<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House To Spank Joe Wilson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanction &#8220;Shoutin&#8217; Joe Wilson!&#8221;- Deep Brain Diary</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-178262</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanction &#8220;Shoutin&#8217; Joe Wilson!&#8221;- Deep Brain Diary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-178262</guid>
		<description>[...] House To Spank Joe Wilson (oliverwillis.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] House To Spank Joe Wilson (oliverwillis.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athornton</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-178027</link>
		<dc:creator>Athornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-178027</guid>
		<description>Respect is given, I repeat, given to the man, not to the office he holds. Would you have respect for the office of Secretary of the Treasury, which is just a title, or not have respect for Timothy Geithner because he &quot;forgot&quot; to pay his taxes like the rest of Obama&#039;s cabinet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Respect is given, I repeat, given to the man, not to the office he holds. Would you have respect for the office of Secretary of the Treasury, which is just a title, or not have respect for Timothy Geithner because he &#8220;forgot&#8221; to pay his taxes like the rest of Obama&#8217;s cabinet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177615</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177615</guid>
		<description>Thank you for all your refutations and contestations against anything I specifically wrote in my reply to your initial posting, Sean (end of sarcasm).  I especially love the irony of you accusing LIBERALS of having double standards in response to my post, considering what I wrote there about conservatives and their schizophrenic views on whether calling Americans &quot;Nazis&quot; is a bad thing or not.  And who is &quot;Saul?&quot; Saul of Tarsus? Saul Bellow? the actor Saul Rubinek? Saul Alinsky?  If it&#039;s the latter, then you mean conservatives like yourself are now quoting this dude in a POSITIVE context (lol)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for all your refutations and contestations against anything I specifically wrote in my reply to your initial posting, Sean (end of sarcasm).  I especially love the irony of you accusing LIBERALS of having double standards in response to my post, considering what I wrote there about conservatives and their schizophrenic views on whether calling Americans &#8220;Nazis&#8221; is a bad thing or not.  And who is &#8220;Saul?&#8221; Saul of Tarsus? Saul Bellow? the actor Saul Rubinek? Saul Alinsky?  If it&#8217;s the latter, then you mean conservatives like yourself are now quoting this dude in a POSITIVE context (lol)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DismasUSA</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177394</link>
		<dc:creator>DismasUSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177394</guid>
		<description>A sample apology for Wilson to give from the well of the house:

I&#039;m sorry I called the President a liar, during his speech, which was a veritable cornucopia of equivocation.

Or something to that effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sample apology for Wilson to give from the well of the house:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry I called the President a liar, during his speech, which was a veritable cornucopia of equivocation.</p>
<p>Or something to that effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177361</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177361</guid>
		<description>&quot;...tolerates a Speaker calling Americans Nazis...&quot;

Pelosi didn&#039;t do this on the floor of the House of Representatives at all, much less do it in the form of heckling on the floor during a speech...and even if she did, since when is the right against calling Americans &quot;Nazis?&quot; I&#039;ve heard and seen plenty of conservatives (Bill O&#039;Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, Glenn Beck, the Gateway Pundit blogger, whatever his/her name is) using that smear against people they disagree with (i.e. people on the left), and all of the latter individuals were Americans.  Rush Limbaugh even used his infamous &quot;feminazi&quot; slander against a JEWISH American (Gloria Allred). 

&quot;...that ignores the insane ravings of Pete Stark...&quot;

Nice try, but Stark DID apologize from the well of the House  for the &quot;president sends troops&quot; statement.  Do your research.

&quot;that booed the President from the floor of the House during the 2005 State of the Union.&quot;

Booing, while not appropriate, is not the same as shouting out &quot;you lie!&quot; Republicans booed during Clinton&#039;s 1998 State of the Union speech, and Democrats didn&#039;t complain.  All heckling is wrong, but not all heckling is equivalent.

&quot;...that ignores the ethical, financial and tax lapses of Charlie Rangel...&quot;

Okay, I&#039;ll give you this one.

&quot;It used to be when Joe Wilson called the President a liar, moonbats like you would stand up and cheer.&quot;

THAT Joe Wilson didn&#039;t do that on the floor of the House of Representatives in the form of heckling during a speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;tolerates a Speaker calling Americans Nazis&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Pelosi didn&#8217;t do this on the floor of the House of Representatives at all, much less do it in the form of heckling on the floor during a speech&#8230;and even if she did, since when is the right against calling Americans &#8220;Nazis?&#8221; I&#8217;ve heard and seen plenty of conservatives (Bill O&#8217;Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, Glenn Beck, the Gateway Pundit blogger, whatever his/her name is) using that smear against people they disagree with (i.e. people on the left), and all of the latter individuals were Americans.  Rush Limbaugh even used his infamous &#8220;feminazi&#8221; slander against a JEWISH American (Gloria Allred). </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;that ignores the insane ravings of Pete Stark&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Nice try, but Stark DID apologize from the well of the House  for the &#8220;president sends troops&#8221; statement.  Do your research.</p>
<p>&#8220;that booed the President from the floor of the House during the 2005 State of the Union.&#8221;</p>
<p>Booing, while not appropriate, is not the same as shouting out &#8220;you lie!&#8221; Republicans booed during Clinton&#8217;s 1998 State of the Union speech, and Democrats didn&#8217;t complain.  All heckling is wrong, but not all heckling is equivalent.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;that ignores the ethical, financial and tax lapses of Charlie Rangel&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;ll give you this one.</p>
<p>&#8220;It used to be when Joe Wilson called the President a liar, moonbats like you would stand up and cheer.&#8221;</p>
<p>THAT Joe Wilson didn&#8217;t do that on the floor of the House of Representatives in the form of heckling during a speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burn</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177351</link>
		<dc:creator>Burn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177351</guid>
		<description>Wingnuts thought ann coulter was hot too.  Double ewwww.

Palin&#039;s little slut of a daughter is one piece of ass, that much is true.  Nothing like being a teen MILF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wingnuts thought ann coulter was hot too.  Double ewwww.</p>
<p>Palin&#8217;s little slut of a daughter is one piece of ass, that much is true.  Nothing like being a teen MILF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177338</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177338</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Sarah is hot.&lt;/em&gt;

Dude. She&#039;s a grandmother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Sarah is hot.</em></p>
<p>Dude. She&#8217;s a grandmother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repack Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177337</link>
		<dc:creator>Repack Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177337</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Sarah is hot.&lt;/i&gt;

Chacon a son gout.

Stupidity is a turnoff for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Sarah is hot.</i></p>
<p>Chacon a son gout.</p>
<p>Stupidity is a turnoff for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repack Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177336</link>
		<dc:creator>Repack Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177336</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;that doesn’t seem to have lessened your whining about Clinton’s impeachment, even ten years later.&lt;/i&gt;

Two words for you: Not. Guilty.

The GOP congress spent &lt;i&gt;$65 million&lt;/i&gt; on investigating Whitewater, and the result?  Let me quote from the report: &quot;No crime could be demonstrated to have taken place.&quot;

Although the Lewinsky event was tawdry, there were no crimes involved with that either.  Unlike serial adulterer and Clinton stalker Newt Gingrich, Clinton hadn&#039;t run on &quot;family values.&quot;  All that money was spent on a FISHING EXPEDITION, to see if the GOP could FIND something to accuse Clinton of, and when they couldn&#039;t, they trumped up a case about an untruth that was not a crime either, and that didn&#039;t begin to pass the smell test, resulting in a &quot;Not Guilty&quot; verdict.

So yeah, the GOP took advantage of its majority to waste money and look like fools by using the Congress in an attempt to de-legitimize the most popular president of a generation, even though they had nothing to work with.  Clinton left office with popularity ratings about three times what Bush left with and would easily have won a thrid timrm if the rules permitted.

OTOH, there is no doubt about what Rep. Wilson said, since millions have heard it and he has owned up to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>that doesn’t seem to have lessened your whining about Clinton’s impeachment, even ten years later.</i></p>
<p>Two words for you: Not. Guilty.</p>
<p>The GOP congress spent <i>$65 million</i> on investigating Whitewater, and the result?  Let me quote from the report: &#8220;No crime could be demonstrated to have taken place.&#8221;</p>
<p>Although the Lewinsky event was tawdry, there were no crimes involved with that either.  Unlike serial adulterer and Clinton stalker Newt Gingrich, Clinton hadn&#8217;t run on &#8220;family values.&#8221;  All that money was spent on a FISHING EXPEDITION, to see if the GOP could FIND something to accuse Clinton of, and when they couldn&#8217;t, they trumped up a case about an untruth that was not a crime either, and that didn&#8217;t begin to pass the smell test, resulting in a &#8220;Not Guilty&#8221; verdict.</p>
<p>So yeah, the GOP took advantage of its majority to waste money and look like fools by using the Congress in an attempt to de-legitimize the most popular president of a generation, even though they had nothing to work with.  Clinton left office with popularity ratings about three times what Bush left with and would easily have won a thrid timrm if the rules permitted.</p>
<p>OTOH, there is no doubt about what Rep. Wilson said, since millions have heard it and he has owned up to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impaler</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177327</link>
		<dc:creator>Impaler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177327</guid>
		<description>Yea, been a long summer perhaps a real bikini pic, this time. Sarah is hot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, been a long summer perhaps a real bikini pic, this time. Sarah is hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177323</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177323</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I’m thinking a good place to check for what the House does next is Sarah Palin’s Facebook page, &lt;/em&gt;

Well, let us know if she posts anything good over there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I’m thinking a good place to check for what the House does next is Sarah Palin’s Facebook page, </em></p>
<p>Well, let us know if she posts anything good over there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177313</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177313</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking a good place to check for what the House does next is Sarah Palin&#039;s Facebook page, Quibbie.  

Probably a better leading indicator than Nancy&#039;s spokesperson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking a good place to check for what the House does next is Sarah Palin&#8217;s Facebook page, Quibbie.  </p>
<p>Probably a better leading indicator than Nancy&#8217;s spokesperson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177308</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177308</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Guess there goes your ‘two days, tops’ speculation, Quibbie.&lt;/em&gt;

I made that guess about two &lt;em&gt;hours&lt;/em&gt; ago, Dennis. I might be wrong if Wilson continues to defy House rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Guess there goes your ‘two days, tops’ speculation, Quibbie.</em></p>
<p>I made that guess about two <em>hours</em> ago, Dennis. I might be wrong if Wilson continues to defy House rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burn</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177303</link>
		<dc:creator>Burn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177303</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s about respecting the rules of the House, which he is a member and he broke those rules. Simple as that.  I thought wingnuts are all about respecting the rule of law and personal responsibilities, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about respecting the rules of the House, which he is a member and he broke those rules. Simple as that.  I thought wingnuts are all about respecting the rule of law and personal responsibilities, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177298</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177298</guid>
		<description>Repack, 

Yes, they do, but that doesn&#039;t seem to have lessened your  whining about Clinton&#039;s impeachment, even ten years later.

Funny that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Repack, </p>
<p>Yes, they do, but that doesn&#8217;t seem to have lessened your  whining about Clinton&#8217;s impeachment, even ten years later.</p>
<p>Funny that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repack Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177295</link>
		<dc:creator>Repack Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177295</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Wilson’s apology and Obama’s acceptance wasn’t good enough for the rabble.&lt;/i&gt;

Elections have consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Wilson’s apology and Obama’s acceptance wasn’t good enough for the rabble.</i></p>
<p>Elections have consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177283</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177283</guid>
		<description>Guess there goes your &#039;two days, tops&#039; speculation, Quibbie.  Wilson&#039;s apology and Obama&#039;s acceptance wasn&#039;t good enough for the rabble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess there goes your &#8216;two days, tops&#8217; speculation, Quibbie.  Wilson&#8217;s apology and Obama&#8217;s acceptance wasn&#8217;t good enough for the rabble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoBull1</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177280</link>
		<dc:creator>NoBull1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177280</guid>
		<description>Pelosi could use some cojones.  Oops, sorry.  Well, the Cowardly Lion got some heart-in Oz. Maybe he should be Speaker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pelosi could use some cojones.  Oops, sorry.  Well, the Cowardly Lion got some heart-in Oz. Maybe he should be Speaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177258</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177258</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;90% of the time Quaker has nothing, &lt;/em&gt;

Show me how it&#039;s done, joker. There&#039;s a big, fat, slow one right over the plate for you just three posts up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>90% of the time Quaker has nothing, </em></p>
<p>Show me how it&#8217;s done, joker. There&#8217;s a big, fat, slow one right over the plate for you just three posts up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joaquin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/house-to-spank-joe-wilson/#comment-177255</link>
		<dc:creator>joaquin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16620#comment-177255</guid>
		<description>William. 90% of the time Quaker has nothing, but silly drivel. He is amusing though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William. 90% of the time Quaker has nothing, but silly drivel. He is amusing though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

