<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let &#8216;Em Smoke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:48:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-163673</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-163673</guid>
		<description>&quot;Get rid of this socialist nanny attitude...&quot;

While I don&#039;t agree with the proposed military smoking ban, it would not be socialistic to have such a thing.  Just because you dislike proposal x, doesn&#039;t automatically mean that x is an example of socialism.  I saw this kind on thinking on another blog where a commentator wrote that same-sex marriage was an example of socialism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Get rid of this socialist nanny attitude&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t agree with the proposed military smoking ban, it would not be socialistic to have such a thing.  Just because you dislike proposal x, doesn&#8217;t automatically mean that x is an example of socialism.  I saw this kind on thinking on another blog where a commentator wrote that same-sex marriage was an example of socialism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hix</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-163532</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-163532</guid>
		<description>While my previous commet is awaiting moderation, chew on this.  Alcohol kills far more people than tobacco but the activists are afraid t tackle this issue.  Try telling our soldiers they can&#039;t have a beer and you will see them marching right out the gate. And no, i don&#039;t drink either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While my previous commet is awaiting moderation, chew on this.  Alcohol kills far more people than tobacco but the activists are afraid t tackle this issue.  Try telling our soldiers they can&#8217;t have a beer and you will see them marching right out the gate. And no, i don&#8217;t drink either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hix</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-163531</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-163531</guid>
		<description>So the Army is now running from some anti smoking activist. Listen, previous generations won WWI and WWII and fought in the Vietnam war. Smoking had nothing to do with winning or loosing and they carried their Lucky Strikes or Marboros or Kools right along with their ammo. Get rid of this socialist nanny attitude that the USA is going to coddle it&#039;s citizens for the betterment of all and take away our freedoms. When the state starts with the little freedoms it escalates to the larger freedoms. I am a non smoker but people should be able to do with their body what they choose. Free will - get it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the Army is now running from some anti smoking activist. Listen, previous generations won WWI and WWII and fought in the Vietnam war. Smoking had nothing to do with winning or loosing and they carried their Lucky Strikes or Marboros or Kools right along with their ammo. Get rid of this socialist nanny attitude that the USA is going to coddle it&#8217;s citizens for the betterment of all and take away our freedoms. When the state starts with the little freedoms it escalates to the larger freedoms. I am a non smoker but people should be able to do with their body what they choose. Free will &#8211; get it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162921</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162921</guid>
		<description>&quot;...making the rules for living our laws.&quot;

So you support no government-imposed rules in society?  You&#039;re an anarchist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;making the rules for living our laws.&#8221;</p>
<p>So you support no government-imposed rules in society?  You&#8217;re an anarchist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162919</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 04:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162919</guid>
		<description>&quot;For some reason somebody&#039;s sense of smell is more important than my sense of sight?&quot;

Yes. You don&#039;t have to look at people, but you do have to breathe in the air (unless you plan to hold your nose all day, which probably isn&#039;t exactly a palatable option for most people).

Also, you know for a fact that literally everyone who supports the ban on cigarettes in the military never &quot;put on a uniform&quot; and served?  No, of course, you don&#039;t. You just have an egocentric worldview where if someone disagrees with you on something, then you automatically assume that they haven&#039;t been through some of the same things you have (in this particular case, military service).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For some reason somebody&#8217;s sense of smell is more important than my sense of sight?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes. You don&#8217;t have to look at people, but you do have to breathe in the air (unless you plan to hold your nose all day, which probably isn&#8217;t exactly a palatable option for most people).</p>
<p>Also, you know for a fact that literally everyone who supports the ban on cigarettes in the military never &#8220;put on a uniform&#8221; and served?  No, of course, you don&#8217;t. You just have an egocentric worldview where if someone disagrees with you on something, then you automatically assume that they haven&#8217;t been through some of the same things you have (in this particular case, military service).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnymags</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162746</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnymags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162746</guid>
		<description>Seems kind of antithetical to me, wouldn&#039;t we want our military to be in top fighting form? Then again they&#039;re not allowed alcohol so I guess its the last legal vice, and if it takes the edge off why not. Give em free nicoderm patches when they get out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems kind of antithetical to me, wouldn&#8217;t we want our military to be in top fighting form? Then again they&#8217;re not allowed alcohol so I guess its the last legal vice, and if it takes the edge off why not. Give em free nicoderm patches when they get out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162730</link>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162730</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s amazing to me that in this day and age smoking is still a socially/politically accepted act given the dire consequences on personal and public health.  Can you imagine the life expectancy rates by this point had smoking never been an option?  Can you imagine substantially lower health care rates across the board?  Can you imagine . . . a beach unlittered by millions of cigarette butts; hospital wards empty of folks choking for every breath; higher productivity at work sites without smoke breaks; babies not negatively affected by pregnant mothers who selfishly consume; men whose sex drives are not diminished by the affects of smoke; a world where the poor aren&#039;t buying cigarettes instead of food (or buying food on welfare because they&#039;ve spent their money on smokes)?   

Ask yourself, how are things better because of cigarettes?   How has your life improved because you decided to smoke?  How has humanity improved because of this simple pleasure?  Honestly, I would be all for smoking if its consequences did not so negatively impact society at countless levels. 

Smoking ban for the military?  Why stop there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing to me that in this day and age smoking is still a socially/politically accepted act given the dire consequences on personal and public health.  Can you imagine the life expectancy rates by this point had smoking never been an option?  Can you imagine substantially lower health care rates across the board?  Can you imagine . . . a beach unlittered by millions of cigarette butts; hospital wards empty of folks choking for every breath; higher productivity at work sites without smoke breaks; babies not negatively affected by pregnant mothers who selfishly consume; men whose sex drives are not diminished by the affects of smoke; a world where the poor aren&#8217;t buying cigarettes instead of food (or buying food on welfare because they&#8217;ve spent their money on smokes)?   </p>
<p>Ask yourself, how are things better because of cigarettes?   How has your life improved because you decided to smoke?  How has humanity improved because of this simple pleasure?  Honestly, I would be all for smoking if its consequences did not so negatively impact society at countless levels. </p>
<p>Smoking ban for the military?  Why stop there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ms</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162728</link>
		<dc:creator>ms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162728</guid>
		<description>I realize that smoking isn&#039;t exactly a &quot;right&quot; but for crying out loud how many things are going to be banned or outlawed or vilified before people start to realize that the government or at least the &quot;squeaky wheel&quot; and those who shout the loudest are making the rules for how we live our lives. If a soldier wants to smoke let them. How dare they try and force everyone to live by the standards set for&quot;our own good&quot;. I&#039;m sick and tired of more and more restrictions put on more and more things in this life and yet we still say this is the land of freedom. Live and let live doesn&#039;t seem to exist here much any more. Freedom of choice is a thing of the past. If one doesn&#039;t conform to whatever is the current outrage they are seen as practically deviant. Our soldiers fight for our safety and freedom, let them have the freedom to choose or not to smoke a freakin cigarette!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize that smoking isn&#8217;t exactly a &#8220;right&#8221; but for crying out loud how many things are going to be banned or outlawed or vilified before people start to realize that the government or at least the &#8220;squeaky wheel&#8221; and those who shout the loudest are making the rules for how we live our lives. If a soldier wants to smoke let them. How dare they try and force everyone to live by the standards set for&#8221;our own good&#8221;. I&#8217;m sick and tired of more and more restrictions put on more and more things in this life and yet we still say this is the land of freedom. Live and let live doesn&#8217;t seem to exist here much any more. Freedom of choice is a thing of the past. If one doesn&#8217;t conform to whatever is the current outrage they are seen as practically deviant. Our soldiers fight for our safety and freedom, let them have the freedom to choose or not to smoke a freakin cigarette!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chooch in Jasper Georgia</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162659</link>
		<dc:creator>Chooch in Jasper Georgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162659</guid>
		<description>All you idiots supporting the ban on cigarettes for the military need to put on a uniform and serve before you even think about supporting a ban or writing on blogs with your reasoning. A young man or woman enlists in the military knowing  they could die given the world animosity towards  the U.S. and the current military involvement around this globe. How much more dangerous is smoking than war? I think a ban on snack food should be instituted so all the lard asses sitting at their computer in the civilian world don&#039;t offend my eyesight. I get nauseated when I see fat and blubber hanging out from clothing, but that doesn&#039;t bother non-smokers. For some reason somebody&#039;s sense of smell is more important than my sense of sight? Don&#039;t know how many times I&#039;ve heard people say &quot;Smoking stinks, I can&#039;t stand the smell&quot;, Take a look in the mirror. Your blubber is disgusting to me so why should your sense of smell be more important than my sense of sight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All you idiots supporting the ban on cigarettes for the military need to put on a uniform and serve before you even think about supporting a ban or writing on blogs with your reasoning. A young man or woman enlists in the military knowing  they could die given the world animosity towards  the U.S. and the current military involvement around this globe. How much more dangerous is smoking than war? I think a ban on snack food should be instituted so all the lard asses sitting at their computer in the civilian world don&#8217;t offend my eyesight. I get nauseated when I see fat and blubber hanging out from clothing, but that doesn&#8217;t bother non-smokers. For some reason somebody&#8217;s sense of smell is more important than my sense of sight? Don&#8217;t know how many times I&#8217;ve heard people say &#8220;Smoking stinks, I can&#8217;t stand the smell&#8221;, Take a look in the mirror. Your blubber is disgusting to me so why should your sense of smell be more important than my sense of sight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162610</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162610</guid>
		<description>I ran a 5:30 mile as a smoker, and ran 5 miles without breaking sweat when I left BCT . We also knew enough not to smoke in the field when on a S &amp; D patrol.

So can the pseudo - strategic BS, and the &quot;Nanny State knows best&quot;. Every soldier is used to the idea that the &lt;i&gt;Army&lt;/i&gt; knows what is best for them, but they have faith in the Army. Some dipshit in Congress? Eeeeh? Not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran a 5:30 mile as a smoker, and ran 5 miles without breaking sweat when I left BCT . We also knew enough not to smoke in the field when on a S &amp; D patrol.</p>
<p>So can the pseudo &#8211; strategic BS, and the &#8220;Nanny State knows best&#8221;. Every soldier is used to the idea that the <i>Army</i> knows what is best for them, but they have faith in the Army. Some dipshit in Congress? Eeeeh? Not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherri</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162598</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162598</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re playing with fire here. Anyone who smokes or who has smoked in the past knows that withdrawal symptoms can easily make a person &quot;go off the handle.&quot; A person trying to quit smoking, especially in the early stages, really needs to keep a check on their self-control. And I am just talking about us homebodies, not those out there in the battlefields toting machine guns, surrounded 24/7 by stressful situations. They really should watch what they wish for. They just may get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re playing with fire here. Anyone who smokes or who has smoked in the past knows that withdrawal symptoms can easily make a person &#8220;go off the handle.&#8221; A person trying to quit smoking, especially in the early stages, really needs to keep a check on their self-control. And I am just talking about us homebodies, not those out there in the battlefields toting machine guns, surrounded 24/7 by stressful situations. They really should watch what they wish for. They just may get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162584</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162584</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ignatz&quot; obliquely points out that going through nicotine withdrawal is serious, especially for &lt;i&gt;&quot;people in extremely stressful situations carrying guns&quot;.&lt;/i&gt;

Doesn&#039;t that &lt;i&gt;support&lt;/i&gt; discouraging troops from getting hooked on an addictive drug that has serious withdrawal consequences along with the other ill-health affects?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ignatz&#8221; obliquely points out that going through nicotine withdrawal is serious, especially for <i>&#8220;people in extremely stressful situations carrying guns&#8221;.</i></p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t that <i>support</i> discouraging troops from getting hooked on an addictive drug that has serious withdrawal consequences along with the other ill-health affects?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignatz</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162579</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162579</guid>
		<description>Just what we want: people in extremely stressful situations carrying guns and going through nicotine withdrawal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what we want: people in extremely stressful situations carrying guns and going through nicotine withdrawal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vet</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162573</link>
		<dc:creator>Vet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162573</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see the readiness issue. As long as you can pass your fitness test, then how much you smoke, what you eat, how often you exercise, etc. should be up to you. If smokers can&#039;t pass the test, they don&#039;t stay in. That goes for fatties too. Raise the fitness minimums and people will quit smoking in order to pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the readiness issue. As long as you can pass your fitness test, then how much you smoke, what you eat, how often you exercise, etc. should be up to you. If smokers can&#8217;t pass the test, they don&#8217;t stay in. That goes for fatties too. Raise the fitness minimums and people will quit smoking in order to pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162572</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162572</guid>
		<description>Right winger &quot;GetErRight&quot; doesn&#039;t know math or recent history.

&lt;b&gt;Republican Debtor Presidents have been racking up the US debt for almost 30 years.&lt;/b&gt;

Republican Hollywood entertainer Reagan more than DOUBLED the US debt.

Republican Bush 1 walked away from 12 years of Republican Presidential rule with a QUADRUPLED &lt;a href=&quot;http://HavenWorks.com/us/debt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;US debt&lt;/a&gt;.

Republican Bush 2 DOUBLED the US debt &lt;i&gt;again&lt;/i&gt; and arguably Republican Bush QUADRUPLED the US debt when all the trillions Republican Bush gave his crony buddies out the back door of the Federal Reserve are added up.

Republican Debtors always blame &lt;i&gt;someone&lt;/i&gt; else for Republican Debt.

It&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://HavenWorks.com/opinion/blog/archive/2009/200902-february/#REPUBLICAN-MATH&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Republican Math&lt;/a&gt; combined with &lt;a href=&quot;http://HavenWorks.com/opinion/blog/archive/2009/200902-february/#Republican&#039;s-First-Rule=Rules-Are-For-Other-People&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Republican&#039;s First Rule: Rules Are For Other People&lt;/a&gt;.

And for the record, &quot;GetErRight&quot;, I&#039;m and independent with a conservative streak that did the math on the REPUBLICAN&#039;S DEBT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right winger &#8220;GetErRight&#8221; doesn&#8217;t know math or recent history.</p>
<p><b>Republican Debtor Presidents have been racking up the US debt for almost 30 years.</b></p>
<p>Republican Hollywood entertainer Reagan more than DOUBLED the US debt.</p>
<p>Republican Bush 1 walked away from 12 years of Republican Presidential rule with a QUADRUPLED <a href="http://HavenWorks.com/us/debt" rel="nofollow">US debt</a>.</p>
<p>Republican Bush 2 DOUBLED the US debt <i>again</i> and arguably Republican Bush QUADRUPLED the US debt when all the trillions Republican Bush gave his crony buddies out the back door of the Federal Reserve are added up.</p>
<p>Republican Debtors always blame <i>someone</i> else for Republican Debt.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s <a href="http://HavenWorks.com/opinion/blog/archive/2009/200902-february/#REPUBLICAN-MATH" rel="nofollow">Republican Math</a> combined with <a href="http://HavenWorks.com/opinion/blog/archive/2009/200902-february/#Republican's-First-Rule=Rules-Are-For-Other-People" rel="nofollow">Republican&#8217;s First Rule: Rules Are For Other People</a>.</p>
<p>And for the record, &#8220;GetErRight&#8221;, I&#8217;m and independent with a conservative streak that did the math on the REPUBLICAN&#8217;S DEBT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GetErRight</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162557</link>
		<dc:creator>GetErRight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162557</guid>
		<description>Left winger &quot;News Reference&quot;: &lt;i&gt;&quot;A larger lung capacity, a healthier heart rate, and a decrease in anxiety, and a longer life is what you get when liberals run the country?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah, because you&#039;re going to need it in order to work two jobs just to pay off the multi-trillion dollar debt hole the liberals are digging for us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Left winger &#8220;News Reference&#8221;: <i>&#8220;A larger lung capacity, a healthier heart rate, and a decrease in anxiety, and a longer life is what you get when liberals run the country?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Yeah, because you&#8217;re going to need it in order to work two jobs just to pay off the multi-trillion dollar debt hole the liberals are digging for us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162548</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162548</guid>
		<description>Let them use their tobacco. It&#039;s stuid to make a rule to take it away. I doubt there are many that are happy to be in the war. Let them have a little pleasure of using if they desire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let them use their tobacco. It&#8217;s stuid to make a rule to take it away. I doubt there are many that are happy to be in the war. Let them have a little pleasure of using if they desire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162546</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162546</guid>
		<description>So our military troops, who could be called into physical combat even while &lt;i&gt;off duty&lt;/i&gt; shouldn&#039;t be encouraged (if not expected) to have a larger lung capacity, a healthier heart rate, and a decrease in anxiety?

My first thought was, &quot;smoke &#039;em if ya&#039; got &#039;em&quot;, but I&#039;ve known too many out of breath smokers not to realize that there is a genuinely legitimate military readiness concern.

Even a smoker with a desk job has erratic productivity because of the persistent urge to regularly satisfy their nicotine addiction.

And this wasn&#039;t some touchy feely liberals advocating this, this was:

&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;A new study commissioned by the Pentagon and the Department of Veterans Affairs&lt;/b&gt; recommends a complete ban on tobacco, which would end tobacco sales on military bases and prohibit smoking by anyone in uniform, not even combat troops in the thick of battle.

According to the study, tobacco use impairs military readiness in the short term. Over the long term, it can cause serious health problems, including lung cancer and cardiovascular disease. The study also says smokeless tobacco use can lead to oral and pancreatic cancer.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So our military troops, who could be called into physical combat even while <i>off duty</i> shouldn&#8217;t be encouraged (if not expected) to have a larger lung capacity, a healthier heart rate, and a decrease in anxiety?</p>
<p>My first thought was, &#8220;smoke &#8216;em if ya&#8217; got &#8216;em&#8221;, but I&#8217;ve known too many out of breath smokers not to realize that there is a genuinely legitimate military readiness concern.</p>
<p>Even a smoker with a desk job has erratic productivity because of the persistent urge to regularly satisfy their nicotine addiction.</p>
<p>And this wasn&#8217;t some touchy feely liberals advocating this, this was:</p>
<p><i><b>A new study commissioned by the Pentagon and the Department of Veterans Affairs</b> recommends a complete ban on tobacco, which would end tobacco sales on military bases and prohibit smoking by anyone in uniform, not even combat troops in the thick of battle.</p>
<p>According to the study, tobacco use impairs military readiness in the short term. Over the long term, it can cause serious health problems, including lung cancer and cardiovascular disease. The study also says smokeless tobacco use can lead to oral and pancreatic cancer.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162528</link>
		<dc:creator>Amused Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162528</guid>
		<description>OK Repack,
You&#039;ve made a strong case for soldiers in combat.  That still leaves an awful lot of time that isn&#039;t off duty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK Repack,<br />
You&#8217;ve made a strong case for soldiers in combat.  That still leaves an awful lot of time that isn&#8217;t off duty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CLIFF</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/12/let-em-smoke/#comment-162527</link>
		<dc:creator>CLIFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15367#comment-162527</guid>
		<description>Hey, LIBS.
Let me know when you have had enough of the &quot;CHANGE&quot; you voted into office.
YUK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, LIBS.<br />
Let me know when you have had enough of the &#8220;CHANGE&#8221; you voted into office.<br />
YUK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

