You should save you money and spend it on extra therapy sessions with your psychologist and whatever medication(s) they prescribe, “Dennis”.

(Though remember, my support for national healthcare includes providing government support to provide for your mental health sessions and medication).

And remember “Dennis”, stalking is a crime.

Truer words, Colin. I’d even provide the seed money to get a campaign started to finance that interview. Along with the video camera.

I knew that Weiner was German. My name is German, and there are many German Jews with the same last name as mine. I know what I’m talking about, and I never gave any indication at all I didn’t know it was a German surname.

Your making the case that the name was German, and therefore not Jewish, is bizarre. I honestly thought it was an act, that you were actually trying to be that stupid. More likely, you think other people are that stupid, apparently. If that’s the case, that might explain why you post links to your self-generated Google searches as somehow proof to the last absurd claim you made in response to another commenter’s irrefutable evidence to the contrary.

Could you be any more insane?

Do you always project “Dennis” or do you ever have self-reflective moments where you feel shame for your anti-Semitic and racist and misogynistic beliefs? Perhaps your psychologist has tried to talk these things out with you?

And do you read the malignant insanity of Commentary Magazine writers? Do you even understand how anti-Semitic their writing is? Or do you really not even understand what the word Semite means? Is it just another group of others for you to hate? Or is it just a word you know can be hurled as an insult?

After all you’re the idiot that didn’t even know that the name “Weiner” is a German name until I pointed it out to you.

Just because your both stupid and clearly unbalanced doesn’t mean that if you keep repeating your ignorant falsehoods they eventually become magically true (at least for anyone outside of the voices in your head).

And now you’ve devolved into sexist insults?

Good lord. How do you know I’m not a Hassidic Jewish woman?

You are the one who defends an explicit attack on non-Christian women. Why do you hate Jews and women, “Dennis”?

Perhaps you could make a list of all of the groups of people you hate so that I don’t have to figure them out one by one.

So far you’ve indicated that you hate Jews, women, gays, and unmarried people. Am I missing anyone?

Because it’s German in derivation doesn’t mean it’s not a Jewish family name.

You don’t play dumb very well. And at this point you don’t research very well, either, especially for an idiot named News Reference. Decency should force your peers to demand you change handles, I swear.

Go one step further than your usual 2-3 key word Google searches and look up some the people with the same name and find out how many of them list Jewish as their religion. On the first link that pops up, the Wiki for the name, the second person listed is quite recognizable in Democratic NY Congressman Anthony Weiner, who ironically was at one time Jon Stewart’s roommate. And also ironically from that article, roommates at the time Stewart changed his name.

Also, as a good start to your badly needed sensitivity training, you might want to read this article by by one Bernard Weiner, posted in the Democratic Underground: Anti-Semitism and the “New Jews” and scroll down to where he addresses “Anti-Semitism from The Left“.

Maybe since you love Google so much, try these two key words together…“anti-semitism + the left” and read all about yourself. Or read the comments alone in the article I linked to on Anthony Weiner. They sound just like you, mein freund..

Jay Tea had you pegged exactly well over a month ago on this with your obsession with neo-con Jews and the writers at Commentary. And now you’re acting like the doe-eyed, innocent little schoolgirl, like this is the first time you’ve heard anyone call you on it.

You fikken dummkopf.

* A German name

http://google.com/search?q=Weiner+German+name

I don’t need to read your links, as you are clearly stupid.

Ah, the famous tolerance of the left.

In any case let’s revisit was I was responding to. Oliver said:

The problem is, while both bases have their kooks, the GOP incessantly panders to the crazies. In fact they elect them to congress and the presidency.

Cynthia McKinney was elected to Congress. Several times. As wikipedia says:

In the 1992 election, McKinney was elected in the newly re-created 11th District,[2] and was re-elected in 1994. When her district was redrawn and renumbered due to the Supreme Court of the United States ruling in Miller v. Johnson,[1][3][4] McKinney was easily elected from the new 4th District in the 1996 election, and was re-elected twice without substantive opposition.

McKinney was defeated by Denise Majette in the 2002 Democratic primary, in part due to Republican crossover voting in Georgia’s open primary election, which permits anyone from any party to vote in any party primary,[5] and in part due to her “controversial profile, which included a suggestion that president George W. Bush knew in advance of the September 11 attacks.”[5]

So Republicans evidently tried to bail the Democrats out from re-electing this nut, but then she was elected yet again to the House in 2004.

In any case my point stands that she was clearly a kook and yet your team continued to re-elect her. The “former” has no relevance.

In defense of Michael Savage

Go there and do a search for ‘Weiner’. Read News Reference’s numerous posts there and tell me your opinion and whether he’s being sincere or not when he claims ignorance about Savage being Jewish, or Weiner being a Jewish name. Notice how often and insistently he equates him to the right-wing extremist, neo-con Jew theme when it comes to “Savage” Weiner.

It’s revealing, Duros, and well worth the time. He’s a fraud.

You and I are evens, Duros; I never thought you were serious about it in the first place- truthfully, I didn’t think anyone was sincere about it, even Southern Strategy.

But News Reference’s reference was clearly an anti-Semitic slur to Michael Savage as a neo-con Jew, no question.

I agree with what you said above, Duros, but not as it pertains to Newsie here, and I’m not just saying that for the opportunism. His mask slipped this time and he knows it. I don’t hate Stewart. I have fewer bones to pick with him than I would Savage, and I watch Stewart a lot more than I listen to Savage, which is like next to never. And I don’t care one rip about his being Jewish, or born Jewish or anything he believes along those lines, and again, that is not the case with News Ref. here. I just have thoughts about people changing their names, but that’s for another day.

Conversely, one can be critical of one’s neo-con asshattery without being critical of one’s religious persuasion.
I highlight Michael “Savage” Weiner’s given name not as an attack of his religion, but as a showcase of what a fraud he is, pretending to be something he is not, or perhaps pretending NOT to be something he IS.

I get that this is your way of retaliating for the criticism you
received over the Jon Stewart discussion, and your point is well taken.
Liberals use Savage’s full name because we hate him. You used Stewarts full name because you hate him. I guess that makes us even, yes?

What you said was a clear and unmistakeable reference to the neocon tendencies of Michael Savage and that by drawing attention to and highlighting his birth name along with calling him a right-wing extremist, you were clear in your intent.

Calling you out on that anti-Semitic outburst had nothing to do with Godwin’s Law or anything like it. It’s nothing more than a vain attempt of yours to weasel out of the fact that you are an Jew neocon-hating hypocrite who is just too fucking stupid apparently to remember that he leveled the exact same charge at me just this past week regarding Jon Stewart, Only apparently when you called me that in reference to him, you had not even the first fucking clue what you were talking about.

The irony of right winger “Dennis’s” attack (other than his attempt at distraction) is that it’s done by someone (”Dennis”) who defends anti-Semitic attacks.

Or you’re accusing me of using your tactics?

Perhaps instead of expecting your rules to apply to everyone but yourself, “Dennis”, you should first live up to your own rules.

But I’d rather you just be who you are, “Dennis”, a perfect illustration of the right wing’s dishonesty, duplicity, and hypocrisy.

Former Democratic Congresswoman and long-time kook Cynthia McKinney was defeated by Democrats and Republicans in a largely red state, to be more accurate. But she was a kook and a 9-11 truther, among many other weird things, when she was elected to Congress, by Democrats, in 2004. So, she was not rejected by Democratic voters that year. One could accurately say she ‘was embraced by Democratic voters’.

Proving your idiocy and your blatant lying is neither a challenge nor fun anymore, News Reference. If you are so certain you are on the just and moral and right side of things, I am baffled why you feel such a need to print lies, rumors, and distortions as often as you do. When you are shown to be the liar you are, with verifiable proof, you just move on to the next lie and run that up the flagpole. Kind of amazing, really.

“Dennis” is a gift to the left.

Keep talking, “Dennis”. Seriously, keep talking, the ‘left’ loves you.

Newsie, in humorous keeping of CSS preferred theme of the use of the word ‘former’, I’ll try to break this down into terms you can understand along the lines of the current and the past.

What David Letterman said is in the news now. The silly topic of this current thread is about the PUMA crazies who protested David Letterman’s highly offensive, bullying and misogynistic ‘jokes’, (or as others would put it, “at worst, a poorly constructed joke”).

What you bring up are variously assorted, irrelevant tidbits of information, mostly liberal folklore and dubiously unsourced charges from your diseased mind’s way-back machine, that is to say, way, way in the past, and now expect me to expound on them to your heart’s content, when I’ve already charitably done so. Far more than any of them merited as it pertains to the here and now.

None of those past irrelevant charges, whether true or not, has anything to do with Letterman’s offenses, nor do they excuse his behavior, and in no way do they bar anyone from the right to criticize what Letterman did. And I’m just really surprised I have to be telling that to a committed far-left, bleeding heart liberal such as yourself.

Tell you what, if you can convince our host to put up a thread on Rush Limbaugh from 1992, with a transcript and a video of Rush Limbaugh’s video monitor erroneously bringing up a picture of Chelsea Clinton and his multiple apologies immediately afterward, I’d be happy to indulge you.

Or if you can convince him to put up a thread about Cliff Schecter’s unsourced-by-anyone-on-record, highly dubious charge about a certain C word he used, I’d be glad to oblige.

Or if you can get perhaps coax him into putting up the video of the McCain supporter who called McCain’s friend Hillary Clinton a bitch and McCain’s muted chuckle, I’d be glad to discuss all the highly misogynistic things hurled at Hillary Clinton during that campaign. But I’d have to warn you ahead of time, the lion’s share of those weren’t coming from the McCain camp, they were coming from Hillary’s future boss’ side, so my comments would be likewise proportional.