Internet Tradition Fail!

Google is your friend.

Funny, you dump all kinds of your crap on this place but you won’t explain, defend, verify or even retract the one huge turd you dropped that I proved you to be lying about.

So what does News Reference do? Comes back and lays more turds.

You linked to Greenwald, but he does not even mention Limbaugh. I was thinking to myself when you linked to him that here’s one guy that even though I disagree politically, wouldn’t resort to blatant falsehoods and pieced together bits of mainly unverifiable information to weave a narrative about Limbaugh to add to the liberal folklore that people like you crave and regurgitate on left-wing blogs, like you, Mr. ed and CSS do routinely. But no, Greenwald doesn’t mention Limbaugh.

The bone out of your nose canard? Funny how you three musketeers all always have to supply a google link, since none of the stories on that page can supply any evidence other than one reporter’s ‘memory’ from like 1972, or something. He recalls that he’s pretty sure he heard Limbaugh say that. Good one, News Reference. God, that name, news reference. At least now I have a better appreciation for why Fox’s masthead bugs liberals so much.

Feminazi? So what? He does more to further women’s causes than the women he was referring to. Especially back when he coined the phrase, when NOW was not only silent about Bill Clinton’s serial molestation of women, but they essentially condoned it. ‘Every man gets should be allowed one grope’? Gloria Steinem? Hello.

Drug dependency on prescribed pain killers? I feel sorry for him for that. I don’t wish it upon anyone. Not you, even.

And ‘credibly accused of sex tourism’? I don’t know what ‘credibly accused’ even means. I looked it up in the liberal dictionary but there’s nothing there. I’m ‘credibly accusing’ you of being a bald-faced liar and a coward for not having the stones to own up to it. Instead you give me more crap that ISN”T credible.

I could ask the same verification from you for the ‘take that bone out of your nose’ canard you represent as the truth and you’d be just as hard-pressed to come with anything as you did with your Chelsea Clinton apology lie, but I’ve already done it to the point of embarrassment with ed and CSS already.

At least they tried.

You better be wearing an onion on your belt when you say that, pardner.

Republican leader Rush Limbaugh misogynist: “Feminazi”.

What’s especially toxic about that term is that the casual use of the word “Nazi” trivializes the atrocities committed during the Nazi regime.

But Rush Limbaugh is a known drug addicted Republican leader who was caught trying to illegally smuggle drugs into the country, so what does he care about trivializes a genocide?

Limbaugh has even been credibly accused of sx tourism.

And still Republican Vice President Dick Cheney would chose leader Limbaugh, who managed to evade service, over an American combat vet.

THAT’S YOUR Republican Party Leadership: Degenerates.

And that doesn’t even mention Republican Limbaugh’s abandonment of ? how many wives. Nor does it include Republican leader Limbaugh’s attack of a 13 year old girl.

Again, which part of Republican Limbaugh’s degeneracy appeals to you, “Dennis”? The racism? The misogyny? The drugs? The philandering? The attack of a 13 year old girl?

I believe that one should not have to resort to lies to make a case against anyone, no matter what. You come here and pretend to share that belief, only selectively. Every belief you have is selective. You’d have no qualms in allowing Rush Limbaugh waterboarded if you could, such is the degree of your selective beliefs, News Liar.

For some reason it seems to upset people here when falsehoods about Rush Limbaugh are dispelled as largely fabricated out of bits and pieces put together dishonestly, like what you have done and refuse to explain yourself over. For some reason you think that’s protecting someone; someone you believe deserves no defense. You believe KSM and bin Ladin deserve a defense, but not the the All-Knowing, All-Sensing, All-Everything Maha Rushie; defender of motherhood, protector of fatherhood and an all-around good guy.

Not his quote but no one said it better than Andy Griffith:

“Oh what a tangled web we weave, when we practice to deceive.”

Jaim can’t remember his deceptions.

The palest ink is better than the best memory, “Chalupa” Jaim.

What is your obsession with protecting the bigoted, misogynistic racist Rush Limbaugh, anyways? Which part of his degenerate career are you a fan of?

Rush Limbaugh, Republican leader: A mean, sleazy, philandering, drug addict without a conscience who attacked a 13 year old girl and goes on international sx tours.

THAT’S the guy you are protecting.

Too many reasons to list here, Mr. “You don’t even have a job” Jaim, but sorry, stupidity or fear have nothing to do with it. If I had the mindset that it was all about me, like it’s glaringly obvious you have, I might consider it. But I don’t, never have, and never will.

I don’t just pretend to care about other people on the one hand, while demeaning them as if they are inferior on the other.

Sorry, but that’s just chickenshit behavior of the highest order.

If you provided irrefutable evidence, or any evidence, that what you claimed was in fact true, and I was proven wrong, I’d have no qualms about admitting that error. But you never do that, you just recycle conspiracy tidbits and garbage from far-left comments sections of far-left blogs or else link to Google searches of two key word combinations and pretend that you proved a point.

That’s just laziness, and it only furthers the partially biased opinion that all liberals are malcontent, lazy whiners who never follow up on their Bravo Sierra when challenged.

Why do you keep making things up, “Dennis”? It just makes you look either deceitful or dumb (or both).

Just because you cite a right wing website that makes false claims doesn’t mean anyone should take it as “evidence” of anything other than your own gullibility (and/or willingness to be deceitful).

And why do you keep lashing out when your falsehoods are revealed, “Dennis”? It just makes you look violent and angry.

I suppose on the upside it’s fortunate that you didn’t have the courage to join the American military.

Anger issues and fear-based ‘reasoning’ like yours endangers American troops overseas.

News Reference knows that he has no case unless he makes things up. News Reference knows when he has been shamed he can always resort to calling those who shame him ‘racists’. Much like “Chalupa” Jaim, who he defends, and CS Strowbridge, he prides himself on resorting to making up falsehoods that people who shame him do not have a job, a if that would somehow make him superior, when it really only shows his bigotry.

I haven’t been without a job since I was about 14 years old, Newsie, not counting college days, and even while in grad school. Pop didn’t send me off to Sidwell Friends to turn me into a anti-American weasel ingrate with anger issues who leaves the country in shame and shakes his fist at people who work hard and scoff at his government hand-out mentality while he belittles the same people he wants the hand-outs given to.

I can see why you defend him, Newsie. Two peas in the same pod.

Jaim and Newsie: Two bitching blood brothers of blatant bias and bigotry.

“Dennis”, if you want to convince people that you aren’t a threat to other people, it would help if you didn’t associate with stalkers who advocate violent extremism like “Amused Observer” does.

Quite strange behavior from a quite strange young boy.