Classic right wing nonsense.

The threat was that if you don’t you may get one in bankruptcy court, which is what happened. How is this “subverting the rule of law?” As a former bankruptcy lawyer I’m pretty familiar with these “rules of law”. I don’t see any subversion. As far as I know, Obama didn’t say, “I don’t care what the statutes or common law have to say about secured creditors and bondholders.”

Better trolls, please.

Do you mean like how Republican President Bush committed Torture Crimes and War Crimes by claiming that his lawyer gave him a permission exempting him from the law?

Or do you mean like when Republican President Bush claimed he could ignore the Laws written by our Legislative Branch by writing unconstitutional signing statements?

Or are you referring to Republican President Bush’s illegal surveillance on American citizenry?

Oh, wait, right wingers are okay with torture crimes, war crimes illegal surveillance, and even shredding of the Constitution as long as their corporate masters can keep looting US.

Well I’ll have to concede the advantage to you on that one. I have no clue what you mean by that.

It is my position that only blustering knownothings throw around overheated phrases like “subverting the rule of law” when they can’t identify a law that has been subverted.

I can continue with this for quite a long time, you know.

You are just being argumenative and blowing smoke.

Lol, What a tool how about a brief bio of Craig Etcheson;
“Between December 1994 and January 1998, he held the academic post of Associate Research Scientist at Yale University’s Center for International and Area Studies. While at Yale University, he served as Program Manager for Yale’s Cambodian Genocide Program from 1994 through 1996, and as Acting Director of the program during 1997. Etcheson was also a principal founder of the Documentation Center of Cambodia in Phnom Penh, serving as its Director in 1995 and 1996, and continuing as an Advisor to the Center since 1997.”
He worked with and ran the very source you put forth.
I would say this makes him…not full of shit.
But you …maybe.

This is not complicated.

Circular logic?

AO: Obammy is subverting the rule of law!
Q: What law?
AO: Some law. One that I think might exist.
Q: Which one?
AO: Why don’t you tell us?
Q: No, really. Which law are you talking about?
AO: Circular logic!

Is that the old bankruptcy law or the new one?

“On claim priority, unsecured creditors come at the bottom of the bankruptcy totem pole. The basic rule of credit transactions distributes the net assets first to secured creditors in the order of their priority. First mortgages are normally paid in full before second, and lower mortgagees receive anything, in order, on their loans. Unsecured creditors of all types have an equal claim regardless of the time they perfected their claims. But they receive their first dime only after secured creditors have been paid in full.”

If you so desire you may go to the link below and read the entire opinion. In which the author castigates Obama for his interference in this matter and touches on possible consequences of his meddling.

http://politics.randomplayground.net/2009/05/14/nervous-secured-creditors-facing-demotion-sell-out-to-speculators-who-are-better-able-to-handle-that-newly-created-sovereign-risk/

Bluster it is!

Oh no you don’t. I like the goalposts just fine where you put ‘em the first time. “Subverting the rule of…” what law, AO? You can’t seem to say.

Now your post of 5/30@ 8:09 references my post of 5/29 @ 10:52. You dispute the facts of that post.

On 5/30 @ 12:05 I call bullshit and ask you to point out which of the 4 specific points first made in the 5/29 10:52 post are not true.

You never do that but instead mention that you are loathe to discuss the subject all over again. The topic would not have risen had you not brought it up in the first place Oliver.

If I take the most charitable view, you are simply mistaken in your posts and never actually comprehended what was in them, merely did a quick cut and paste with a snarky reply. A less charitqble view, in light of your employment as a propaganda professional, is that you knew better and are lying.

You keep making the accusation. Now deliver the goods. Here’s a headstart: 11 U.S.C……?

What law is being subverted? Which part of the Bankruptcy Code hasn’t been honored to the letter? Either you have an answer or you’re blustering.

More or less. The media tends to reflect the views of the moderates of the country.