Is Michael J. Fox a liar?

Then why do you keep responding…but only to cherry picked issues?

They prove your wide-eyed zealotry to truther conspiracy theories.

You’ll believe anything that anyone throws out on the internet, and solid proof is solid proof, Indeed the Truther.

Your nuttiness is now certified.

So is “No shit, Sherlock,” but I used it as an illustrative example. Or didn’t you catch that?

For every refutation and complete debunking of your wild-ass accusations that you have nothing more than hearsay from anonymous sources for, you come back with something else.

Now now, I gave you a list of, what, a dozen sources. Go back and check it out. They weren’t anonymous, and you know it. You’re ignoring this. But nice try.

Did the other David Neiwert link work? Did he get anything wrong, besides predict with incredible prescience, people like you and Jim David Adkisson.

No word on Michael J. Fox? Still?

Ergo, you are a Rush Limbaugh urban legend truther.

Because you said so! How childlike. Does it help to stamp your feet?

As to the rest, they were never anything I’ve ever argued about Limbaugh.

So they never happened? Do you merely block out the nasty, cruel stuff because it tarnished the image of your idol? You said he was the most awesomest person evar. How…sad.

Do you get tired of tongue-bathing Rush Limbaugh?

It’s futile to respond.

Then why do you keep responding…but only to cherry picked issues? Sorry, Britney, you made your bed, now you have to sleep in it.

Yes, Dennis. It’s all about you.

Shorter Dennis: I know you are, but what am I. Childlike.

Et tu? That phrase is overused, trite, and childlike itself. You are working too hard at it.

So no explanation as to why the link to Neiwert didn’t work?

No. It was your link. Why should I look in to why it didn’t work. I know enough about the enormous waste of time that dude puts into criticizing other people’s work. Right now he’s probably at home going over last night’s Glenn Beck program for the fifteenth time. It’s no wonder you look up to him.

How about the dozens of other links I provided? I suppose those are fake too. Still no comment on those? Urban legend are they?

This is how you are much like a birther, a 9/11 truther, a Kennedy conspiracy theorist, and a Andy Sullivan Trig Truther, Indeed. For every refutation and complete debunking of your wild-ass accusations that you have nothing more than hearsay from anonymous sources for, you come back with something else. Nothing will satisfy you. This is the very definition of a left-wing loon urban legend conspiracy nut. You are that person.

What the hell are you blabbering about? Are you really suggesting this never happened?

I’m suggesting no one knows what really happened. You repeat it as if it is true and happened the way you want to believe it have happened. You don’t know. Molly Ivins didn’t knw, she botched all kinds of details. Nutcase failed comedian Al Franken didn’t know, he had to change details to a different date to make the ‘joke’ appear logically and temporally correct. You don’t know, you just repeat what other people who repeat what one of those two wrote, and those two conflict each other. Ergo, you are a Rush Limbaugh urban legend truther.

QED

As to the rest, they were never anything I’ve ever argued about Limbaugh. You just bring them up as part of your, “Oh yeah, well maybe that wasn’t true, but what about….. It will never stop with you or those of your ilk. It’s futile to respond. You’re like Jason in Friday 13th, you keep coming back. Only Jason is much smarter than you are.

And/or Dennis’s ideological compadre, Jim David Adkisson.

Shorter Dennis: I know you are, but what am I. Childlike.

1) Your link to Neiwert didn’t work. A good metaphor for him, and a good one for your blathering too. Did you even buy his book to help him out? One book sale might move him up from #2,973 on Amazon to, who know, maybe #2,970. You might learn something by reading, too.

So no explanation as to why the link to Neiwert didn’t work. Not a single argument (of any sort) to refute Mr. Neiwert. Just a diversionary attempt. What does buying his book have to do with the substance at hand?

2) Any link for the bone out of your nose comment? No? Still working on it, or do other charges you’ve moved on to imply some sort of guilt in your urban legend?

How about the dozens of other links I provided? I suppose those are fake too. Still no comment on those? Urban legend are they?

3) Any video of the Chelsea Clinton incident to determine exactly what happened and whether it was a mistake, as it would have to have been as Molly Ivins first reported on it several years later when she gave a date that would be impossible to have happened in, or Al Franken’s later version, where he changed her date? Seems odd no one can get this right, but you take whatever version works and repeat it without knowing boo about it.

What the hell are you blabbering about? Are you really suggesting this never happened?

4) Sexism? Every day someone writes something sexist here. Never bothers you. Calling mentally disable people, ‘fucking retards’…doesn’t phase you. Fat white people? Indeed no where in site.

When have I ever turned any of those phrases? Please enlighten me. And what does that have to do with your idol, Rush Limbaugh? If any of what you write in #4 were remotely true (and it isn’t), how would it be relevant? If someone else says it, that makes it OK for your hero to do it? Good grief, I hope you never become a parent. (And what a wonderful example Rush Limbaugh is to parents and children everywhere. I love it when he does “Black Speak”. What a wonderful American.)

5)Phony soldiers? Another case where you have to piece together and stretch things to make a phony case, and this one being precious because it called out and embarrassed Dems to no end for the weanie frauds they are. As soon as Limbaugh donated $4.2mm to the Marines fund Harry Reid starting talking about how great the controversy had been to generate these funds, like he was responsible for Rush’s $4.2mm donation. This is how the Harry Reid Dems roll. The Senate Resolution, how’d that one work out for ya, Indeed.

Keep digging. Keep pretending that never happened. Childlike.

You took some time to respond. But still no comment on cruelly mocking Michael J. Fox. Did that never happen either? How about mocking the homeless? American Indians? Anything else I noted in my long comment above.

You’re another one here that seems to be working too hard to foil me but not working smart at it, and you’re flailing like the rest of them.

1) Your link to Neiwert didn’t work. A good metaphor for him, and a good one for your blathering too. Did you even buy his book to help him out? One book sale might move him up from #2,973 on Amazon to, who know, maybe #2,970. You might learn something by reading, too.

2) Any link for the bone out of your nose comment? No? Still working on it, or do other charges you’ve moved on to imply some sort of guilt in your urban legend?

3) Any video of the Chelsea Clinton incident to determine exactly what happened and whether it was a mistake, as it would have to have been as Molly Ivins first reported on it several years later when she gave a date that would be impossible to have happened in, or Al Franken’s later version, where he changed her date? Seems odd no one can get this right, but you take whatever version works and repeat it without knowing boo about it.

4) Sexism? Every day someone writes something sexist here. Never bothers you. Calling mentally disable people, ‘fucking retards’…doesn’t phase you. Fat white people? Indeed no where in site.

5)

Phony soldiers? Another case where you have to piece together and stretch things to make a phony case, and this one being precious because it called out and embarrassed Dems to no end for the weanie frauds they are. As soon as Limbaugh donated $4.2mm to the Marines fund Harry Reid starting talking about how great the controversy had been to generate these funds, like he was responsible for Rush’s $4.2mm donation. This is how the Harry Reid Dems roll. The Senate Resolution, how’d that one work out for ya, Indeed.

If you want to help liberals, Indeed, go buy one of their books.

This is a good thing, although it comes at the expense of having to hear him make racist cracks about twice a week.

On the whole, a good thing for America, since he ensures that the moderate and independent voters that the GOP so desperately needs will never align themselves with him.

Rahm Emmanuel played your party for the suckers that they are. I’m surprised he hasn’t gotten more credit for hatching the “Rush = GOP Leader” meme.

Call him out on Rush Limbaugh’s many irredeemably obscene transgressions, and he pretends it isn’t true or pretends to ignore the issue or desperately tries to change the subject. Like a child would.

Reality Based Liberal: Rush Limbaugh is a racist shithead, look at all of the racist quotes.
Dennis: No he isn’t, those quotes are made up. You got them off of Wikiquote, that’s not cricket.
RBL; What about the dozens of quotes to myriad publications therein.
Dennis:

RBL: What about when Rush cruelly mocked Michael J. Fox for his Parkinson’s Disease [ed note: much as a child would]
Dennis: That was three years ago!
RBL: So?
Dennis:

RBL: What about the time Rush called Chelsea Clinton “The Family Dog”?
Dennis: Joe Biden is the worst racist ever!

Dennis asks, Just what is it about this all-around good guy that drives you people insane like he does?

I think I can virtually speak for a good number of Reality Based Liberals when I virtually say that we are bothered by Rush. We are bothered by overt racism and race baiting (in a childlike fashion, it bears noting) (e.g., “Take that bone out of your nose and call me back!”); sexism (“feminazis”); cruel, childlike demeaning of innocent children (“Chelsea’s the family dog–get it!”); cruel, childlike mocking of people with horrible diseases (the Michael J. Fox Situation); making fun of the homeless (“Homeless updates!”); calling U.S. soldiers who do not share his worldview “phony soldiers,” making fun of American Indians (“Indian updates”), and countless other, well documented examples of extreme douchebaggery.

We do not care for any of this, and that’s why Dennis and his ilk like Rush. That’s it, that’s all. It’s all a game to them. If it bothers Reality Based Liberals, then it must be good. This explains Rush Limbaugh and the other Right Wing Shock Jocks (Coulter, Savage, Hannity, O’Reilly, et al). Dennis likes the childlike affirmation and his childlike lack of empathy makes it all the easier to buy in.

The irreplaceable David Neiwert (http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/) has tirelessly researched this quite unfortunate phenomenon (http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/Rush%20Newspeak%20%20Fascism.pdf). (When confronted with the specter of Neiwert recently in these pages, Dennis made no attempt at any sort of coherent rebuttal, but lashed out at Neiwert in a childlike ad hominem attack.) And in this very thread, when confronted with much of the Rush awfulness noted in this comment, he reverted to childlike form with an homage more suited to Tiger Beat (I like to call it a “tongue bath” because of its wildly fawning nature, and because it’s funny).

So keep on keeping on playing your game Dennis. Keep trying to change the subject. Keep pretending that you have the facts on your side (“it’s urban legend!”). We’ll keep mocking you. But we know that you know that your heroes are the worst sort of douchebags, who make Father Coughlin look like a piker. And we know that you are a child.

Scary shit there, folks. That really got your engine revved up.

Oh, I’m sorry Denny. Was that hypocritical or racist against large stuffed cats?

Why do you feel the need to defend him?

Doggone it, fafaroo, because he’s a harmless, lovable little fuzz ball, a highly-trained broadcast specialist, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have, from behind the golden EIB microphone, firmly ensconced in the prestigious Attila-the-Hun chair at the Limbaugh Institute of Advanced Conservative Studies, serving humanity simply by showing up, and he’s not retiring until every American agrees with him, do NOT doubt him, with shrieks of joy at the mere mention of his name, the Mandarin of Talk Radio, with talent on loan from God, at the cutting-edge of societal evolution, with half his brain tied behind his back — just to make it fair, the all-knowing, all-caring, all-sensing, all-feeling, all-concerned Maha-Rushie! America’s anchorman, truth detector, and doctor of democracy. A Real Man, a living legend, a way of life. Commander in Chief of U.S. Operation Chaos. Chief Waga-Waga El Rushbo of the El Conservo Tribe. Chief of the Patriotism Police. Leader of the Conservative Movement. A Weapon of Mass Instruction. El Rushbo. He is the man who is running America (you know it and I know it). He knows the Democrats like every square inch of his glorious naked body. He is ready to do what he was born to do—that’s host. Get ready to do what you were born to do—that’s listen.

I thought I told you that yesterday.

Nice. haven’t heard that one before.

Why do you feel the need to defend him?

Denny’s going WAY beyond defending him. It’s getting to the point where throwing himself on a grenade for Rushie would be the least he could do.
All-around good guy? Doctor of Democracy?

Tigger, please.