<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fox News Sat On Letter In Ensign Scandal Case, Lied About It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/24/fox-news-sat-on-letter-in-ensign-scandal-case-lied-about-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/24/fox-news-sat-on-letter-in-ensign-scandal-case-lied-about-it/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:00:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Repack Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/24/fox-news-sat-on-letter-in-ensign-scandal-case-lied-about-it/#comment-159067</link>
		<dc:creator>Repack Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15132#comment-159067</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;repack, the government holds you responsible for things you don’t sign too.&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s impossible to &quot;prove&quot; that no one read it, all that is possible to &quot;prove&quot; is that they had it in their hands with a date and time stamp on it and lied about that date and time stamp.

So all we know for sure is that FOX lied about when they got it, and for what reason do you suppose they did that when it is so easy to &quot;prove&quot; that it was a lie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>repack, the government holds you responsible for things you don’t sign too.</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s impossible to &#8220;prove&#8221; that no one read it, all that is possible to &#8220;prove&#8221; is that they had it in their hands with a date and time stamp on it and lied about that date and time stamp.</p>
<p>So all we know for sure is that FOX lied about when they got it, and for what reason do you suppose they did that when it is so easy to &#8220;prove&#8221; that it was a lie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/24/fox-news-sat-on-letter-in-ensign-scandal-case-lied-about-it/#comment-159014</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 06:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15132#comment-159014</guid>
		<description>The &quot;usual &#039;Republican&#039; suspect&quot; doesn&#039;t think a right wing organization invested in the pretense that it was a &lt;b&gt;&quot;News&quot;&lt;/b&gt; organization should be able to correctly report the date it received a &#039;priority envelope&#039; that could predictably have a confirmation-delivery date/receipt that could be independently produced to show WHEN they received the &#039;priority envelope&#039;.

I guess it&#039;s not that hard to believe. After all, the last thing I associate with FOX Propaganda is timely, investigative journalism...

If the &#039;priority envelope&#039; sent to FOX doesn&#039;t say &quot;Republican Talking Points&quot; &quot;From&quot; either Luntz, Norquist, or Rove, why would FOX open it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;usual &#8216;Republican&#8217; suspect&#8221; doesn&#8217;t think a right wing organization invested in the pretense that it was a <b>&#8220;News&#8221;</b> organization should be able to correctly report the date it received a &#8216;priority envelope&#8217; that could predictably have a confirmation-delivery date/receipt that could be independently produced to show WHEN they received the &#8216;priority envelope&#8217;.</p>
<p>I guess it&#8217;s not that hard to believe. After all, the last thing I associate with FOX Propaganda is timely, investigative journalism&#8230;</p>
<p>If the &#8216;priority envelope&#8217; sent to FOX doesn&#8217;t say &#8220;Republican Talking Points&#8221; &#8220;From&#8221; either Luntz, Norquist, or Rove, why would FOX open it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usualsuspect</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/24/fox-news-sat-on-letter-in-ensign-scandal-case-lied-about-it/#comment-159010</link>
		<dc:creator>usualsuspect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15132#comment-159010</guid>
		<description>As suspected, no evidence.

How many crank packages and letter do you think television and newspapers get every day?

Anyone?  Bueller?

I wouldn&#039;t expect a news agency to immediately jump into an investigation of any unsolicited, anonymous information even if it were delivered by hand from a bonded messenger.

And repack, the government holds you responsible for things you don&#039;t sign too.  But fedex doesn&#039;t actually have any authority to make you read what you sign for.  But it is entirely possible that the mailroom clerk who opened the envelope read it, yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As suspected, no evidence.</p>
<p>How many crank packages and letter do you think television and newspapers get every day?</p>
<p>Anyone?  Bueller?</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t expect a news agency to immediately jump into an investigation of any unsolicited, anonymous information even if it were delivered by hand from a bonded messenger.</p>
<p>And repack, the government holds you responsible for things you don&#8217;t sign too.  But fedex doesn&#8217;t actually have any authority to make you read what you sign for.  But it is entirely possible that the mailroom clerk who opened the envelope read it, yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repack Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/24/fox-news-sat-on-letter-in-ensign-scandal-case-lied-about-it/#comment-159008</link>
		<dc:creator>Repack Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15132#comment-159008</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And the evidence that anyone other than a mailroom clerk actually LOOKED at that letter from an unsolicited, unknown source?&lt;/i&gt;

The time stamp and signature on the FedEx delivery?  

Are you saying that no one who sends a message by overnight express to a news agency should expect it to be read?  The government holds &lt;i&gt;me&lt;/i&gt; accountable for stuff I sign for; that&#039;s the PURPOSE of delivery methods that require a signature.

What is YOUR standard of evidence that they read it, a notarized statement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And the evidence that anyone other than a mailroom clerk actually LOOKED at that letter from an unsolicited, unknown source?</i></p>
<p>The time stamp and signature on the FedEx delivery?  </p>
<p>Are you saying that no one who sends a message by overnight express to a news agency should expect it to be read?  The government holds <i>me</i> accountable for stuff I sign for; that&#8217;s the PURPOSE of delivery methods that require a signature.</p>
<p>What is YOUR standard of evidence that they read it, a notarized statement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpiderJ</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/24/fox-news-sat-on-letter-in-ensign-scandal-case-lied-about-it/#comment-159005</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiderJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15132#comment-159005</guid>
		<description>But why would Fox News sit on this story? After all, isn&#039;t he John Ensign (D)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But why would Fox News sit on this story? After all, isn&#8217;t he John Ensign (D)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/24/fox-news-sat-on-letter-in-ensign-scandal-case-lied-about-it/#comment-159002</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15132#comment-159002</guid>
		<description>Suppose that same mailroom clerk received a similar letter about Senator Reid rather than Senator Ensign?  Think he might have sent is somewhere other than the circular file?  Remember this is Fox we&#039;re talking aobut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suppose that same mailroom clerk received a similar letter about Senator Reid rather than Senator Ensign?  Think he might have sent is somewhere other than the circular file?  Remember this is Fox we&#8217;re talking aobut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usualsuspect</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/24/fox-news-sat-on-letter-in-ensign-scandal-case-lied-about-it/#comment-158973</link>
		<dc:creator>usualsuspect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15132#comment-158973</guid>
		<description>And the evidence that anyone other than a mailroom clerk actually LOOKED at that letter from an unsolicited, unknown source?

Good thing you just plug wires into computers for Media Matters, cause your epic reporting skilz need some serious work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the evidence that anyone other than a mailroom clerk actually LOOKED at that letter from an unsolicited, unknown source?</p>
<p>Good thing you just plug wires into computers for Media Matters, cause your epic reporting skilz need some serious work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/24/fox-news-sat-on-letter-in-ensign-scandal-case-lied-about-it/#comment-158969</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15132#comment-158969</guid>
		<description>[and to recycle my own funny]

At least adulterous Republican Mark Sanford can say he was boning up on international affairs for the 2012 election so he wouldn&#039;t be caught with his pants down like Republican Vice Presidential Candidate Sarah Palin.

(&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/11/sarah-palins-charlie-gibs_n_125772.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;In what respect, Charlie?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;)

What can adulterous Republican hypocrite John Ensign say?

That the married woman he was cheating with was worth every penny he was paying her and her husband?

And remember, nobody does hypocritical moralizing like thrice married Republicans (Gingrich, Giuliani, Limbaugh...), so after a couple of divorces both adulterous Republicans Sanford and Ensign will be back in the top of the Republican leadership rolls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[and to recycle my own funny]</p>
<p>At least adulterous Republican Mark Sanford can say he was boning up on international affairs for the 2012 election so he wouldn&#8217;t be caught with his pants down like Republican Vice Presidential Candidate Sarah Palin.</p>
<p>(<i><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/11/sarah-palins-charlie-gibs_n_125772.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;In what respect, Charlie?&#8221;</a></i>)</p>
<p>What can adulterous Republican hypocrite John Ensign say?</p>
<p>That the married woman he was cheating with was worth every penny he was paying her and her husband?</p>
<p>And remember, nobody does hypocritical moralizing like thrice married Republicans (Gingrich, Giuliani, Limbaugh&#8230;), so after a couple of divorces both adulterous Republicans Sanford and Ensign will be back in the top of the Republican leadership rolls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/24/fox-news-sat-on-letter-in-ensign-scandal-case-lied-about-it/#comment-158967</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15132#comment-158967</guid>
		<description>If Republican Senator Ensign followed his own rules he&#039;d resign.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://HavenWorks.com/opinion/blog/archive/2009/200902-february/#Republican&#039;s-First-Rule=Rules-Are-For-Other-People&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;But Republican&#039;s First Rule is &lt;i&gt;Always&lt;/i&gt; Rules Are For Other People&lt;/a&gt;.

AKA IOKIYAR

Right wing troll defending Republican hypocrisy in 5, 4, 3...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Republican Senator Ensign followed his own rules he&#8217;d resign.</p>
<p><a href="http://HavenWorks.com/opinion/blog/archive/2009/200902-february/#Republican's-First-Rule=Rules-Are-For-Other-People" rel="nofollow">But Republican&#8217;s First Rule is <i>Always</i> Rules Are For Other People</a>.</p>
<p>AKA IOKIYAR</p>
<p>Right wing troll defending Republican hypocrisy in 5, 4, 3&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
