<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sotomayor: The Optics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:42:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: freD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163339</link>
		<dc:creator>freD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163339</guid>
		<description>All they can find is one out of context quote for one supreme court justice wannabe.  But I can find hundreds of idiotic quotes and gaffes from the most powerful man in the world for 8 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All they can find is one out of context quote for one supreme court justice wannabe.  But I can find hundreds of idiotic quotes and gaffes from the most powerful man in the world for 8 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not That IvyNYC</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163269</link>
		<dc:creator>Not That IvyNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163269</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been cringing with embarrassment for the last 2 days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been cringing with embarrassment for the last 2 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163199</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163199</guid>
		<description>The (fictional) Dukes of Hazzard were from (also fictional) Hazzard County, Georgia. Not Alabama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The (fictional) Dukes of Hazzard were from (also fictional) Hazzard County, Georgia. Not Alabama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163161</link>
		<dc:creator>freD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163161</guid>
		<description>Dennis,
I see your wise Latina:
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/07/sotomayor_defends_wise_latina.html
And raise you one “mah base”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mn4daYJzyls

SaveFarris,
What Oliver said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,<br />
I see your wise Latina:<br />
<a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/07/sotomayor_defends_wise_latina.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/07/sotomayor_defends_wise_latina.html</a><br />
And raise you one “mah base”:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mn4daYJzyls" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mn4daYJzyls</a></p>
<p>SaveFarris,<br />
What Oliver said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaim</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163145</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163145</guid>
		<description>Judge Sotomayor will make the SCOTUS less activist.

That&#039;s a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judge Sotomayor will make the SCOTUS less activist.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ref</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163135</link>
		<dc:creator>Ref</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163135</guid>
		<description>Sessions makes me want to rip the radio right out of my dashboard, as does the absence of any criticism of his hypocrisy by our beloved MSM, and the evident reluctance of any high profile Dems to take this cornpone asshat to task.  

The silence of the Democrats in the face of all this &quot;leftist&quot; talk is liable to set a media standard of what (Sotomayor) is BARELY acceptable in a Supreme Court nominee, even though she&#039;s probably a little more conservative than Souter.  If President Obama nominates a genuine progressive next time, the airwaves and newsprint will be filled with howling about how unsuitably liberal that person is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sessions makes me want to rip the radio right out of my dashboard, as does the absence of any criticism of his hypocrisy by our beloved MSM, and the evident reluctance of any high profile Dems to take this cornpone asshat to task.  </p>
<p>The silence of the Democrats in the face of all this &#8220;leftist&#8221; talk is liable to set a media standard of what (Sotomayor) is BARELY acceptable in a Supreme Court nominee, even though she&#8217;s probably a little more conservative than Souter.  If President Obama nominates a genuine progressive next time, the airwaves and newsprint will be filled with howling about how unsuitably liberal that person is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163124</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163124</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;all that proves is that Republucans don’t play politics when it comes to the Judiciary&lt;/em&gt;
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>all that proves is that Republucans don’t play politics when it comes to the Judiciary</em><br />
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163113</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163113</guid>
		<description>Actually freD, all that proves is that Republucans don&#039;t play politics when it comes to the Judiciary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually freD, all that proves is that Republucans don&#8217;t play politics when it comes to the Judiciary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163100</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163100</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Face it zygote zombies, she’s in.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We know she&#039;s in, freD.  We also know that if any Republican politician or any Supreme Court nominee appointed by a Republican presidenthad the same record and background and had said the same thing she did, not once but seven times, you guys wouldn&#039;t shut up about it till the day they closed the lid on your coffins.  

Media Matters would be doing the same somersaults, back flips and contortions to bitch about her as they are now doing to defend her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Face it zygote zombies, she’s in.</p></blockquote>
<p>We know she&#8217;s in, freD.  We also know that if any Republican politician or any Supreme Court nominee appointed by a Republican presidenthad the same record and background and had said the same thing she did, not once but seven times, you guys wouldn&#8217;t shut up about it till the day they closed the lid on your coffins.  </p>
<p>Media Matters would be doing the same somersaults, back flips and contortions to bitch about her as they are now doing to defend her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freD</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163095</link>
		<dc:creator>freD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163095</guid>
		<description>“Sotomayor was nominated to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by President George H. W. Bush in 1991 and confirmed in 1992.”

If you denigrate Sotomayor you denigrate Dubya’s dad which means you denigrate Dubya who’s in league wit’ ‘em good ol’ boys who denigrate Sotomayor.  

Face it zygote zombies, she’s in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Sotomayor was nominated to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by President George H. W. Bush in 1991 and confirmed in 1992.”</p>
<p>If you denigrate Sotomayor you denigrate Dubya’s dad which means you denigrate Dubya who’s in league wit’ ‘em good ol’ boys who denigrate Sotomayor.  </p>
<p>Face it zygote zombies, she’s in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163083</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163083</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Wonderful Pryme, except that’s not what she said.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s exactly what she said, Farris. Stop trying to curve time and space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Wonderful Pryme, except that’s not what she said.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s exactly what she said, Farris. Stop trying to curve time and space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163075</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163075</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I guess it really upsets these idiot crackers in Alabammee that some ‘mesican’ is going to be on the SC. --Burned&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow, Burned, I thought &#039;cracker&#039; was considered an ethnic slur.  Careful, or Chris Parry might read this and write an article in the Vancouver Sun about this being a racist blog.  

Or do whites have to call each other that term in an endearing way for it to officially become an offensive slur if a black person says it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I guess it really upsets these idiot crackers in Alabammee that some ‘mesican’ is going to be on the SC. &#8211;Burned</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow, Burned, I thought &#8216;cracker&#8217; was considered an ethnic slur.  Careful, or Chris Parry might read this and write an article in the Vancouver Sun about this being a racist blog.  </p>
<p>Or do whites have to call each other that term in an endearing way for it to officially become an offensive slur if a black person says it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163074</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163074</guid>
		<description>I was wondering what ever happened to Henry Gibson. Does he still do the poetry-and-giant-flower gag he used to do every week on Laugh In?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering what ever happened to Henry Gibson. Does he still do the poetry-and-giant-flower gag he used to do every week on Laugh In?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163070</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163070</guid>
		<description>Thank you Newsy for proving my point: you didn&#039;t quote Sotomayor because if you did, it would &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NDkyNmNlMTNhNjliZmYzYjA1MzYwODczY2IzMGVmY2M=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;decimate&lt;/a&gt; your already tedious argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Newsy for proving my point: you didn&#8217;t quote Sotomayor because if you did, it would <a HREF="http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NDkyNmNlMTNhNjliZmYzYjA1MzYwODczY2IzMGVmY2M=" rel="nofollow">decimate</a> your already tedious argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163059</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163059</guid>
		<description>Republican Alito&#039;s comments were &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt; explicit than Sotomayors.

&lt;b&gt;White male Republican &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/07/13/alito/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sam Alito&lt;/a&gt; specifically stated at his Supreme Court nomination hearing that he would take his &quot;ethnic background&quot; into consideration for all of his cases.&lt;/b&gt;

Republican Alito specifically stated at his Supreme Court nomination hearing that he would take his &quot;religion&quot; into consideration for all of his cases.

Republican Alito specifically stated at his Supreme Court nomination hearing that he would take his &quot;gender&quot; into consideration for all of his cases.

And all Republicans Senators voted for Republican Alito for Supreme Court Justice.

For Republicans, a white male Republican making such statements get a free pass, but &lt;i&gt;less&lt;/i&gt; offensive statements by someone who &lt;i&gt;isn&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; a Republican (white male), well, that&#039;s against the rules...

And everyone knows that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://HavenWorks.com/opinion/blog/archive/2009/200902-february/#Republican&#039;s-First-Rule=Rules-Are-For-Other-People&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Republican&#039;s First Rule is that Rules Are For Other People&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican Alito&#8217;s comments were <i>more</i> explicit than Sotomayors.</p>
<p><b>White male Republican <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/07/13/alito/" rel="nofollow">Sam Alito</a> specifically stated at his Supreme Court nomination hearing that he would take his &#8220;ethnic background&#8221; into consideration for all of his cases.</b></p>
<p>Republican Alito specifically stated at his Supreme Court nomination hearing that he would take his &#8220;religion&#8221; into consideration for all of his cases.</p>
<p>Republican Alito specifically stated at his Supreme Court nomination hearing that he would take his &#8220;gender&#8221; into consideration for all of his cases.</p>
<p>And all Republicans Senators voted for Republican Alito for Supreme Court Justice.</p>
<p>For Republicans, a white male Republican making such statements get a free pass, but <i>less</i> offensive statements by someone who <i>isn&#8217;t</i> a Republican (white male), well, that&#8217;s against the rules&#8230;</p>
<p>And everyone knows that the <a href="http://HavenWorks.com/opinion/blog/archive/2009/200902-february/#Republican's-First-Rule=Rules-Are-For-Other-People" rel="nofollow">Republican&#8217;s First Rule is that Rules Are For Other People</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burn</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163055</link>
		<dc:creator>Burn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163055</guid>
		<description>Waaaa waaaaa waaaaaa!  Geez, do you wingnut crybabies ever stop whining?  Just shut your fucking mouths already.  

She&#039;ll be confirmed despite what the asshole from Alabamee thinks.  You can just feel his contempt for her, doesn&#039;t she know her place in society?
Too bad for him and his toothless constituents...I guess it really upsets these idiot crackers in Alabammee that some &#039;mesican&#039; is going to be on the SC.  

Get used to it, losers.  She&#039;ll be on the bench a long time and there will be more SC retirements soon, so save some of your slobbering, impotent rage for the other rounds.  Like it matters, because elections have consequences, remember?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waaaa waaaaa waaaaaa!  Geez, do you wingnut crybabies ever stop whining?  Just shut your fucking mouths already.  </p>
<p>She&#8217;ll be confirmed despite what the asshole from Alabamee thinks.  You can just feel his contempt for her, doesn&#8217;t she know her place in society?<br />
Too bad for him and his toothless constituents&#8230;I guess it really upsets these idiot crackers in Alabammee that some &#8216;mesican&#8217; is going to be on the SC.  </p>
<p>Get used to it, losers.  She&#8217;ll be on the bench a long time and there will be more SC retirements soon, so save some of your slobbering, impotent rage for the other rounds.  Like it matters, because elections have consequences, remember?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163053</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163053</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Remember when white male Republican Sam Alito said that as a Supreme Court Justice he would take his “ethnic background” and his religion and his gender “in to account” for his judicial rulings?&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Only even if they were one and the same quotes, which they&#039;re not, Alito didn&#039;t make the same comment seven times and then claim, apparently all seven times, that it was a rhetorical flourish that fell flat.


Good grief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Remember when white male Republican Sam Alito said that as a Supreme Court Justice he would take his “ethnic background” and his religion and his gender “in to account” for his judicial rulings?</p></blockquote>
<p>Only even if they were one and the same quotes, which they&#8217;re not, Alito didn&#8217;t make the same comment seven times and then claim, apparently all seven times, that it was a rhetorical flourish that fell flat.</p>
<p>Good grief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163052</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163052</guid>
		<description>Then why don&#039;t you reproduce the &quot;full&quot; quote Newsy instead if conjuring up false equivalence.  It&#039;s not like you don&#039;t know how...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then why don&#8217;t you reproduce the &#8220;full&#8221; quote Newsy instead if conjuring up false equivalence.  It&#8217;s not like you don&#8217;t know how&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163048</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163048</guid>
		<description>Part of the quote of Sotomayor is constantly cut off to make it look worse.

I&#039;m assuming that a more experienced Doctor makes better decisions than a Doctor that &lt;i&gt;doesn&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; have that experience.

I assume that a more experienced mechanic makes better decisions than a mechanic &lt;i&gt;without&lt;/i&gt; those experiences.

I assume a military General with more experience than a Private &lt;i&gt;without&lt;/i&gt; those experiences makes better judgements.

I understand that &quot;experience&quot; and &quot;better&quot; &lt;i&gt;judgement&lt;/i&gt; are alien concepts to the right wing who assumes that only ignorant racist white males like Republican Jeff &quot;KKK&quot; Sessions know what they are talking about.

After all, Republican Jeff &quot;KKK&quot; Sessions clearly stated that a 5-4 decision was magically a 9-0 decision based on right wing Orwellian magic.

Clearly right wing magic shows it strength by warping basic math and mangling simple facts.

After all, in right wing world, Ignorance IS Strength.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the quote of Sotomayor is constantly cut off to make it look worse.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming that a more experienced Doctor makes better decisions than a Doctor that <i>doesn&#8217;t</i> have that experience.</p>
<p>I assume that a more experienced mechanic makes better decisions than a mechanic <i>without</i> those experiences.</p>
<p>I assume a military General with more experience than a Private <i>without</i> those experiences makes better judgements.</p>
<p>I understand that &#8220;experience&#8221; and &#8220;better&#8221; <i>judgement</i> are alien concepts to the right wing who assumes that only ignorant racist white males like Republican Jeff &#8220;KKK&#8221; Sessions know what they are talking about.</p>
<p>After all, Republican Jeff &#8220;KKK&#8221; Sessions clearly stated that a 5-4 decision was magically a 9-0 decision based on right wing Orwellian magic.</p>
<p>Clearly right wing magic shows it strength by warping basic math and mangling simple facts.</p>
<p>After all, in right wing world, Ignorance IS Strength.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-the-optics/#comment-163047</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15460#comment-163047</guid>
		<description>Wonderful Pryme, except that&#039;s not what she said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful Pryme, except that&#8217;s not what she said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

