<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Baits TechCrunch Into Publishing Junk Without Checking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/facebook-baits-techcrunch-into-publishing-junk-without-checking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/facebook-baits-techcrunch-into-publishing-junk-without-checking/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:00:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean D. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/facebook-baits-techcrunch-into-publishing-junk-without-checking/#comment-177420</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 08:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16624#comment-177420</guid>
		<description>While I certainly believe reporters should check their sources and not publish until they are sure of their facts, I don&#039;t see some notable failure here.  This isn&#039;t a hard news piece.  It&#039;s a short, barely over 100 word &lt;b&gt;opinion&lt;/b&gt;.  &quot;Facebook has this new feature.  For these reasons, can&#039;t see why anyone would want to use it.&quot;

And, &quot;breathless&quot;?  Where in the world do you see that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I certainly believe reporters should check their sources and not publish until they are sure of their facts, I don&#8217;t see some notable failure here.  This isn&#8217;t a hard news piece.  It&#8217;s a short, barely over 100 word <b>opinion</b>.  &#8220;Facebook has this new feature.  For these reasons, can&#8217;t see why anyone would want to use it.&#8221;</p>
<p>And, &#8220;breathless&#8221;?  Where in the world do you see that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CapMidnight</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/facebook-baits-techcrunch-into-publishing-junk-without-checking/#comment-177287</link>
		<dc:creator>CapMidnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16624#comment-177287</guid>
		<description>But I can still fax your blog to my Mom, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I can still fax your blog to my Mom, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/facebook-baits-techcrunch-into-publishing-junk-without-checking/#comment-177273</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16624#comment-177273</guid>
		<description>Fax this photo? Baw!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fax this photo? Baw!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/09/11/facebook-baits-techcrunch-into-publishing-junk-without-checking/#comment-177270</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16624#comment-177270</guid>
		<description>Thank God that never happens &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;here.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank God that never happens <b><i>here.</i></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
