But, I will try this again: “living wills” , “end – of – life advisory councils” , “death panels” , are all ways to avoid being a victim of “mercy killing” (euthanasia). That would make them different.

And Oliver wants us all to stop calling each other names.

So you’re saying that not only that “death panels” refer to a living will, but that this kind of rhetoric is also appropriate?

If I wasn’t sure of it before, I’m sure of it now. Frank, you’re a moron.

You are incorrect.

Frank, here’s you defending the “death panel” rhetoric. Now, the Snopes article I linked debunks that claim. Do you wish to apologize your earlier post or not?

No, Jaim. He argued that belief in a sky-god is BETTER than science.

Honestly, you recently argued that belief in a sky-god is the same as science. And this is because you are as dumb as a fucking bag of hammers.

Now hang on, that’s unfair. Sarah Palin make Saint Ronnie look like a freaking Einstein. Then again, she’d do that to any slime mold of above-average intelligence.

Dennis: the word you’re looking for is “nay”, you insensitive bastard.

“She has eighty names, thirty addresses, twelve Social Security cards and is collecting veteran’s benefits on four non-existing deceased husbands. And she is collecting Social Security on her cards. She’s got Medicaid, getting food stamps, and she is collecting welfare under each of her names.”

“All the waste in a year from a nuclear power plant can be stored under a desk.”

“We were told four years ago that 17 million people went to bed hungry every night. Well, that was probably true. They were all on a diet.”

Ha ha. Hungry poor people are hilarious.

Fascism was really the basis for the New Deal

I have flown twice over Mount St. Helens. I’m not a scientist and I don’t know the figures, but I have a suspicion that one little mountain out there, in these last several months, has probably released more sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere than has been released in the last ten years of automobile driving or things of that kind.

I bet he wasn’t a scientist and didn’t know the figures (obviously), so give him that.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. The U.S. Geological Survey has told me that the proven potential for oil in Alaska alone is greater than the proven reserves in Saudi Arabia.

He may have said that before, I can’t prove he didn’t.

Trains are not any more energy efficient than the average automobile, with both getting about 48 passenger miles to the gallon.

I know all the bad things that happened in that war. I was in uniform four years myself.

It isn’t that liberals don’t know anything, it’s that so much of what they know isn’t so.

Riiiiiiiigggggggttt.

Well David Weigel didn’t say ‘em, despite his girth and poor complexion.

“Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications and statements by people
now in custody reveal that
Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of Al Qaida.”

“Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at [past nuclear] sites.”

“The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.”

“We know he’s been absolutely devoted to trying to acquire nuclear weapons, and we believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons.”

“We gave him a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn’t let them in.”

U.S. intelligence indicates that Saddam Hussein
had upwards of 30,000 munitions capable
of delivering chemical agents.

We have also discovered through intelligence
that Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to disperse chemical or biological weapons across broad areas.”

I cannot believe that people can be so wrong, and have no doubt.

Pres Reagan was right when he said, “It isn’t that liberals don’t know anything, it’s that so much of what they know isn’t so.”

Oh no, another dilemma. Should I believe Snopes or Frank? What to do, what to do…

Wait, no one said that the “death panels” were about ending people’s lives?

Uh, bullshit.