<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Steele Flip Flops On Palin 2012 In Hours</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaim</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161903</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161903</guid>
		<description>GOP logic: Let&#039;s criticize Obama for trying to fix the roof, rather than blame our own party for blowing huge fucking holes in it in the first place.

You guys don&#039;t deserve to ever govern again.  For the sake of America, hopefully you never will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOP logic: Let&#8217;s criticize Obama for trying to fix the roof, rather than blame our own party for blowing huge fucking holes in it in the first place.</p>
<p>You guys don&#8217;t deserve to ever govern again.  For the sake of America, hopefully you never will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161723</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161723</guid>
		<description>Since the right wingers want to talk about the disastrous Republican economy...

&lt;b&gt;The 2007 Great Recession is a direct result of right wing economic fictions.&lt;/b&gt;

The stimulus to repair the Republican damage to the economy was inadequate and lefty economists said as much when it was first being discussed.

Krugman, Baker, Stiglitz and other near-prescient economists were quite clear that the economy was &lt;i&gt;much&lt;/i&gt; worse than was discussed in the corporate media and they were quite clear that a much larger stimulus was needed to get the economy back on track.

The Republicans damage to both our American economy AND the global economy is in some ways &lt;i&gt;worse&lt;/i&gt; than the Republicans infliceted upon US during the Republican Great Depression.

The only difference is that we had hindsight enough to be able to respond better to the Republican Economic Disaster.

Even the Republicans in September of 2008 understood enough to know that the only way to save capitalism was to engage in radical government intervention.

Republican Bush nationalized (communism) many large banks and insurance companies.

Republican Bush used massive government/taxpayer money to boost the economy (socialism).

But that&#039;s only forestalled US from sinking into another Republican Great Depression.

Further economic stimulus is essential to keep US out of the economic hole the Republicans have been digging US into these last 30 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the right wingers want to talk about the disastrous Republican economy&#8230;</p>
<p><b>The 2007 Great Recession is a direct result of right wing economic fictions.</b></p>
<p>The stimulus to repair the Republican damage to the economy was inadequate and lefty economists said as much when it was first being discussed.</p>
<p>Krugman, Baker, Stiglitz and other near-prescient economists were quite clear that the economy was <i>much</i> worse than was discussed in the corporate media and they were quite clear that a much larger stimulus was needed to get the economy back on track.</p>
<p>The Republicans damage to both our American economy AND the global economy is in some ways <i>worse</i> than the Republicans infliceted upon US during the Republican Great Depression.</p>
<p>The only difference is that we had hindsight enough to be able to respond better to the Republican Economic Disaster.</p>
<p>Even the Republicans in September of 2008 understood enough to know that the only way to save capitalism was to engage in radical government intervention.</p>
<p>Republican Bush nationalized (communism) many large banks and insurance companies.</p>
<p>Republican Bush used massive government/taxpayer money to boost the economy (socialism).</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s only forestalled US from sinking into another Republican Great Depression.</p>
<p>Further economic stimulus is essential to keep US out of the economic hole the Republicans have been digging US into these last 30 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161717</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161717</guid>
		<description>The whole economic &quot;Stimulus Package&quot; is based on the faulty premise exposed by Bastiat in the story of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quebecoislibre.org/04/040207-5.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the glazier and the broken window&lt;/a&gt;. It would be nice if it were &lt;i&gt;only&lt;/i&gt; a zero-sum game. Unfortunately, since the spending is built on a deficit, it will prove to be superinflationary. Once again, the debtors will be rewarded, and the creditors punished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole economic &#8220;Stimulus Package&#8221; is based on the faulty premise exposed by Bastiat in the story of <a href="http://www.quebecoislibre.org/04/040207-5.htm" rel="nofollow">the glazier and the broken window</a>. It would be nice if it were <i>only</i> a zero-sum game. Unfortunately, since the spending is built on a deficit, it will prove to be superinflationary. Once again, the debtors will be rewarded, and the creditors punished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161715</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161715</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You are quoting Boehner as proof that the Democrats lied.

Could you find a less reliable source?
---CS Strawbridge&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A less reliable source, you say?  How about Christina Romer, from when she prepared the report.  Given the predictions, yes, a less reliable source.  

In any event, here it is:
-------------------
&lt;a href=&quot;http://otrans.3cdn.net/45593e8ecbd339d074_l3m6bt1te.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Job Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Christina Romer- Chair-Nominee-Designate, Council of Economic Advisers

Jared Bernstein- Office of the Vice President Elect
---------------------

Scroll down to page 5 of the pdf.   Straight from the horse&#039;s mouth, Strowbridge. Unemployment projected not to go above 8% &lt;i&gt;with&lt;/i&gt; the stimulus plan.

If you had something to refute Boehner, you&#039;d not only know about it from liberal blogs screaming at the top of their lungs about so blatant a lie, you&#039;d also have posted it here intead of just scoffing at him with no evidence to refute him.

Always the dishonest one.  Exposed fraudulence, once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You are quoting Boehner as proof that the Democrats lied.</p>
<p>Could you find a less reliable source?<br />
&#8212;CS Strawbridge</p></blockquote>
<p>A less reliable source, you say?  How about Christina Romer, from when she prepared the report.  Given the predictions, yes, a less reliable source.  </p>
<p>In any event, here it is:<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<a href="http://otrans.3cdn.net/45593e8ecbd339d074_l3m6bt1te.pdf" rel="nofollow"><b>The Job Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan</b></a></p>
<p>Christina Romer- Chair-Nominee-Designate, Council of Economic Advisers</p>
<p>Jared Bernstein- Office of the Vice President Elect<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Scroll down to page 5 of the pdf.   Straight from the horse&#8217;s mouth, Strowbridge. Unemployment projected not to go above 8% <i>with</i> the stimulus plan.</p>
<p>If you had something to refute Boehner, you&#8217;d not only know about it from liberal blogs screaming at the top of their lungs about so blatant a lie, you&#8217;d also have posted it here intead of just scoffing at him with no evidence to refute him.</p>
<p>Always the dishonest one.  Exposed fraudulence, once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrfunkenstein</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161689</link>
		<dc:creator>jrfunkenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161689</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t we all just get along?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t we all just get along?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161681</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161681</guid>
		<description>Dennis the Bigot: &quot;&#039;Where Are the Jobs&#039; From the Stimulus?&quot;

You are quoting Boehner? The person who admitted he was wrong when he said no contracts had been awarded yet. 

You are quoting Boehner as proof that the Democrats lied. 

Could you find a less reliable source?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis the Bigot: &#8220;&#8216;Where Are the Jobs&#8217; From the Stimulus?&#8221;</p>
<p>You are quoting Boehner? The person who admitted he was wrong when he said no contracts had been awarded yet. </p>
<p>You are quoting Boehner as proof that the Democrats lied. </p>
<p>Could you find a less reliable source?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161666</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161666</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Wouldn’t go above 8%? What the fuck are you talking about?

I think you are mixing up the ’stress test’ vs. the budget. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

And I think you&#039;re an idiot who doesn&#039;t know his ass from a hole in the ground, Strowbridge.  You&#039;re the only guy here who would call someone else fucking stupid without doing any homework to know just what he was talking about before he started writing.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/27/republican-john-boehner-w_n_221852.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Where Are the Jobs&quot; From the Stimulus?&lt;/a&gt;

&quot;The president and Democrats in Congress claim this spending binge is necessary to put Americans back to work,&quot; House Republican leader John Boehner said Saturday in the Republican radio and Internet address. &lt;b&gt;&quot;They promised unemployment would not rise above 8 percent if their trillion-dollar stimulus was passed.&quot;&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wouldn’t go above 8%? What the fuck are you talking about?</p>
<p>I think you are mixing up the ’stress test’ vs. the budget. </p></blockquote>
<p>And I think you&#8217;re an idiot who doesn&#8217;t know his ass from a hole in the ground, Strowbridge.  You&#8217;re the only guy here who would call someone else fucking stupid without doing any homework to know just what he was talking about before he started writing.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/27/republican-john-boehner-w_n_221852.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Where Are the Jobs&#8221; From the Stimulus?</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The president and Democrats in Congress claim this spending binge is necessary to put Americans back to work,&#8221; House Republican leader John Boehner said Saturday in the Republican radio and Internet address. <b>&#8220;They promised unemployment would not rise above 8 percent if their trillion-dollar stimulus was passed.&#8221;</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161660</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161660</guid>
		<description>Dennis the Bigot: &quot;I guess that’s why we’re at 9.5% unemployment when Obama’s budget people told us it wouldn’t go above 8%, because everything is kicking in.&quot;

Wouldn&#039;t go above 8%? What the fuck are you talking about? 

I think you are mixing up the &#039;stress test&#039; vs. the budget. 

&quot;The irony is that your comeback makes no sense.&quot;

The problem is you are fucking stupid and are mixing up two different things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis the Bigot: &#8220;I guess that’s why we’re at 9.5% unemployment when Obama’s budget people told us it wouldn’t go above 8%, because everything is kicking in.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t go above 8%? What the fuck are you talking about? </p>
<p>I think you are mixing up the &#8216;stress test&#8217; vs. the budget. </p>
<p>&#8220;The irony is that your comeback makes no sense.&#8221;</p>
<p>The problem is you are fucking stupid and are mixing up two different things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zadura</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161659</link>
		<dc:creator>zadura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161659</guid>
		<description>CSS: &quot;The Democrats barely lost 2004.&quot;  Well, that&#039;s weird because I seem to remember off the top of my head that there were more R&#039;s than D&#039;s in 2004 than 2002 in both the Senate and House.  I also remember that Bush the popular vote by 2-3% where he had lost the popular vote in 2000.  I also remember a lot of articles/books/academic papers pointing to the period of Republican hegemony.  Please let me know the facts that support this assertion.

I am not here to tell you the sky is falling, but I am here to tell you that all of this triumphalism about Democratic majorities as far as the eye can see are &quot;short-sighted.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CSS: &#8220;The Democrats barely lost 2004.&#8221;  Well, that&#8217;s weird because I seem to remember off the top of my head that there were more R&#8217;s than D&#8217;s in 2004 than 2002 in both the Senate and House.  I also remember that Bush the popular vote by 2-3% where he had lost the popular vote in 2000.  I also remember a lot of articles/books/academic papers pointing to the period of Republican hegemony.  Please let me know the facts that support this assertion.</p>
<p>I am not here to tell you the sky is falling, but I am here to tell you that all of this triumphalism about Democratic majorities as far as the eye can see are &#8220;short-sighted.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaim</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161644</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161644</guid>
		<description>Black people who vote for Obama aren&#039;t &quot;real&quot; voters, just like middle and working class people who pay taxes aren&#039;t &quot;real&quot; tax payers.  Only tax cuts for George Soros and Paris Hilton are &quot;real&quot; tax cuts.

Welcome to GOP logic ca. 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black people who vote for Obama aren&#8217;t &#8220;real&#8221; voters, just like middle and working class people who pay taxes aren&#8217;t &#8220;real&#8221; tax payers.  Only tax cuts for George Soros and Paris Hilton are &#8220;real&#8221; tax cuts.</p>
<p>Welcome to GOP logic ca. 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161619</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161619</guid>
		<description>I guess that&#039;s why we&#039;re at 9.5% unemployment when Obama&#039;s budget people told us it wouldn&#039;t go above 8%, because everything is kicking in.

The irony is that your comeback makes no sense.  Just like your original statement in March when you were bragging that it was all coming together just like they drew it up.

That&#039;s the irony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that&#8217;s why we&#8217;re at 9.5% unemployment when Obama&#8217;s budget people told us it wouldn&#8217;t go above 8%, because everything is kicking in.</p>
<p>The irony is that your comeback makes no sense.  Just like your original statement in March when you were bragging that it was all coming together just like they drew it up.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161611</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161611</guid>
		<description>Me: &quot;I remember one of the right-wing talking points was that the stimulus spending would take too long to kick it. This has been proven false.”

Dennis the Bigot: &quot;That has been proven TRUE.&quot;

Uhhh... You realize the money is being spent right now. You do know that, right? In fact, stimulus money was being spent almost immediately, and BEFORE INCOME TAX REFUNDS WENT OUT. 

On the other hand, the Right-wingers claimed it would take too long for the money to be spend. In fact, John Boehner recently claimed no contracts had been awarded in Ohio. 

This was a big fucking lie. 

&quot;You have been proven a know-it-all idiot who in actuality knows very little.&quot;

How ironic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me: &#8220;I remember one of the right-wing talking points was that the stimulus spending would take too long to kick it. This has been proven false.”</p>
<p>Dennis the Bigot: &#8220;That has been proven TRUE.&#8221;</p>
<p>Uhhh&#8230; You realize the money is being spent right now. You do know that, right? In fact, stimulus money was being spent almost immediately, and BEFORE INCOME TAX REFUNDS WENT OUT. </p>
<p>On the other hand, the Right-wingers claimed it would take too long for the money to be spend. In fact, John Boehner recently claimed no contracts had been awarded in Ohio. </p>
<p>This was a big fucking lie. </p>
<p>&#8220;You have been proven a know-it-all idiot who in actuality knows very little.&#8221;</p>
<p>How ironic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161610</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161610</guid>
		<description>Me: &quot;Are you claiming most middle class people don’t pay taxes?&quot;

Frank: &quot;No.&quot;

Then explain what you meant when you said... 

“Sending an additional check to benefit recipients is not a tax cut, anymore than handing a quarter to everyone who crosses over a bridge on a Monday morning a toll reduction’”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me: &#8220;Are you claiming most middle class people don’t pay taxes?&#8221;</p>
<p>Frank: &#8220;No.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then explain what you meant when you said&#8230; </p>
<p>“Sending an additional check to benefit recipients is not a tax cut, anymore than handing a quarter to everyone who crosses over a bridge on a Monday morning a toll reduction’”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161609</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161609</guid>
		<description>Dennis the Bigot: &quot;So if failed predictions were reasons for shutting the fuck up and you had even the slightest bit of honor, YOU are the first person who should shut the fuck up.&quot;

Except I predicted things would bottom out at the end of 2009 or the beginning of 2010. 

We haven&#039;t reached the end of 2009 / the beginning of 2010, so you can&#039;t judge my predictions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis the Bigot: &#8220;So if failed predictions were reasons for shutting the fuck up and you had even the slightest bit of honor, YOU are the first person who should shut the fuck up.&#8221;</p>
<p>Except I predicted things would bottom out at the end of 2009 or the beginning of 2010. </p>
<p>We haven&#8217;t reached the end of 2009 / the beginning of 2010, so you can&#8217;t judge my predictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rip</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161595</link>
		<dc:creator>rip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161595</guid>
		<description>The balance of power is decided by non-ideological voters - both swing voters, and voters who usually vote for the same party when they come out to vote, but aren&#039;t committed enough to be reliable.

In a two party system, when these voters are disillusioned with the way the party in power governs, they only have one place to go (most of time), so writing the obituary of either of the two main parties is always premature as it assumes the party in ascendancy will never disappoint the public at large. 

At some time in the future, the Democrats will be vulnerable to arguments that it once again time for a change - but the Republicans will need to be able to convince enough American&#039;s that they are capable of competently effecting that change in order to shift the balance of power in congress or the Whitehouse. It is still early, but there is very little chance of that happening in 2010 (even if the Republicans could get their shit together by then), and 2012 looks out of reach as well (given that incumbent Presidents of both parties are more likely to increase their margin of victory than to be defeated when seeking re-election).

The Republicans have five years until the 2014 midterms to find a unifying and resonant message, and another two years beyond that to find a standard bearer capable of uniting the party and reaching beyond it. Even this does not assure victory, but five to seven years is a long time in politics and the issues that will drive those election cycles are currently unknowable, but it&#039;s as least as likely that the Republicans will be focused and united by then as it is they continue to marginalize themselves while bickering over the future of the party and rallying behind personalities who all but guarantee minority party status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The balance of power is decided by non-ideological voters &#8211; both swing voters, and voters who usually vote for the same party when they come out to vote, but aren&#8217;t committed enough to be reliable.</p>
<p>In a two party system, when these voters are disillusioned with the way the party in power governs, they only have one place to go (most of time), so writing the obituary of either of the two main parties is always premature as it assumes the party in ascendancy will never disappoint the public at large. </p>
<p>At some time in the future, the Democrats will be vulnerable to arguments that it once again time for a change &#8211; but the Republicans will need to be able to convince enough American&#8217;s that they are capable of competently effecting that change in order to shift the balance of power in congress or the Whitehouse. It is still early, but there is very little chance of that happening in 2010 (even if the Republicans could get their shit together by then), and 2012 looks out of reach as well (given that incumbent Presidents of both parties are more likely to increase their margin of victory than to be defeated when seeking re-election).</p>
<p>The Republicans have five years until the 2014 midterms to find a unifying and resonant message, and another two years beyond that to find a standard bearer capable of uniting the party and reaching beyond it. Even this does not assure victory, but five to seven years is a long time in politics and the issues that will drive those election cycles are currently unknowable, but it&#8217;s as least as likely that the Republicans will be focused and united by then as it is they continue to marginalize themselves while bickering over the future of the party and rallying behind personalities who all but guarantee minority party status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161572</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161572</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Are you claiming most middle class people don’t pay taxes?&lt;/i&gt;
No.

You know what your problem is, Strowbridge? You present the evidence that &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; should be insulted before you insult anyone. If you ever demonstrated that you had some alternative explanation for things, or perhaps some evidence not previously presented that you were correct, and the other person incorrect, that might have some worth.

But to follow a statement that someone is stupid with a statement of your own that is stupendously stupid is really a tragic error. 

&lt;i&gt;It’s a shame you were born at all.&lt;/i&gt;

Spoken like a true 21st Century liberal, who appreciates the value of every human being. You would have been right at home in 1930&#039;s Germany.

&lt;i&gt;Pathetic&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Are you claiming most middle class people don’t pay taxes?</i><br />
No.</p>
<p>You know what your problem is, Strowbridge? You present the evidence that <i>you</i> should be insulted before you insult anyone. If you ever demonstrated that you had some alternative explanation for things, or perhaps some evidence not previously presented that you were correct, and the other person incorrect, that might have some worth.</p>
<p>But to follow a statement that someone is stupid with a statement of your own that is stupendously stupid is really a tragic error. </p>
<p><i>It’s a shame you were born at all.</i></p>
<p>Spoken like a true 21st Century liberal, who appreciates the value of every human being. You would have been right at home in 1930&#8242;s Germany.</p>
<p><i>Pathetic</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161571</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161571</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I want dates, so when you are wrong, I can point to this prediction and tell you the shut the fuck up.--CS Strawbridge&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Here&#039;s what you said back in March egarding the stimulus,CSS:
&quot;&lt;i&gt;there are already signs of hope, including people being hired thanks to stimulus money. 

I remember one of the right-wing talking points was that the stimulus spending would take too long to kick it. &lt;b&gt;This has been proven false.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&quot;

That has been proven TRUE.  &lt;i&gt;You&lt;/i&gt; have been proven a know-it-all idiot who in actuality knows very little.

So if failed predictions were reasons for shutting the fuck up and you had even the slightest bit of honor, YOU are the first person who should shut the fuck up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I want dates, so when you are wrong, I can point to this prediction and tell you the shut the fuck up.&#8211;CS Strawbridge</p></blockquote>
<p>Here&#8217;s what you said back in March egarding the stimulus,CSS:<br />
&#8220;<i>there are already signs of hope, including people being hired thanks to stimulus money. </p>
<p>I remember one of the right-wing talking points was that the stimulus spending would take too long to kick it. <b>This has been proven false.</b></i>&#8221;</p>
<p>That has been proven TRUE.  <i>You</i> have been proven a know-it-all idiot who in actuality knows very little.</p>
<p>So if failed predictions were reasons for shutting the fuck up and you had even the slightest bit of honor, YOU are the first person who should shut the fuck up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161564</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161564</guid>
		<description>Frank: &quot;You see, most people don’t think like Democrats (i.e., Tax cuts + Unchanged spending = Increased deficits). No, they think like Republicans (i.e., Wages + Tax cuts = More money in my pocket).&quot;

Good god, you are a stupid, stupid man. 

George W. Bush cuts taxes to the richest of the rich while increasing spending, but you think people will blame Obama for trying to restart a failed economy. 

When do you think this will happen? 

I want dates, so when you are wrong, I can point to this prediction and tell you the shut the fuck up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank: &#8220;You see, most people don’t think like Democrats (i.e., Tax cuts + Unchanged spending = Increased deficits). No, they think like Republicans (i.e., Wages + Tax cuts = More money in my pocket).&#8221;</p>
<p>Good god, you are a stupid, stupid man. </p>
<p>George W. Bush cuts taxes to the richest of the rich while increasing spending, but you think people will blame Obama for trying to restart a failed economy. </p>
<p>When do you think this will happen? </p>
<p>I want dates, so when you are wrong, I can point to this prediction and tell you the shut the fuck up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.S.Strowbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161563</link>
		<dc:creator>C.S.Strowbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161563</guid>
		<description>Frank DiSalle: &quot;Sending an additional check to benefit recipients is not a tax cut, anymore than handing a quarter to everyone who crosses over a bridge on a Monday morning a toll reduction’&quot;

Are you claiming most middle class people don&#039;t pay taxes? 

&quot;Damn, Jaim, I was born in the afternoon – not yesterday afternoon.&quot;

It&#039;s a shame you were born at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank DiSalle: &#8220;Sending an additional check to benefit recipients is not a tax cut, anymore than handing a quarter to everyone who crosses over a bridge on a Monday morning a toll reduction’&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you claiming most middle class people don&#8217;t pay taxes? </p>
<p>&#8220;Damn, Jaim, I was born in the afternoon – not yesterday afternoon.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame you were born at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/07/07/michael-steele-flip-flops-on-palin-2012-in-hours/#comment-161560</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15271#comment-161560</guid>
		<description>Sending an additional check to benefit recipients is not a tax cut, anymore than handing a quarter to everyone who crosses over a bridge on a Monday morning a toll reduction&#039;

Damn, Jaim, I was born in the afternoon - not yesterday afternoon .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sending an additional check to benefit recipients is not a tax cut, anymore than handing a quarter to everyone who crosses over a bridge on a Monday morning a toll reduction&#8217;</p>
<p>Damn, Jaim, I was born in the afternoon &#8211; not yesterday afternoon .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

