<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OMG So Many Words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: mambochicken23</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180385</link>
		<dc:creator>mambochicken23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180385</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;When Frank makes a claim &lt;strike&gt;that is easily disproved&lt;/strike&gt;, when you show him how obviously wrong his claim was&lt;strong&gt;, as it always is,&lt;/strong&gt; he’ll respond by &lt;strike&gt;acknowledging he overstated things, uh, continuing to make his claim&lt;/strike&gt;spouting idiotic nonsense and being a little bitch.&lt;/i&gt;

Fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>When Frank makes a claim <strike>that is easily disproved</strike>, when you show him how obviously wrong his claim was<strong>, as it always is,</strong> he’ll respond by <strike>acknowledging he overstated things, uh, continuing to make his claim</strike>spouting idiotic nonsense and being a little bitch.</i></p>
<p>Fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180380</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180380</guid>
		<description>Frank DiSalle: &lt;i&gt;anti-choice
civil rights will never require affirmative action
the war on terror is gone — where did it go?
and so many, many more&lt;/i&gt;

Yup.  When Frank makes a claim that is easily disproved, when you show him how obviously wrong his claim was he&#039;ll respond by &lt;strike&gt;acknowledging he overstated things&lt;/strike&gt;, uh, continuing to make his claim.

wingnut intellectual honesty, ladies and gents</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank DiSalle: <i>anti-choice<br />
civil rights will never require affirmative action<br />
the war on terror is gone — where did it go?<br />
and so many, many more</i></p>
<p>Yup.  When Frank makes a claim that is easily disproved, when you show him how obviously wrong his claim was he&#8217;ll respond by <strike>acknowledging he overstated things</strike>, uh, continuing to make his claim.</p>
<p>wingnut intellectual honesty, ladies and gents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gumby</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180370</link>
		<dc:creator>gumby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 05:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180370</guid>
		<description>Um, do legislators not have staff that can prepare, like, memos and shit that would tell them what is in the big stack &#039;o confusin&#039; words they are presented with?  It seems to me that the problem is not entirely insurmountable.  I know, get a smart intern chock full of book lernin&#039; and pep to tell you what is in the bill!  Complexity is overcome with hard work and smartness, and if you ain&#039;t got it, you can hire it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, do legislators not have staff that can prepare, like, memos and shit that would tell them what is in the big stack &#8216;o confusin&#8217; words they are presented with?  It seems to me that the problem is not entirely insurmountable.  I know, get a smart intern chock full of book lernin&#8217; and pep to tell you what is in the bill!  Complexity is overcome with hard work and smartness, and if you ain&#8217;t got it, you can hire it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180360</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 04:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180360</guid>
		<description>Sean, let us not forget the infamous &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4443.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gingrich Lexicon&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, let us not forget the infamous <a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4443.htm" rel="nofollow">Gingrich Lexicon</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180358</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 04:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180358</guid>
		<description>anti-choice
civil rights will never require affirmative action
the war on terror is gone -- where did it go?
and so many, many more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anti-choice<br />
civil rights will never require affirmative action<br />
the war on terror is gone &#8212; where did it go?<br />
and so many, many more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180313</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180313</guid>
		<description>Frank DiSalle: &lt;i&gt;Because if anyone knows how to use and abuse words to forward their agenda, it is the left. You can tell by the sophistry that passes for thought in here, how the left manipulates words and their meanings to appear to be right.&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah!  The right never abuses words or uses them to misconstrue things!

They&#039;d never use terms like &quot;enhanced interrogation&quot;, or &quot;Clean Skies Act&quot; for a bill that actually allows increased levels of pollutants, or &quot;death tax&quot;, or such vague ephemera as &quot;The American Dream Restoration Act&quot;.

Nope.  Nothing but straight talkers on the right.  Every one of them.

(See, Frank.  Here&#039;s where the folk here on the left differ significantly from those of you on the right.  The left tends to acknowledge when folks on the left are wrong.  Not always, sure.  But we do do it often.  While you on the right insist certain traits exist ONLY on one side.  Folks on the right NEVER abuse words.  Folks on the left ALWAYS do.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank DiSalle: <i>Because if anyone knows how to use and abuse words to forward their agenda, it is the left. You can tell by the sophistry that passes for thought in here, how the left manipulates words and their meanings to appear to be right.</i></p>
<p>Yeah!  The right never abuses words or uses them to misconstrue things!</p>
<p>They&#8217;d never use terms like &#8220;enhanced interrogation&#8221;, or &#8220;Clean Skies Act&#8221; for a bill that actually allows increased levels of pollutants, or &#8220;death tax&#8221;, or such vague ephemera as &#8220;The American Dream Restoration Act&#8221;.</p>
<p>Nope.  Nothing but straight talkers on the right.  Every one of them.</p>
<p>(See, Frank.  Here&#8217;s where the folk here on the left differ significantly from those of you on the right.  The left tends to acknowledge when folks on the left are wrong.  Not always, sure.  But we do do it often.  While you on the right insist certain traits exist ONLY on one side.  Folks on the right NEVER abuse words.  Folks on the left ALWAYS do.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180307</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180307</guid>
		<description>Sean Thornton: &lt;i&gt;…said the boy who reads comic books…&lt;/i&gt;

And the problem with comic books is...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean Thornton: <i>…said the boy who reads comic books…</i></p>
<p>And the problem with comic books is&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180306</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180306</guid>
		<description>Granted the article you link to is short, OW.  But it&#039;s only in the last two sentences that anything is made about the number of pages.  Most of it is (legitimately) questioning the &quot;revenue neutral&quot; claim and pointing out (rightly) that once the amendments are gone thru the financial impact is going to end up quite different that what it would be for the bare bill.

But never mind that.  In the last two sentences they said the bill is long.  THAT&#039;s what we obviously want to be focusing on.

I mean, it&#039;s only folks on the right who nit pick on irrelevant side issues, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted the article you link to is short, OW.  But it&#8217;s only in the last two sentences that anything is made about the number of pages.  Most of it is (legitimately) questioning the &#8220;revenue neutral&#8221; claim and pointing out (rightly) that once the amendments are gone thru the financial impact is going to end up quite different that what it would be for the bare bill.</p>
<p>But never mind that.  In the last two sentences they said the bill is long.  THAT&#8217;s what we obviously want to be focusing on.</p>
<p>I mean, it&#8217;s only folks on the right who nit pick on irrelevant side issues, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mambochicken23</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180273</link>
		<dc:creator>mambochicken23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180273</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Boy the Bible sure does have a lot of words too.&lt;/i&gt;

Maybe this explains why so many shitheel &quot;Christian&quot; conservatives wind up perpetrating vile, un-Christian acts.  They&#039;ve never read the Bible!  There&#039;s just SOOOO many pages.  Who has time for that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Boy the Bible sure does have a lot of words too.</i></p>
<p>Maybe this explains why so many shitheel &#8220;Christian&#8221; conservatives wind up perpetrating vile, un-Christian acts.  They&#8217;ve never read the Bible!  There&#8217;s just SOOOO many pages.  Who has time for that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnymags</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180267</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnymags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180267</guid>
		<description>Boy the Bible sure does have a lot of words too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy the Bible sure does have a lot of words too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnymags</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180266</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnymags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180266</guid>
		<description>Hey! I&#039;ll have you know comics ( before Rob Liefeld poisoned the well) were a source of great vocabulary. Stan Lee was quite the wordsmith in his story telling, Excelsior, bitches! ( add mine)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! I&#8217;ll have you know comics ( before Rob Liefeld poisoned the well) were a source of great vocabulary. Stan Lee was quite the wordsmith in his story telling, Excelsior, bitches! ( add mine)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parthenon</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180263</link>
		<dc:creator>Parthenon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180263</guid>
		<description>This, as with the czar &#039;controversy,&#039; is another of those issues that is only of concern when Democrats are in charge, and then it&#039;s the latest and greatest threat to the republic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This, as with the czar &#8216;controversy,&#8217; is another of those issues that is only of concern when Democrats are in charge, and then it&#8217;s the latest and greatest threat to the republic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justus Paiewonsky</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180262</link>
		<dc:creator>Justus Paiewonsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180262</guid>
		<description>But they&#039;re right, I mean, where are all the pretty pictures in these bills anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But they&#8217;re right, I mean, where are all the pretty pictures in these bills anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mambochicken23</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180261</link>
		<dc:creator>mambochicken23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180261</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;how the left &lt;b&gt; utilizes &lt;/b&gt; words and their meanings to &lt;strike&gt; appear to &lt;/strike&gt; be right.&lt;/i&gt;

FTFY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>how the left <b> utilizes </b> words and their meanings to <strike> appear to </strike> be right.</i></p>
<p>FTFY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180254</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180254</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Why do they fear words so?&lt;/i&gt; Because if anyone knows how to use and abuse words to forward their agenda, it is the left. You can tell by the sophistry that passes for thought in here, how the left manipulates words and their meanings to appear to be right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why do they fear words so?</i> Because if anyone knows how to use and abuse words to forward their agenda, it is the left. You can tell by the sophistry that passes for thought in here, how the left manipulates words and their meanings to appear to be right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180236</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180236</guid>
		<description>Jay: I love that this is a concern all of a sudden and 2 - your GOPpals aren&#039;t making the more reality based critique you are. They&#039;re just saying golly, they have a lot of pages!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay: I love that this is a concern all of a sudden and 2 &#8211; your GOPpals aren&#8217;t making the more reality based critique you are. They&#8217;re just saying golly, they have a lot of pages!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180235</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180235</guid>
		<description>I read lots of comics, actually. But unlike the GOP I don&#039;t think theyre reality or that they have too many words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read lots of comics, actually. But unlike the GOP I don&#8217;t think theyre reality or that they have too many words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180232</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180232</guid>
		<description>Once again you&#039;re missing the point about the size of these bills. The reason the size of the bills are called into into question is this: Who the hell reads these things before they vote on them?

That&#039;s the problem. How many frigging times have we seen politicians say, &quot;I wasn&#039;t aware that was part of the bill&quot; or how many times have we witnessed Congress have to go back and write new legislation to undo old legislation that was a total clusterfuck because politicians had no clue as to what they were actually voting for?

THAT&#039;s the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again you&#8217;re missing the point about the size of these bills. The reason the size of the bills are called into into question is this: Who the hell reads these things before they vote on them?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the problem. How many frigging times have we seen politicians say, &#8220;I wasn&#8217;t aware that was part of the bill&#8221; or how many times have we witnessed Congress have to go back and write new legislation to undo old legislation that was a total clusterfuck because politicians had no clue as to what they were actually voting for?</p>
<p>THAT&#8217;s the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repack Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/22/omg-so-many-words/#comment-180220</link>
		<dc:creator>Repack Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16793#comment-180220</guid>
		<description>When &lt;i&gt;The Very Hungry Caterpillar&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;The Pet Goat&lt;/i&gt; are the books most closely associated with the GOP preznit, you get used to one page documents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When <i>The Very Hungry Caterpillar</i> and <i>The Pet Goat</i> are the books most closely associated with the GOP preznit, you get used to one page documents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

