<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: James Inhofe Displays The Conservative Maturity We Know So Well</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:02:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amused Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158726</link>
		<dc:creator>Amused Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158726</guid>
		<description>LOL Quaker,
Even the smartest or most athletic kicker can only do so much!  Personally the only thing I wonder about a kickers intelligence is if he keeps his shoe on.  Everytime I see one of those guys kick barefoot I feel like limping around for a while.  Talk about tough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL Quaker,<br />
Even the smartest or most athletic kicker can only do so much!  Personally the only thing I wonder about a kickers intelligence is if he keeps his shoe on.  Everytime I see one of those guys kick barefoot I feel like limping around for a while.  Talk about tough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158721</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158721</guid>
		<description>Sorry. Placekicker-punter. Not QB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. Placekicker-punter. Not QB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158720</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158720</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Leveling the playing field to the lowest common denominator is no way to achieve excellence in anything.&lt;/em&gt;

So-called &quot;intelligence testing&quot; won&#039;t always get you to excellence either. The NFL uses the Wonderlic test--the same one Duke Power used. Quarterback Travis Dorsch scored higher than any other player who ever took the test. Remember when Dorsch took the Cincinnati Bengals to the Super Bowl?

Me neither.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Leveling the playing field to the lowest common denominator is no way to achieve excellence in anything.</em></p>
<p>So-called &#8220;intelligence testing&#8221; won&#8217;t always get you to excellence either. The NFL uses the Wonderlic test&#8211;the same one Duke Power used. Quarterback Travis Dorsch scored higher than any other player who ever took the test. Remember when Dorsch took the Cincinnati Bengals to the Super Bowl?</p>
<p>Me neither.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158718</link>
		<dc:creator>Amused Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158718</guid>
		<description>What is it they say?  Hard case makes for bad law.  The consequences of throwing out the ability to generally test for intelligence in hiring far outweigh the specifics of one company&#039;s hiring practices.  Leveling the playing field to the lowest common denominator is no way to achieve excellence in anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it they say?  Hard case makes for bad law.  The consequences of throwing out the ability to generally test for intelligence in hiring far outweigh the specifics of one company&#8217;s hiring practices.  Leveling the playing field to the lowest common denominator is no way to achieve excellence in anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158717</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158717</guid>
		<description>Flaming leftist radical Chief Justice Burger, in the majority decision in Griggs:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Nothing in the Act precludes the use of testing or measuring procedures; obviously they are useful. What Congress has forbidden is giving these devices and mechanisms controlling force unless they are demonstrably a reasonable measure of job performance. Congress has not commanded that the less qualified be preferred over the better qualified simply because of minority origins. Far from disparaging job qualifications as such, Congress has made such qualifications the controlling factor, so that race, religion, nationality, and sex become irrelevant. What Congress has commanded is that any tests used must measure the person for the job and not the person in the abstract. &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flaming leftist radical Chief Justice Burger, in the majority decision in Griggs:</p>
<blockquote><p>Nothing in the Act precludes the use of testing or measuring procedures; obviously they are useful. What Congress has forbidden is giving these devices and mechanisms controlling force unless they are demonstrably a reasonable measure of job performance. Congress has not commanded that the less qualified be preferred over the better qualified simply because of minority origins. Far from disparaging job qualifications as such, Congress has made such qualifications the controlling factor, so that race, religion, nationality, and sex become irrelevant. What Congress has commanded is that any tests used must measure the person for the job and not the person in the abstract. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158715</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158715</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;You think testing for intelligence is a bad thing when making a hiring decision? &lt;/em&gt;

I think testing for &quot;intelligence&quot; as a pretext for justifying predetermined outcomes is illegal discrimination. What was Duke Power&#039;s history on this score, AO?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>You think testing for intelligence is a bad thing when making a hiring decision? </em></p>
<p>I think testing for &#8220;intelligence&#8221; as a pretext for justifying predetermined outcomes is illegal discrimination. What was Duke Power&#8217;s history on this score, AO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158711</link>
		<dc:creator>Amused Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158711</guid>
		<description>You seem fairly happy about this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem fairly happy about this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fafaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158702</link>
		<dc:creator>fafaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158702</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You’re blowing smoke, if you had aces you would have laid them down already.&lt;/i&gt;

So ignorance really is bliss, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You’re blowing smoke, if you had aces you would have laid them down already.</i></p>
<p>So ignorance really is bliss, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158701</link>
		<dc:creator>Amused Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158701</guid>
		<description>LOL,
Playing your cards close to your vest won&#039;t make any difference when you have to lay them on the table.  You&#039;re blowing smoke, if you had aces you would have laid them down already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL,<br />
Playing your cards close to your vest won&#8217;t make any difference when you have to lay them on the table.  You&#8217;re blowing smoke, if you had aces you would have laid them down already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fafaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158699</link>
		<dc:creator>fafaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158699</guid>
		<description>You see, Amused, we don&#039;t have to speculate about what experts were used and what they said in the Ricci case. It&#039;s all a matter of public record. 

All you have to do is look it up and read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You see, Amused, we don&#8217;t have to speculate about what experts were used and what they said in the Ricci case. It&#8217;s all a matter of public record. </p>
<p>All you have to do is look it up and read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fafaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158698</link>
		<dc:creator>fafaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158698</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Have you ever been in court and witnessed testimony in a trial? Expert opinions are offered for sale in any flavor you might choose.&lt;/i&gt;

And you still have no idea what your talking about. Have you bothered to look into the details of the Ricci case at all? Ever?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Have you ever been in court and witnessed testimony in a trial? Expert opinions are offered for sale in any flavor you might choose.</i></p>
<p>And you still have no idea what your talking about. Have you bothered to look into the details of the Ricci case at all? Ever?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158696</link>
		<dc:creator>Amused Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158696</guid>
		<description>Fafaroo,

Have you ever been in court and witnessed testimony in a trial?  Expert opinions are offered for sale in any flavor you might choose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fafaroo,</p>
<p>Have you ever been in court and witnessed testimony in a trial?  Expert opinions are offered for sale in any flavor you might choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fafaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158690</link>
		<dc:creator>fafaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158690</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Look at whoever hired Fafaroo, if only they’d access to an intelligence test.&lt;/i&gt;

Amused, when I don&#039;t know something, I look it up. Now let&#039;s check out one of your latest comments: 

&lt;i&gt;These experts that the city hired jusdge discriminatory effects by what criteria, objective or subjective? &lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;What is the qualification of an expert?&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Since you admonish posting bfore research, perhaps you can give us examples of what made this test discriminitory? &lt;/i&gt;

Now there&#039;s three questions that you seem to believe are important to understanding the Ricci case. 

And yet you don&#039;t know the answers to them. 

I do. 

Because I read all about the case a month ago when Sotomayor was first nominated. 

Why don&#039;t you know the answers to these questions? 

Why do you think you&#039;re at all qualified to engage in a discussion of the case if you don&#039;t know the answers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Look at whoever hired Fafaroo, if only they’d access to an intelligence test.</i></p>
<p>Amused, when I don&#8217;t know something, I look it up. Now let&#8217;s check out one of your latest comments: </p>
<p><i>These experts that the city hired jusdge discriminatory effects by what criteria, objective or subjective? </i></p>
<p><i>What is the qualification of an expert?</i></p>
<p><i>Since you admonish posting bfore research, perhaps you can give us examples of what made this test discriminitory? </i></p>
<p>Now there&#8217;s three questions that you seem to believe are important to understanding the Ricci case. </p>
<p>And yet you don&#8217;t know the answers to them. </p>
<p>I do. </p>
<p>Because I read all about the case a month ago when Sotomayor was first nominated. </p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you know the answers to these questions? </p>
<p>Why do you think you&#8217;re at all qualified to engage in a discussion of the case if you don&#8217;t know the answers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158675</link>
		<dc:creator>Amused Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158675</guid>
		<description>Quaker,
You think testing for intelligence is a bad thing when making a hiring decision? 

 Look at whoever hired Fafaroo, if only they&#039;d access to an intelligence test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker,<br />
You think testing for intelligence is a bad thing when making a hiring decision? </p>
<p> Look at whoever hired Fafaroo, if only they&#8217;d access to an intelligence test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fafaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158661</link>
		<dc:creator>fafaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158661</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Since you admonish posting bfore research, perhaps you can give us examples of what made this test discriminitory?&lt;/i&gt;

And just one post later you wrote: &quot;Quaker, Look it up, I shall return in a few hours, that should give you plenty of time.&quot;

What a moron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Since you admonish posting bfore research, perhaps you can give us examples of what made this test discriminitory?</i></p>
<p>And just one post later you wrote: &#8220;Quaker, Look it up, I shall return in a few hours, that should give you plenty of time.&#8221;</p>
<p>What a moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fafaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158659</link>
		<dc:creator>fafaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158659</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The devil is in the details.&lt;/i&gt;

Amused, whenever you actually take the time to acquaint yourself with them (they&#039;re also called &quot;facts&quot;) you just let us all know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The devil is in the details.</i></p>
<p>Amused, whenever you actually take the time to acquaint yourself with them (they&#8217;re also called &#8220;facts&#8221;) you just let us all know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158654</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158654</guid>
		<description>Griggs? You mean the decision that says you can&#039;t practice discrimination just because you call it &quot;intelligence testing&quot; or some other noble sounding name?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Griggs? You mean the decision that says you can&#8217;t practice discrimination just because you call it &#8220;intelligence testing&#8221; or some other noble sounding name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158636</link>
		<dc:creator>Amused Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158636</guid>
		<description>Quaker,
Griggs vs Duke Power</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quaker,<br />
Griggs vs Duke Power</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158628</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158628</guid>
		<description>Right winger &quot;Amused Observer&quot; makes stuff up and then insists &lt;i&gt;others&lt;/i&gt; take the time to dispel his lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right winger &#8220;Amused Observer&#8221; makes stuff up and then insists <i>others</i> take the time to dispel his lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/19/james-inhofe-displays-the-conservative-maturity-we-know-so-well/#comment-158626</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=15084#comment-158626</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Look it up, &lt;/em&gt;

I did. Came up empty. You didn&#039;t just make this up, did you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Look it up, </em></p>
<p>I did. Came up empty. You didn&#8217;t just make this up, did you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
