<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minnesota Supreme Court: Al Franken Won</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:43:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-160246</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-160246</guid>
		<description>BTW. 

Groucho Marx is a comedian.

Will Rogers is a humorist.

Andy Dick is a wiseass.

Carry on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW. </p>
<p>Groucho Marx is a comedian.</p>
<p>Will Rogers is a humorist.</p>
<p>Andy Dick is a wiseass.</p>
<p>Carry on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-160243</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-160243</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/7371579@N04/582610559/&quot; title=&quot;Franken_Stein 12 by duros39, on Flickr&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ahem&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/7371579@N04/582610559/" title="Franken_Stein 12 by duros39, on Flickr" rel="nofollow">ahem</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-160242</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-160242</guid>
		<description>Oliver, a little help? I can never get this right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver, a little help? I can never get this right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-160239</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-160239</guid>
		<description>Dammit, did I break the intertube again?

&lt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/7371579@N04/582610559/&quot; title=&quot;Franken_Stein 12 by duros39, on Flickr&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&gt;

Works great in preview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dammit, did I break the intertube again?</p>
<p>&lt;<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/7371579@N04/582610559/" title="Franken_Stein 12 by duros39, on Flickr" rel="nofollow"></a>&gt;</p>
<p>Works great in preview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-160236</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-160236</guid>
		<description>&lt;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-160109</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-160109</guid>
		<description>Right winger &lt;a href=&quot;http://dallastaa.ning.com/profile/FrankDiSalle&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Frank DiSalle&quot;&lt;/a&gt; misreads the book &quot;The Imperial Animal&quot; and thinks that it means that a domineering thug like him should be able to dictate to others, and especially women.

Sorry, &quot;Frank DiSalle&quot;, just because you read a book that you didn&#039;t understand and can&#039;t articulate doesn&#039;t mean you get to pretend to have the authority you crave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right winger <a href="http://dallastaa.ning.com/profile/FrankDiSalle" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Frank DiSalle&#8221;</a> misreads the book &#8220;The Imperial Animal&#8221; and thinks that it means that a domineering thug like him should be able to dictate to others, and especially women.</p>
<p>Sorry, &#8220;Frank DiSalle&#8221;, just because you read a book that you didn&#8217;t understand and can&#8217;t articulate doesn&#8217;t mean you get to pretend to have the authority you crave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canadian bacon</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-160106</link>
		<dc:creator>canadian bacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-160106</guid>
		<description>&quot;... the zoological approach to human behavior.&quot;

Why read the book considering the last 8 years?  Sums of the GOP I&#039;d say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; the zoological approach to human behavior.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why read the book considering the last 8 years?  Sums of the GOP I&#8217;d say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-159975</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-159975</guid>
		<description>You have to work on that reading comprehension, &quot;Newsie&quot;.

I said , &quot;&lt;i&gt;They&lt;/i&gt; said that if someone like you or I walked into a Police Station, and &lt;i&gt;spoke like&lt;/i&gt; the President of the United States, we would be committed to the nearest psychiatric hospital within the hour.&quot;

You said, &quot;I can understand how hard it would be for ... “Frank DiSalle” to understand why showing up at the Police Station and &lt;i&gt;acting like&lt;/i&gt; he’s the President of the United States is crazy.&quot;

See, &quot;Newsie&quot;? I never said anyone would be acting like the President; I said they would be &lt;i&gt;speaking&lt;/i&gt; like the President. And, of course, I never said I didn&#039;t understand how that would be so, let alone that I was unable to understand.

You see, I have read the book, and you have not. It is the seminal work on biogrammar, and the zoological approach to human behavior. Since you and your colleagues think you know everything, &quot;The Imperial Animal&quot; is undoubtedly yet another book you would never read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to work on that reading comprehension, &#8220;Newsie&#8221;.</p>
<p>I said , &#8220;<i>They</i> said that if someone like you or I walked into a Police Station, and <i>spoke like</i> the President of the United States, we would be committed to the nearest psychiatric hospital within the hour.&#8221;</p>
<p>You said, &#8220;I can understand how hard it would be for &#8230; “Frank DiSalle” to understand why showing up at the Police Station and <i>acting like</i> he’s the President of the United States is crazy.&#8221;</p>
<p>See, &#8220;Newsie&#8221;? I never said anyone would be acting like the President; I said they would be <i>speaking</i> like the President. And, of course, I never said I didn&#8217;t understand how that would be so, let alone that I was unable to understand.</p>
<p>You see, I have read the book, and you have not. It is the seminal work on biogrammar, and the zoological approach to human behavior. Since you and your colleagues think you know everything, &#8220;The Imperial Animal&#8221; is undoubtedly yet another book you would never read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Dugdale</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-159936</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Dugdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-159936</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m proud that Franken is a Senator (Senator-elect, technically). I even voted for him. 

It seems that nearly every Republican these days thinks that Bush was an idiot, mostly because he didn&#039;t go far enough Right. It&#039;s a bit difficult to find Republicans willing to admit that they voted for Bush, in fact. 

Well, Coleman backed Bush and Bush&#039;s policies 100%. Why would Republicans want someone like that in office, if Bush was such an idiot? The answer, of course, is that he is a reliable foot-soldier who votes the way he told to by Party leadership and has no substantial views of his own. But how does this make Coleman such a &#039;better&#039; Senator than Franken? 

On virtually every issue of import, Coleman is on record as supporting &lt;i&gt;both&lt;/i&gt; sides, depending on who is front of him at the moment. And he votes as he is told to, regardless of what he has said to either side in the past. For a Party that seems to want to get back to &#039;core principles&#039; and &#039;true believers&#039;, Coleman in the Senate would be a step backwards. You do know that Coleman used to be a pot-smoking Democrat, right? Face it, the GOP dodged a bullet here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m proud that Franken is a Senator (Senator-elect, technically). I even voted for him. </p>
<p>It seems that nearly every Republican these days thinks that Bush was an idiot, mostly because he didn&#8217;t go far enough Right. It&#8217;s a bit difficult to find Republicans willing to admit that they voted for Bush, in fact. </p>
<p>Well, Coleman backed Bush and Bush&#8217;s policies 100%. Why would Republicans want someone like that in office, if Bush was such an idiot? The answer, of course, is that he is a reliable foot-soldier who votes the way he told to by Party leadership and has no substantial views of his own. But how does this make Coleman such a &#8216;better&#8217; Senator than Franken? </p>
<p>On virtually every issue of import, Coleman is on record as supporting <i>both</i> sides, depending on who is front of him at the moment. And he votes as he is told to, regardless of what he has said to either side in the past. For a Party that seems to want to get back to &#8216;core principles&#8217; and &#8216;true believers&#8217;, Coleman in the Senate would be a step backwards. You do know that Coleman used to be a pot-smoking Democrat, right? Face it, the GOP dodged a bullet here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-159908</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-159908</guid>
		<description>Oops, strike that assumption in the first comment.

I&#039;m delighted that Coleman took the high road, finally.

Franken might be a genuine policy wonk but I wonder how he&#039;ll fit into the good old boys and girls club that is the U.S. Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, strike that assumption in the first comment.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m delighted that Coleman took the high road, finally.</p>
<p>Franken might be a genuine policy wonk but I wonder how he&#8217;ll fit into the good old boys and girls club that is the U.S. Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-159901</link>
		<dc:creator>Amused Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-159901</guid>
		<description>Quaker,
What ever do you mean?  Sure Obama is a socialist but that doesn&#039;t mean he won&#039;t compromise his values or his rhetoric.

Mikey,
Deranged carny speak, nice touch.  Franken doesn&#039;t phase me much.  Perhaps he&#039;ll surprise me and make an intelligent contribution to the nation.  Stranger things have happened.  More likely he&#039;ll prove to be a lying liberal hypocrit seduced by power, incapable of giving a honest answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker,<br />
What ever do you mean?  Sure Obama is a socialist but that doesn&#8217;t mean he won&#8217;t compromise his values or his rhetoric.</p>
<p>Mikey,<br />
Deranged carny speak, nice touch.  Franken doesn&#8217;t phase me much.  Perhaps he&#8217;ll surprise me and make an intelligent contribution to the nation.  Stranger things have happened.  More likely he&#8217;ll prove to be a lying liberal hypocrit seduced by power, incapable of giving a honest answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: locus</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-159896</link>
		<dc:creator>locus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-159896</guid>
		<description>Umm...Frank,

You should refer to him as SENATOR Wise-Ass now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230;Frank,</p>
<p>You should refer to him as SENATOR Wise-Ass now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-159890</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-159890</guid>
		<description>&lt;/i&gt; Italics should have ended before &quot;Yeah, I said that Michael&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Italics should have ended before &#8220;Yeah, I said that Michael&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank DiSalle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-159889</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank DiSalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-159889</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And as I say, it’s better to be a wise ass than a dumb ass.&lt;/i&gt;
And yet, Zython, somehow you are both.

&lt;i&gt;David Letterman vacillates between humorist, &lt;b&gt;comedian&lt;/b&gt; [emphasis added - fd] and wiseass.  Yeah, I said that , Michael.

Two more very funny (unfortunately, deceased) left wing comedians : Mort Sahl, Lenny Bruce. A third (also, deceased, not nearly as funny) George Carlin.

Also, naming left wing comedians is an easy task:  Nearly every comedian is a left wing comedian, with the exception of a handful.

The most interesting thing I have observed in recent years is how Dennis Miller was a darling of the left, until he began to support Pres Bush&#039;s war on terrorism. Then , he not only ceased to be a darling of the Left , but, mysteriously, he was judged by them to be &quot;unfunny&quot;. Even when I have outgrown a comedian&#039;s humor, or have just become weary of it, I still never take the self-centered view that the comedian has become unfunny.

Case in point for me : Wanda Sykes and George Lopez. I think they are both hilarious; I just don&#039;t laugh at their jibes aimed at conservatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And as I say, it’s better to be a wise ass than a dumb ass.</i><br />
And yet, Zython, somehow you are both.</p>
<p><i>David Letterman vacillates between humorist, <b>comedian</b> [emphasis added - fd] and wiseass.  Yeah, I said that , Michael.</p>
<p>Two more very funny (unfortunately, deceased) left wing comedians : Mort Sahl, Lenny Bruce. A third (also, deceased, not nearly as funny) George Carlin.</p>
<p>Also, naming left wing comedians is an easy task:  Nearly every comedian is a left wing comedian, with the exception of a handful.</p>
<p>The most interesting thing I have observed in recent years is how Dennis Miller was a darling of the left, until he began to support Pres Bush&#8217;s war on terrorism. Then , he not only ceased to be a darling of the Left , but, mysteriously, he was judged by them to be &#8220;unfunny&#8221;. Even when I have outgrown a comedian&#8217;s humor, or have just become weary of it, I still never take the self-centered view that the comedian has become unfunny.</p>
<p>Case in point for me : Wanda Sykes and George Lopez. I think they are both hilarious; I just don&#8217;t laugh at their jibes aimed at conservatives.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I'm a Hick</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-159886</link>
		<dc:creator>I'm a Hick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-159886</guid>
		<description>Even with preview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even with preview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I'm a Hick</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-159885</link>
		<dc:creator>I'm a Hick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-159885</guid>
		<description>Franken is beginning to strikes me as more of a wonk who became a comedian than as a comedian who became a wonk. No ones a bigger wise ass than Dennis Miller, who I like, too. ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franken is beginning to strikes me as more of a wonk who became a comedian than as a comedian who became a wonk. No ones a bigger wise ass than Dennis Miller, who I like, too. ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Over Here</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-159861</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Over Here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-159861</guid>
		<description>Frank just listed everyone he agrees politically as a comedian and everyone he disagrees with as a wise ass. You have to lack a large degree of self-awareness to make a post like that.

It&#039;s been an interesting day here in the OW comments section. I think we&#039;ve seen our normal cabal of wingnuts go manic with the Franken win and a few other recent developments. Amused Observer has descended into crypto carny speak. Frank has started making semantic definitions based on politics as if it were some type of argument. Usual Suspect, just a day ago, started making ridiculous assumptions about someone just because they&#039;re Canadian and liked their health care. 

I&#039;m not saying these guys aren&#039;t usually crazy or stupid, it just seems like the dam has broken and all the sudden they&#039;re wearing all their insecurities on their sleeves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank just listed everyone he agrees politically as a comedian and everyone he disagrees with as a wise ass. You have to lack a large degree of self-awareness to make a post like that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been an interesting day here in the OW comments section. I think we&#8217;ve seen our normal cabal of wingnuts go manic with the Franken win and a few other recent developments. Amused Observer has descended into crypto carny speak. Frank has started making semantic definitions based on politics as if it were some type of argument. Usual Suspect, just a day ago, started making ridiculous assumptions about someone just because they&#8217;re Canadian and liked their health care. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying these guys aren&#8217;t usually crazy or stupid, it just seems like the dam has broken and all the sudden they&#8217;re wearing all their insecurities on their sleeves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-159857</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-159857</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;I’m having a hard time following Frank’s argument here. Does he have one?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Rarely, if ever. He just makes stuff up as he goes along.

Reading right winger &quot;Frank DiSalle&#039;s&quot; &quot;arguments&quot; is like walking through a Fun House Of Mirrors: Everything is warped, distorted, and a little unreal.

It&#039;s hard to tell if &quot;Frank DiSalle&quot; is drunk, high, addled, off his meds, or just painfully ignorant.

To me he&#039;s the crazy guy in nearly every big city that demands your attention, screams something bizarre, and then nods smugly at themselves as if they&#039;ve won an argument.

It&#039;s ironic that &quot;Frank DiSalle&quot; sums up exactly how I see him: &lt;i&gt;&quot;if someone like you or I walked into a Police Station, and spoke like the President of the United States, we would be committed to the nearest psychiatric hospital within the hour. What exactly did they mean by that?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Indeed.

I can understand how hard it would be for a right wing authoritarian extremist like &quot;Frank DiSalle&quot; to understand why showing up at the Police Station and acting like he&#039;s the President of the United States is crazy.

It sums up &quot;Frank DiSalle&quot; perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;I’m having a hard time following Frank’s argument here. Does he have one?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Rarely, if ever. He just makes stuff up as he goes along.</p>
<p>Reading right winger &#8220;Frank DiSalle&#8217;s&#8221; &#8220;arguments&#8221; is like walking through a Fun House Of Mirrors: Everything is warped, distorted, and a little unreal.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to tell if &#8220;Frank DiSalle&#8221; is drunk, high, addled, off his meds, or just painfully ignorant.</p>
<p>To me he&#8217;s the crazy guy in nearly every big city that demands your attention, screams something bizarre, and then nods smugly at themselves as if they&#8217;ve won an argument.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ironic that &#8220;Frank DiSalle&#8221; sums up exactly how I see him: <i>&#8220;if someone like you or I walked into a Police Station, and spoke like the President of the United States, we would be committed to the nearest psychiatric hospital within the hour. What exactly did they mean by that?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Indeed.</p>
<p>I can understand how hard it would be for a right wing authoritarian extremist like &#8220;Frank DiSalle&#8221; to understand why showing up at the Police Station and acting like he&#8217;s the President of the United States is crazy.</p>
<p>It sums up &#8220;Frank DiSalle&#8221; perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-159855</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-159855</guid>
		<description>Oh, and by the way, can anybody explain to me what the deal is with Norm&#039;s teeth? Did he get like a transplant from Secretariat or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and by the way, can anybody explain to me what the deal is with Norm&#8217;s teeth? Did he get like a transplant from Secretariat or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/30/minnesota-supreme-court-al-franken-won/#comment-159853</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15158#comment-159853</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;we’ll see if he compromises himself in D.C. Obama certainly has.&lt;/em&gt;

Whoa, whoa, whoa! AO, you&#039;re straying pretty far from the party line there. Ever&#039;body knows that Hussein X Obama has been the most antiamericanleftwingsocialistsecretmooslimcommieterrorist ever to hold elected office.

Well, except maybe for Jerry Brown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>we’ll see if he compromises himself in D.C. Obama certainly has.</em></p>
<p>Whoa, whoa, whoa! AO, you&#8217;re straying pretty far from the party line there. Ever&#8217;body knows that Hussein X Obama has been the most antiamericanleftwingsocialistsecretmooslimcommieterrorist ever to hold elected office.</p>
<p>Well, except maybe for Jerry Brown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
