p>Euripides</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/10/01/omg-teh-diplomacy-iran-edition/#comment-182583</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 03:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16926#comment-182583</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And that Hitler guy? I guess if he says it’s true, it must be true, eh? There is a truly credible source for information about the Third Reich – Hitler himself!&lt;/i&gt;

That same criteria applies to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/bush-god-told-me-to-invade-iraq-509925.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;another fella&lt;/a&gt; that took God&#039;s orders and tallied up a minimum of 60,000- If you&#039;re still working on the &quot;in the name of G-d since 1900&quot; quotient.

If you insist on hitting yourself in the face, let me help you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And that Hitler guy? I guess if he says it’s true, it must be true, eh? There is a truly credible source for information about the Third Reich – Hitler himself!</i></p>
<p>That same criteria applies to <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/bush-god-told-me-to-invade-iraq-509925.html" rel="nofollow">another fella</a> that took God&#8217;s orders and tallied up a minimum of 60,000- If you&#8217;re still working on the &#8220;in the name of G-d since 1900&#8243; quotient.</p>
<p>If you insist on hitting yourself in the face, let me help you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

