Comments on: Teabaggers On Health Care

By: Oliver

Oliver — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:06:39 +0000

Enough with the personal bs. CSS is welcome to comment, simply barking that he’s Canadian is no sub for a real argument. Move along.

By: C.S.Strowbridge

C.S.Strowbridge — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:25:00 +0000

Wilbur: “You can tell it’s been a bad patch for the wingnuts when a.o. is reduced to bitching about meddling Canadians.”

I know.

I’m from Canada. Practically the dullest place on Earth, yet some of the right-wing ‘tards here seem to have a seething hatred for the place.

Maybe they want us to be the targets of the new Southern Strategy. After all, it appears going after gays not longer works.

By: C.S.Strowbridge

C.S.Strowbridge — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:16:46 +0000

Amused Observer: “Cs,
Generally speaking you’re a twit…”

And generally speaking, you are a racist piece of shit.

It’s nice to see your bigotry extends to nationalities as well.

“…the fact that you are an American obsessed…”

What is with the obsession with calling me obsessed. The fact that so many people do it on this blog makes think that you conspire outside the blog to co-ordinate your attacks against me.

However, not even my ego will allow me to believe that is happening.

If it was, it would be too awesome.

By the way, I’m ignoring the rest of your post, as you ignored mine.

There’s no point in getting into a discussion with you, as you are far too obsessed with my nationality to actually address any of my points. Seriously. You guys call me Canadian so many times, it’s like you are being paid each time you do.

You can’t defend your previous position of the Tea Baggers, which has been shown to be 100% wrong, so you mere shout, ‘YOU ARE CANADIAN!’ as if you were making a fucking point.

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:29:06 +0000

Peter Jennings has been down here so long most people have forgotten where he comes from. He seldom mentions it.

Perhaps he seldom mentions it because he has been dead for four years. Which leads me to ask: where is the “down here” you refer to?

By: Wilbur

Wilbur — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:24:15 +0000

You can tell it’s been a bad patch for the wingnuts when a.o. is reduced to bitching about meddling Canadians.

“You damn Canadians get off my lawn!!”

By: C.S.Strowbridge

C.S.Strowbridge — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:01:13 +0000

Fred: “Teabag shrinkage. Heh”

Even without the innuendos, these people are laughable.
With the innuendos, it is virtually impossible not to laugh at them.

By: Amused Observer

Amused Observer — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:00:36 +0000

Cs,
Generally speaking you’re a twit, the fact that you are an American obsessed Canuck makes it all the more entertaining to hear you blather on. Are there many blogs on Canadian politics where Americans post and pontificate? I can think of one or two Canadian pundits that make a lot of sense. Peter Jennings has been down here so long most people have forgotten where he comes from. He seldom mentions it. Neil Young doesn’t count.

By: Fred

Fred — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:48:55 +0000

Teabag shrinkage.

Heh

By: C.S.Strowbridge

C.S.Strowbridge — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:47:58 +0000

Amused Observer: “No CS, I mean that you aren’t a part of the American electorate.”

Never claimed I was. But don’t lets facts get in the way of your prejudices.

“Your views on the tea baggers are unimportant.”

So because I can’t vote in your elections, my opinions on American politics can be dismissed out of hand? Wow. That’s a textbook example of Argumentum ad Hominem.

On the other hand, your views on everything are unimportant, because you are a fucking ‘tard. You could only be correct by accident.

Speaking of which… Were you one of the people who claimed the Tea Baggers were a real grassroots movement that was spreading?

By: Amused Observer

Amused Observer — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:40:30 +0000

No CS,
I mean that you aren’t a part of the American electorate. Your views on the tea baggers are unimportant. I suppose you could come down to Chicago and vote, maybe I spoke to soon.

By: Indeed

Indeed — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:25:24 +0000

Those tea-baggers, representative of the remaining Republicans, sure are a stupid set.

By: Indeed

Indeed — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:24:05 +0000

Right wingers rewrite history as a hobby.

Incorrect. They need to rewrite history to fit their feeble-minded worldview: The Founding Fathers fought off communism. White Christians are the most oppressed people ever. Hitler? Liberal. It’s not a hobby, it’s all part of the Orwellian playbook.

By: News Reference

News Reference — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:28:21 +0000

Tea baggers still don’t understand that the “Tea Party” was expressing anger that the King’s favored corporation got a tax cut.

Right wingers rewrite history as a hobby.

By: C.S.Strowbridge

C.S.Strowbridge — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:17:48 +0000

Amused Observer: “Uh CS, You aren’t any part of we, regardless of your fantasies.”

Really? I’m not part of a group of people who are laughing at the Tea Baggers?

I’m really the only one laughing at these people?

Care to back that up? I ask, because I’ve seen clips of people making jokes at the expense of Tea Baggers.

By: Amused Observer

Amused Observer — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:09:28 +0000

Uh CS,
You aren’t any part of we, regardless of your fantasies.

By: C.S.Strowbridge

C.S.Strowbridge — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:04:05 +0000

No time to check out these video clips. But I’ve seen others on the Independence Day Tea Parties. Seemed rather pathetic. Literally. There were so few people there, I actually felt pity for the people they got to speak.

That said, we are still laughing at you. We are still not scared of you.

By: bryan

bryan — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:59:22 +0000

I wonder how many people go just to point and laugh. There did seem a fair few at that one though. Time to worry.

By: Parthenon

Parthenon — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:57:18 +0000

A moment of Blumenthalesque awesome.