<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Joan Walsh Takes On Bill O&#8217;Reilly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: LongHairedWeirdo</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157681</link>
		<dc:creator>LongHairedWeirdo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157681</guid>
		<description>Repeat Offender:
&lt;blockquote&gt;As far as the “dangerous pregnancy” defense. Bull!! There is a substantial amount of evidence that has shown he did not run his practice by these standards otherwise I am sure he would have not taken it upon himself to play God and decided if the fetus was viable or not. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ah, yes, Argumentum Ad Bullshitum, the fallacy of argument by making shit up.

Yawn.

Go &#039;way, kid, I think I hear your mother calling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Repeat Offender:</p>
<blockquote><p>As far as the “dangerous pregnancy” defense. Bull!! There is a substantial amount of evidence that has shown he did not run his practice by these standards otherwise I am sure he would have not taken it upon himself to play God and decided if the fetus was viable or not. </p></blockquote>
<p>Ah, yes, Argumentum Ad Bullshitum, the fallacy of argument by making shit up.</p>
<p>Yawn.</p>
<p>Go &#8216;way, kid, I think I hear your mother calling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Over Here</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157646</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Over Here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157646</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll only say this last thing to Amused Observer as he has clearly gone completely off the walls in his judgmental spree.

I know nothing about the situations these women are in but I&#039;m not the one judging them, you are. You&#039;ve been unable to provide any documentation for the claims you&#039;ve made against Tiller. I researched on Google and could only find articles quoting O&#039;Reilly with no backing up evidence. I&#039;m glad I live in a world where a woman is allowed to make a decision about whether or not to sentence her self to a potentially deadly birth. We&#039;re not even talking about all abortions here, just the ones that are necessary to protect the life of the mother and you start calling everyone deadbeats and killers. I&#039;m glad you&#039;re not the one making the decisions for these women because you are clearly deranged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll only say this last thing to Amused Observer as he has clearly gone completely off the walls in his judgmental spree.</p>
<p>I know nothing about the situations these women are in but I&#8217;m not the one judging them, you are. You&#8217;ve been unable to provide any documentation for the claims you&#8217;ve made against Tiller. I researched on Google and could only find articles quoting O&#8217;Reilly with no backing up evidence. I&#8217;m glad I live in a world where a woman is allowed to make a decision about whether or not to sentence her self to a potentially deadly birth. We&#8217;re not even talking about all abortions here, just the ones that are necessary to protect the life of the mother and you start calling everyone deadbeats and killers. I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re not the one making the decisions for these women because you are clearly deranged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157568</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157568</guid>
		<description>Right wing deadbeat daddy &quot;Repeat offender&quot; demands that GOVERNMENT FORCE STRANGERS TO HAVE CHILDREN and then he insists that &lt;b&gt;those children HE FORCED onto strangers&lt;/b&gt; aren&#039;t his responsibility.

Because of right wing deadbeat daddies like &quot;Repeat offender&quot;, children go hungry in America, children are refused health care in America, and children are homeless in America.

The left in America step up to those responsibilities even while right wing deadbeats evade their personal responsibility of forcing &lt;i&gt;strangers&lt;/i&gt; into having children.

Deadbeat right wingers even taunt, &#039;my kid&#039;s fine&#039;, and feel no responsibility or even humanity for the kids they force on strangers that go hungry and homeless and unclothed and are sick.

&lt;b&gt;Right wing deadbeats turn their back on children that are hungry and homeless and sick and then moralize like Taliban thugs that &lt;i&gt;they&lt;/i&gt; should be able to &lt;i&gt;dictate&lt;/i&gt; that &lt;i&gt;others&lt;/i&gt; reproductive freedom be taken away by government force.&lt;/b&gt;

And when right wing terrorists use violence, right wingers like &quot;Repeat offender&quot; shrug their shoulders and refuse to admit that their violent rhetoric is no different than a Taliban Fatwa that encourages terrorism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right wing deadbeat daddy &#8220;Repeat offender&#8221; demands that GOVERNMENT FORCE STRANGERS TO HAVE CHILDREN and then he insists that <b>those children HE FORCED onto strangers</b> aren&#8217;t his responsibility.</p>
<p>Because of right wing deadbeat daddies like &#8220;Repeat offender&#8221;, children go hungry in America, children are refused health care in America, and children are homeless in America.</p>
<p>The left in America step up to those responsibilities even while right wing deadbeats evade their personal responsibility of forcing <i>strangers</i> into having children.</p>
<p>Deadbeat right wingers even taunt, &#8216;my kid&#8217;s fine&#8217;, and feel no responsibility or even humanity for the kids they force on strangers that go hungry and homeless and unclothed and are sick.</p>
<p><b>Right wing deadbeats turn their back on children that are hungry and homeless and sick and then moralize like Taliban thugs that <i>they</i> should be able to <i>dictate</i> that <i>others</i> reproductive freedom be taken away by government force.</b></p>
<p>And when right wing terrorists use violence, right wingers like &#8220;Repeat offender&#8221; shrug their shoulders and refuse to admit that their violent rhetoric is no different than a Taliban Fatwa that encourages terrorism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repeat offender</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157563</link>
		<dc:creator>Repeat offender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157563</guid>
		<description>Well I am getting of this sad marry-go-round. All the lack of responsibility is making me sick. All I have to say is grow up. Take responsibility and don&#039;t be so ignorant.

.....But if you did that you might be in danger of being a decent human being. I will come back tomorrow and see if any of you got any smarter. And if I am such a dead beat why is my child still alive instead dead in a dumpster? Kinda hard to shurk the truth that it IS YOU WHO ARE THE REAL DEADBEATS! You are just in denial. Mommy and Daddy never taught you how to take responsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I am getting of this sad marry-go-round. All the lack of responsibility is making me sick. All I have to say is grow up. Take responsibility and don&#8217;t be so ignorant.</p>
<p>&#8230;..But if you did that you might be in danger of being a decent human being. I will come back tomorrow and see if any of you got any smarter. And if I am such a dead beat why is my child still alive instead dead in a dumpster? Kinda hard to shurk the truth that it IS YOU WHO ARE THE REAL DEADBEATS! You are just in denial. Mommy and Daddy never taught you how to take responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157560</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157560</guid>
		<description>Right wing deadbeat daddy &quot;Repeat offender&quot; and his deadbeat wife want government to force strangers to have children and then he expects to be allowed to abandon the stranger he forced birthing onto.

Why does the right wing abandon children?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://matthew25.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Why does the right wing refuse health care for sick children?

Why does the right wing refuse to feed hungry children?

Why does the right wing refuse to provide safe drinking water to thirsty children?

Why does the right wing refuse to clothe poverty-stricken children?&lt;/a&gt;

Why? Because &lt;b&gt;right wingers are deadbeats&lt;/b&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right wing deadbeat daddy &#8220;Repeat offender&#8221; and his deadbeat wife want government to force strangers to have children and then he expects to be allowed to abandon the stranger he forced birthing onto.</p>
<p>Why does the right wing abandon children?</p>
<p><a href="http://matthew25.org" rel="nofollow">Why does the right wing refuse health care for sick children?</p>
<p>Why does the right wing refuse to feed hungry children?</p>
<p>Why does the right wing refuse to provide safe drinking water to thirsty children?</p>
<p>Why does the right wing refuse to clothe poverty-stricken children?</a></p>
<p>Why? Because <b>right wingers are deadbeats</b>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repeat offender</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157556</link>
		<dc:creator>Repeat offender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157556</guid>
		<description>and furthermore, I don&#039;t want to force anybody to do anything. I want them to have enough humanity to do the right things by themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and furthermore, I don&#8217;t want to force anybody to do anything. I want them to have enough humanity to do the right things by themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repeat offender</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157554</link>
		<dc:creator>Repeat offender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157554</guid>
		<description>The left steps up by making it alright to kill children!? WOW you guys are real heroes. Real standup job your doing. “Liberals, always taking the easy way out.” I think I just came up with your new motto!

I don&#039;t think a child is a punishment, I think a child is a blessing, not something to be thrown out like trash. 

My child has all those things. You know why? I did what all the real deadbeats failed doing. I didn&#039;t take the easy way out and that’s what sets the left and the right apart, the easy way or the right way. This just goes to show that virtue truly is dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The left steps up by making it alright to kill children!? WOW you guys are real heroes. Real standup job your doing. “Liberals, always taking the easy way out.” I think I just came up with your new motto!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think a child is a punishment, I think a child is a blessing, not something to be thrown out like trash. </p>
<p>My child has all those things. You know why? I did what all the real deadbeats failed doing. I didn&#8217;t take the easy way out and that’s what sets the left and the right apart, the easy way or the right way. This just goes to show that virtue truly is dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157551</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157551</guid>
		<description>A woman who makes the very difficult decision to have an abortion &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; taking responsibility.

Right wingers like YOU, &quot;Repeat offender&quot;, want to force strangers to have a child and then claim YOU don&#039;t have any responsibility for &lt;b&gt;YOUR FORCING that stranger to have a child.

Right wingers like YOU evade your responsibility for forcing children on strangers&lt;/b&gt;. You even see that forced birth as some kind of sick PUNISHMENT.

Let&#039;s hear the right wing start taking responsibility for all of the unadopted children in America.

Let&#039;s hear the right wing start taking responsibility for the health care of every child (and mother) in America.

Let&#039;s hear the right wing start taking responsibility for feeding the hungry children in America.

Let&#039;s hear the right wing start taking responsibility for making sure every child in America has clean, affordable water in America.

Let&#039;s hear the right wing start taking responsibility to see every poor child is decently clothed.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://matthew25.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The left steps up to these responsibilities as a core part of their belief system.&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;b&gt;The right wing, though, is riddled with deadbeat parents.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A woman who makes the very difficult decision to have an abortion <i>is</i> taking responsibility.</p>
<p>Right wingers like YOU, &#8220;Repeat offender&#8221;, want to force strangers to have a child and then claim YOU don&#8217;t have any responsibility for <b>YOUR FORCING that stranger to have a child.</p>
<p>Right wingers like YOU evade your responsibility for forcing children on strangers</b>. You even see that forced birth as some kind of sick PUNISHMENT.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hear the right wing start taking responsibility for all of the unadopted children in America.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hear the right wing start taking responsibility for the health care of every child (and mother) in America.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hear the right wing start taking responsibility for feeding the hungry children in America.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hear the right wing start taking responsibility for making sure every child in America has clean, affordable water in America.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hear the right wing start taking responsibility to see every poor child is decently clothed.</p>
<p><a href="http://matthew25.org" rel="nofollow">The left steps up to these responsibilities as a core part of their belief system.</a></p>
<p><b>The right wing, though, is riddled with deadbeat parents.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repeat offender</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157550</link>
		<dc:creator>Repeat offender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157550</guid>
		<description>We only know what the media lets out 99% of the time and if only one of the horrible things that could have happened while he was practicing, did happen, that is enough for me. I only know what is reported same as you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We only know what the media lets out 99% of the time and if only one of the horrible things that could have happened while he was practicing, did happen, that is enough for me. I only know what is reported same as you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repeat offender</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157549</link>
		<dc:creator>Repeat offender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157549</guid>
		<description>He did stay within the scope of his states law. That only means the states law is flawed as far as I am concerned.

Do you know the circumstnces for what all of these women got abortions? I would really like to know if you know something more than the next person. Do you have some special insite that you would like to share that nobody else has access to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He did stay within the scope of his states law. That only means the states law is flawed as far as I am concerned.</p>
<p>Do you know the circumstnces for what all of these women got abortions? I would really like to know if you know something more than the next person. Do you have some special insite that you would like to share that nobody else has access to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Over Here</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157545</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Over Here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157545</guid>
		<description>Sources? Citations? Do you have anything to back up O&#039;Reilly&#039;s claims? Do we know anything about this &quot;temporary depression&quot; claim at all besides what O&#039;Reilly brayed on his show? Do we know if it was just one of many justifying reasons for an abortion? Do we even know if it was related to a late term abortion?

You know nothing about the circumstances these women were in and yet you&#039;re more than happy to judge.

You keep harping on him being charged for murder but by your own quoted Kansas state law Tiller was acquitted by a jury of his peers of violating the statute, and the statute just prohibits it, it doesn&#039;t even claim it&#039;s murder!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sources? Citations? Do you have anything to back up O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s claims? Do we know anything about this &#8220;temporary depression&#8221; claim at all besides what O&#8217;Reilly brayed on his show? Do we know if it was just one of many justifying reasons for an abortion? Do we even know if it was related to a late term abortion?</p>
<p>You know nothing about the circumstances these women were in and yet you&#8217;re more than happy to judge.</p>
<p>You keep harping on him being charged for murder but by your own quoted Kansas state law Tiller was acquitted by a jury of his peers of violating the statute, and the statute just prohibits it, it doesn&#8217;t even claim it&#8217;s murder!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repeat offender</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157542</link>
		<dc:creator>Repeat offender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157542</guid>
		<description>&quot;How many unadopted children are there? Nationally? Internationally?

How many children go without health care?

How many children go without enough food or decent nutrition?&quot;

So any child that was adopted, without healthcare, or didn&#039;t get nutrition is disposable? Sounds pretty despicable!
 
As far as I can tell you have NOT put any responsibility on the actual parents, and that is what makes it okay for the real deadbeats to abort children without a second thought. Stop the problem at the source and make them take the responsibility of being a parent, especially considering they chose to perform the act that creates a child by their own free will (not taking rape into account).

It is just like you people to push the real responsibility off on someone else. SO TYPICAL! Put the responsibility where is belongs, that is the only thing that will make a REAL difference. Stop making it so easy!

If wanting a child to live makes me wrong then fine, I sincerely chose to be wrong…….…by your standards anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How many unadopted children are there? Nationally? Internationally?</p>
<p>How many children go without health care?</p>
<p>How many children go without enough food or decent nutrition?&#8221;</p>
<p>So any child that was adopted, without healthcare, or didn&#8217;t get nutrition is disposable? Sounds pretty despicable!</p>
<p>As far as I can tell you have NOT put any responsibility on the actual parents, and that is what makes it okay for the real deadbeats to abort children without a second thought. Stop the problem at the source and make them take the responsibility of being a parent, especially considering they chose to perform the act that creates a child by their own free will (not taking rape into account).</p>
<p>It is just like you people to push the real responsibility off on someone else. SO TYPICAL! Put the responsibility where is belongs, that is the only thing that will make a REAL difference. Stop making it so easy!</p>
<p>If wanting a child to live makes me wrong then fine, I sincerely chose to be wrong…….…by your standards anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157534</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157534</guid>
		<description>The problem with the right wing, &quot;Repeat offender&quot; is that the right wing simultaneously wants to use the power of government to force strangers to have children but then that same right wing walks away from their responsibilities of the child that they forced on that stranger.

How many unadopted children are there? Nationally? Internationally?

How many children go without health care?

How many children go without enough food or decent nutrition?

&lt;b&gt;Right wingers are deadbeat parents.&lt;/b&gt;

If you want to make a difference go adopt a few children, don&#039;t force a stranger to have a child that you wouldn&#039;t take responsibility for.

If you want to make a difference, demand health care be provided to every child (and mother) in America, don&#039;t force a stranger to have a child that you wouldn&#039;t take responsibility for.

If you want to make a difference demand that every child in America get enough nutritional food to eat, don&#039;t force a stranger to have a child that you wouldn&#039;t take responsibility for.

To me, &quot;Repeat offender&quot;, if you think it&#039;s right to force a stranger to have a baby than &lt;b&gt;that child is YOUR responsibility.&lt;/b&gt;

And if you want to demand that the force of government be used to force a stranger to have a baby don&#039;t whine when I demand that the force of government be used to demand that &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; &lt;b&gt;stop being a deadbeat parent and support that child&#039;s health care, and education, and nutrition&lt;/b&gt;, and even demand that you at least help get that woman a decent job and not leave her and the baby you forced on her in poverty for generation after generation. I&#039;d add that you also owe that child a decent education up through at least a four year college degree.

But the truth is that &lt;b&gt;right wingers are deadbeat parents&lt;/b&gt;.

Right wingers expect to force a stranger to have a child and then demand that they have no responsibility for the child they forced on that stranger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with the right wing, &#8220;Repeat offender&#8221; is that the right wing simultaneously wants to use the power of government to force strangers to have children but then that same right wing walks away from their responsibilities of the child that they forced on that stranger.</p>
<p>How many unadopted children are there? Nationally? Internationally?</p>
<p>How many children go without health care?</p>
<p>How many children go without enough food or decent nutrition?</p>
<p><b>Right wingers are deadbeat parents.</b></p>
<p>If you want to make a difference go adopt a few children, don&#8217;t force a stranger to have a child that you wouldn&#8217;t take responsibility for.</p>
<p>If you want to make a difference, demand health care be provided to every child (and mother) in America, don&#8217;t force a stranger to have a child that you wouldn&#8217;t take responsibility for.</p>
<p>If you want to make a difference demand that every child in America get enough nutritional food to eat, don&#8217;t force a stranger to have a child that you wouldn&#8217;t take responsibility for.</p>
<p>To me, &#8220;Repeat offender&#8221;, if you think it&#8217;s right to force a stranger to have a baby than <b>that child is YOUR responsibility.</b></p>
<p>And if you want to demand that the force of government be used to force a stranger to have a baby don&#8217;t whine when I demand that the force of government be used to demand that <i>you</i> <b>stop being a deadbeat parent and support that child&#8217;s health care, and education, and nutrition</b>, and even demand that you at least help get that woman a decent job and not leave her and the baby you forced on her in poverty for generation after generation. I&#8217;d add that you also owe that child a decent education up through at least a four year college degree.</p>
<p>But the truth is that <b>right wingers are deadbeat parents</b>.</p>
<p>Right wingers expect to force a stranger to have a child and then demand that they have no responsibility for the child they forced on that stranger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repeat offender</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157531</link>
		<dc:creator>Repeat offender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157531</guid>
		<description>Well as far as the passage, you convieniently left out the part where it talks about male servatute as well. Considering it was a common practice to own MALE AND FEMALE servants in those days, the whole chapter is how to treat servants, both male adn female. Never the less I don&#039;t believe it makes it right to have slaves either. Nothing in what I wrote indicated that. What I did indicate was that I thought a child, even though not able to talk or tell you they want to live, still deserve that right to. 

Take it for what you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as far as the passage, you convieniently left out the part where it talks about male servatute as well. Considering it was a common practice to own MALE AND FEMALE servants in those days, the whole chapter is how to treat servants, both male adn female. Never the less I don&#8217;t believe it makes it right to have slaves either. Nothing in what I wrote indicated that. What I did indicate was that I thought a child, even though not able to talk or tell you they want to live, still deserve that right to. </p>
<p>Take it for what you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repeat offender</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157524</link>
		<dc:creator>Repeat offender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157524</guid>
		<description>Well I am not entirely sure why you think trying to give an unborn child a shot at life means I think of women as property, but to each his own I guess. I can&#039;t say for sure, but if males were the ones who carried the child I don&#039;t believe I would change my view. My wife shares my beliefs on abortion while disagrees with me on many other things, and guess what; she does that all on her own!!! I believe if I had to risk my life to save my child I would without question. 

Terrorism on women’s rights?......Really? Murdering an unborn, innocent child doesn&#039;t bother you at all huh? Who is really the despicable one in all this? 

To be honest I am not familiar with the biblical passage sited above. I will get back to you on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I am not entirely sure why you think trying to give an unborn child a shot at life means I think of women as property, but to each his own I guess. I can&#8217;t say for sure, but if males were the ones who carried the child I don&#8217;t believe I would change my view. My wife shares my beliefs on abortion while disagrees with me on many other things, and guess what; she does that all on her own!!! I believe if I had to risk my life to save my child I would without question. </p>
<p>Terrorism on women’s rights?&#8230;&#8230;Really? Murdering an unborn, innocent child doesn&#8217;t bother you at all huh? Who is really the despicable one in all this? </p>
<p>To be honest I am not familiar with the biblical passage sited above. I will get back to you on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157516</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157516</guid>
		<description>So a rabid right winger who names themselves &quot;Repeat offender&quot; decides to moralize about the behavior of others and expects to be taken seriously.

It&#039;s always fascinating to hear right winger&#039;s claim that government dictate taking away someone&#039;s most personal decisions, even taking away a woman&#039;s right to choose her own reproductive decisions.

It&#039;s as if right winger&#039;s think women are property.

What other rights would you take away from women, &quot;Repeat offender&quot;?

I&#039;ve been trying to wrap my head around Exodus 21:7-11

&lt;i&gt;&quot; [7] &quot;If a man sells his daughter as a servant, she is not to go free as menservants do. [8] If she does not please the master who has selected her for himself, [a] he must let her be redeemed. He has no right to sell her to foreigners, because he has broken faith with her. [9] If he selects her for his son, he must grant her the rights of a daughter. [10] If he marries another woman, he must not deprive the first one of her food, clothing and marital rights. [11] If he does not provide her with these three things, she is to go free, without any payment of money.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
http://google.com/search?q=Exodus+21%3A7-11

What do you think, &quot;Repeat offender&quot;, since you brought up God, do you support child sex slavery or don&#039;t you believe in the God of the Bible?

Perhaps you&#039;d like to spit out a Fatwa against some other Doctors like some right wing Muslim Mullah?

Personally I think that Murdoch&#039;s thug O&#039;Reilly&#039;s Fatwa against Tiller was despicable and directly contributes to the terrorism against women&#039;s right to choose their own reproductive decisions.

And while we&#039;re at it, any other patriarchal moralizing you&#039;d like to decree while you are at it, &quot;Repeat offender&quot;?

Would you put women in a Burka &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/133120/why_is_bill_o%27reilly_attacking_me_for_highlighting_his_rape_comments/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;or just make sure they show modesty in their dress&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Coulter_If_we_took_away_womens_1003.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Deny women the vote&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/reproductiverights/sexed/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stop providing women with basic reproductive education&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/28/taliban-destoy-girls-educ_n_161563.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Perhaps even stop providing women with education at all, like the Taliban extremists&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So a rabid right winger who names themselves &#8220;Repeat offender&#8221; decides to moralize about the behavior of others and expects to be taken seriously.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always fascinating to hear right winger&#8217;s claim that government dictate taking away someone&#8217;s most personal decisions, even taking away a woman&#8217;s right to choose her own reproductive decisions.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s as if right winger&#8217;s think women are property.</p>
<p>What other rights would you take away from women, &#8220;Repeat offender&#8221;?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to wrap my head around Exodus 21:7-11</p>
<p><i>&#8221; [7] &#8220;If a man sells his daughter as a servant, she is not to go free as menservants do. [8] If she does not please the master who has selected her for himself, [a] he must let her be redeemed. He has no right to sell her to foreigners, because he has broken faith with her. [9] If he selects her for his son, he must grant her the rights of a daughter. [10] If he marries another woman, he must not deprive the first one of her food, clothing and marital rights. [11] If he does not provide her with these three things, she is to go free, without any payment of money.&#8221;</i><br />
<a href="http://google.com/search?q=Exodus+21%3A7-11" rel="nofollow">http://google.com/search?q=Exodus+21%3A7-11</a></p>
<p>What do you think, &#8220;Repeat offender&#8221;, since you brought up God, do you support child sex slavery or don&#8217;t you believe in the God of the Bible?</p>
<p>Perhaps you&#8217;d like to spit out a Fatwa against some other Doctors like some right wing Muslim Mullah?</p>
<p>Personally I think that Murdoch&#8217;s thug O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s Fatwa against Tiller was despicable and directly contributes to the terrorism against women&#8217;s right to choose their own reproductive decisions.</p>
<p>And while we&#8217;re at it, any other patriarchal moralizing you&#8217;d like to decree while you are at it, &#8220;Repeat offender&#8221;?</p>
<p>Would you put women in a Burka <a href="http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/133120/why_is_bill_o%27reilly_attacking_me_for_highlighting_his_rape_comments/" rel="nofollow">or just make sure they show modesty in their dress</a>? <a href="http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Coulter_If_we_took_away_womens_1003.html" rel="nofollow">Deny women the vote</a>? <a href="http://www.aclu.org/reproductiverights/sexed/index.html" rel="nofollow">Stop providing women with basic reproductive education</a>? <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/28/taliban-destoy-girls-educ_n_161563.html" rel="nofollow">Perhaps even stop providing women with education at all, like the Taliban extremists</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repeat offender</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157500</link>
		<dc:creator>Repeat offender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157500</guid>
		<description>Last time I checked that makes a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last time I checked that makes a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repeat offender</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157499</link>
		<dc:creator>Repeat offender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157499</guid>
		<description>Just becasue somone thinks their dog should die because they don&#039;t want it anymore or they are &quot;temporarly depressed&quot; and I have a gun doesn&#039;t mean I should do it, IT STILL MAKES ME THE DOG KILLER. Now if the dog has rabies, then there is an exception and it is nessicary, but all the same very unfortunate. 

Poor analogy I know. Forgive me.

Anyways I realize I am being very critical of some of these people who chose to abort, and I realize that there are exceptions to any case, but I don&#039;t believe there are as many as some would want us to believe.

And again.......he never stood trial for &quot;MURDER&quot; which is what I believe would have been a more appropriate charge. He was aquitted for 19 &quot;Misdamenors&quot;, not a Felony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just becasue somone thinks their dog should die because they don&#8217;t want it anymore or they are &#8220;temporarly depressed&#8221; and I have a gun doesn&#8217;t mean I should do it, IT STILL MAKES ME THE DOG KILLER. Now if the dog has rabies, then there is an exception and it is nessicary, but all the same very unfortunate. </p>
<p>Poor analogy I know. Forgive me.</p>
<p>Anyways I realize I am being very critical of some of these people who chose to abort, and I realize that there are exceptions to any case, but I don&#8217;t believe there are as many as some would want us to believe.</p>
<p>And again&#8230;&#8230;.he never stood trial for &#8220;MURDER&#8221; which is what I believe would have been a more appropriate charge. He was aquitted for 19 &#8220;Misdamenors&#8221;, not a Felony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Over Here</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157496</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Over Here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157496</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;There is a substantial amount of evidence&lt;/i&gt;

Source? Someone who is not Bill O&#039;Reilly.

&lt;i&gt;taken it upon himself to play God&lt;/i&gt;

Who should have made the decision on whether it&#039;s a dangerous pregnancy or not? You? Should the Republican congress Terri Schiavo every single woman&#039;s dangerous 3rd trimester dangerous pregnancy and tell them whether or not they should risk their lives? Or should we create a bureaucracy  of some sort that would go around adjudicating it? I believe that we should just let the woman carrying the child decide whether or not it&#039;s the right thing to do, so did doctor Tiller.

&lt;i&gt; Tiller sited “temporary depression” as a reason to perform the abortion.&lt;/i&gt;

Citation please. Someone besides O&#039;Reilly because my quick google on this brings up only stories that quote O&#039;Reilly accusing Tiller of this.

&lt;i&gt;because if a womens life is at risk you have to make that almost impossible decision, but when their life is not definightly (sic) at risk, there should be no abortion.&lt;/i&gt;

Again, who makes this decision? I&#039;ve yet to see a reliable source for the &quot;temporary depression&quot; accusation, and I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if it was one of many issues listed on a single patient&#039;s justification. I don&#039;t want some high barrier of what is &quot;definightly at risk&quot; because I don&#039;t want some woman with a rare disease not on the books or with an unpredicted circumstance having to jump through your hoops to prove that her life is at risk.

&lt;i&gt;And you’re right; he will be missed, missed by irresponsible parents who would rather abort their child than take responsibility.&lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re incredibly judgmental of his thousands of patients. Is that really the accusation you want to make? If there was even a small chance that my wife could die or be seriously injured giving birth I would be relieved if she chose to have an abortion, I love her too much. But they&#039;re all irresponsible, not taking on the responsibility of death!

&lt;i&gt;Tiller went on trial in March 2009, charged with 19 misdemeanors for allegedly consulting a second physician in late-term abortion cases who was not truly “independent” as required by Kansas state law.[28][29] (sic)&lt;/i&gt;

And was acquitted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There is a substantial amount of evidence</i></p>
<p>Source? Someone who is not Bill O&#8217;Reilly.</p>
<p><i>taken it upon himself to play God</i></p>
<p>Who should have made the decision on whether it&#8217;s a dangerous pregnancy or not? You? Should the Republican congress Terri Schiavo every single woman&#8217;s dangerous 3rd trimester dangerous pregnancy and tell them whether or not they should risk their lives? Or should we create a bureaucracy  of some sort that would go around adjudicating it? I believe that we should just let the woman carrying the child decide whether or not it&#8217;s the right thing to do, so did doctor Tiller.</p>
<p><i> Tiller sited “temporary depression” as a reason to perform the abortion.</i></p>
<p>Citation please. Someone besides O&#8217;Reilly because my quick google on this brings up only stories that quote O&#8217;Reilly accusing Tiller of this.</p>
<p><i>because if a womens life is at risk you have to make that almost impossible decision, but when their life is not definightly (sic) at risk, there should be no abortion.</i></p>
<p>Again, who makes this decision? I&#8217;ve yet to see a reliable source for the &#8220;temporary depression&#8221; accusation, and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it was one of many issues listed on a single patient&#8217;s justification. I don&#8217;t want some high barrier of what is &#8220;definightly at risk&#8221; because I don&#8217;t want some woman with a rare disease not on the books or with an unpredicted circumstance having to jump through your hoops to prove that her life is at risk.</p>
<p><i>And you’re right; he will be missed, missed by irresponsible parents who would rather abort their child than take responsibility.</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re incredibly judgmental of his thousands of patients. Is that really the accusation you want to make? If there was even a small chance that my wife could die or be seriously injured giving birth I would be relieved if she chose to have an abortion, I love her too much. But they&#8217;re all irresponsible, not taking on the responsibility of death!</p>
<p><i>Tiller went on trial in March 2009, charged with 19 misdemeanors for allegedly consulting a second physician in late-term abortion cases who was not truly “independent” as required by Kansas state law.[28][29] (sic)</i></p>
<p>And was acquitted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repeat offender</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2009/06/12/video-joan-walsh-takes-on-bill-oreilly/#comment-157484</link>
		<dc:creator>Repeat offender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverwillis.com/?p=14965#comment-157484</guid>
		<description>Well as far as I can tell he was charged with 19 misdemeanors......I said he should stand trial for &quot;MURDER&quot;. Learn to read you idiot. 

As far as the &quot;dangerous pregnancy&quot; defense. Bull!! There is a substantial amount of evidence that has shown he did not run his practice by these standards otherwise I am sure he would have not taken it upon himself to play God and decided if the fetus was viable or not. Tiller sited &quot;temporary depression&quot; as a reason to perform the abortion. Notice the &quot;temporary&quot; for those of you that have trouble reading. 90 % of women suffer from some sort of anxiety or depression during the gestational period. I know my wife did, but it was no reason to kill our baby. I am not saying all of the women that he performed abortions for were wrong in doing so, because if a womens life is at risk you have to make that almost impossible decision, but when their life is not definightly at risk, there should be no abortion. Considering that &quot;temporary depression&quot; hardly seems like a life and death situation. 

And you’re right; he will be missed, missed by irresponsible parents who would rather abort their child than take responsibility.

Kansas law prohibits aborting viable fetuses, which is generally midway through the second trimester, unless two doctors certify that continuing the pregnancy would cause the woman &quot;substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.&quot;[27] Tiller went on trial in March 2009, charged with 19 misdemeanors for allegedly consulting a second physician in late-term abortion cases who was not truly &quot;independent&quot; as required by Kansas state law.[28][29]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as far as I can tell he was charged with 19 misdemeanors&#8230;&#8230;I said he should stand trial for &#8220;MURDER&#8221;. Learn to read you idiot. </p>
<p>As far as the &#8220;dangerous pregnancy&#8221; defense. Bull!! There is a substantial amount of evidence that has shown he did not run his practice by these standards otherwise I am sure he would have not taken it upon himself to play God and decided if the fetus was viable or not. Tiller sited &#8220;temporary depression&#8221; as a reason to perform the abortion. Notice the &#8220;temporary&#8221; for those of you that have trouble reading. 90 % of women suffer from some sort of anxiety or depression during the gestational period. I know my wife did, but it was no reason to kill our baby. I am not saying all of the women that he performed abortions for were wrong in doing so, because if a womens life is at risk you have to make that almost impossible decision, but when their life is not definightly at risk, there should be no abortion. Considering that &#8220;temporary depression&#8221; hardly seems like a life and death situation. </p>
<p>And you’re right; he will be missed, missed by irresponsible parents who would rather abort their child than take responsibility.</p>
<p>Kansas law prohibits aborting viable fetuses, which is generally midway through the second trimester, unless two doctors certify that continuing the pregnancy would cause the woman &#8220;substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.&#8221;[27] Tiller went on trial in March 2009, charged with 19 misdemeanors for allegedly consulting a second physician in late-term abortion cases who was not truly &#8220;independent&#8221; as required by Kansas state law.[28][29]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

