<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kenneth Gladney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:42:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie O.</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-171328</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-171328</guid>
		<description>Sorry to come so late to the party, but I noticed a point in a comment above by Dennis:
[blockquote]Note that one lady who was filming the kerfuffel had her camera smashed right into her face by another SEIU thug — this one a woman![/blockquote]
I couldn&#039;t see the woman in the video hit the camera at all.  She was in the frame, the camera got jostled, and the woman holding the camera started asking if &quot;you&quot; hit her, whoever &quot;you is.&quot;

But on the wider video that&#039;s been disseminated showing Gladney getting up in an aggressive stance and then being pulled back by a baseball cap-wearing union member, you can almost see the incident involving this other woman with a camera and you can hear a man saying, &quot;He hit her, he hit her.&quot;  So whoever &quot;you&quot; was, it apparently wasn&#039;t the woman in the video.  

Interestingly, the woman who claimed she had been hit was arrested immediately following her outcry, which had been observed by one of the cops.  I wonder why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to come so late to the party, but I noticed a point in a comment above by Dennis:<br />
[blockquote]Note that one lady who was filming the kerfuffel had her camera smashed right into her face by another SEIU thug — this one a woman![/blockquote]<br />
I couldn&#8217;t see the woman in the video hit the camera at all.  She was in the frame, the camera got jostled, and the woman holding the camera started asking if &#8220;you&#8221; hit her, whoever &#8220;you is.&#8221;</p>
<p>But on the wider video that&#8217;s been disseminated showing Gladney getting up in an aggressive stance and then being pulled back by a baseball cap-wearing union member, you can almost see the incident involving this other woman with a camera and you can hear a man saying, &#8220;He hit her, he hit her.&#8221;  So whoever &#8220;you&#8221; was, it apparently wasn&#8217;t the woman in the video.  </p>
<p>Interestingly, the woman who claimed she had been hit was arrested immediately following her outcry, which had been observed by one of the cops.  I wonder why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170665</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170665</guid>
		<description>&quot;To those two clowns, any challenge whatsoever to what they say is trying to drown them out.&quot;

I re-read the Pelosi/Hoyer op-ed and can&#039;t find anywhere where those two individuals define &quot;drowning out opposing views&quot; in this way...but if you&#039;ve embarked on a new career in mind reading (Pelosi and Hoyer being the first two minds you&#039;ve decided to read), good luck to you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;To those two clowns, any challenge whatsoever to what they say is trying to drown them out.&#8221;</p>
<p>I re-read the Pelosi/Hoyer op-ed and can&#8217;t find anywhere where those two individuals define &#8220;drowning out opposing views&#8221; in this way&#8230;but if you&#8217;ve embarked on a new career in mind reading (Pelosi and Hoyer being the first two minds you&#8217;ve decided to read), good luck to you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaim</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170637</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170637</guid>
		<description>LOL Michelle Malkin.

How &#039;bout some links to FreeRepublic while you&#039;re at it?

(I&#039;m kidding.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL Michelle Malkin.</p>
<p>How &#8217;bout some links to FreeRepublic while you&#8217;re at it?</p>
<p>(I&#8217;m kidding.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trochilus</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170377</link>
		<dc:creator>Trochilus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170377</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Here’s the only time in the op-ed by Pelosi and  Hoyer where the word &quot;un-American&quot; appears: “Drowning out views is simply un-American.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

To those two clowns, any challenge whatsoever to what they say is trying to drown them out.

And, for the President to actively encourage Americans to &quot;snitch&quot; on one another by reporting &quot;fishy&quot; e-mails about healthcare to political operatives in the White House, now that IS un-American.  And, it is also a possible violation of the federal Privacy Act. 

But Hoyer and Pelosi forgot to add that packing the room with union supporters and locking real constituents outside is just fine. 

Oh.  They also forgot to say that punching someone in the face and knocking them down -- if you&#039;re a union thug -- well that&#039;s just fine, too.  

Maybe that sentence was cut in the editing process!  But HHS Secretary, Kathleen Sebelius made sure to signal that last one the very next day when she held a confab with the SEIU, and told all the &quot;brothers and sisters&quot; to &quot;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;keep doing what you’re doing&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.&quot;  You can  &lt;a href=&quot;//michellemalkin.com/2009/08/07/sebelius-calls-her-seiu-brothers-and-sisters-to-battle/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;read all about it, right here&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Here’s the only time in the op-ed by Pelosi and  Hoyer where the word &#8220;un-American&#8221; appears: “Drowning out views is simply un-American.”</p></blockquote>
<p>To those two clowns, any challenge whatsoever to what they say is trying to drown them out.</p>
<p>And, for the President to actively encourage Americans to &#8220;snitch&#8221; on one another by reporting &#8220;fishy&#8221; e-mails about healthcare to political operatives in the White House, now that IS un-American.  And, it is also a possible violation of the federal Privacy Act. </p>
<p>But Hoyer and Pelosi forgot to add that packing the room with union supporters and locking real constituents outside is just fine. </p>
<p>Oh.  They also forgot to say that punching someone in the face and knocking them down &#8212; if you&#8217;re a union thug &#8212; well that&#8217;s just fine, too.  </p>
<p>Maybe that sentence was cut in the editing process!  But HHS Secretary, Kathleen Sebelius made sure to signal that last one the very next day when she held a confab with the SEIU, and told all the &#8220;brothers and sisters&#8221; to &#8220;<b><i>keep doing what you’re doing</i></b>.&#8221;  You can  <a href="//michellemalkin.com/2009/08/07/sebelius-calls-her-seiu-brothers-and-sisters-to-battle/" rel="nofollow">read all about it, right here</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170371</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170371</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And what is your basis — your proof, Zython, for concluding that I — or all “ultra-cons,” as you put it — lie about everything?&lt;/i&gt;

2000-2008 for starters.

&lt;i&gt;Please, be specific about what lies I have told about Iraq, or sex-ed, or gay rights, or abortion, or taxes or healthcare? Just the lies, mind you.&lt;/i&gt;

If I did that, not only would I be moderated for posting too many links, it would probably exceed Oliver&#039;s bandwidth.

&lt;i&gt;And I still wonder why you seem not to care about Kenneth Gladney. Is it because he says he is conservative?&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, but indirectly. I don&#039;t care because I don&#039;t believe him. I don&#039;t believe him because he lies about everything. He lies about everything because he&#039;s a conservative. See, simple.

&lt;i&gt;Wow. I do not even know what to say about this level of stupid.&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s like watching someone repeatedly fail to put a round peg in a round hole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And what is your basis — your proof, Zython, for concluding that I — or all “ultra-cons,” as you put it — lie about everything?</i></p>
<p>2000-2008 for starters.</p>
<p><i>Please, be specific about what lies I have told about Iraq, or sex-ed, or gay rights, or abortion, or taxes or healthcare? Just the lies, mind you.</i></p>
<p>If I did that, not only would I be moderated for posting too many links, it would probably exceed Oliver&#8217;s bandwidth.</p>
<p><i>And I still wonder why you seem not to care about Kenneth Gladney. Is it because he says he is conservative?</i></p>
<p>Yes, but indirectly. I don&#8217;t care because I don&#8217;t believe him. I don&#8217;t believe him because he lies about everything. He lies about everything because he&#8217;s a conservative. See, simple.</p>
<p><i>Wow. I do not even know what to say about this level of stupid.</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s like watching someone repeatedly fail to put a round peg in a round hole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170355</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170355</guid>
		<description>Jaim, from the video, it&#039;s clear that Mr. Gladney was standing over the fallen union guy, but it&#039;s NOT clear that he was (literally) kicking the guy when he was down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaim, from the video, it&#8217;s clear that Mr. Gladney was standing over the fallen union guy, but it&#8217;s NOT clear that he was (literally) kicking the guy when he was down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170352</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170352</guid>
		<description>&quot;Pelosi and Hoyer are calling us un-American for showing up to challenge this plan.&quot;

No, they aren&#039;t. Here&#039;s the only time in the op-ed by Pelosi and Hoyer where the word &quot;un-American&quot; appears: &quot;Drowning out views is simply un-American.&quot;
So either a. you didn&#039;t read the op-ed; b. you lied about what Pelosi and Hoyer wrote; or c. the only way you and others (the &quot;us&quot; you mentioned) engage in &quot;showing up to challenge this plan&quot; is by &quot;drowning out views.&quot;  None of these three answers put you in a particularly flattering light, do they, Trochilus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Pelosi and Hoyer are calling us un-American for showing up to challenge this plan.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, they aren&#8217;t. Here&#8217;s the only time in the op-ed by Pelosi and Hoyer where the word &#8220;un-American&#8221; appears: &#8220;Drowning out views is simply un-American.&#8221;<br />
So either a. you didn&#8217;t read the op-ed; b. you lied about what Pelosi and Hoyer wrote; or c. the only way you and others (the &#8220;us&#8221; you mentioned) engage in &#8220;showing up to challenge this plan&#8221; is by &#8220;drowning out views.&#8221;  None of these three answers put you in a particularly flattering light, do they, Trochilus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaim</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170350</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170350</guid>
		<description>So Gladney is asking for donations since he&#039;s uninsured, but would have access to affordable insurance under Obama&#039;s plan.

And it&#039;s clear from the video that he was giving as good as he was getting, and that what he &quot;got&quot; was something he bounced up from a few seconds later.

Sure, maybe there was some sort of freak injury that only manifested itself later, but I still haven&#039;t heard a plausible defense for Gladney&#039;s criminal actions in kicking the union guy while he was down.

Delusional, violent, and a liar.  A perfect spokeperson for the GOP.  No wonder he&#039;s so popular with the wing-nut trolls here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Gladney is asking for donations since he&#8217;s uninsured, but would have access to affordable insurance under Obama&#8217;s plan.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s clear from the video that he was giving as good as he was getting, and that what he &#8220;got&#8221; was something he bounced up from a few seconds later.</p>
<p>Sure, maybe there was some sort of freak injury that only manifested itself later, but I still haven&#8217;t heard a plausible defense for Gladney&#8217;s criminal actions in kicking the union guy while he was down.</p>
<p>Delusional, violent, and a liar.  A perfect spokeperson for the GOP.  No wonder he&#8217;s so popular with the wing-nut trolls here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170347</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170347</guid>
		<description>&quot;Punch back twice as hard.&quot;

This is the Obama quote that &quot;incited&quot; the incident with Mr. Gladney?  So you&#039;re admitting then that Kenneth Gladney punched first?  Sure would be a logical claim, given that the start of the video shows an SEIU guy on the ground with  Mr. Gladney standing over him BEFORE Gladney is even touched by another SEIU guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Punch back twice as hard.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is the Obama quote that &#8220;incited&#8221; the incident with Mr. Gladney?  So you&#8217;re admitting then that Kenneth Gladney punched first?  Sure would be a logical claim, given that the start of the video shows an SEIU guy on the ground with  Mr. Gladney standing over him BEFORE Gladney is even touched by another SEIU guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170339</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 04:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170339</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;they’re doing that thing now where they talk to each other to hope that no one else bothers them&lt;/em&gt;

I noticed that, AP. That&#039;s new, isn&#039;t it? If only they had some place to have their little private conversations....but where?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>they’re doing that thing now where they talk to each other to hope that no one else bothers them</em></p>
<p>I noticed that, AP. That&#8217;s new, isn&#8217;t it? If only they had some place to have their little private conversations&#8230;.but where?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: August J. Pollak</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170336</link>
		<dc:creator>August J. Pollak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170336</guid>
		<description>Hey, you wanna do it too, Quaker?  See, say something to me, and make sure you&#039;re being really specific on how you are talking just to me, because you certainly don&#039;t want anyone else to know what you&#039;re talking about... it&#039;s just like second grade when Suzie had to tell Timmy that Becky wasn&#039;t talking to him!  Aren&#039;t the newest intellectuals on this site so interesting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, you wanna do it too, Quaker?  See, say something to me, and make sure you&#8217;re being really specific on how you are talking just to me, because you certainly don&#8217;t want anyone else to know what you&#8217;re talking about&#8230; it&#8217;s just like second grade when Suzie had to tell Timmy that Becky wasn&#8217;t talking to him!  Aren&#8217;t the newest intellectuals on this site so interesting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: August J. Pollak</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170334</link>
		<dc:creator>August J. Pollak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170334</guid>
		<description>Shhhh, Quaker... they&#039;re doing that thing now where they talk to each other to hope that no one else bothers them, like for example point out how they&#039;re not answering any of the questions... shhhh....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shhhh, Quaker&#8230; they&#8217;re doing that thing now where they talk to each other to hope that no one else bothers them, like for example point out how they&#8217;re not answering any of the questions&#8230; shhhh&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170309</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170309</guid>
		<description>A new wingnut?

Goody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new wingnut?</p>
<p>Goody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trochilus</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170296</link>
		<dc:creator>Trochilus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170296</guid>
		<description>I am trying to imagine what it must feel like to suddenly realize that a &quot;Hopey-Changy&quot; President that I had supported, and his minions throughout the country, including this hapless Congressman, had exposed themselves by employing Chicago-style hardball tactics to try and ram through legislation that will radically alter the fundamental structure of about 16 or 17 percent of the gross national product of the United States -- and that they don&#039;t want any damned public debate about it, or they&#039;ll send in union thugs!

Pelosi and Hoyer are calling us un-American for showing up to challenge this plan.

And now, Obama is pretending that he needs to step in to define &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/balance_of_power/2009/08/white-house-draws-lines-for-to.html?utm_source=August&amp;utm_medium=BlogAd&amp;utm_campaign=balance-of-power&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;what the limits to debate should be&lt;/a&gt; in the town hall &quot;public debate?&quot;  

This, after encouraging Americans to &quot;snitch&quot; on one another for sending &quot;fishy&quot; e-mails!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to imagine what it must feel like to suddenly realize that a &#8220;Hopey-Changy&#8221; President that I had supported, and his minions throughout the country, including this hapless Congressman, had exposed themselves by employing Chicago-style hardball tactics to try and ram through legislation that will radically alter the fundamental structure of about 16 or 17 percent of the gross national product of the United States &#8212; and that they don&#8217;t want any damned public debate about it, or they&#8217;ll send in union thugs!</p>
<p>Pelosi and Hoyer are calling us un-American for showing up to challenge this plan.</p>
<p>And now, Obama is pretending that he needs to step in to define <a href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/balance_of_power/2009/08/white-house-draws-lines-for-to.html?utm_source=August&amp;utm_medium=BlogAd&amp;utm_campaign=balance-of-power" rel="nofollow">what the limits to debate should be</a> in the town hall &#8220;public debate?&#8221;  </p>
<p>This, after encouraging Americans to &#8220;snitch&#8221; on one another for sending &#8220;fishy&#8221; e-mails!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trochilus</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170288</link>
		<dc:creator>Trochilus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170288</guid>
		<description>Good one Dennis. Still being blocked some of the time. 

I tried to make the point to August J. Pollak that I don&#039;t know whether the guy -- Kenneth Gladney -- has medical insurance coverage that would fully covers all his losses or not.  

But I said I&#039;d even be will send the guy a few bucks, even if I knew he had the &quot;Cadillac&quot; coverage that Russ Carnahan and every other Member of Congress has, on our dime.

That&#039;s because all the vicious, nasty little bastards on the left are now going to try and drag this guy through Holy Hell, just like they did to Joe the Plumber, for simply asking a question.  

All this guy Kenneth did was try to sell a few flags -- and for his trouble, he got punched in the face and knocked down by some criminal thug for his efforts. 

Mark my words, the left is going to make sure that every inch of his being will be run through the grinder.  

So, yeah . . . I&#039;m going to find out where this guy is, and I AM going to send him a few bucks.  And if August J. Pollak were a decent guy, he would too.

I wonder whether state and perhaps even federal employees will participate in trying to destroy the guy in a criminal manner, you know, like they did with Joe?  

It wouldn&#039;t surprise any of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one Dennis. Still being blocked some of the time. </p>
<p>I tried to make the point to August J. Pollak that I don&#8217;t know whether the guy &#8212; Kenneth Gladney &#8212; has medical insurance coverage that would fully covers all his losses or not.  </p>
<p>But I said I&#8217;d even be will send the guy a few bucks, even if I knew he had the &#8220;Cadillac&#8221; coverage that Russ Carnahan and every other Member of Congress has, on our dime.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s because all the vicious, nasty little bastards on the left are now going to try and drag this guy through Holy Hell, just like they did to Joe the Plumber, for simply asking a question.  </p>
<p>All this guy Kenneth did was try to sell a few flags &#8212; and for his trouble, he got punched in the face and knocked down by some criminal thug for his efforts. </p>
<p>Mark my words, the left is going to make sure that every inch of his being will be run through the grinder.  </p>
<p>So, yeah . . . I&#8217;m going to find out where this guy is, and I AM going to send him a few bucks.  And if August J. Pollak were a decent guy, he would too.</p>
<p>I wonder whether state and perhaps even federal employees will participate in trying to destroy the guy in a criminal manner, you know, like they did with Joe?  </p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t surprise any of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170271</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170271</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Trochilus, I&#039;ll try to find it.  Sometimes links just disappear when you&#039;re trying to post them on here and some of the text goes along with it.  I&#039;m sure it happens to everyone.

Yes, they are encouraging it, that&#039;s why it&#039;s so funny to see numb skulls like Pollack trying to make sense out of irrelevant discrepancies between what different newspapers report.  The St. Louis P-D was a p.o.s. rag when I lived there 20 years ago and I&#039;m sure it&#039;s ten times worse now.

Here&#039;s further proof that they are encouraging it:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/08/seiu_recruits_obamacare_suppor.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SEIU Recruits Obamacare Supporters to &#039;Drown Out Voices&#039;&lt;/a&gt; in Conn. (Pelosi Will Be Appalled at the &#039;Un-Americanness&#039;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Trochilus, I&#8217;ll try to find it.  Sometimes links just disappear when you&#8217;re trying to post them on here and some of the text goes along with it.  I&#8217;m sure it happens to everyone.</p>
<p>Yes, they are encouraging it, that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s so funny to see numb skulls like Pollack trying to make sense out of irrelevant discrepancies between what different newspapers report.  The St. Louis P-D was a p.o.s. rag when I lived there 20 years ago and I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s ten times worse now.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s further proof that they are encouraging it:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/08/seiu_recruits_obamacare_suppor.asp" rel="nofollow">SEIU Recruits Obamacare Supporters to &#8216;Drown Out Voices&#8217;</a> in Conn. (Pelosi Will Be Appalled at the &#8216;Un-Americanness&#8217;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trochilus</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170267</link>
		<dc:creator>Trochilus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170267</guid>
		<description>Dennis . . . I&#039;ve tried a few times, but the site will apparently not permit the link I was trying to post to a Michelle Malkin story, dated the 7th, about HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius actually telling the &lt;b&gt;SEIU&lt;/b&gt; &quot;brothers and sisters&quot; to &quot;&lt;i&gt;keep doing what you&#039;re doing&lt;i&gt;.&quot; 

They&#039;re actually ENCOURAGING this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis . . . I&#8217;ve tried a few times, but the site will apparently not permit the link I was trying to post to a Michelle Malkin story, dated the 7th, about HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius actually telling the <b>SEIU</b> &#8220;brothers and sisters&#8221; to &#8220;<i>keep doing what you&#8217;re doing</i><i>.&#8221; </p>
<p>They&#8217;re actually ENCOURAGING this!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: August J. Pollak</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170266</link>
		<dc:creator>August J. Pollak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170266</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Notice how the most ridiculous (among the rabid posters here and elsewhere) are trying so desperately to change the subject to whether or not Kenneth has health insurance that will cover him?&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;the Left is now trying to suggest that this is a “Tawana Brawley” story because Kenneth took some donations to cover his medical expenses.&lt;/i&gt;

Are you serious?  I&#039;m trying to find out why Gladney and his lawyer lied and collected over a grand in donations before admitting it, and why you refuse to respond to that.  If he &quot;took some donations to cover his medical expenses&quot; - what you just fucking said- then where did the money go because as you also just fucking said- he didn&#039;t need them.  Jesus tap-dancing Christ.  How do you actually enjoy looking like this much of a fool?

Dennis actually said, right now, that he refuses to read my links and is just going to assume they say the opposite of what they say.  You people are &lt;i&gt;lunatics&lt;/i&gt;.  I understand trolling, but I&#039;ve never seen trolls who pretend to be stupid and make themselves look like fools for no reason but to annoy people.  It&#039;s sociopathic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Notice how the most ridiculous (among the rabid posters here and elsewhere) are trying so desperately to change the subject to whether or not Kenneth has health insurance that will cover him?</i></p>
<p><i>the Left is now trying to suggest that this is a “Tawana Brawley” story because Kenneth took some donations to cover his medical expenses.</i></p>
<p>Are you serious?  I&#8217;m trying to find out why Gladney and his lawyer lied and collected over a grand in donations before admitting it, and why you refuse to respond to that.  If he &#8220;took some donations to cover his medical expenses&#8221; &#8211; what you just fucking said- then where did the money go because as you also just fucking said- he didn&#8217;t need them.  Jesus tap-dancing Christ.  How do you actually enjoy looking like this much of a fool?</p>
<p>Dennis actually said, right now, that he refuses to read my links and is just going to assume they say the opposite of what they say.  You people are <i>lunatics</i>.  I understand trolling, but I&#8217;ve never seen trolls who pretend to be stupid and make themselves look like fools for no reason but to annoy people.  It&#8217;s sociopathic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trochilus</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170264</link>
		<dc:creator>Trochilus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170264</guid>
		<description>By the way, &lt;b&gt;Dennis&lt;/b&gt; did you happen to catch the comment at &lt;b&gt;Gateway&lt;/b&gt;, right after Jim Hoft&#039;s comment you linked me to?

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;&quot;SEIU -- 

Slugging Everyone, Indiscriminately, Unprovoked.

John &#124; 08.10.09 - 10:53 am&lt;/b&gt;&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yep.  That&#039;s about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, <b>Dennis</b> did you happen to catch the comment at <b>Gateway</b>, right after Jim Hoft&#8217;s comment you linked me to?</p>
<blockquote><p><b>&#8220;SEIU &#8212; </p>
<p>Slugging Everyone, Indiscriminately, Unprovoked.</p>
<p>John | 08.10.09 &#8211; 10:53 am</b>&#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p>Yep.  That&#8217;s about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trochilus</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/08/08/kenneth-gladney/#comment-170258</link>
		<dc:creator>Trochilus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=16014#comment-170258</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll split it:

&lt;b&gt;Dennis&lt;/b&gt;,

This is becoming the case of the &quot;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sibling Thugs&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.&quot;  

Notice how the most ridiculous (among the rabid posters here and elsewhere) are trying so desperately to change the subject to whether or not Kenneth has health insurance that will cover him?

Naturally, they want no part of honest discussion the central issue -- that the &lt;b&gt;FOB / SEIU&lt;/b&gt; thugs intentionally and personally attacked Kenneth Gladney, including punching him and knocked him down, and they also smashed a camera into another woman&#039;s face, who was filming the aftermath of the incident.  

Rather than doing the obvious -- deploring the violent attacks -- the Left is now trying to suggest that this is a &quot;Tawana Brawley&quot; story because Kenneth took some donations to cover his medical expenses.  

But we know it can&#039;t be true . . . no Rev. Al in sight!  Oh yeah . . . that &lt;b&gt;and&lt;/b&gt; the fact that both of the attacks are on film!!!

Note that one lady who was filming the kerfuffel &lt;a href=&quot;http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/08/seiu-obama-supporter-smashes-woman-tea.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;had her camera smashed right into her face&lt;/a&gt; by another &lt;b&gt;SEIU&lt;/b&gt; thug -- this one a woman!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll split it:</p>
<p><b>Dennis</b>,</p>
<p>This is becoming the case of the &#8220;<b><i>Sibling Thugs</i></b>.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Notice how the most ridiculous (among the rabid posters here and elsewhere) are trying so desperately to change the subject to whether or not Kenneth has health insurance that will cover him?</p>
<p>Naturally, they want no part of honest discussion the central issue &#8212; that the <b>FOB / SEIU</b> thugs intentionally and personally attacked Kenneth Gladney, including punching him and knocked him down, and they also smashed a camera into another woman&#8217;s face, who was filming the aftermath of the incident.  </p>
<p>Rather than doing the obvious &#8212; deploring the violent attacks &#8212; the Left is now trying to suggest that this is a &#8220;Tawana Brawley&#8221; story because Kenneth took some donations to cover his medical expenses.  </p>
<p>But we know it can&#8217;t be true . . . no Rev. Al in sight!  Oh yeah . . . that <b>and</b> the fact that both of the attacks are on film!!!</p>
<p>Note that one lady who was filming the kerfuffel <a href="http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/08/seiu-obama-supporter-smashes-woman-tea.html" rel="nofollow">had her camera smashed right into her face</a> by another <b>SEIU</b> thug &#8212; this one a woman!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

